A reclusive neo-Nazi who co-runs the white supremacist Daily Stormer website, and recently said Jewish children “deserve to die,” has Jewish relatives on “both sides of his family,” his mother told Newsweek.
-End excerpt-
———————————————————————————————————————————-
The above Newsweek article covers various aspects of the American far-right and the subject person within that may or may not be true, judging from the way the information is presented. It is not my goal to analyze the accuracy of the above mentioned Newsweek article with this post.
Instead, the purpose of this post is to simply point out the blatant hypocrisy conducted on the part of Newsweek as, during the publication of the above-mentioned article, they have neglected to inform their current readership about the fact that on August 15, 2015 Newsweek ran a lengthy article that glorified Swedish Nazis sniper Mikel Skillt of the pro Nazi far-right Azov Battalion of the Ukrainian National Guard.
A simple read through the Newsweek article linked directly above reveals that it glorifies the actions of self confessed Swedish neo-nazi Mikael Skillt as he conducts warfare against the men and women fighting for their lives against the Ukrainian regime in Donbass in the breakaway regions of Ukraine. The Newsweek article does this under the false premise that Mikael Skillt is righteous in his actions because he is fighting a {quote} “Russian invasion”.
It is now the year 2018, the so called “Russian invasion” that western media outlets and governments predicted and portrayed never came. There always were approximately 8 million ethnic Russians living in East Ukraine with over 4 million ethnic Russians in the breakaway regions. In actuality, over 1.8 million refugees fled TO RUSSIA. There is no verifiable evidence to back up the assertions made by the post coup Ukrainian government that a ‘Russian invasion” ever occurred.
In contrast, there is extensive first person victim evidence uploaded online that shows clearly that the Ukrainian Right Sector National Guard battalions (funded by western governments) have been bombing and killing innocent civilians in their homes in the breakaway regions of East Ukraine for the past three years. This continual shelling is occurring on a daily basis and is being downplayed, misreported and obfuscated by the OSCE in Donetsk, and western media outlets. At the conclusion of this post I will provide links to the daily video reports of Patrick Lancaster who is the only American reporter actually reporting on the ground in the breakaway regions of Donetsk and Lughansk.
Pic of Mikhail Skillt of Azov Battalion- subject of Newsweek article in 2015
Regarding the presentation of the Newsweek Skillt article, it is written in a manner that portrays the killer Mikael Skillt as a hero amongst the Ukrainian Right Sector Azov battalion units. It uses phrases such as “He has an easygoing demeanor and matter-of-fact way of speaking. He is quick to make a self-deprecating joke” and “He looks a little softer now than in some of the pictures of him on the front lines, the result of the more sedentary life of an instructor at Azov Battalion’s base in downtown Kiev—and, he says, of the cooking of his girlfriend, Anna. “Ukrainian women don’t like skinny men,” he explains.”
Note the way Newsweek attempts to portray him as a nice, normal guy with endearing human qualities? His “girlfriend is cooking”…….he “makes light self deprecating jokes”…..he “looks softer”. These are obvious propagandist forms of writing and portrayal.
Other obvious bits of propaganda attempting to make Skillt seem more likeable include “He throws a few lighthearted jabs making fun of Spider’s dating habits”……..“Ukraine gave me purpose,” Skillt says, “and I think a man needs a purpose”……..”Skillt had survived his first battle, killed for the first time. “Ten hours of fighting and not a scratch,” he says: “Now I knew I could react. I could survive and I could work good. It was a big boost to know I was not useless.”…..“He has always been a very confident man in his nature, almost to the grade that one might think that he believes he can fight the gods himself,” Nilsson says: “This is where I find the change in him during this war to be the greatest. He still has his confidence, but he is more humble”……….”Skillt: war made me into a much better person.”
All the above phrases are scattered throughout the Newsweek article, and juxtaposed with little bits of truth related to the fact that Mikael Skillt is a self professed neo-nazi and that the Ukrainian National Guard Azov Battalion is also comprised of neo-nazis who openly worship WW2 Nazi collaborator Stephan Bandera. The Ukrainian Insurgent Army troops led by Stephan Bandera in WW2 were responsible for the killing of over 100,000 Poles and Jews in the regions of Volhnya and Galicia.
Regarding the Azov battalion and its financiers, in the article Newsweek attempts to deflect from the fact that Ukrainian Jewish oligarch Igor Kolomoisky finances the far right pro Nazi Azov battalion, however Yahoo and Agence Presse France disclosed that very fact in an article in 2015.
Dnipro-1’s headquarters are on the ground floor of the Dnipropetrovsk administration building. Upstairs sits the regional governor, Igor Kolomoisky. The arrangement is no accident: Kolomoisky, one of Ukraine’s most controversial billionaires, funds the paramilitary, which returns the favour in these troubled times by boosting the banking and industrial tycoon’s personal security and political clout. All the signs are of a flourishing military enterprise. Young men with Kalashnikovs and pistols and several well dressed women working on laptops fill the anteroom to Bereza’s office.
Dnipro-1 has 700 men — “officially,” Bereza says with an enigmatic smile. “Unofficially, it’s 7,000.”
– DARK SIDE –
Questions over the far right leanings of some volunteer groups and allegations of involvement in the murder of civilians cast a long shadow. One of the most controversial is the Azov Battalion, which uses the Wolfsangel insignia — an ancient design that was resurrected in Hitler’s Germany. The Azov has been linked to Oleg Lyashko, a politician accused of neo-Nazi sympathies. Right Sector, an ultra-nationalist party, also has its own battalion of several hundred men on the frontlines, even if the government refuses to register or pay them. Dasha Slutskovska, a 29-year-old volunteer from the battalion in Dnipropetrovsk, conceded that Right Sector has an image problem — they are relentlessly portrayed in Russia’s state-controlled media as fascists.
End excerpt –
Images of Right Sectors Azov Battalion –
Please see previous Clarity of Signal posts to learn more about Igor Kolomoisky who is also the President of the United Jewish Community of Ukraine. In 2010 he was appointed as the President of the European Council of Jewish Communities.
Now to fully understand the scale of the Azov battalions military operations in Ukraine, I present the following videos from their own Azov Media You Tube channels posted in June 2015 showing the vehicles and equipment that have been supplied to them by complicit western governments.
The following link features over 20 videos which provide a pragmatic/realistic view of the fascist make-up and characteristics of the Ukrainian military battalions that the EU, US, Canada and Australia have been supporting, financing and weaponizing since the start of the Ukrainian coup/conflict in 2014.
US LIFTS BAN ON FUNDING ‘NEO-NAZI’ UKRAINIAN MILITIA
BY SAM SOKOL JANUARY 18, 2016
Excerpt:
Last June, Congress passed a resolution intended to block American military funding for Ukraine from being used to provide training or weaponry for the Azov Battalion. Congress is reported to have recently repealed its ban on a Ukrainian militia accused of being neo-Nazi, opening the way for American military assistance.
Last June, Congress passed a resolution intended to block American military funding for Ukraine from being used to provide training or weaponry for the Azov Battalion, an independent unit that had been integrated into the former Soviet Republic’s national guard and was taking part in operations against Russian- backed rebels. Called a “neo-Nazi paramilitary militia” by Congressmen John Conyers Jr. and Ted Yoho, who cosponsored the bipartisan amendment, the battalion has been a source of controversy since its inception.
With the neo-Nazi Wolfsangel symbol on its unit flash – which resembles a black swastika on a yellow background – and founders drawn from the ranks of the paramilitary national socialist group called “Patriot of Ukraine,” the group would have been a fringe phenomenon in any Western nation, but with its army unequipped to face the separatist threat in the east, Kiev actually integrated Azov into its military forces.
According to a report in The Nation, the Pentagon lobbied the House Defense Appropriations Committee to remove the Conyers-Yoho amendment from the 2016 defense budget, claiming it was unnecessary as such funding was already prohibited under another law.
-End excerpt-
Additional link from The Nation showing US financing of Ukrainian fascist military units:
Now, considering that Newsweek decided to glorify Nazi sniper Mikael Skillt, let me show you what an an Azov battalion sniper hiding in the woods near Slavyansk did to a 30 year old school teacher Irina Boevets who was simply standing on her balcony in May 2014 waiting for her husband to come home. SHE WAS USED BY AN AZOV SNIPER …….FOR TARGET PRACTICE…..shot in the head and killed for no known reason whatsoever.
A 30-year-old civilian woman died after being shot in the head by sniper fire while standing on her balcony in Slavyansk. RT’s Paula Slier visited shocked relatives of the victim, who say a Ukrainian army sniper is responsible, though they don’t know why. Slier arrived to the small Slavyansk apartment just hours after Irina was murdered, a large pool of blood still marking the floor of the balcony. A hospital nurse earlier confirmed that the woman died of a gunshot wound to her head.
The apartment, located on the sixth floor of a small block of flats, appeared to be away from the recent fighting in Slavyansk, and no barricades or checkpoints could be seen anywhere near the area.
Irina, who was head of a department at a technical college in Slavyansk, never took part in any protests or fighting. However, when standing on her balcony and waiting for her husband to come home from a nearby garage, the woman was targeted by an unidentified sniper. Neighbors said they heard a popping sound coming from the trees opposite her window.
Slier spoke to the family of the victim, still in shock and disbelief at what happened.
Screen cap from video at RT link:
The following Yahoo/Euronews link also covers the story and provides the name of the woman Irina Boevets, as well as pointing out clearly that she was killed by a Ukrainian sniper according to local witnesses.
Caveat: Many of the items I track down and post at Clarity of Signal are removed after I post them, thus screenshots help verify validity. Last year the site received tremendous views and drew the attention of the Atlantic Council which featured it in a slanderous piece and attempted to portray CoS as far-right and Neo-Nazi associated. That slanderous inaccurate piece by the Atlantic Council is here: –
Now, considering that Newsweek appears to currently want to expose Nazis wouldn’t it be better if they started looking within seeing how their article glorified and promoted Mikael Skillt as just “your everyday Nazi sniper” operating in Ukraine fighting a fake “Russian invasion” that never came? Maybe they should come clean about what they presented Nazi Mikael Skillt as a hero rather than the murderous nazi that he actually is?
For those looking for the real truth about the Ukrainian war and US/western support for Nazi groups, I recommend you watch this excellent video from the Australia based Watchdog Media, alas, I’m sure you won’t find much of what is shown in it reported by Newsweek which has constantly inaccurately ‘reported’ the facts about the Ukraine war and western government support for pro-Nazi groups since the very beginning of hostilities in February 2014.
Oh and in case your wondering what happened to Mikael Skillt, he’s still up and running on Twitter. When it comes to the current censorship agenda, apparently Twitter feels he deserves a free pass – Featured in his Tweet below is Ukrainian National Guard battalion commander and politician Oleg Lyashko that Skillt promotes holding a sniper rifle. Oleg Lyashko is also featured amongst the twenty videos showing the fascist battalions in Ukraine linked above using torture to attain confessions alongside other members of the Azov Battalion.
@November1228 Recon sniper, meaning I work both long distance and super short distance
Note also that the Azov Battalion Nazis also still have their You Tube channels up and running (as proven above) and have not been censored in any way, shape or form in any western country, including in Germany where new hate crime laws have been enacted targeted at people who criticize people of Jewish descent and immigrants. The Azov Nazis apparently receive a completely free pass from all western governments.
Caveat: All of the information above should be considered as simply my opinion of the facts backed up by all the materials available online posted by the individual entities themselves and others. This caveat is provided so that corrupt organizations that may misrepresent the facts regarding this information, and my opinion in regards to such, cannot attempt to misrepresent such, nor my actions in regards to such. Free speech is currently under attack from a number of global governments and entities. People should be vigilant and state their right to express themselves freely when communicating.
On the three year commemoration of the tragic shootdown of Malaysian Airlines Flight MH-17, Brisbane, Australia based Watchdog Media has released the most thorough and accurate chronological portrayal of events occurring between the start of Ukraine’s Euromaidan in November 2013 and the tragic destruction of Malaysian Airlines flight MH-17 on July 17, 2014.
