Compilation of Important Articles and Videos Detail NATO/US/UK/French Government’s Support for Terrorists in Libya and Direct Responsibility for the Manchester Arena Terror Attack

In the wake of the May 22, 2017 Manchester Arena Bombing a number of highly revealing articles were published that exposed direct western government responsibility for training, aiding and financing the al-Qaeda and ISIS affiliated terrorist groups involved in the overthrow of the Libyan government in 2011 and beyond. These important articles and videos below detail specific western actions that have now led to the 9/11 style “blowback’ of the Manchester Arena bombing. Although the most important excerpt’s are highlighted here, I recommend reading each article in its entirety in order to ascertain the clear larger picture.

Article 1 –

No Laughing Matter: The Manchester Bomber is the Spawn of Hillary and Barack’s Excellent Libyan Adventure

Screen Shot 2017-05-31 at 3.31.28 PM

Excerpt 1:

Last Monday, jihadi suicide bomber Salman Abedi blew himself up at an Ariana Grande concert in Manchester, England, killing 22 people. Salman grew up in an anit-Qaddafi Libyan immigrant family. In 2011, his father, Ramadan Abedi, along with other British Libyans (including one who was under house arrest), “was allowed to go [to Libya], no questions asked,” to join the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG), an al-Qaeda-affiliate, to help overthrow Qaddafi. In Manchester, as Max Blumenthal puts it, in his excellent Alternet piece, it was all “part of the rat line operated by the MI5, which hustled anti-Qaddafi Libyan exiles to the front lines of the war.” In Manchester, Salman lived near a number of LIFG militants, including an expert bomb maker. This was a tough bunch, and everybody—including the cops and Salman’s Muslim neighbors—knew they weren’t the Jets and the Sharks. As Middle East Eye reports, he “was known to security services,” and some of his acquaintances “had reported him to the police via an anti-terrorism hotline.”

Could it be any clearer? The Abedi family was part of a protected cohort of Salafist proxy soldiers that have been used by “the West” to destroy the Libyan state. There are a number of such cohorts around the world that have been used for decades to overthrow relatively prosperous and secular, but insufficiently compliant, governments in the Arab and Muslim world—and members of those groups have perpetrated several blowback attacks in Western countries, via various winding roads. In this case, the direct line from Libya to Mali to Manchester is particularly easy to trace.

Excerpt 2 – Regarding US politics and the current cognitive dissonance amongst red team/blue team politically divided and conquered US citizens……

Manchester is the latest iteration of a scenario we’ve gone through so many times now, like some groundhog-day dream. At the end of my post two years ago, I was urging and hoping that Americans would wake up. But a lot of American liberals and lefties, including Berniebots, still like to imagine there’s a political space they can inhabit called Progressive Except Imperialism. There isn’t. Imperialism with Social Security and Medicare and Obamacare—even single-payer healthcare—is imperialism, and it’s reactionary and supremacist. Equal-opportunity imperialism is imperialism. African-American, women, Latinx, or LGBTQ presidents, generals, and drone operators do not make it any less criminal, or dangerous, or any less inevitably erosive of all those cherished progressive domestic programs.

Ignoring or putting aside what the U.S. does in Libya, or Iraq, or Syria, or Palestine because…Trump! The Republicans! is ignoring a fundamental element of a progressive politics as well as an immediate danger to the country. One can do it, but those who do, can’t claim to be seriously confronting the horrors of a tragedy like Manchester, no matter how many tears they shed.

The article below is by world renowned investigative war correspondent John Pilger and must be read in its entirety to grasp the full scope of western culpability for the Manchester Arena bombing……..

Article 2 –

Terror in Britain: What Did the Prime Minister Know?    by John Pilger

Screen Shot 2017-05-31 at 11.24.27 AM

Excerpt 1 – Pertaining to the actions of Theresa May and David Cameron:

The unsayable in Britain’s general election campaign is this. The causes of the Manchester atrocity, in which 22 mostly young people were murdered by a jihadist, are being suppressed to protect the secrets of British foreign policy. Critical questions – such as why the security service MI5 maintained terrorist “assets” in Manchester and why the government did not warn the public of the threat in their midst – remain unanswered, deflected by the promise of an internal “review”.

The alleged suicide bomber, Salman Abedi, was part of an extremist group, the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, that thrived in Manchester and was cultivated and used by MI5 for more than 20 years. The LIFG is proscribed by Britain as a terrorist organisation which seeks a “hardline Islamic state” in Libya and “is part of the wider global Islamist extremist movement, as inspired by al-Qaida”.

The “smoking gun” is that when Theresa May was Home Secretary, LIFG jihadists were allowed to travel unhindered across Europe and encouraged to engage in “battle”: first to remove Mu’ammar Gadaffi in Libya, then to join al-Qaida affiliated groups in Syria.

The Manchester atrocity lifts the rock of British foreign policy to reveal its Faustian alliance with extreme Islam, especially the sect known as Wahhabism or Salafism, whose principal custodian and banker is the oil kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Britain’s biggest weapons customer.

Screen Shot 2017-05-31 at 2.48.50 PM

Excerpt 2 pertaining to the actions of MI5 and the US government under the leadership of Barack Obama:

In 2011, according to Middle East Eye, the LIFG in Manchester were known as the “Manchester boys”. Implacably opposed to Mu’ammar Gadaffi, they were considered high risk and a number were under Home Office control orders – house arrest – when anti-Gadaffi demonstrations broke out in Libya, a country forged from myriad tribal enmities. Suddenly the control orders were lifted. “I was allowed to go, no questions asked,” said one LIFG member. MI5 returned their passports and counter-terrorism police at Heathrow airport were told to let them board their flights.