Between 2013 and 2017, the Watch Dog Media Institute compiled and archived the largest known video volumes of first-person video related to the Ukraine war, as well as the largest and most substantial amount of all mainstream media footage related to such.
These volumes have been aptly and poetically titled “Roses Have Thorns”, and are accessible at the Watchdog Media You Tube page linked below. These chronological video volumes include 17 videos totaling over 32 hours of first-person and MSM video clips related to the war. This downloaded and archived footage has been thoroughly sorted over the past two years and placed into a 5 hour video timeline that reveals the true and terrible nature of the Ukraine war and its horrific effects on the civilian population. This is the most revealing video in existence highlighting what actually took place in Ukraine.
This video thoroughly reveals that the western mainstream media’s narrative related to events in Ukraine was not accurate in relation to what the first-person captured videos show. It also clearly shows that there was a substantial amount of video footage placed online that revealed that fascist battalions from Kiev attacked innocent ethnic Russian Ukrainian civilians in a number of locations and repressed dissent in horrific and murderous ways……on camera. A number of those on-camera murders are included within the video footage. Within the videos, there is also a large amount of location verifiable footage (largely unseen in western countries) of Ukraine’s BUK missile launchers active and on-the-move in the Ukrainian war zones prior to, and during the time of, the shootdown of MH-17. This is highly important due to the fact that the rebels, (labeled as terrorists by Kiev) in the eastern breakaway regions, had no air force for the Ukrainian BUK missile launchers to be used against. Thus, it begs the questions “what were the Kiev troops using these BUK missile launchers for?” And “why did US senator John McCain state on CNN that the new post coup Kiev government had no BUK’s in their possession?
(McCain video proving his statement linked below).
The uniqueness of this particular Watchdog Media video is that, not only does it include fascinating relatively unseen video footage and unknown information along with professional translation and subtitles, but it also utilizes map zooming techniques that allow the viewer to fully comprehend the ongoing nature of the war related events, by zooming them into map locations and videos filmed at those particular precise locations by citizens under duress and directly involved in war related events, thus allowing for a broader view of what actually took place in relation to what the western mainstream media was reporting at that specific time. This is all carried along via well-placed video timeline insertions and accompanied by a soundtrack and easy to comprehend translation which gives the viewer the feel of watching a major war movie in the cinema. At times one feels almost as if they can’t wait to see how it all turns out, although by now most well-informed people are quite aware that the war was sold on an assortment of lies told by western mainstream media, in the same manner as the Iraq, Libya and Syria wars.
From a personal perspective, as someone who watched the Ukraine war online from the very beginning and also compiled a massive amount of videos and information myself that has now seen over 5 million views (primarily on Live Leak), I can honestly vouch for this newest Roses Have Thorns piece to be the best work I have ever seen on the subject of the Ukraine war. It is truly astounding and a great service to humanity. I recommend that people share this video (and this important post) widely so that it stands as a record to what really occurred in Ukraine, so that future generations can learn the truth and help prevent such horrific events from ever happening again.
Official site –
Roses Have Thorns – Watch Dog Media Institute
Link to my Clarity of Signal posts on the Ukraine War – My entire two and a half years of compiled research on the warcrimes of the Ukrainian Nazis now surpasses 5 million views
Regarding the passage of flight MH-17 in Ukraine – although it wasn’t reported in the western English-speaking media, expert aviation witnesses who spoke to the Dutch Safety Board stated on record that Ukraines statement that it had all 3 of its primary radar stations offline at the time of the MH-17 crash (as stated by Kiev authorities) was not believable. However, the Dutch Safety Board has proceeded with its desired, pre-determined ‘investigative’ result just the same. A number of questions are still to be answered, along with questions about the ‘investigation’ itself. Why did the DSB not mention the complete lack of primary radar availablity in Eastern Ukraine airspace in the final report? Despite the fact that the Ukraine air traffic controller did not have primary radar available, airspace was not closed on July 17, 2014. Without primary radar, an air traffic controller cannot see military aircraft on his radar screen. Thus, if a civil aircraft needed to descend and ATC does not have a clue about the position of military aircraft in the national airspace there could have quite easily been a crash. Normally airspace would be closed, especially over a war-zone, if there was no radar working for air traffic control.
Something Most People Don’t Know About MH17……Ukrainian Gov’t Claims Radars Were Not Operational
The following articles proving such were all published by Dutch media outlets in late January 2016. This story was completely ignored by western media and did not even have an English article available on Google during the time it came out. I located them by scanning through Dutch media articles at the time and using Google translate.
MH17 Experts: Strange That Radars Were Not Operational – ADL Netherlands
From Google translate. A Minimum of Four Radar Systems Should Have Images of MH17 Disaster
By Michael van der Galien January 22, 2016
Professor and radar expert Piet van Genderen, TU Delft, says that at least four radars should have picked up the images of flight MH17 being downed.
That is a remarkable statement because it proves the government has no radar images and also has not been able to get their hands on them. During a hearing in the House, Van Genderen said the following:
“The primary radar images of these four facilities are the most important because the chances are that they picked up the image of the BUK missile and it should be seen. Also, the disintegration of the aircraft is on these images, it should almost certainly be noticeable.”
This involves three radar stations in Ukraine and one in Russia. All four facilities would see what brought down the plane. These countries, however, deny they have these images.
Van Genderen trust it for a penny:
“That these facilities were all out of operation or undergoing maintenance as Ukraine and Russia claim is not credible.”
Satellite Expert Marco Langbroek adds that he finds it strange that the government is doing nothing to retrieve the satellite imagery.
“Three of these satellites covered Ukraine at the time of the crash. It seems to me that to see justice served there is every interest to have this information. Indeed, the evidence can thus be substantiated. ”
——————-
Link to 3rd Dutch media source on Ukraine radars not being operational on July 17, 2014
From Google translate: Four radars were active for MH17 ‘
by Paul Eldering and Jolanda van der Graaf
THE HAGUE –
The shootdown of down MH17 was imaged by at least four radars in the vicinity said Professor and radar expert Piet van Genderen at TU Delft during a hearing in the Parliament. “The primary radar images of these four facilities are the most important because the chances are that the they picked up a BUK missile and it should be seen. Also, the disintegration of the aircraft is on these images, it should be almost certainly noticeable. ”
It involves three Ukrainian systems – one in the Lugansk airport and two long-range radar in the vicinity – and a fourth Russian radar at Rostov.
“That all these facilities were all not in operation or under maintenance as Ukraine and Russia claim is not credible,” said the professor.
Like Van Genderen, satellite expert Marco Langbroek believes that the images are crucial to the criminal investigation as to who the perpetrators are. According to Langbroek there must exist a large number of satellite images of the disaster. This includes the so-called Space Based Infrared Systems, the top-secret radar systems of the Americans. “Three of these satellites covered Ukraine at the time of the crash,” said Langbroek. “It seems to me that justice has every interest to have this information. Indeed, the evidence can thus be substantiated.”
The following paragraphs and image captures are from the “What really Happened to Flight MH-17” investigative researchers site and include official Dutch Safety Board final report images and links.
Ukraine did not mention in NOTAMS about combat actions in Eastern Ukraine. Russia did mention the closure of lower airways ‘DUE TO COMBAT ACTIONS ON THE TERRITORY OF THE UKRAINE NEAR THE STATE BORDER WITH THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION’. See this blogpost with information on that.DSB states at page 207 of the final report: Ukraine did not inform the reason for airways restrictions in their NOTAMs while Russia did
Image from DSB report:
2. Ukraine did not mention in NOTAMS about one of the primary radar stations being destroyed and the other in maintenance on July 17.
3. Ukraine did not mention in NOTAMS about the loss of GPS signals over Eastern Ukraine. Malaysia Airlines informed the crew of MH17 about the loss of GPS in this message. The message was taken from Appendix A-U of the DSB final report. DSB wrote in the final report :
This is what DSB reported about the loss of GPS – (image from official DSB report)
Conclusion – There were many reasons to close the airspace over Ukraine on July 17, 2014.
Link to lawsuit against the state of Ukraine for not closing its airspace, includes official Ukrainian response for not doing so:
In April 2017, the Dutch Ministry of Security and Justice submitted an appeal on a judgement by Court Midden Holland to release all documents related to the DSB investigation of MH-17. Now the case is handled by the Dutch Raad van State.
At July 11, 2017, an appeal by RTL, NOS and Volkskrant is discussed at Raad van State.
Having access to all the above information, and knowing what is known now, international investigators should be asking “who had the means, motive, opportunity, and benefitted most from the shootdown of flight MH-17 over Ukrainian airspace?” and “why were flights allowed over Ukraine when Kiev’s authorities now state on record that they had no operational radar?” If that is truly the case, then “how did they track and allow for European air traffic in the air corridors over Ukraine on July 17, 2014?” and most importantly…….”why has the Dutch Safety Board allowed Ukraine a free pass and even collaboration with their ’investigation’? Specifically, “which Dutch authorities are responsible for the statement that they did not need Ukrainian radar images, and then later requested radar images from Russia?”, “Who is responsible for this double standard that allows the Kiev authorities a free pass regarding the missing radar data?”
Watchdog Media’s new video series brings into focus the true nature of the Kiev regime and its fascist battalions that took power in Ukraine on February 20th, 2014, and thus, also reveals that they were quite capable of killing innocent civilians and falsely portraying events in order to fit their barbaric Ukrainian takeover agenda. Like a mirror from the past, the Kiev regimes false flags in Odessa and Mariupol carry ghostly echoes of the German Reichstag Fire and other atrocities carried out by the Nazis during the time of World War II. Thus, they should be considered as the primary suspects in the shootdown of flight MH-17.
I hope my highlighting this important video series will help wake people up to the strong likelihood that it was actually fascist troops operating under the control of the coup imposed Kiev regime that shot down Malaysian Airlines flight MH-17 on July 17th, 2014, as a false flag to be used as a reason to implement western sanctions against Russia. The innocent deceased from the war, and the family members of the victims aboard flight MH-17, still deserve justice. Due to the coverups by the corrupt western media and government entities, true justice for the victims, those affected by the crime, and the world as a whole, is yet to be served.
For reference:
False statement by US Senator John McCain (31 second mark): US Senator John McCain states on CNN that Ukrainians do not possess BUK missile capability.
August 27, 2014 Corbett Report Presentation on MH-17 evidence from the time of the shootdown –
The following post features over 20 videos which provide a pragmatic/realistic view of the fascist make-up and characteristics of the Ukrainian military battalions that the EU, US, Canada and Australia have been supporting, financing and weaponizing since the start of the Ukrainian coup/conflict in 2014.
Links proving that the western powers finance these groups are provided mid-way through this post in order to provide proper perspective on exactly what is taking place using western citizens hard earned tax dollars. Considering that it was Russia that defeated over 80% of the German army in World War II by killing over 2.5 million German troops on the Eastern Front, it is remarkable to see that western governments have now chosen to openly provide support to fascist military groups that utilize symbols and ideology in line with Adolph Hitler’s Third Reich and Nazi Germany.
Video from official Azov Battalion (Azov Media) channel published on June 16, 2017
Ritualistic ceremony featuring use of torches and Wolfsangel symbol….
Azov battalion housing features fascist symbols which is paid for with US, EU, Canadian and Australian tax money…….
Children are being openly indoctrinated into Azov battalion training camps and programs….
Hromadske.tv Ukraine, partially funded by the Soros Foundation and early 2014 grants from US AID, features fascist balaklava clad shock troops conducting fascist arm salutes at an induction ceremony utilizing the WW2 Waffen SS Wolfsangel flag in 2014……
Official link to US AID funding for Ukrainian media in 2014:
Excerpt: WASHINGTON, D.C. – The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) is providing an additional $1.25 million to the U-MEDIA program in Ukraine, a project of Internews and its Ukrainian partner organizations aimed at supporting Ukrainian media outlets as they prepare for the Ukrainian presidential election on May 25th
Excerpt: According to the interim financial report Hromadske TV was funded in 2013 by the Embassy of the Kingdom of The Netherlands (793,089 Ukrainian hryvnias, -₴-), the Embassy of the United States of America (399,650 ₴) and by George Soros International Renaissance Foundation (247,860).[13] By June 2014 Hromadske TV had received another 558,842₴ from the Government of Canada, 394,181₴ from the Fritt Ord Foundation, 287,898₴ from the Embassy of the United States, Kiev, 207,402₴ from an auction organized by ‘Dukat’ (the Auction House) and 1,875,180₴ from individual contributors.[15]
GEORGE SOROS – FATHER OF PRO-UKROP PROPAGANDA
The Soros Foundation is behind the “Ukrainian Crisis Media Center” and NGO- International Renaissance Foundation (IRF).
George Soros on March 31, 2014: “Agreement on the strategic communications issue—providing professional PR assistance to Ukrainian government would be very useful. Gave an overview of the Crisis Media Center set up by IRF and the need for Yatseniuk to do more interviews with them that address directly with journalists and the public the current criticisms of his decision making.”
Link to International Renaissance Foundation Wikipedia page –
Link to additional Clarity of Signal post on the DCLeaks which revealed George Soros as the key international financier behind the travesty of the overthrow of Ukraine:
Ukraine Crisis: War Crimes/Atrocities committed by Ukrainian Army [ENG] (Banned on mainstream media) – Highly graphic warning.
Leader of the Svoboda Party Oleg Tannybuk who met with US Senator John McCain on numerous occasions prior to the Right Sector led Kiev coup in February 2014.
More Azov battalion videos clearly show that fascism is on the march in Ukraine…..
The following video clearly shows that the fascist battalions even march to public fairs and local events to recruit young people into their ranks……
The following March 2016 video shows that night torchlit marches featuring fascist symbols are now a common occurrence in West Ukraine….
More official Azov Battalion promotion videos……
The Great Ukrainian Reconquista video featuring Dmitri Yarosh the leader of the Right Sector which led the violent overthrow of the Ukrainian government in 2014 has now morphed into the fascist Azov, Aidar and other battalions that are now officially incorporated and operating in the Ukrainian military command structure and forces.
Excerpt: In early April 2015, Ukraine’s defence ministry announced that MP Dmytro Yarosh was to become an aide to military chief Viktor Muzhenko and that his Right Sector fighting group would be integrated into the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
The following video highlights Right Sector (Azov Battalion) roots and how they led the charge and took control in February 2014.
“Right Sector” (Ukraine): the history, fascist ideology and role in Euromaidan
The BBC even highlighted the threat of neo-nazis in Ukraine before they themselves became involved in obscuring and omitting the war crimes of the fascist battalions….
It took HBO owned Vice News a full 76 ‘dispatch’ videos to finally get around to mentioning the fact that their ‘reporter’ Simon Ostrovsky was riding around daily with Azov battalion members who had Nazi symbols on their clothing and helmets. He made no mention of the fact that they were firing on the homes of innocent people in the breakaway regions of Donbass. Thanks to Vice News flashy, state-of-the-art editing and filming techniques, they were made to look like regular friendly guys who are simply looking out for their fellow citizens well being.
The StormCloudsGathering You Tube channel reported the truth about the fascist, pro-nazi battalions and the origins of the conflict back in March 2014.
Proof that the Azov battalion receives funding from the Untied States:
US LIFTS BAN ON FUNDING ‘NEO-NAZI’ UKRAINIAN MILITIA
BY SAM SOKOL JANUARY 18, 2016
Excerpt:
Last June, Congress passed a resolution intended to block American military funding for Ukraine from being used to provide training or weaponry for the Azov Battalion. Congress is reported to have recently repealed its ban on a Ukrainian militia accused of being neo-Nazi, opening the way for American military assistance.
Last June, Congress passed a resolution intended to block American military funding for Ukraine from being used to provide training or weaponry for the Azov Battalion, an independent unit that had been integrated into the former Soviet Republic’s national guard and was taking part in operations against Russian- backed rebels. Called a “neo-Nazi paramilitary militia” by Congressmen John Conyers Jr. and Ted Yoho, who cosponsored the bipartisan amendment, the battalion has been a source of controversy since its inception.
With the neo-Nazi Wolfsangel symbol on its unit flash – which resembles a black swastika on a yellow background – and founders drawn from the ranks of the paramilitary national socialist group called “Patriot of Ukraine,” the group would have been a fringe phenomenon in any Western nation, but with its army unequipped to face the separatist threat in the east, Kiev actually integrated Azov into its military forces.
According to a report in The Nation, the Pentagon lobbied the House Defense Appropriations Committee to remove the Conyers-Yoho amendment from the 2016 defense budget, claiming it was unnecessary as such funding was already prohibited under another law.
end excerpt
Additional links showing US financing of Ukrainian fascist military units:
The video below shows the US, EU, Canadian and George Soros financed Hromadske TV promoting and giving air time to Bogdan Butkevych who is a fascist propaganda disseminator for the Right Sector as he “clearly states on Ukrainian national TV that 1.5 million residents of Donbass, South East Ukraine must be exterminated”. (English subtitles are included) Notice that the TV host conducting the interview does not protest his statement in any way. The video proves that this Soros/western government funded channel openly allows for calls for the ethnic cleansing of an entire population of 1.5 million ethnic Russian people.
The Facebook page of Bogdan Butkevych can be found here:
The following image was taken from his own open Facebook page where he jokes about the subject of his comments on Hromodske TV:
The three videos below highlight the Mariupol Azov battalion as they parade with new military vehicles, facilities, uniforms, equipment and military hardware that is acquired through western government financing of the Ukrainian military.
Note brand new vehicles and modernized western combat uniforms, helmets and equipment…..all paid for by western governments aligned with the 2014 coup imposed Kiev regime.
The fascist Azov battalion proudly displays their western government financed fighting vehicles:
The following link shows the US Marines Amphibious Assault Forces collaborating in exercises with the Ukrainian Military in Odessa, Ukraine in July 2016….
The following Live Leak video shows what US and EU tax payers get for their money when financing the Ukrainian military as drunk Ukrainian troops indiscriminately fire heavy guns upon a small village filled with local residents. Not a single care is given by these troops as to where these high explosive rounds will end up and who they may end up killing. The videos above from the “FallenUSSoldiers” You Tube channel shows that a large amount of the dead are innocent men, women and children civilians, including a substantial number of elderly people who had munitions rain down soon them while they were going through day to day activities.
Additional strange ritual of Kiev forces: Note – 1) Azov battalion attendees wearing new military fatigues, 2) the flags of the Svoboda Party (Oleg Tannybuk’s party- John McCain associate), 3) the red and black flags of the Right Sector who worship WW2 Nazi collaborator Stephan Bandera, and 4) various WW2 military attire on older men receiving awards from priests, as well as 5) black flags of Misanthropic units. This video shows quite a hodgepodge of fascism……
What does the Misanthropic Division stand for? Below is their 14 point manifesto…..
14 POINTS OF THE MISANTHROPIC DIVISION INTERNATIONAL
1. Misanthropic Division is a NS Brotherhood exclusive to european and eurodescendent men. We live accordingly the principles of Nature and we denounce the modern political and corrupt system with his multicultural society.
2. Misanthropic Division is composed with people who refuse this repugnant modern world. Our misanthropy is a cry of hatred towards human weakness and all that oppose traditional values based on the laws of Nature. The main purpose of NS is the Ubermensch, deprived of weakness, defects and ugliness.
3. Misanthropic Division is nietzschean and promotes the revival of our primordial religions, that of our ancestors. Therefore, Misanthropic Division rejects all beliefs and religions strange to our ancestral heritage.
4. Misanthropic Division members are free to join and to be part of any other political organisations that promote our Cause, but always bearing in mind their allegiance to Misanthropic Division principles and brotherhood.
5. As a brotherhood, all Misanthropic Division members must be treated as equal by all national chapter members. No offense or disrespect will be tolerated to other member or Chapter of our Misanthropic Division brotherhood. Those who violate this basic principle will face disciplinar sanctions and may be expelled from Misanthropic Division.
6. Internal Rules are full responsability of each Misanthropic Division Chapter. New members should prove their intents to join Misanthropic Division for, at least, one year.
7. Misanthropic Division Chapters should struggle by all means necessary and whatever it takes to rebuild a common european society, based on Family, Folk and Tradition; protecting our European Culture and Identity.
8. Misanthropic Division main purpose is the immediate support of military in ATO – AZOV and DUK – without forgetting that they are fighting and representing our cause.
9. All Misanthropic Division Chapters should produce their own local propaganda, according to the national situation of each country.
10. Misanthropic Division is neither a gang or a terrorist organisation. Misanthropic Division members are political soldiers promptly to fight for a worldview. As so, Misanthropic Division denounce gang behaviour (drug consumption/dealing, robbery, etc) as part of modern decadence.
11. We should defend the integrity of all European ethnicities, Languages and Traditions as our own Heritage.
12. Family is the basic cell of a community, as so all Misanthropic Division members put their families as a priority, since in our families lies the future of white children and consequently of our Race as a whole.
13. It is mandatory to Misanthropic Division members to assist our members who are facing judicial problems or are behind bars, as well when a member or a family member needs help in any form may it be.
14. All MD brotherhood members will proceed with Honour and Loyalty, remembering that UNITED WE WILL WIN!
Image from their site shows they are aligned with the US funded Azov battalion that is part of the make-up of the official Ukrainian military:
This is what US, EU and western tax payers are getting for their NATO buck……
The truth about what has actually happened in Ukraine has been obvious all along for those who were watching closely, but western media outlets have performed a massive disservice to their respective customer base and global citizens by covering it all up for the sake of gaining a global chess piece for their elite globalist masters who run NATO.
Sadly, the Telegraph Uk did cover this nefarious and shameful subject in 2014, yet they failed to continue to report truthfully on events in Ukraine after that time. Link here:
As Ukraine’s armed forces tighten the noose around pro-Russian separatists in the east of the country, the western-backed government in Kiev is throwing militia groups – some openly neo-Nazi – into the front of the battle.
The Azov battalion has the most chilling reputation of all. Last week, it came to the fore as it mounted a bold attack on the rebel redoubt of Donetsk, striking deep into the suburbs of a city under siege.
But Kiev’s use of volunteer paramilitaries to stamp out the Russian-backed Donetsk and Luhansk “people’s republics”, proclaimed in eastern Ukraine in March, should send a shiver down Europe’s spine. Recently formed battalions such as Donbas, Dnipro and Azov, with several thousand men under their command, are officially under the control of the interior ministry but their financing is murky, their training inadequate and their ideology often alarming.
The Azov men use the neo-Nazi Wolfsangel (Wolf’s Hook) symbol on their banner and members of the battalion are openly white supremacists, or anti-Semites.
A former history student and amateur boxer, Mr Biletsky is also head of an extremist Ukrainian group called the Social National Assembly. “The historic mission of our nation in this critical moment is to lead the White Races of the world in a final crusade for their survival,” he wrote in a recent commentary. “A crusade against the Semite-led Untermenschen.”
Yahoo and AFP also revealed a little truth before making all future stories Kiev favorable:
Excerpt: Dnipro-1’s headquarters are on the ground floor of the Dnipropetrovsk administration building. Upstairs sits the regional governor, Igor Kolomoisky. The arrangement is no accident: Kolomoisky, one of Ukraine’s most controversial billionaires, funds the paramilitary, which returns the favour in these troubled times by boosting the banking and industrial tycoon’s personal security and political clout.
All the signs are of a flourishing military enterprise. Young men with Kalashnikovs and pistols and several well dressed women working on laptops fill the anteroom to Bereza’s office.
– DARK SIDE –
Questions over the far right leanings of some volunteer groups and allegations of involvement in the murder of civilians cast a long shadow.
One of the most controversial is the Azov Battalion, which uses the Wolfsangel insignia — an ancient design that was resurrected in Hitler’s Germany. The Azov has been linked to Oleg Lyashko, a politician accused of neo-Nazi sympathies. Right Sector, an ultra-nationalist party, also has its own battalion of several hundred men on the frontlines, even if the government refuses to register or pay them.