The overthrow of Gaddafi, who controlled Africa’s largest oil reserves, had been long been planned in Washington and London. According to French intelligence, the LIFG made several assassination attempts on Gadaffi in the 1990s – bank-rolled by British intelligence. In March 2011, France, Britain and the US seized the opportunity of a “humanitarian intervention” and attacked Libya. They were joined by Nato under cover of a UN resolution to “protect civilians”.

Screen Shot 2017-05-31 at 2.43.06 PM

Last September, a House of Commons Foreign Affairs Select Committee inquiry concluded that then Prime Minister David Cameron had taken the country to war against Gaddafi on a series of “erroneous assumptions” and that the attack “had led to the rise of Islamic State in North Africa”. The Commons committee quoted what it called Barack Obama’s “pithy” description of Cameron’s role in Libya as a “shit show”.

In fact, Obama was a leading actor in the “shit show”, urged on by his warmongering Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, and a media accusing Gaddafi of planning “genocide” against his own people. “We knew… that if we waited one more day,” said Obama, “Benghazi, a city the size of Charlotte, could suffer a massacre that would have reverberated across the region and stained the conscience of the world”.

Article 3 –

Alternet article by Max Blumenthal

The Manchester bombing is blowback from the West’s disastrous interventions and covert proxy wars

Screen Shot 2017-05-31 at 1.31.55 PM

Lead excerpt highlights UK government responsibility for Manchester Arena attack:

The heinous suicide bombing by British-born Salman Abedi of an Arianna Grande concert in Manchester was not merely the work of an “evil loser,” as Donald Trump called it. It was blowback from interventionist policies carried out in the name of human rights and “civilian protection.” Through wars of regime change and the arming and training of Islamist proxy groups, the US, UK and France played out imperial delusions across the Middle East. In Syria and Libya, they cultivated the perfect petri dish for jihadist insurgency, helping to spawn weaponized nihilists like Abedi intent on bringing the West’s wars back home.

The son of anti-Qaddafi immigrants to the UK, Abedi grew up in Manchester’s community of Libyan exiles. A report in the London Telegraph indicated that he had traveled just weeks before his attack to Libya, where Salafi-jihadi militias are competing for control of the destabilized country. Abedi had also reportedly traveled to Syria to join up with the extremist rebels that have waged a six-year-long insurgency against the country’s government, with billions of dollars in assistance from the West and its Gulf allies. According to French Interior Minister Gerard Collomb, it was in these conflict zones where Abedi was radicalized.

The impressionable 22-year-old returned to the UK with enough training to make a fairly sophisticated bomb that massacred 22 concert goers, many of them children. “It seems likely — possible — that he wasn’t doing this on his own,” Britain’s home secretary, Amber Rudd, told the BBC. She described the bomb as “more sophisticated than some of the attacks we’ve seen before.” According to the Telegraph, “A group of Gaddafi dissidents, who were members of the outlawed Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG), lived within close proximity to Abedi in Whalley Range.” They included Abd al-Baset Azzouz, an expert bomb maker who controls an Al Qaeda-affiliated militia in eastern Libya.

2nd important excerpt covers well the actions of John McCain, Hillary Clinton and Nicolas Sarkozy:

When the Libyan uprising broke out in March 2011, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates immediately pumped arms and logistical support into the armed opposition. Then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton saw the insurgency as an opportunity for America to assert its influence amidst the tumult of the Arab Spring. She advocated arming the rebels on the grounds that Washington could get “skin in the game,” according to her Middle East advisor, Dennis Ross. Ignoring warnings from NATO’s supreme allied commander Adm. James Stavridis about the presence of Al Qaeda in the opposition, President Barack Obama approved shipments of TOW missiles, armored Humvees, and advanced radar systems to the Libyan insurgents.

When she learned of the newly up-armed rebels’ rapid advances, Clinton reportedly exclaimed, “Good! This is the only language that Qaddafi is understanding.” French President Nicolas Sarkozy, a subject of Qatari political influence and alleged bribery over the 2022 FIFA World Cup vote, urged his Western allies to “ask our Arab friends” to distribute weapons to the National Transitional Council, the official body of the Libyan opposition. When a French shipment of missiles and machine guns arrived through the port of Benghazi, the NTC’s acting defense minister handed them over to Belhaj and the LIFG.

As the insurgency gathered steam, Belhaj found a powerful ally in John McCain, the Republican chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. After a friendly meeting with Belhaj and his militiamen in Benghazi on April 22, 2011, McCain called on “responsible nations” to provide the Libyan rebels with “battlefield intelligence, training, and weapons.” McCain emerged from the meeting stirred with inspiration. “I met these courageous fighters, and they are not al-Qaeda,” the senator proclaimed. “To the contrary: they are Libyan patriots who want to liberate their nation. We need to help them do that.”

More at link above…..

Below I will highlight an important series of videos that also documents the direct culpability of western powers in the destabilization and war in Libya utilizing terrorist groups.

This informative May 2016 video from the South Front geopolitical analysis group covered well the western government support for al-Qaeda leader Abdul Hakim Belhaj in Libya when putting together a post war start up government that included known terrorists.

The video above proves quite clearly that the west does indeed negotiate with terrorists. Not only do they negotiate with then, they reward them handsomely with large sums of money and powerful political positions.