Dasha Slutskovska, a 29-year-old volunteer from the battalion in Dnipropetrovsk, conceded that Right Sector has an image problem — they are relentlessly portrayed in Russia’s state-controlled media as fascists. But she insisted her comrades only want the Maidan goals of ending corruption and steering Ukraine into Europe.
“Nationalists does not mean Nazis. We’re just normal people,” she said, adding with a laugh: “Well, maybe a bit more radical.”
The following videos highlight the Soros, EU and US government funded Maidan Press Center and the terrorist actions of Right Sector/Azov battalion commanders Mykola Bondar and Oleg Lyashko who are currently still part of the Ukrainian government and military command structure that is funded by western governments. In these videos Oleg Lyashko conducts civilian abductions and torture on camera.
School teacher abducted, tortured and threatened with death by Right Sector leader/politician Oleg Lyashko….
Civilian from breakaway region abducted, tortured and threatened with death by Ukrainian military commander Oleg Lyashko…
Councilor from breakaway regions threatened to be thrown out of a window by Ukrainian military commander and politician Oleg Lyashko……
Local civilians home raided by Right Sector/Azov battalion special ops group who conduct savage beating….
Highly graphic- Ukrainian army shelling of civilian areas in Donbass breakaway region leads to multiple deaths, including young women and children.
This is what George Soros, the EU and US tax dollars have paid for. Highly Graphic – Genocide – Ukrainian Army shelling of civilians in Luhansk
The following Independent UK article from May 2014 highlights the takeover of Mariupol by Kiev’s fascist battalions and Ukrainian oligarch Arsen Avakov who also finances the Right Sector in Mariupol. Note that civilians who refused to comply with the new fascist government, and instead sought independence, were constantly referred to as “terrorists” by the new Kiev regimes fascist military commanders.
That was Mariupol after a day of bloody strife which slid Ukraine further towards civil war. The country’s caretaker government can be accused of trying to blow out flickering hopes of peace by launching a military operation on one of the most revered anniversaries in the Russian-speaking half of the country, the commemoration of victory over Nazi Germany. The military action is accompanied by stridently aggressive rhetoric from politicians in Kiev who are crowing about the numbers of “terrorists” killed and threatening further lethal punishment. There are two conflicting narratives. The Kiev administration’s version is that a mob had taken over the central police station, with the primary aim of getting hold of its extensive armoury, and then opened fire on government troops, killing some policemen in the process.
Residents, as well as protesters, insist this is a lie. The police, they maintain, had shown great sympathy towards them, and the Ukrainian military, with a band of armed fellow travellers, wanted to take control of the weapons and attacked the station precisely for that reason.Across the road lies another corpse, that of one of the “fascists” who had been with the soldiers, say the residents, inevitably labelled a member of the Right Sector, an extremist group who allegedly carry out the government’s dirty work. The man is wearing civilian clothing, a black top and jeans, with an armband in Ukrainian colours. “This man was shooting at the police building, I saw him,” Valentina Semoronova says. “Then he got wounded and fell; the policemen were shooting back. The soldiers did nothing to help him. All they did was take the rifle with them when they left.”
In the course of the next confusing hour the armband disappears, snatched off by a collaborator, according to some. There are mutters that it was a Ukrainian journalist, although we have not seen any present at the scene. Such charges often lead to an outbreak of hostility towards the media. But here the crowd, though angry, is keen to put over its side. The people stand under raindrops blackened by ash pleading that two things must be made clear to the outside world; they do not have guns and they are Ukrainians, not Russians. They produce their driving licences and passports. To Arsen Avakov, many of these people are terrorists. Ukraine’s acting Interior Minister has been a voracious user of Facebook to chronicle military operations, some of the accounts wildly inaccurate. He wrote: “A terrorist group of about 60 men armed with automatic weapons attacked the police headquarters. About 20 terrorists were destroyed and four taken prisoner. To those who come with weapons and who shoot… To them there can be only one answer from the Ukrainian state – annihilation.”
Mr Avakov also stresses the involvement of several branches of security in the mission, including special forces, National Guard and the army. This is seen as an attempt to assuage criticism in Kiev and western Ukraine of the “anti-terrorist offensive”. But Mariupol has also become the arena for a number of shadowy bunches of gunmen. Two days ago, a unit in black combat uniform carried out unprovoked assaults on protesters outside another police station. There have been contradictory accounts about who they were from Kiev authorities – National Guard, special forces, Ministry of Interior police. One theory is that they were mercenaries bankrolled by Igor Kolomoisky, an oligarch and Ukrainian nationalist, who had previously offered a bounty for the capture of Russian “agents”.
Link to ITV UK report showing the fascist battalions taking over the city of Mariupol on May 9th, 2014 –
Like a scene from Nazi Germany – Rare video shows fascist troops taking over the city of Mariupol in May 2014.
The entire anti-Russian narrative about Ukraine has been a well-orchestrated, massive lie. There never was a Russian invasion. It never occurred. Instead, there was a genocide of the ethnic Russian Ukrainian population in Donbass carried out by the fascist military forces of the Kiev regime that is financed by the US, EU and western powers. That is the real horrific reality of the Ukrainian Conflict. Alas, the corrupt and complicit western media propaganda front has been massive and is, visibly and demonstrably, on par with the German Nazi regime during WW2.
Final video showing Ukrainian military atrocities conducted upon civilians in the breakaway regions of Donbass: Highly graphic warning:
“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”
Joseph Goebbels, German politician and Reich Minister of Propaganda of Nazi Germany from 1933 to 1945.
The massacre at Kiev’s Maidan was a major turning point in the Ukrainian crisis in which the BBC played a key role on reporting of events. This post will examine the BBC video reports of reporter Gabriel Gatehouse as he covered the Maidan sniper massacre and it will demonstrate that the videos his team filmed clearly show that Gatehouse’s own on camera acceptance of an undercover British forensic investigative team version of events fails to match his own personal experience of being shot at by a sniper in the Hotel Ukraine, a sniper, who incidentally, was not included in the ‘official’ investigation final report conducted by the post coup Kiev based government of Ukraine.
At the time of the Maidan Massacre on February 20, 2014, the Hotel Ukraine was occupied and controlled by opposition forces including the Right Sector neo-nazi groups led by Andriy Parubiy that were the frontline foot soldiers being used as a battering ram against the Yankovich led government.
In the following video filmed on February 20th, 2014, we see Gabriel Gatehouse and his BBC team clearly shot at from the Hotel Ukraine at the 2:35 mark. The BBC report verifies snipers were in the Hotel Ukraine behind protesters. Gatehouse even goes so far as to identify the room the shooters are located in, stating ” from one of the upper windows of the hotel a shot rang out…….up there, yes….our hotel…..upper window 5th row from the left…2nd from the top….the one that is open”. He then states ” I saw the shooter, he was wearing one of the protester’s green helmets”.
In this 2nd video at the 3:50 mark we see Gabriel Gatehouse in the unedited version of the same video cursing about the rifle shot which just barely misses him. Before being shot at he states clearly “What is that, that window facing directly to us……fuck….let’s get the fuck out of here!”
Now here is where things get interesting. In the following BBC video, filmed 4 days later, and featuring the very same Gabriel Gatehouse, he accepts the version of events of a team of anonymous undercover British forensic experts who neglect to include the sniper that shot at him and his BBC crew from the Hotel Ukraine. He makes no mention of this fact, nor does he correct their reporting, and instead, simply accepts their stated version of events that the snipers were in other locations and government positions which has been deduced by the anonymous team based on bullet scars on surrounding objects.
At the 1:58 mark above, Gatehouse states “It’s amazing how you can work that all out”. The anonymous forensic expert then states “It was just a bloodbath really……wasn’t it?” To which Gatehouse quizzically nods and says “Yes it was”.
At the 2:26 mark, while standing in front of a barricade, Gatehouse then states “The investigator’s say that there were at least 4 sniper positions…..one at ground level, here at this barricade, and then another 3 in the tall buildings behind it over there (points at government side) they were shooting directly down this road in the direction of the hotel where we were staying (camera then pans towards the Hotel Ukraine) and the square beyond”. Gatehouse makes no mention whatsoever of the sniper that shot at his crew in the previous BBC videos taken on February 20th, 2014. The rest of the video features interviews with members of the groups who took over the city and a short BBC expose’ on deposed Ukrainian President Victor Yankovich’s estate.
The following BBC video was released a full year later on February 12, 2015 and finally features Gabriel Gatehouse revealing there were snipers shooting from other buildings than the ones the anonymous British forensic team cited. The BBC video makes no direct mention of these snipers intentionally shooting protesters, nor does it accurately portray that 10 Ukrainian Berkut police officers were killed by snipers, instead, it inaccurately states that only 3 police officers were killed in the footnotes to the video and it creates an even more confusing version of events. This video does features Berkut police radio communications pointing out clearly that a sniper was in the Hotel Ukraine and even gives a precise location description stating at the 2:16 mark “Second level from the top on the left side of the Hotel Ukraine”. Now be careful to pay close attention to what Gabriel Gatehouse states in the video below at the 4:24 mark after interviewing Andriy Parubiy (Right Sector Commandant). He states ” the location matters, the Hotel Ukraine was that morning largely under the control of government forces, but the conservatory building several hundred meters away was firmly in the hands of protesters.” Later in the BBC video, a new narrative is introduced about a sniper in the conservatory building. The statement that the Hotel Ukraine was under government control is obviously inaccurate due to the fact that Gabriel Gatehouse had already previously identified a green helmeted protester in the window that he pointed out in this video and previous videos. He also had stated previously that the Hotel Ukraine was occupied by protestors as a makeshift medical facility. Yet, strangely, in this fourth video he refers to it as a building under the control of government forces. Then he interviews Andriy Parubiy again on the possibilities of snipers in the Hotel Ukraine and takes his words at face value that his Maidan Right Sector neo-nazi foot-soldiers did not locate a sniper in the Hotel Ukraine (once again, this provides more proof that the hotel was not under government control as Gatehouse previously stated).
Gatehouse redeems himself somewhat at the 11:40 mark when he states ” I’ve spoken to a senior investigator at the general prosecutors office here, he’s convinced that whoever was firing from the Hotel Ukraine was targeting both sides. He’s gathering evidence that he says will prove that the massacre on Maidan on the 20th of February was the culmination of a carefully worked out plot….the aim of which was to cause maximum chaos…..but he says that his investigation is constantly being blocked by the courts.” (Note that nothing of substance has ever come of this Kiev led investigation, instead a few Berkut officers have been scapegoated for the killings).
Gatehouse’s reporting then reverts to narratives based on Russia blaming put forth by the same Andriy Parubiy, CIA blaming put forth by anonymously cited Russians and finally wrapping up with the statement that Maidan was all about good people coming together, yet, unfortunately people were manipulated and no one knows by whom……..thus, resulting in the waters being thoroughly muddied enough to conceal everything, even though the BBC itself has previously reported on the dangers of Maidens Right Sector neo-nazis.
Judging from all the above, if the BBC’s goal was to confuse the hell out of the general public with their ‘reporting’, then they have performed a remarkable job. The waters are completely muddied, there’s been plenty of time for all evidence to be destroyed (even the tree’s were removed) and a complete cloud of confusion now hovers over the sniper murders that took place at Maidan on February 20th, 2014. A closer look at the actions of participating BBC interviewee Andriy Parubiy would certainly be a good place to start when it comes to accessing the truth about the snipers that killed the so called ‘heavenly 100’ at Maidan.
On a more professional and decent note, there have been some remarkable researchers cacheing information and investigating what really happened in Kiev on February 20th, 2014 and I will link to them here so that other researchers may continue to look more deeply into this terrible tragedy that has now led to the New Cold War between the United States and Russia.
The best place to start is here:
The “Snipers’ Massacre” on the Maidan in Ukraine
by Ivan Katchanovski, Ph.D. School of Political Studies University of Ottawa
September 2014 German TV investigation disproves the West’s claim that Yanukovych was responsible for killing of dozens of Ukrainian protestors. (English Subs)
Linked below is the most shocking video showing the sniper killings up close (Graphic Warning). This particular group of victims appear to have all been shot from behind by the snipers in the Hotel Ukraine, the evidence proving such (trees with bullets lodged in them showing azimuth of fire) were removed not long after the massacre. The fact that these victims were all sent forth from the Hotel Ukraine with no firearms of their own is also cause for suspicion on the actions of Andriy Paruiby and his Right Sector soldiers who were occupying the Hotel Ukraine.
No proper investigation has ever been conducted by the Kiev regime that performed a coup utilizing neo-nazi battalions and took control of the Ukrainian government in February 2014. For those looking for more regarding the US instigated New Cold War with Russia please see my CoS posts on Zbigniew Brzezinski’s Grand Chessboard and implementation of the war in Ukraine.
IMI- Analysis – Understanding the Grand Chessboard
1. COINTELPRO Techniques for dilution, misdirection and control of a internet forum
2. Twenty-Five Rules of Disinformation
3. Eight Traits of the Disinformationalist
4. How to Spot a Spy (Cointelpro Agent)
5. Seventeen Techniques for Truth Suppression
______________________________________________________________________________________
COINTELPRO Techniques for dilution, misdirection and control of a internet forum..
There are several techniques for the control and manipulation of a internet forum no matter what, or who is on it. We will go over each technique and demonstrate that only a minimal number of operatives can be used to eventually and effectively gain a control of a ‘uncontrolled forum.’
Technique #1 – ‘FORUM SLIDING’
If a very sensitive posting of a critical nature has been posted on a forum – it can be quickly removed from public view by ‘forum sliding.’ In this technique a number of unrelated posts are quietly prepositioned on the forum and allowed to ‘age.’ Each of these misdirectional forum postings can then be called upon at will to trigger a ‘forum slide.’ The second requirement is that several fake accounts exist, which can be called upon, to ensure that this technique is not exposed to the public. To trigger a ‘forum slide’ and ‘flush’ the critical post out of public view it is simply a matter of logging into each account both real and fake and then ‘replying’ to prepositined postings with a simple 1 or 2 line comment. This brings the unrelated postings to the top of the forum list, and the critical posting ‘slides’ down the front page, and quickly out of public view. Although it is difficult or impossible to censor the posting it is now lost in a sea of unrelated and unuseful postings. By this means it becomes effective to keep the readers of the forum reading unrelated and non-issue items.
Technique #2 – ‘CONSENSUS CRACKING’
A second highly effective technique (which you can see in operation all the time at http://www.abovetopsecret.com) is ‘consensus cracking.’ To develop a consensus crack, the following technique is used. Under the guise of a fake account a posting is made which looks legitimate and is towards the truth is made – but the critical point is that it has a VERY WEAK PREMISE without substantive proof to back the posting. Once this is done then under alternative fake accounts a very strong position in your favour is slowly introduced over the life of the posting. It is IMPERATIVE that both sides are initially presented, so the uninformed reader cannot determine which side is the truth. As postings and replies are made the stronger ‘evidence’ or disinformation in your favour is slowly ‘seeded in.’ Thus the uninformed reader will most like develop the same position as you, and if their position is against you their opposition to your posting will be most likely dropped. However in some cases where the forum members are highly educated and can counter your disinformation with real facts and linked postings, you can then ‘abort’ the consensus cracking by initiating a ‘forum slide.’
Technique #3 – ‘TOPIC DILUTION’
Topic dilution is not only effective in forum sliding it is also very useful in keeping the forum readers on unrelated and non-productive issues. This is a critical and useful technique to cause a ‘RESOURCE BURN.’ By implementing continual and non-related postings that distract and disrupt (trolling ) the forum readers they are more effectively stopped from anything of any real productivity. If the intensity of gradual dilution is intense enough, the readers will effectively stop researching and simply slip into a ‘gossip mode.’ In this state they can be more easily misdirected away from facts towards uninformed conjecture and opinion. The less informed they are the more effective and easy it becomes to control the entire group in the direction that you would desire the group to go in. It must be stressed that a proper assessment of the psychological capabilities and levels of education is first determined of the group to determine at what level to ‘drive in the wedge.’ By being too far off topic too quickly it may trigger censorship by a forum moderator.
Technique #4 – ‘INFORMATION COLLECTION’
Information collection is also a very effective method to determine the psychological level of the forum members, and to gather intelligence that can be used against them. In this technique in a light and positive environment a ‘show you mine so me yours’ posting is initiated. From the number of replies and the answers that are provided much statistical information can be gathered. An example is to post your ‘favourite weapon’ and then encourage other members of the forum to showcase what they have. In this matter it can be determined by reverse proration what percentage of the forum community owns a firearm, and or a illegal weapon. This same method can be used by posing as one of the form members and posting your favourite ‘technique of operation.’ From the replies various methods that the group utilizes can be studied and effective methods developed to stop them from their activities.
Technique #5 – ‘ANGER TROLLING’
Statistically, there is always a percentage of the forum posters who are more inclined to violence. In order to determine who these individuals are, it is a requirement to present a image to the forum to deliberately incite a strong psychological reaction. From this the most violent in the group can be effectively singled out for reverse IP location and possibly local enforcement tracking. To accomplish this only requires posting a link to a video depicting a local police officer massively abusing his power against a very innocent individual. Statistically of the million or so police officers in America there is always one or two being caught abusing there powers and the taping of the activity can be then used for intelligence gathering purposes – without the requirement to ‘stage’ a fake abuse video. This method is extremely effective, and the more so the more abusive the video can be made to look. Sometimes it is useful to ‘lead’ the forum by replying to your own posting with your own statement of violent intent, and that you ‘do not care what the authorities think!!’ inflammation. By doing this and showing no fear it may be more effective in getting the more silent and self-disciplined violent intent members of the forum to slip and post their real intentions. This can be used later in a court of law during prosecution.
Technique #6 – ‘GAINING FULL CONTROL’
It is important to also be harvesting and continually maneuvering for a forum moderator position. Once this position is obtained, the forum can then be effectively and quietly controlled by deleting unfavourable postings – and one can eventually steer the forum into complete failure and lack of interest by the general public. This is the ‘ultimate victory’ as the forum is no longer participated with by the general public and no longer useful in maintaining their freedoms. Depending on the level of control you can obtain, you can deliberately steer a forum into defeat by censoring postings, deleting memberships, flooding, and or accidentally taking the forum offline. By this method the forum can be quickly killed. However it is not always in the interest to kill a forum as it can be converted into a ‘honey pot’ gathering center to collect and misdirect newcomers and from this point be completely used for your control for your agenda purposes.
CONCLUSION
Remember these techniques are only effective if the forum participants DO NOT KNOW ABOUT THEM. Once they are aware of these techniques the operation can completely fail, and the forum can become uncontrolled. At this point other avenues must be considered such as initiating a false legal precidence to simply have the forum shut down and taken offline. This is not desirable as it then leaves the enforcement agencies unable to track the percentage of those in the population who always resist attempts for control against them. Many other techniques can be utilized and developed by the individual and as you develop further techniques of infiltration and control it is imperative to share then with HQ.
______________________________________________________________________________________
Twenty-Five Rules of Disinformation
Note: The first rule and last five (or six, depending on situation) rules are generally not directly within the ability of the traditional disinfo artist to apply. These rules are generally used more directly by those at the leadership, key players, or planning level of the criminal conspiracy or conspiracy to cover up.
1. Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil. Regardless of what you know, don’t discuss it — especially if you are a public figure, news anchor, etc. If it’s not reported, it didn’t happen, and you never have to deal with the issues.
2. Become incredulous and indignant. Avoid discussing key issues and instead focus on side issues which can be used show the topic as being critical of some otherwise sacrosanct group or theme. This is also known as the ‘How dare you!’ gambit.
3. Create rumor mongers. Avoid discussing issues by describing all charges, regardless of venue or evidence, as mere rumors and wild accusations. Other derogatory terms mutually exclusive of truth may work as well. This method which works especially well with a silent press, because the only way the public can learn of the facts are through such ‘arguable rumors’. If you can associate the material with the Internet, use this fact to certify it a ‘wild rumor’ from a ‘bunch of kids on the Internet’ which can have no basis in fact.
4. Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponent’s argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues.
5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary ‘attack the messenger’ ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as ‘kooks’, ‘right-wing’, ‘liberal’, ‘left-wing’, ‘terrorists’, ‘conspiracy buffs’, ‘radicals’, ‘militia’, ‘racists’, ‘religious fanatics’, ‘sexual deviates’, and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.
6. Hit and Run. In any public forum, make a brief attack of your opponent or the opponent position and then scamper off before an answer can be fielded, or simply ignore any answer. This works extremely well in Internet and letters-to-the-editor environments where a steady stream of new identities can be called upon without having to explain criticism, reasoning — simply make an accusation or other attack, never discussing issues, and never answering any subsequent response, for that would dignify the opponent’s viewpoint.
7. Question motives. Twist or amplify any fact which could be taken to imply that the opponent operates out of a hidden personal agenda or other bias. This avoids discussing issues and forces the accuser on the defensive.
8. Invoke authority. Claim for yourself or associate yourself with authority and present your argument with enough ‘jargon’ and ‘minutia’ to illustrate you are ‘one who knows’, and simply say it isn’t so without discussing issues or demonstrating concretely why or citing sources.
9. Play Dumb. No matter what evidence or logical argument is offered, avoid discussing issues except with denials they have any credibility, make any sense, provide any proof, contain or make a point, have logic, or support a conclusion. Mix well for maximum effect.
10. Associate opponent charges with old news. A derivative of the straw man — usually, in any large-scale matter of high visibility, someone will make charges early on which can be or were already easily dealt with – a kind of investment for the future should the matter not be so easily contained.) Where it can be foreseen, have your own side raise a straw man issue and have it dealt with early on as part of the initial contingency plans. Subsequent charges, regardless of validity or new ground uncovered, can usually then be associated with the original charge and dismissed as simply being a rehash without need to address current issues — so much the better where the opponent is or was involved with the original source.
11. Establish and rely upon fall-back positions. Using a minor matter or element of the facts, take the ‘high road’ and ‘confess’ with candor that some innocent mistake, in hindsight, was made — but that opponents have seized on the opportunity to blow it all out of proportion and imply greater criminalities which, ‘just isn’t so.’ Others can reinforce this on your behalf, later, and even publicly ‘call for an end to the nonsense’ because you have already ‘done the right thing.’ Done properly, this can garner sympathy and respect for ‘coming clean’ and ‘owning up’ to your mistakes without addressing more serious issues.
12. Enigmas have no solution. Drawing upon the overall umbrella of events surrounding the crime and the multitude of players and events, paint the entire affair as too complex to solve. This causes those otherwise following the matter to begin to lose interest more quickly without having to address the actual issues.
13. Alice in Wonderland Logic. Avoid discussion of the issues by reasoning backwards or with an apparent deductive logic which forbears any actual material fact.
14. Demand complete solutions. Avoid the issues by requiring opponents to solve the crime at hand completely, a ploy which works best with issues qualifying for rule 10.
15. Fit the facts to alternate conclusions. This requires creative thinking unless the crime was planned with contingency conclusions in place.
16. Vanish evidence and witnesses. If it does not exist, it is not fact, and you won’t have to address the issue.
17. Change the subject. Usually in connection with one of the other ploys listed here, find a way to side-track the discussion with abrasive or controversial comments in hopes of turning attention to a new, more manageable topic. This works especially well with companions who can ‘argue’ with you over the new topic and polarize the discussion arena in order to avoid discussing more key issues.
18. Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad Opponents. If you can’t do anything else, chide and taunt your opponents and draw them into emotional responses which will tend to make them look foolish and overly motivated, and generally render their material somewhat less coherent. Not only will you avoid discussing the issues in the first instance, but even if their emotional response addresses the issue, you can further avoid the issues by then focusing on how ‘sensitive they are to criticism.’