Insightful comment at the linked above video:

Simplified Western coup formula –

Step 1: Stir an uprising utilizing nefarious proxy groups, then kill the leader of the sovereign (prosperous) nation, after lying your way into the airspace of that country under total BS pretext using social media groups suck as Soros funded MoveOn and Avaaz (just like Syria and Ukraine, but got pulled back due to Russia intervening on behalf of the NATO targeted country).

Step 2: Quickly install a puppet regime while blanketing the media with distractions and false stories, if not implemented quickly, start to create confusion by blaming ”allies” who also committed the illegal act of war in order to achieve the coup, and start giving more influential roles to influential terrorist scum (who we were hoping would just kill each other off) in order to create a semi-puppet government that allows for time and maneuverability. General public now stands completely confused about root causes and actions inside the affected country.

Step 3: Ultimately get this proxy terrorist ”government” to ”invite” the NATO tyrannic army and create bases for an indefinite stay in order to further project power down into sub-Sahara Africa.

Thus, coup accomplished via terrorist scum proxy group detour. Blowback inevitable.

Additional May 2016 video by South Front exposes the expansion of ISIS in Libya after NATO toppled Gaddafi…….

More from South Front here –

At the 4:32 mark in the following South Front video the narrator warns that “the growing destabilization in Libya will also increase the illegal immigration flow to Europe, and moreover, the Mediterranean migration route opens a highway for terrorists aiming to set up sleeper terrorist cells or conduct terrorist actions across the whole of Europe”

Whitney Webb at Mint Press News rounds out the real narrative on UK grooming of terrorists from Libya……

Article 4 –

Manchester Bomber May Have Been Groomed By UK Intelligence

The alleged perpetrator of last week’s bombing in Manchester has been linked to a Libyan terror group that has been aided in the past by British intelligence authorities – a fact that has been conveniently ignored by mainstream media, despite their intense coverage of the attack.

By Whitney Webb | May 27, 2017

MANCHESTER — As the worst terrorist attack to hit the United Kingdom since 2005, last week’s bombing of a concert in Manchester has since been a constant fixture of the news cycle both in the UK and abroad. Absent from mainstream media accounts of the event – and the man allegedly behind it – are several key coincidences that have raised concerns, particularly regarding links between British intelligence and the alleged suicide bomber, British-born Salman Abedi.

Absent from mainstream media accounts of the event, however – and the man allegedly behind it – are several key coincidences that have raised concerns, particularly regarding links between British intelligence and the alleged suicide bomber, British-born Salman Abedi.

Media reports have already established that Abedi, a Libyan national, was radicalized in the hotbed of radical extremism that Libya has become since the U.S.-NATO backed invasion that ousted Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi.

Though most mainstream accounts don’t mention the UK’s role in destabilizing and overthrowing the Libyan government in 2011 – that is, causing Libya’s current state of chaos by arming right-wing rebels who now make up al-Qaeda and ISIS – several have mentioned the link between Abedi and the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG).

More at link above……

 

Additional Clarity of Signal post on the plight of sub-Saharan Africans in Libya post NATOs intervention –

CNN caught lying about the plight of sub-Saharan Africans in Libya- Clinton’s war

Pentagon Video Lies Exposed – US Attempts To Steal Credit For Russia and Syria Wiping Out US Allied Terrorist Groups in Syria

 

The video speaks for itself and brings to mind the Sith Lords in Star Wars……..

Meanwhile…….the following articles completely prove that General Mattis’ claims are false and misleading. Note General Mattis’ own Freudian slip at the 8:12 mark in the video where he accidentally states “not one inch of territory has been recaptured from them, er by them.”

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/terror-list-omission-1.4114621

Syria’s al-Qaeda affiliate escapes from Canada’s terror list
Failure to list group keeps Canada in line with U.S., but complicates potential prosecutions
By Evan Dyer, CBC News Posted: May 14, 2017

The Syrian branch of al-Qaeda, currently calling itself Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), has succeeded in getting itself off Canada’s list of designated terrorist entities following its latest identity shift. That complicates the task of prosecuting Canadians who travel to join the group, send it money or propagandize on its behalf. It also illustrates the pitfalls of Canada following the lead of the U.S. in designating terror groups.

Syrian airstrikes could help al-Qaeda​​​

Listed terrorist entities

Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham escapes being listed at a time when it is absorbing other jihadi groups and attracting more recruits, even as the Islamic State retreats on multiple fronts. HTS has a history of renaming itself and altering its structure to confuse outsiders, and the Syrian population, about its true affiliations. But until now, few observers have accepted its claims to have distanced itself from its parent organization.

Bin Laden’s squabbling offspring

Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham (the Organization for Conquest in the Levant) began life as an expeditionary force called Jabhat al-Nusra (the Support Front), despatched into Syria in 2011 by the leader of al-Qaeda in Iraq, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, now “caliph” of the Islamic State (ISIS). Jabhat al-Nusra was led by Syrian jihadist Abu Mohammad al-Jawlani.

More at link above……

 

Meanwhile, the Russian government is pointing out that the US government completely misrepresented the truth about the recent strikes against a Syrian defense forces unit on May 18th, 2017.

“US is using terrorists to fight Syrian government”: Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov

https://www.almasdarnews.com/article/us-using-terrorists-fight-syrian-government-lavrov/

The new strike by the US Air Force in Syria confirms Washington’s intention to use the Jabhat al-Nusra terrorist group (outlawed in Russia) for the fight against Bashar Assad’s government, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov told reporters on Friday. Moscow is concerned over differences in understanding the need to unite those who indeed fight on the ground and in the air against terrorists of the Islamic State and the former Jabhat al-Nusra, he said.