19. Ignore proof presented, demand impossible proofs. This is perhaps a variant of the ‘play dumb’ rule. Regardless of what material may be presented by an opponent in public forums, claim the material irrelevant and demand proof that is impossible for the opponent to come by (it may exist, but not be at his disposal, or it may be something which is known to be safely destroyed or withheld, such as a murder weapon.) In order to completely avoid discussing issues, it may be required that you to categorically deny and be critical of media or books as valid sources, deny that witnesses are acceptable, or even deny that statements made by government or other authorities have any meaning or relevance.
20. False evidence. Whenever possible, introduce new facts or clues designed and manufactured to conflict with opponent presentations — as useful tools to neutralize sensitive issues or impede resolution. This works best when the crime was designed with contingencies for the purpose, and the facts cannot be easily separated from the fabrications.
21. Call a Grand Jury, Special Prosecutor, or other empowered investigative body. Subvert the (process) to your benefit and effectively neutralize all sensitive issues without open discussion. Once convened, the evidence and testimony are required to be secret when properly handled. For instance, if you own the prosecuting attorney, it can insure a Grand Jury hears no useful evidence and that the evidence is sealed and unavailable to subsequent investigators. Once a favorable verdict is achieved, the matter can be considered officially closed. Usually, this technique is applied to find the guilty innocent, but it can also be used to obtain charges when seeking to frame a victim.
22. Manufacture a new truth. Create your own expert(s), group(s), author(s), leader(s) or influence existing ones willing to forge new ground via scientific, investigative, or social research or testimony which concludes favorably. In this way, if you must actually address issues, you can do so authoritatively.
23. Create bigger distractions. If the above does not seem to be working to distract from sensitive issues, or to prevent unwanted media coverage of unstoppable events such as trials, create bigger news stories (or treat them as such) to distract the multitudes.
24. Silence critics. If the above methods do not prevail, consider removing opponents from circulation by some definitive solution so that the need to address issues is removed entirely. This can be by their death, arrest and detention, blackmail or destruction of their character by release of blackmail information, or merely by destroying them financially, emotionally, or severely damaging their health.
25. Vanish. If you are a key holder of secrets or otherwise overly illuminated and you think the heat is getting too hot, to avoid the issues, vacate the kitchen.
1) Avoidance. They never actually discuss issues head-on or provide constructive input, generally avoiding citation of references or credentials. Rather, they merely imply this, that, and the other. Virtually everything about their presentation implies their authority and expert knowledge in the matter without any further justification for credibility.
2) Selectivity. They tend to pick and choose opponents carefully, either applying the hit-and-run approach against mere commentators supportive of opponents, or focusing heavier attacks on key opponents who are known to directly address issues. Should a commentator become argumentative with any success, the focus will shift to include the commentator as well.
3) Coincidental. They tend to surface suddenly and somewhat coincidentally with a new controversial topic with no clear prior record of participation in general discussions in the particular public arena involved. They likewise tend to vanish once the topic is no longer of general concern. They were likely directed or elected to be there for a reason, and vanish with the reason.
4) Teamwork. They tend to operate in self-congratulatory and complementary packs or teams. Of course, this can happen naturally in any public forum, but there will likely be an ongoing pattern of frequent exchanges of this sort where professionals are involved. Sometimes one of the players will infiltrate the opponent camp to become a source for straw man or other tactics designed to dilute opponent presentation strength.
5) Anti-conspiratorial. They almost always have disdain for ‘conspiracy theorists’ and, usually, for those who in any way believe JFK was not killed by LHO. Ask yourself why, if they hold such disdain for conspiracy theorists, do they focus on defending a single topic discussed in a NG focusing on conspiracies? One might think they would either be trying to make fools of everyone on every topic, or simply ignore the group they hold in such disdain.Or, one might more rightly conclude they have an ulterior motive for their actions in going out of their way to focus as they do.
6) Artificial Emotions. An odd kind of ‘artificial’ emotionalism and an unusually thick skin — an ability to persevere and persist even in the face of overwhelming criticism and unacceptance. This likely stems from intelligence community training that, no matter how condemning the evidence, deny everything, and never become emotionally involved or reactive. The net result for a disinfo artist is that emotions can seem artificial.
Most people, if responding in anger, for instance, will express their animosity throughout their rebuttal. But disinfo types usually have trouble maintaining the ‘image’ and are hot and cold with respect to pretended emotions and their usually more calm or unemotional communications style. It’s just a job, and they often seem unable to ‘act their role in character’ as well in a communications medium as they might be able in a real face-to-face conversation/confrontation. You might have outright rage and indignation one moment, ho-hum the next, and more anger later — an emotional yo-yo.
With respect to being thick-skinned, no amount of criticism will deter them from doing their job, and they will generally continue their old disinfo patterns without any adjustments to criticisms of how obvious it is that they play that game — where a more rational individual who truly cares what others think might seek to improve their communications style, substance, and so forth, or simply give up.
7) Inconsistent. There is also a tendency to make mistakes which betray their true self/motives. This may stem from not really knowing their topic, or it may be somewhat ‘freudian’, so to speak, in that perhaps they really root for the side of truth deep within.
I have noted that often, they will simply cite contradictory information which neutralizes itself and the author. For instance, one such player claimed to be a Navy pilot, but blamed his poor communicating skills (spelling, grammar, incoherent style) on having only a grade-school education. I’m not aware of too many Navy pilots who don’t have a college degree. Another claimed no knowledge of a particular topic/situation but later claimed first-hand knowledge of it.
8) Time Constant. Recently discovered, with respect to News Groups, is the response time factor. There are three ways this can be seen to work, especially when the government or other empowered player is involved in a cover up operation:
a) ANY NG posting by a targeted proponent for truth can result in an IMMEDIATE response. The government and other empowered players can afford to pay people to sit there and watch for an opportunity to do some damage. SINCE DISINFO IN A NG ONLY WORKS IF THE READER SEES IT – FAST RESPONSE IS CALLED FOR, or the visitor may be swayed towards truth.
b) When dealing in more direct ways with a disinformationalist, such as email, DELAY IS CALLED FOR – there will usually be a minimum of a 48-72 hour delay. This allows a sit-down team discussion on response strategy for best effect, and even enough time to ‘get permission’ or instruction from a formal chain of command.
c) In the NG example 1) above, it will often ALSO be seen that bigger guns are drawn and fired after the same 48-72 hours delay – the team approach in play. This is especially true when the targeted truth seeker or their comments are considered more important with respect to potential to reveal truth. Thus, a serious truth sayer will be attacked twice for the same sin.
One way to neutralize a potential activist is to get them to be in a group that does all the wrong things. Why?
1) The message doesn’t get out.
2) A lot of time is wasted
3) The activist is frustrated and discouraged
4) Nothing good is accomplished.
FBI and Police Informers and Infiltrators will infest any group and they have phoney activist organizations established.
Their purpose is to prevent any real movement for justice or eco-peace from developing in this country.
Agents come in small, medium or large. They can be of any ethnic background. They can be male or female.
The actual size of the group or movement being infiltrated is irrelevant. It is the potential the movement has for becoming large which brings on the spies and saboteurs.
This booklet lists tactics agents use to slow things down, foul things up, destroy the movement and keep tabs on activists.
It is the agent’s job to keep the activist from quitting such a group, thus keeping him/her under control.
In some situations, to get control, the agent will tell the activist:
“You’re dividing the movement.”
[Here, I have added the psychological reasons as to WHY this maneuver works to control people]
This invites guilty feelings. Many people can be controlled by guilt. The agents begin relationships with activists behind a well-developed mask of “dedication to the cause.” Because of their often declared dedication, (and actions designed to prove this), when they criticize the activist, he or she – being truly dedicated to the movement – becomes convinced that somehow, any issues are THEIR fault. This is because a truly dedicated person tends to believe that everyone has a conscience and that nobody would dissimulate and lie like that “on purpose.” It’s amazing how far agents can go in manipulating an activist because the activist will constantly make excuses for the agent who regularly declares their dedication to the cause. Even if they do, occasionally, suspect the agent, they will pull the wool over their own eyes by rationalizing: “they did that unconsciously… they didn’t really mean it… I can help them by being forgiving and accepting ” and so on and so forth.
The agent will tell the activist:
“You’re a leader!”
This is designed to enhance the activist’s self-esteem. His or her narcissistic admiration of his/her own activist/altruistic intentions increase as he or she identifies with and consciously admires the altruistic declarations of the agent which are deliberately set up to mirror those of the activist.
This is “malignant pseudoidentification.” It is the process by which the agent consciously imitates or simulates a certain behavior to foster the activist’s identification with him/her, thus increasing the activist’s vulnerability to exploitation. The agent will simulate the more subtle self-concepts of the activist.
Activists and those who have altruistic self-concepts are most vulnerable to malignant pseudoidentification especially during work with the agent when the interaction includes matter relating to their competency, autonomy, or knowledge.
The goal of the agent is to increase the activist’s general empathy for the agent through pseudo-identification with the activist’s self-concepts.
The most common example of this is the agent who will compliment the activist for his competency or knowledge or value to the movement. On a more subtle level, the agent will simulate affects and mannerisms of the activist which promotes identification via mirroring and feelings of “twinship”. It is not unheard of for activists, enamored by the perceived helpfulness and competence of a good agent, to find themselves considering ethical violations and perhaps, even illegal behavior, in the service of their agent/handler.
The activist’s “felt quality of perfection” [self-concept] is enhanced, and a strong empathic bond is developed with the agent through his/her imitation and simulation of the victim’s own narcissistic investments. [self-concepts] That is, if the activist knows, deep inside, their own dedication to the cause, they will project that onto the agent who is “mirroring” them.
The activist will be deluded into thinking that the agent shares this feeling of identification and bonding. In an activist/social movement setting, the adversarial roles that activists naturally play vis a vis the establishment/government, fosters ongoing processes of intrapsychic splitting so that “twinship alliances” between activist and agent may render whole sectors or reality testing unavailable to the activist. They literally “lose touch with reality.”
Activists who deny their own narcissistic investments [do not have a good idea of their own self-concepts and that they ARE concepts] and consciously perceive themselves (accurately, as it were) to be “helpers” endowed with a special amount of altruism are exceedingly vulnerable to the affective (emotional) simulation of the accomplished agent.
Empathy is fostered in the activist through the expression of quite visible affects. The presentation of tearfulness, sadness, longing, fear, remorse, and guilt, may induce in the helper-oriented activist a strong sense of compassion, while unconsciously enhancing the activist’s narcissistic investment in self as the embodiment of goodness.
The agent’s expresssion of such simulated affects may be quite compelling to the observer and difficult to distinguish from deep emotion.
It can usually be identified by two events, however:
First, the activist who has analyzed his/her own narcissistic roots and is aware of his/her own potential for being “emotionally hooked,” will be able to remain cool and unaffected by such emotional outpourings by the agent.
As a result of this unaffected, cool, attitude, the Second event will occur: The agent will recompensate much too quickly following such an affective expression leaving the activist with the impression that “the play has ended, the curtain has fallen,” and the imposture, for the moment, has finished. The agent will then move quickly to another activist/victim.
The fact is, the movement doesn’t need leaders, it needs MOVERS. “Follow the leader” is a waste of time.
A good agent will want to meet as often as possible. He or she will talk a lot and say little. One can expect an onslaught of long, unresolved discussions.
Some agents take on a pushy, arrogant, or defensive manner:
1) To disrupt the agenda
2) To side-track the discussion
3) To interrupt repeatedly
4) To feign ignorance
5) To make an unfounded accusation against a person.
Calling someone a racist, for example. This tactic is used to discredit a person in the eyes of all other group members.
Some saboteurs pretend to be activists. She or he will ….
1) Write encyclopedic flyers (in the present day, websites)
2) Print flyers in English only.
3) Have demonstrations in places where no one cares.
4) Solicit funding from rich people instead of grass roots support
5) Display banners with too many words that are confusing.
6) Confuse issues.
7) Make the wrong demands.
Cool Compromise the goal.
9) Have endless discussions that waste everyone’s time. The agent may accompany the endless discussions with drinking, pot smoking or other amusement to slow down the activist’s work.
Such tactics include slander, defamation, threats, getting close to disaffected or minimally committed fellow activists to persuade them (via psychological tactics described above) to turn against the movement and give false testimony against their former compatriots. They will plant illegal substances on the activist and set up an arrest; they will plant false information and set up “exposure,” they will send incriminating letters [emails] in the name of the activist; and more; they will do whatever society will allow.
This booklet in no way covers all the ways agents use to sabotage the lives of sincere an dedicated activists.
If an agent is “exposed,” he or she will be transferred or replaced.
COINTELPRO is still in operation today under a different code name. It is no longer placed on paper where it can be discovered through the freedom of information act.
The FBI counterintelligence program’s stated purpose: To expose, disrupt, misdirect, discredit, and otherwise neutralize individuals who the FBI categorize as opposed to the National Interests. “National Security” means the FBI’s security from the people ever finding out the vicious things it does in violation of people’s civil liberties.
Strong, credible allegations of high-level criminal activity can bring down a government. When the government lacks an effective, fact-based defense, other techniques must be employed. The success of these techniques depends heavily upon a cooperative, compliant press and a mere token opposition party.
1. Dummy up. If it’s not reported, if it’s not news, it didn’t happen.
2. Wax indignant. This is also known as the “How dare you?” gambit.
3. Characterize the charges as “rumors” or, better yet, “wild rumors.” If, in spite of the news blackout, the public is still able to learn about the suspicious facts, it can only be through “rumors.” (If they tend to believe the “rumors” it must be because they are simply “paranoid” or “hysterical.”)
4. Knock down straw men. Deal only with the weakest aspects of the weakest charges. Even better, create your own straw men. Make up wild rumors (or plant false stories) and give them lead play when you appear to debunk all the charges, real and fanciful alike.
5. Call the skeptics names like “conspiracy theorist,” “nutcase,” “ranter,” “kook,” “crackpot,” and, of course, “rumor monger.” Be sure, too, to use heavily loaded verbs and adjectives when characterizing their charges and defending the “more reasonable” government and its defenders. You must then carefully avoid fair and open debate with any of the people you have thus maligned. For insurance, set up your own “skeptics” to shoot down.
6. Impugn motives. Attempt to marginalize the critics by suggesting strongly that they are not really interested in the truth but are simply pursuing a partisan political agenda or are out to make money (compared to over-compensated adherents to the government line who, presumably, are not).
7. Invoke authority. Here the controlled press and the sham opposition can be very useful.
8. Dismiss the charges as “old news.”
9. Come half-clean. This is also known as “confession and avoidance” or “taking the limited hangout route.” This way, you create the impression of candor and honesty while you admit only to relatively harmless, less-than-criminal “mistakes.” This stratagem often requires the embrace of a fall-back position quite different from the one originally taken. With effective damage control, the fall-back position need only be peddled by stooge skeptics to carefully limited markets.
10. Characterize the crimes as impossibly complex and the truth as ultimately unknowable.
11. Reason backward, using the deductive method with a vengeance. With thoroughly rigorous deduction, troublesome evidence is irrelevant. E.g. We have a completely free press. If evidence exists that the Vince Foster “suicide” note was forged, they would have reported it. They haven’t reported it so there is no such evidence. Another variation on this theme involves the likelihood of a conspiracy leaker and a press who would report the leak.
12. Require the skeptics to solve the crime completely. E.g. If Foster was murdered, who did it and why?
13. Change the subject. This technique includes creating and/or publicizing distractions.
14. Lightly report incriminating facts, and then make nothing of them. This is sometimes referred to as “bump and run” reporting.
15. Baldly and brazenly lie. A favorite way of doing this is to attribute the “facts” furnished the public to a plausible-sounding, but anonymous, source.
16. Expanding further on numbers 4 and 5, have your own stooges “expose” scandals and champion popular causes. Their job is to pre-empt real opponents and to play 99-yard football. A variation is to pay rich people for the job who will pretend to spend their own money.
17. Flood the Internet with agents. This is the answer to the question, “What could possibly motivate a person to spend hour upon hour on Internet news groups defending the government and/or the press and harassing genuine critics?” Don t the authorities have defenders enough in all the newspapers, magazines, radio, and television? One would think refusing to print critical letters and screening out serious callers or dumping them from radio talk shows would be control enough, but, obviously, it is not.
The US military is developing software that will let it secretly manipulate social media sites by using fake online personas to influence internet conversations and spread pro-American propaganda.
A Californian corporation has been awarded a contract with United States Central Command (Centcom), which oversees US armed operations in the Middle East and Central Asia, to develop what is described as an “online persona management service” that will allow one US serviceman or woman to control up to 10 separate identities based all over the world.
The project has been likened by web experts to China’s attempts to control and restrict free speech on the internet. Critics are likely to complain that it will allow the US military to create a false consensus in online conversations, crowd out unwelcome opinions and smother commentaries or reports that do not correspond with its own objectives.
The discovery that the US military is developing false online personalities – known to users of social media as “sock puppets” – could also encourage other governments, private companies and non-government organisations to do the same.
The Centcom contract stipulates that each fake online persona must have a convincing background, history and supporting details, and that up to 50 US-based controllers should be able to operate false identities from their workstations “without fear of being discovered by sophisticated adversaries”.
Ntrepid Timestream product allows for “Across the board” propaganda rollout- cohesion of information to multiple affiliated media sources. (Note video highlights pro-Kiev (Ukraine) information agenda.
This “best of” compilation of huge crowd videos clearly shows that the people of the breakaway regions chose their own path away from the Kiev regime that came to power in the February 2014 US and EU backed illegal coup.
Link to 2014 thread that shows the long lines during the 2014 referendum
Incredibly long lines during the 2014 referendum in Lugansk……
The following link leads to a post where I personally placed 9 videos of the 2014 referendum lines proving that voter turnout was massive. The link now shows that You Tube has removed all 9 videos from 9 separate accounts.
Ah, the great unspoken. No branch of the US mainstream media wants to go there. Its two degrees of Kevin Bacon and surreal as hell. Its a multi-billionaire Geneva based Jewish Ukrainian oligarch Igor Kolomoisky who finances the volunteer far right national guard Right Sector Aidar battalions in Ukraine that are implicated in having killed over 10,000 ethnic Russian civilians over two and a half years of civilian slaughter.
Its that same oligarch being the head of the European Council of Jewish Communities and employing the coke sniffing, Ashley Madison website surfing son of the Vice President of the United States, one Hunter Biden, at an offshore Cyprus based company called Burisma Holdings while at the very same time $1.8 billion in missing IMF funds have been funneled to that same oligarchs offshore based Cyprus accounts. This information is all verifiable via reputable mainstream media outlets as shown below.
Its reads like a bad, really bad Tom Clancy novel doesn’t it? If the missing $1.8 billion has anything to do with Hunter Biden is still up in the air, but everything else is, unfortunately, verifiably accurate and comes from long term professional media outlets.
Link to large thread proving the victims of the Ukraine civil war are all ethnic Russians killed by Ukrianian fascist battalions:
Dnipro-1’s headquarters are on the ground floor of the Dnipropetrovsk administration building. Upstairs sits the regional governor, Igor Kolomoisky. The arrangement is no accident: Kolomoisky, one of Ukraine’s most controversial billionaires, funds the paramilitary, which returns the favour in these troubled times by boosting the banking and industrial tycoon’s personal security and political clout.
All the signs are of a flourishing military enterprise. Young men with Kalashnikovs and pistols and several well dressed women working on laptops fill the anteroom to Bereza’s office.
Dnipro-1 has 700 men — “officially,” Bereza says with an enigmatic smile.
“Unofficially, it’s 7,000.”
– DARK SIDE –
Questions over the far right leanings of some volunteer groups and allegations of involvement in the murder of civilians cast a long shadow. One of the most controversial is the Azov Battalion, which uses the Wolfsangel insignia — an ancient design that was resurrected in Hitler’s Germany. The Azov has been linked to Oleg Lyashko, a politician accused of neo-Nazi sympathies.
Right Sector, an ultra-nationalist party, also has its own battalion of several hundred men on the frontlines, even if the government refuses to register or pay them. Dasha Slutskovska, a 29-year-old volunteer from the battalion in Dnipropetrovsk, conceded that Right Sector has an image problem — they are relentlessly portrayed in Russia’s state-controlled media as fascists.
Naked Capitalism provides the low down on Kolomoisky’s offshore gas company Burisma Holdings which hired the US Vice Presidents son Hunter Biden……..
R. Hunter Biden Should Declare Who Really Owns His New Ukrainian Employer, Burisma Holdings
Posted on May 21, 2014 by Richard Smith
Excerpt:
Here’s last week’s big announcement, adorned by a photograph of an American with a faintly alarming rictus; oh yes, oh dear me, yes: Hunter Biden joins the team of Burisma Holdings: Burisma Holdings, Ukraine’s largest private gas producer, has expanded its Board of Directors by bringing on Mr. R Hunter Biden as a new director.
R. Hunter Biden will be in charge of the Holdings’ legal unit and will provide support for the Company among international organizations. On his new appointment, he commented: “Burisma’s track record of innovations and industry leadership in the field of natural gas means that it can be a strong driver of a strong economy in Ukraine. As a new member of the Board, I believe that my assistance in consulting the Company on matters of transparency, corporate governance and responsibility, international expansion and other priorities will contribute to the economy and benefit the people of Ukraine.”
Additional excerpt on Kolomoiskys nefarious past.
Bogolyubov and Kolomoisky fostered strong reputations as corporate raiders in the mid-2000s, becoming notorious for a series of hostile takeovers. Hostile takeovers Ukrainian style, that is, which often included the active involvement of Privat’s quasi-military teams. These schemes included, among others, a literal raid on the Kremenchuk steel plant in 2006, in which hundreds of hired rowdies armed with baseball bats, iron bars, gas and rubber bullet pistols and chainsaws forcibly took over the plant. More recently, Aerosvit Airlines, which according to the media was controlled by Mr. Kolomoisky, declared bankruptcy in 2012, stranding thousands of Ukrainians in Ukraine and abroad. The Financial Times, when reporting on Kolomoisky’s recent conflict with UK company JKX Oil & Gas, stated in no uncertain terms, that “in Ukraine they [Kolomoisky and Bogolyubov] are called ‘The Raiders’”. Privat Group has been involved in several court cases and arbitration proceedings in the US, UK, and Sweden. In 2009, a US court made clear its distrust of Privat representatives: “the Court has become increasingly skeptical of these gentleman [at Privat] and the credibility of their statements.”
Back to R. Hunter Biden:
As a new member of the Board, I believe that my assistance in consulting the Company on matters of transparency, corporate governance and responsibility, international expansion and other priorities will contribute to the economy and benefit the people of Ukraine.”
HEART OF EMPIRE — August 13, 2015, 11:32 am Undelivered Goods How $1.8 billion in aid to Ukraine was funneled to the outposts of the international finance galaxy
Kolomoisky had built his multibillion dollar financial base partly thanks to his mastery of “raiding,” the local version of mergers and acquisitions, involving methods that would make even the most hardened Wall Street financier turn pale. According to Matthew Rojansky, director of the Kennan Institute at the Woodrow Wilson Center for International Scholars, who has made a special study of the practice, “there are actual firms in Ukraine . . . registered with offices and business cards, firms [that specialize in] various dimensions of the corporate raiding process, which includes armed guys to do stuff, forging documents, bribing notaries, bribing judges.” In April 2014, as the separatists advanced, Kolomoisky mobilized his workforce into a 20,000-man private army in two battalions, Dnipro-1 and Dnipro-2, and stemmed the tide. According to Wilson Center director Rojansky, Kolomosiky is “perceived as the bulwark and the reason why the whole Novorossiya project [Putin’s plan to absorb most of eastern Ukraine] broke down at the border of the Donbass.”
As the largest bank, Kolomoisky’s PrivatBank stood to garner the largest share of the international aid. Published estimates put this share as high as 40 percent. Despite the torrent of cash, the banks’ situation did not improve; nine months into the program, the IMF announced: “As of end January 2015 . . . the banking system’s capital adequacy ratio stood at 13.8 percent, down from 15.9 percent at end-June.” Where had the money gone?