“We see the confirmation of an intention to use opposition and some extremists, including Jabhat al-Nusra, in the fight against the legitimate government of Syria,” Lavrov said

This comes amid Washington’s calls to stop all contacts with Assad, he said, noting that the US Congress had passed a law demanding punishment for those who cooperate with the legitimate government of Syria. “This distracts us from the Syrian settlement and the major goal of this settlement – preventing the seizure of Syria and other parts of the Middle East by terrorists,” Lavrov said. “So, what we hear about Washington’s position on Syria now is in fact coddling terrorists.”

The warning

Russia’s Foreign Ministry has no information that Washington warned Moscow before delivering an air strike on Syrian pro-government forces, Lavrov pointed out:

“I don’t know about any such warning, whatever the reason the US command made such a decision, the strike was illegitimate and unlawful. It was yet another crude violation of Syria’s sovereignty,” he stated.

 

Even the Independent UK is calling the US’s bluff on what really took place in the Syrian desert.

US air strikes in Syria: Why America really attacked pro-Assad militia convoy

Exclusive: For the Pentagon to suggest that this was a sideshow to Washington’s battle against Isis was to stretch the truth beyond credibility

Robert Fisk – Friday 19 May 2017

Excerpts: The Pentagon’s account of its Thursday-night air strike on pro-Assad militia forces in Syria concealed the real story of a race to the Syrian-Iraqi border by armed groups working for both the Americans and the Syrian regime. Even the targets listed by the US appear to have been wrong. Indeed, what was described by the Americans as a minor action was part of a far more important struggle between the US and the Syrian regime for control of the south-eastern frontier of Syria – a vital supply line for Iran to maintain its forces in Syria.

Although US jets were involved in Thursday’s air strikes, the forces on the ground comprised largely proxy fighters – belonging to both the American-trained ‘rebel’ opposition and to the Syrian military. If US personnel were accompanying the ‘rebel’ forces, then they were lucky that neither the Russians nor Syrian Army personnel were present on the other side. For the Pentagon to suggest that this was a sideshow to Washington’s battle against Isis was to stretch the truth beyond credibility in the Middle East. Cutting Syria off from Iraq – and thus from Iran – appears to be a far more immediate operational aim of US forces in Syria than the elimination of the Sunni “Caliphate” cult that Washington claims to be its principal enemy in the Middle East.

More at link above…..

 

So General Mattis held that C-Span Pentagon press conference on May 19th where he took all the credit for wiping out ISIS in Syrian territory, the very ISIS that they have, in actuality, created and nurtured along with their Saudi, Qatari, Turkish, Israeli and Western allies, and the very credit that is, in actuality, due to the Russian, Syrian and Iranian government actions against the US proxy terrorist force………now all the credit for such is completely assimilated by Trumps general. They are completely acting as an empire and like the Borg in Star Trek, simply absorbing all that they desire regardless of the consequences, including all credit for wiping out their own proxy terrorist ruse used for the overthrow of Syria. Mattis’ use of the words ‘extraordinary efforts to avoid civilian casualties’ is pure Orwellian doublespeak, lies and propaganda. The US proxy terror groups have, of course, killed tens of thousands of innocent civilians in Syria and Libya, and the US has no concern whatsoever about avoiding civilians casualties. Its all an elaborate smoke and mirrors show.

In Libya the US has also aligned with terror groups and even placed al-Qaeda linked terrorists in power.

Dissident Voice describes well the Pentagon’s Orwellian approach to dominating the Middle East and global minds.

Orwell, Freud, and the Syrian Ruse Reality by other means by Jason Hirthler / May 18th, 2017

Excerpts:

When applied to U.S. propaganda, the formula is revealing. To discover what your government is hiding, just reverse the media narrative. If the papers all say Russia is an imperial aggressor, it’s likely because Washington is. If the news networks say that Assad is a murderous monster, it’s likely because the groups we’re backing are. If the mainstream says Communism is a dire threat, it’s likely because capitalism is a dire threat. All of these examples are demonstrably true.

Reversing Reality

If Freud was correct, then we tend to publicly deny our greatest desires when they run counter to prevailing morality, shielding our base wishes behind a curtain of rectitude, even as we quietly pursue them. The modern instances of this in government are boundless.

Exhibit A

Take Syria as a recent example. The media narrative states that the U.S. and its freedom-loving allies have cautiously backed a loose confederation of rebels who rose up against Syrian tyrant Bashar al-Assad in 2011. In actuality, the U.S. and its freedom-hating allies have incautiously backed a loose confederation of foreign terrorists who have been paid to overthrow the elected Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. Only occasionally is the real backstory hinted at, which includes weakening Shia strongholds and destabilizing independent states in the region.

In turning the truth around to justify its war of aggression, the state and its supplicant media seized upon a handful of facts as the bedrock on which it constructed a false historical narrative. Which is what you’d expect from the Orwell-Freud model. And so…Are there elements of Syrian civil society that protested Assad in 2011? Absolutely. Are there actual Syrians fighting against Assad now? Sure. Are there elements of corruption and repression in Assad’s history? Definitely. But each of these truths are used to disguise the much larger facts of unmitigated U.S. aggression.

Upon this foundation, the typical narrative is constructed. The United States government is romanticized as a virtuous mediator concerned with supporting the freedom fighters and helping them achieve the freedoms they’ve yearned for. Assad is demonized as the autocratic mass murderer who repeatedly denies these freedoms, and tortures thousands before destroying the bodies. And the Syrian people, engine of the largest refugee crisis since World War Two, are shown as the valiant victims of the war, particularly in Aleppo, where the destruction of the city in an attempt to uproot the terrorist army is leveraged to milk as much emotional content from the war as possible and to further cement Assad’s reputation as a moral monster.

The MSM didn’t stop there. It followed with a series of attempts to further demonize Assad. A massive cache of photos purportedly detailing “regime” torture. This cache was delivered from somebody named “Caesar,” a defector not unlike the fake defector, “Curveball” from the run-up to the Iraq War. Twice false flags have been utilized to claim that the evil optometrist in Damascus has in a fit of pique demanded that innocent Syrians be sprayed with chemical weapons. Now a “crematorium” where Assad supposedly cremates all the Syrian citizens he is slaughtering (supposedly because he hates humanity so much). It doesn’t particularly matter if these stories eventually unravel when evidence is shown to be lacking. The damage is done to the psyche of readers and listeners, who absorb the media reports with the uncritical acceptance of animals entering an abattoir.

More at link above…….

 

For interested parties, I figured it best to put all of these White Helmets terrorist ruse threads that I put together into this one thread so a clearer picture can be shared and ascertained by readers in regards to what the US government is “actually” currently up to regarding support for terrorists.

https://clarityofsignal.com/2017/05/08/direct-jihadist-collusion-over-one-dozen-videos-capture-white-helmets-working-side-by-side-with-terrorist-groups/

https://clarityofsignal.com/2017/05/02/father-of-invention-media-portrayed-grief-stricken-dad-turns-out-to-be-al-nusra-front-terrorist/

https://clarityofsignal.com/2017/05/01/now-you-see-me-over-100-white-helmet-self-posted-facebook-images-expose-fake-humanitarian-group-as-fsa-terrorists-in-bed-with-al-qaeda/

https://clarityofsignal.com/2017/04/21/western-media-cover-up-well-known-white-helmet-terrorist-was-present-at-rashideen-bus-bombing-that-killed-126-women-and-children-on-april-15-2017/

 

Great Resource: World Affairs Geopolitical site also provides additional evidence for the White Helmets Terrorist ruse and western support for terrorist groups …..

World Affairs – FALSE FLAG OR FAKE: “CHEMICAL GAS ATTACK” IN SYRIA

To sum it all up, this is Donald Trump on May 20th, 2017 right after General Mattis BS speech.

Meanwhile the White Helmets, ISIS and other terrorists are smiling in their videos because they know that the President of the US Donald Trump is dancing while waving swords with their financiers….

 

The EU Migration Crisis: Two Birds with One Stone- The Clash of Cultures and Propping Up of the German Labor Force

One video from the always amazing SouthFront sums it all up quite well. This 13 minutes will bring you up to speed on the ongoing EU refugee crisis…..

Caveat: I’m a little biased here as I have been the voice of SouthFront and aided in geopolitical assistance to various videos for the SouthFront team for the past two years. Yes…. that is my voice in the video. Enjoy a little Clarity of Signal.

 

 

Germany is looking to save its decreasing population through the flood……

‘Secret’ German plan to resettle 500,000 Syrian refugees across Europe unveiled this week

SECRET plans to bring up to 500,000 Syrian refugees into the European Union (EU) from Turkey are to be unveiled by Germany this week.

By TOM BATCHELOR
PUBLISHED: 07:00, Thu, Dec 3, 2015 | UPDATED: 08:09, Thu, Dec 3, 2015

According to the Hungarian prime minister, EU and Turkish leaders are set to announce a behind-the-scenes agreement to resettle hundreds of thousands of people displaced by the war in Syria.

It is not known how many of the 500,000 will arrive in Britain, but fears have been raised that a significant number could be drawn to the UK by its relatively generous welfare system.

It comes just days after the EU agreed a €3billion (£2.1bn) funding package for Turkey in return for their help in stemming the flow of migrants passing through on their way to Europe.

Hungary’s PM Viktor Orban warned of a “nasty surprise” for Europeans when the deal is announced in the coming days.

He said: “The issue [of resettlement] will be a hot potato in the coming period because even though this could be kept in a semi-secret state…someone somewhere – I think in Berlin this week – will announce that 400,000-500,000 Syrian refugees could be brought straight from Turkey to the EU. This nasty surprise still awaits Europeans.”

He added that EU nations would then be obliged to resettle them, with “intense” pressure to take in quotas of newly-arrived refugees.

Mr Orban continued: “We should not only bring these people to Europe but divide them amongst ourselves, as an obligation.”

“It will not be an easy one because obviously we cannot accept it like this.”

Hungary has firmly resisted the idea of resettlement quotas to distribute more evenly the migrants, most of whom wanted to go to Germany or Sweden.

The agreement was reportedly floated at the recent EU summit in Malta but was abandoned and not included in the multi-billion pound EU-Turkey agreements signed at the weekend in Brussels after diplomats failed to gather the necessary support for it.

UKIP defence spokesman Mike Hookem MEP told Express.co.uk the plans were “utterly unacceptable” and Europe’s citizens were “being deliberately kept in the dark”.

“Poll after poll shows that immigration is the number one concern for voters in the UK and people in other EU countries are also upset at the number of migrants being foisted on them by foreign leaders.

“We were told this week in Brussels by an EU security adviser that Daesh [ISIS] could well be planning to use the community tensions from mass resettlement to their advantage by radicalising those who find themselves in neighbourhoods where they are not welcome.”

Here’s why Merkel wants the refugees…..It serves the global elitists to keep the economy of Germany well oiled and in control of Europe……

https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2016/jan/06/refugee-influx-helps-halt-decline-in-germanys-population

Refugee influx helps halt decline in Germany’s population
Nation’s population is growing again although longer-term trends still point to a decline – and the need for continued high levels of immigration

Germany’s population is no longer shrinking. Four consecutive years of increasingly high net migration have outpaced the country’s birth deficit, taking the country’s population to nearly 82 million people – a level last seen in 2009.

The population growth has been particularly concentrated among those of working age. The number of people employed in Germany hit 43 million in 2015, according to data released by Destatis, the German statistics office, on Tuesday. The figure represents the highest number of people in work since German reunification. Meanwhile, the number of unemployed people has dropped below 2 million for the first time since the fall of the Berlin Wall.

Over the past 12 months the active labour force (the total number of people in employment and unemployed) has increased to 44.9 million, driven by higher labour force participation of the domestic population and the immigration of foreign workers, which has offset negative demographic effects.

Net migration has exceeded 300,000 every year since 2011, hitting 676,730 in 2014, according to data published by Germany’s federal office for migration and refugees.

Off the Charts – The U.S. and NATO backed Libyan Terrorists

Libya, like Yemen and Ukraine, has almost become the “forgotten war’ as corrupted western media outlets keep it off the radar and out of the public eye. Its all part of the order from chaos agenda. They’ll let you know what they want you to know and nothing more…….thus, I thought it was well beyond time to give folks a proper primer on what the U.S. and European powers have been supporting in Libya as that unfortunate country continues to spiral into conflict and chaos.

During 2016, Southfront Geopolitical Analysis has performed an excellent service by putting together some primer videos on western support for terrorists and a basic assessment of the Libyan war.

 

Geopolitical researcher and former US congressman (Head of Intelligence Committee) Peter Hoekstra has also compiled a lot of important info related to terrorists in Libya…..his “Investigative Project on Terrorism” site is a good resource for those looking to learn more about the connections between global terrorists and global and Deep State powers. It is very telling that the Obama administration spokeman Josh Earnest tried to denounce Hoekstra’s 2015 book.

http://www.investigativeproject.org/5160/isis-leader-moves-to-libya#

ISIS Leader Moves to Libya

by Pete Hoekstra
IPT News
February 16, 2016

The barbaric and elusive Chechen commander who recruited British executioner “Jihadi John” has moved to Sirte, Libya to assume control of ISIS operations in the terrorist organization’s metastasizing Mediterranean caliphate. The Investigative Project on Terrorism first learned about the movement of Abu Omar al-Shishani – among the world’s most-wanted terrorists – through its exclusive Middle East sources. Other news organizations later confirmed the account.

Al-Shishani is a former American-trained officer in the Georgian special forces. He developed a reputation for his ferocity and effectiveness while fighting against the Russians during the 2008 invasion of Georgia and later for ISIS against dictator Bashar al-Assad in Syria. He established his presence not long after arriving in former dictator Muammar Gaddafi’s hometown Sirte by ordering one execution and chopping the limbs off another individual.

Western intelligence officials believe that up to 6,500 ISIS fighters – twice the number previously thought – have relocated to Libya as a result of coalition airstrikes on ISIS in the Middle East and new difficulties entering Syria.

Libya’s emergence as an ideal location in which to foster its new caliphate arose after NATO assisted radical jihadists in killing Gaddafi in 2011 and abruptly abandoned the country. Left in its wake were two rival governments competing for power, which created space for Islamists to turn Libya into a cesspool of extremism.

ISIS’s new caliphate along the Mediterranean coastline reaches as close as 200 miles from the vulnerable southern border of Europe. It exploits Libya as a base to export weapons, jihadists and ideology to Europe, Africa and the Middle East. Benghazi and Derna have long been nests of radicalism. They provided more fighters per capita to Afghanistan and Iraq than nearly any other geographic area in the world. The difference between then and now is that Gaddafi kept the lid on the garbage can.

With al-Shishani hanging his hat in Sirte, Libya has become a safe haven for one of the most murderous leaders in the world today. The situation demonstrates the total failure of a Western foreign policy that “leads from behind.”

 

Pete Hoekstra is the Shillman Senior Fellow at the Investigative Project on Terrorism and the former Chairman of the U.S. House Intelligence Committee. He is the author of “Architects of Disaster: The Destruction of Libya.”

SouthFront covers more about ISIS being used as a ruse to carry out the global domination agenda of the western powers……

A large part of the Grand Chessboard is, of course, about control of the resources…….

Now Libya is destabilized, the excuse of pursuing terrorists allows western powers to expand influence down into sub-Saharan Africa as a ploy to ‘go after’ the terrorists they are in actuality aligned with…..

 

More here from Brandon Turbeville at Activist Post:

Hillary Clinton And The Funding Of Al-Qaeda Terrorists In Libya And Syria

Picking up where the Benghazi scandal left off, it cannot be stated often enough that Hillary Clinton, in her tenure as Secretary of State, was instrumental in helping to fund, organize, train, and direct al-Qaeda terrorist forces in Libya and Syria.

In regards to Libya, it was well known and even criticized by Libyan officials that Clinton’s State Department was actively funneling weaponry to “rebels” with “ties to al-Qaeda.” Of course, the “rebels” actually were al-Qaeda as the Libyan “rebellion” itself was nothing more than the use of proxy forces by the United States and NATO whose ranks were made up of terrorists, jihadists, and mercenaries. As the Washington Times reported in February, 2015

Libyan officials were deeply concerned in 2011, as Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton was trying to remove Moammar Gadhafi from power, that weapons were being funneled to NATO-backed rebels with ties to al Qaeda, fearing that well-armed insurgents could create a safe haven for terrorists, according to secret intelligence reports obtained by The Washington Times.

The Libyan free Press site has more on what the NATO backed terrorists have done to people of darker skin color since the western destabilization and overthrow of Muamar Gaddafi:

rats-thugs-in-libya

Libyan “Rebels” Listed by US State Department as Terrorists – NATO leaders are guilty of providing material support to terrorists

Libyan Rebels Listed by US State Department as Terrorists – NATO leaders are guilty under US code of providing material support to terrorists.
by Tony Cartalucci

“Whoever knowingly provides material support or resources to a foreign terrorist organization, or attempts or conspires to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 15 years, or both, and, if the death of any person results, shall be imprisoned for any term of years or for life. To violate this paragraph, a person must have knowledge that the organization is a designated terrorist organization (as defined in subsection (g)(6)), that the organization has engaged or engages in terrorist activity (as defined in section 212(a)(3)(B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act), or that the organization has engaged or engages in terrorism (as defined in section 140(d)(2) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1988 and 1989).”-USC § 2339B. Providing material support or resources to designated foreign terrorist organizations

In March 2011, the London Telegraph reported that Libya’s rebels had direct ties to Al Qaeda and that both leaders and fighters had spent time in both Iraq and Afghanistan combating US troops. The article titled, “Libyan rebel commander admits his fighters have al-Qaeda links” featured Abdel-Hakim al-Hasidi, who had been captured by the US after fighting Americans in Afghanistan, returned to Libya, and released under a bargain for Hasidi and his Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) militants to abandon extremism and become productive members of society. Quite obviously, and with the US, UK, and NATO’s help, Hasidi and his men went back on this bargain and are now sowing murder and mayhem across Libya.

 

 

 

CNN caught lying about the plight of sub-Saharan Africans in Libya- Clinton’s war

The lie……..at the 2:38 mark  the reporter states “And Wolf one of the reasons why the people there (at the refugee camps) are so afraid that a massacre could take place if Gaddafi forces do prevail is that they’re even shooting at humanitarian aid ships”

Note that earlier in the video all the refugees are black sub-saharan Africans.

It is now very well known that black africans who primarily came from sub-saharan poor countries to work in Libya due to the readily available oil work and irrigation jobs have now been hunted and slaughtered by US and NATO backed radical jihadist groups that were used to overthrow the country. The majority of Libyan refugee drowning deaths in the Mediterranean are black sub-saharan refugees attempting to flee the slaughter in NATO destabilized Libya. Being black in Libya right now is a death sentence due to the racist hateful views of the US backed radicals who saw the black workers as a threat to their own jobs when Gaddafi was in power. Once Gaddafi was removed it became hunting season on black refugees.

https://www.equaltimes.org/racism-and-revolution-the-plight?lang=en#.WB1kPGXOWZw

14 October 2013
RACISM AND REVOLUTION: THE PLIGHT OF BLACK AFRICANS IN LIBYA
by Shaimaa Abul Hajj

Last Thursday as many as 350 migrants, mainly from sub-Saharan Africa, died as they tried to reach Italy by boat. But as the world continues to reel from the shock of the Lampedusa tragedy, the spotlight is turning towards Libya, the point of the boat’s departure. More than 30,000 migrants and refugees have arrived in Italy by sea this year alone, according to the United Nations – mainly from Libya.

What are they running from?

In their home countries, which are mainly Eritrea, Somalia and increasingly, Syria, the answer is conflict, repression and persecution. But Libya has also long been a base for guest workers from all over Africa who were attracted by its booming oil economy to find decent work. For years they were welcomed by Muammar Gaddafi, but now, many of those same migrants are scrambling to flee Libya’s instability and deadly discrimination.

Divisions

As the second anniversary of the death of Gaddafi approaches, peace still eludes Libya.

Equal Times met with some of the black African migrants trying to survive in Libya.

A group of Sudanese immigrants close to the eastern border with Egypt told us that following the 2011 February revolution, armed Libyans went from door-to-door looking for ‘Africans’. “We were chased everywhere we went,” said J.Kawasili who originally comes from Somalia. “They said we supported Gaddafi and killed rebels and assaulted women.”

Kawasili says that he and the other migrants were forced to leave town and that while trying to escape, a 15-year-old Sudanese girl was raped by the rebels. He also says their identity documents were destroyed by the militia. The exact number of sub-Saharan African refugees, asylum seekers and economic migrants in Libya is unknown. However, some reports puts that figure at around 18,000.

Libya is the main point of departure for African migrants trying to cross the Mediterranean Sea in order to reach Italy and other parts of southern Europe. But the Italian government, working with the European border agency Frontex, has been criticised for using harsh methods to try and stop the flow of migrants rather than trying to give the help that refugees are entitled to under international law. Methods include intercepting the small, fishing boats which carry them, while at sea, thus forcing them back to North Africa.

 

Related articles showing the high number of sub-saharan Libyan refugee deaths due to drownings in the Med after fleeing Libyan instability, violence and chaos due to NATO led war:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3213564/Boat-packed-migrants-sinks-Libya-200-feared-dead.html

http://mgafrica.com/article/2015-04-20-mediterranean-boat-tragedies-the-myths-about-the-africa-europe-migrations-and-the-one-graph-you-need-to-know  – 800 people drowned.

2nd article below on same story

http://www.13abc.com/content/news/700-migrants-presumed-dead-after-boats-capsized-off-Italian-coast-381242511.html

http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/07/refugee-boat-22-dead-bodies-libya-coast-160721133439798.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/06/03/refugee-crisis-300-people-rescued-as-boat-capsizes-off-island-of/

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-32530485 – Mediterranean boat disaster: ‘200 Senegalese’ among dead

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-italy-migrants-idUSKBN0LF0QU20150211 – More than 300 migrants died this week trying to reach Italy: U.N. agency

 

So to quickly put things into perspective, Muammar Gadaffi was supplying over 20,000 sub-saharan Africans with jobs and livelihood for a better life and once NATO overthrew the government by supporting radical jihadist groups those very same sub-saharan Africans were hunted and killed and made refugees, a large amount of which died by drowning on a perilous journey towards Europe by crossing the daunting Mediterranean Sea. In the above video from 2011, CNN states that those poor people (who have now most likely lost their lives) are in danger from being killed by Gaddafi, the man that provided them jobs and security.  The outright lying by the CNN reporter is plain to see and now, 5 years later, the world knows what really happened in Libya. The US, UK, and French governments with the aid of their propaganda channels such as CNN and the BBC turned Libya into a hell on Earth, especially for black sub-saharan Africans.

Now let take a look at what Hillary Clinton knew about the summary executions of black skinned people in Libya…..

http://theantimedia.org/emails-prove-hillary-knew-libyan-rebels-were-conducting-ethnic-cleansing-supported-them-anyway/

On New Year’s Eve, the State Department released 3,000 new Hillary Clinton emails from her tenure as secretary of state. While much of the corporate media dove into investigating pointless gossip, Brad Hoff at the Levant Report decided to look for more clues into understanding the epic failure that was the 2011 war on Libya by the US and NATO.

What Hoff discovered in the emails was Secretary Clinton being briefed by a trusted advisor, Sidney Blumenthal, on a events in Libya where Clinton’s public statements appear to contradict her private understanding. The issues range from the early presence of special forces and al Qaida-linked militants on the ground to the material motivations of France (gold, oil). And, of course, more evidence that Clinton knew the claims about Qaddafi issuing Viagra to troops for rapes were bogus. But, perhaps, the most troubling revelation is that Secretary Clinton was being explicitly told that the Libyan rebel forces were conducting racially charged massacres of black Africans under the rationale of labeling them “foreign mercenaries.”

In an email on March 27, 2011 [PDF], Blumenthal informs Secretary Clinton that a Libyan rebel commander told him that “his troops continue to summarily execute all foreign mercenaries captured in the fighting.” Summarily execute is a nice way of saying they are straight up killing anyone they see, who they think could be a “foreign mercenary.” So, you ask, how are the rebels determining who are (and are not) foreign mercenaries based merely on sight? The answer is based on the color of their skin. But the killings were not just cases of mistaken identity, they were part of a racial grudge connected to perceived favoritism by the Gaddafi government.

As the BBC reported in 2011, the war for the rebels extended to black Libyan civilians and sub-Saharan contract workers. The town of Tawergha, whose residents were descendants of black slaves, was “cleansed” by the rebels. The 30,000 people who lived in Tawergha were forced to flee, many unable to outrun the rebels and subjected to beatings, rape, and those summary executions Blumenthal mentioned.
A 2011 report from Human Rights Watch accuses rebels of terrorizing the people of Tawergha. After setting their homes on fire, the rebels captured the black Libyans and subjected them to “torture and severe beatings, sometimes leading to death.”

More at link above……

Another UK story related to the plight of black Africans in Libya:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/9124817/Libyan-rebels-force-black-Africans-to-eat-flags-in-cage.html

A video that reportedly showing black Africans being forced to eat the former Libyan flag inside a cage by Libyan rebels has surfaced on the Internet.

In the following CNN video the reporter does recognize that a young dark skinned African man is being kidnapped, however, he leaves out the fact that the young man will most likely be killed by the US backed terrorists that took over the country.

It was Hillary Clinton who led the charge for the war in Libya and today she relies on the vote of African Americans in order to get into the US presidential office. I hope all people of all race and colors will recognize that the plight of black people did not matter one iota to Mrs, Hillary Clinton when it came to the war in Libya and its horrific blood soaked after shocks. Regarding Gaddafi who protected and helped black people, she simply laughed and stated “We came, we saw, he died”. Those are the words of a real sociopath, possibly a psychopath, whose direct actions led to the deaths of tens of thousands of innocent people. People who deserved better than to die in such a manner.

https://shadowproof.com/2015/11/24/libyas-collapse-proves-hillary-clinton-learned-nothing-from-iraq-war/

Excerpt:

In 2011, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton led the charge by the Obama Administration to begin a military campaign in Libya. US and NATO forces helped Libyan rebels overthrow the government led by Muammar Gaddafi. The justification was to prevent a massacre that was supposedly imminent in Benghazi, Libya.

Clinton maneuvered behind the scenes to keep the NATO coalition together, as well as promote regime change as the ultimate goal. After the war, she claimed that “we set into motion a policy that was on the right side of history, on the right side of our values, on the right side of our strategic interests in the region.”

Gaddafi, who fled after the fall of his government, was eventually found, then tortured and killed by the rebels — something Clinton apparently found amusing when, in an interview with CBS News, she paraphrased Julius Caesar in regards to Gaddafi, chuckling “We came, we saw, he died.” Once again, Hillary Clinton had backed the violent overthrow of a government in the Middle East, and, once again, the results would ultimately be a nightmare for both the region and the US.

More at Shadowproof link above….

Watching the above videos should give anyone who supported Hillary Clinton serious pause for thought. Her claiming to care about the plight of dark skinned people is all a ploy. The videos and information above clearly show that her actions regarding the overthrow of the government of once stable Libya led to the deaths of tens of thousands of innocent and helpless dark skinned people.