Nash Groshi (Our Money) – Investigative branch that pursued the missing IMF billions.
In this case however, thanks to investigative work by the Ukrainian anticorruption watchdog group Nashi Groshi (“Our Money”), we can actually watch the process by which the gigantic sum of $1.8 billion was smoothly maneuvered offshore, in the first instance to PrivatBank accounts in Cyprus, and thence into accounts in Belize, the British Virgin Islands, and other outposts of the international financial galaxy. The scheme, as revealed in a series of court judgments of the Economic Court of the Dnipropetrovsk region monitored and reported by Nashi Groshi, worked like this: Forty-two Ukrainian firms owned by fifty-four offshore entities registered in Caribbean, American, and Cypriot jurisdictions and linked to or affiliated with the Privat group of companies, took out loans from PrivatBank in Ukraine to the value of $1.8 billion. The firms then ordered goods from six foreign “supplier” companies, three of which were incorporated in the United Kingdom, two in the British Virgin Islands, one in the Caribbean statelet of St. Kitts & Nevis. Payment for the orders—$1.8 billion—was shortly afterwards prepaid into the vendors’ accounts, which were, coincidentally, in the Cyprus branch of PrivatBank. Once the money was sent, the Ukrainian importing companies arranged with PrivatBank Ukraine that their loans be guaranteed by the goods on order.
But the foreign suppliers invariably reported that they could not fulfill the order after all, thus breaking the contracts, but without any effort to return the money. Finally, the Ukrainian companies filed suit, always in the Dnipropetrovsk Economic Court, demanding that that foreign supplier return the prepayment and also that the guarantee to PrivatBank be cancelled. In forty-two out of forty-two such cases the court issued the identical judgment: the advance payment should be returned to the Ukrainian company, but the loan agreement should remain in force.
As a result, the loan of the Ukrainian company remained guaranteed by the undelivered goods, while the chances of returning the advance payments from foreign companies remain remote. “Basically this transaction of $1.8 bill[ion] abroad with the help of fake contracts was simply an asset siphoning [operation] and a violation of currency legislation in general,” explained Lesya Ivanovna, an investigator with Nashi Groshi in an email to me. “The whole lawsuit story was only needed to make it look like the bank itself is not involved in the scheme . . . officially it looks like PrivatBank now owns the products, though in reality [they] will never be delivered.
More on Ukraine’s oligarchs and IMF fund distribution from Naked Capitalism here:
To top it all off, Wikipedia has more on Igor Kolomoisky being the President of the United Jewish Community of Ukraine. In 2010 he was appointed as the President of the European Council of Jewish Communities.
Kolomoyski is a prominent supporter of Ukraine’s Jewish community[47] and the president of the United Jewish Community of Ukraine.[48] In 2010 he was appointed as the president of the European Council of Jewish Communities[49] after promising the outgoing president he would donate $14 million,[50] with his appointment being described as a “putsch”[48][49] and a “Soviet-style takeover”[51] by other EJCJ board members. After several ECJC board members resigned in protest, Kolomyski quit the ECJC and, together with fellow Ukrainian oligarch Vadim Rabinovich, founded the European Jewish Union.[50]
Later career
After leaving the Governor of Dnipropetrovsk Oblast post, Kolomoyskyi obtained a U.S. Visa. He moved to mainly reside in Switzerland, also spending time in the United States.[52]
So there you have it, that which the US media won’t go near with a ten foot barge pole. Now keep your hats on as this it taken to the next level with additional info on the shootdown of Malaysia Airlines flight MH-17 and the deaths of 293 innocent people.
The Russian government believes that Igor Kolomoisky is the oligarch behind the shootdown of MH-17. They have conducted a massive “White Paper” investigation on the MH-17 false flag and it all points towards a rogue Ukrainian unit in the service of Igor Kolomoisky. Robert Parry at Consortium News has pointed out this possibility for the past two and a half years.
Meanwhile, after CIA analysts had time to evaluate U.S. satellite, electronic and other intelligence data, the U.S. government went curiously silent about what it had discovered, including the possible identity of the people who were responsible. The U.S. reticence, after the initial rush to judgment blaming Russia, suggested that the more detailed findings undercut those original claims.
Graphic slide: A side-by-side comparison of the Russian presidential jetliner and the Malaysia Airlines plane.
A source who was briefed by U.S. intelligence analysts told me that the CIA’s conclusion pointed toward a rogue Ukrainian operation involving a hard-line oligarch with the possible motive of shooting down Russian President Vladimir Putin’s official plane returning from South America that day, with similar markings as MH-17. But I have been unable to determine if that assessment represented a dissident or consensus view inside the U.S. intelligence community.
What I’ve been told by one source, who has provided accurate information on similar matters in the past, is that U.S. intelligence agencies do have detailed satellite images of the likely missile battery that launched the fateful missile, but the battery appears to have been under the control of Ukrainian government troops dressed in what look like Ukrainian uniforms.
The source said CIA analysts were still not ruling out the possibility that the troops were actually eastern Ukrainian rebels in similar uniforms but the initial assessment was that the troops were Ukrainian soldiers. There also was the suggestion that the soldiers involved were undisciplined and possibly drunk, since the imagery showed what looked like beer bottles scattered around the site, the source said.
Instead of pressing for these kinds of details, the U.S. mainstream press has simply passed on the propaganda coming from the Ukrainian government and the U.S. State Department, including hyping the fact that the Buk system is “Russian-made,” a rather meaningless fact that gets endlessly repeated.
The Russian government has analyzed the released Ukrainian SBU recordings that framed the rebels for shooting down MH-17. According to the Russian government the recordings are fake and were recorded in a studio which proves the SBU had prior knowledge of the event to come and were the intentional murderers of 293 innocent civilians in order to frame Russia and draw international sympathy that would lead to the implementation of sanctions against Russia.
Link to Russian analysis recording of Ukrainian SBU fake recording:
Note: Shortly after the crash of Malaysian Flight MH17, the Ukrainian Security Service (SBU) released a video on YouTube, claiming it had intercepted calls between eastern rebels discussing how the plane was shot down. SBU said this proved that the rebels were behind the downing of the plane.However, a technical analysis by Russian sound experts of the sound in the video proves the recording is manufactured and includes drops outs, noticeable splicing (digital editing) and switching from mono to stereo. The analysis is made in Adobe Audition and shows multiple flaws such as merges, background noise coming and going, the endings of the words being cut off and many other things. A professional studio engineer can easily verify that particularly, the third conversation switches from a mono digital track to a stereo digital track in mid-conversation. That is an anomaly that would be impossible for it to have been a normal unbroken cell phone conversation. It would have had to have been either continually in mono or continually in stereo. The swicthing proves without a doubt that the recording was spliced together in a studio environment. The studio manipulation of the SBU released audio can be verified in any studio by simply extracting the original audio from the video uploaded by the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) on their YouTube channel:
Link to official original SBU released recording:
Geopolitical analyst and Finnish researcher Petri Krohn at “A Closer Look on Syria” website has extensively covered Kolomoisky, MH-17 and the British information outfit Bellingcat.
Finnish researcher Krohn revealed the leaked Russian captured Facebook screenshots of Igor Kolomoiskys assistant discussing the making of the fake SBU recordings and the shootdown of MH-17.
Below are the translations of the Facebook conversation screen shots between Kolomoiskys political protege and his assistants plus additional intercepted phone conversations. Items translated below are also verifiable from the screenshots above. They are openly discussing the faking of the studio recordings (materials) for the false flag/shootdown of MH-17.
May 1
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
01.05.2014 10:26
Svyatoslav Oliynyk Yura, come to me today
Yury Bereza
01.05.2014 10:43
Yury Bereza I can either after 8 pm tonight or tomorrow morning.
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
01.05.2014 10:50
Svyatoslav Oliynyk Well, let it be tomorrow. Call me
May 10
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
10.05.2014 10:02
Svyatoslav Oliynyk Take the so called propositions we were talking about last time, and try to be at my place tonight
Yury Bereza
10.05.2014 10:09
Yury Bereza No problem. I’ll call you in an hour!
May 25
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
25.05.2014 19:43
Svyatoslav Oliynyk Tomorrow morning boss and I are waiting for you, are you aware?
Yury Bereza
25.05.2014 19:45
Yury Bereza Yes. I’ll be at 10
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
25.05.2014 19:45
Svyatoslav Oliynyk Ok, then by tomorrow.
June 7
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
07.06.2014 21:07
Svyatoslav Oliynyk Yura, we have arranged for today!
Yury Bereza
07.06.2014 21:10
Yury Bereza There were urgent matters…
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
07.06.2014 21:11
Svyatoslav Oliynyk So? When will you come?
Yury Bereza
07.06.2014 21:11
Yury Bereza Likely tomorrow in the afternoon. Will you be at place?
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
07.06.2014 21:12
Svyatoslav Oliynyk Yes, we will. Come.
June 16
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
16.06.2014 11:13
Svyatoslav Oliynyk You haven’t sent me materials. Forgot or what?
Yury Bereza
16.06.2014 11:19
Yury Bereza No, there’s something to add. Tonight I’ll receive some more shots, and then send the whole to you.
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
16.06.2014 11:20
Svyatoslav Oliynyk Ok, waiting.
June 28
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
28.06.2014 20:35
Svyatoslav Oliynyk Call me, I cannot reach you, you’re out of signal. Is everything arranged? By the way, what’s with the injured? Are you placed?
Yury Bereza
28.06.2014 20:39
Yury Bereza The injured are placed, everything OK. The chief doctor just needed some brainwashing) we made a little political conference, so to say, used sanctions))
Yury Bereza
28.06.2014 20:40
Yury Bereza I can’t do everything today – the guys need to be sent. Tomorrow morning, deal?
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
28.06.2014 20:40
Svyatoslav Oliynyk Yes, OK. I haven’t heard of the chief doctor yet!
Yury Bereza
28.06.2014 20:41
Yury Bereza Now it’s normal.
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
28.06.2014 20:41
Svyatoslav Oliynyk I have no doubt.
July 7
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
07.07.2014 09:56
Svyatoslav Oliynyk I need you tonight! We should present the final version of the materials. Take the expert and come after 18:00.
Yury Bereza
07.07.2014 10:07
Yury Bereza I remember! We’ll come
July 17
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
17.07.2014 21:21
Svyatoslav Oliynyk What’s with the archive? The password isn’t right. In brief – what’s there? What’s finally?
Yury Bereza
17.07.2014 21:22
Yury Bereza The password is normal! Check the layout and Caps.
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
17.07.2014 21:22
Svyatoslav Oliynyk Forget it. What’s there? And how?
Yury Bereza
17.07.2014 21:23
Yury Bereza land – direct – air
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
17.07.2014 21:24
Svyatoslav Oliynyk What the fucking air???
Yury Bereza
17.07.2014 21:26
Yury Bereza They reported that he couldn’t hold there for long, as if it was high. Made one direct. Failed. Had to make air.
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
17.07.2014 21:27
Svyatoslav Oliynyk Why have they risen Kharkiv ones first?
Yury Bereza
17.07.2014 21:30
Yury Bereza They said that the command came from Kiev firstly to the Kharkiv desk, and as it began to turn, then the others were connected.
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
17.07.2014 21:32
Svyatoslav Oliynyk clear, tell me later in detail. Are you without layover?
Юрій Береза
17.07.2014 21:34
Юрій Береза Yes, I’ll be soon at place. Just finished with journalists.
Texting Oliynyk – Geletey materials:
July 12
Valeriy Geletey
12.07.2014 23:01
Valeriy Geletey It’s my profile. Don’t ask per phone or Skype! And here – everything only in notional phrases. Got it?
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
12.07.2014 23:03
Svyatoslav Oliynyk OK. Although I don’t really share your troubles about phone. We’ve got everything arranged.
Valeriy Geletey
12.07.2014 23:06
Valeriy Geletey On traffic controllers it’s all decided with your boss. He said control is on you. I’ll send my person to you tomorrow and you’ll have to report me through him of the condition of all planned stages of preparation you are responsible for!
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
12.07.2014 23:07
Svyatoslav Oliynyk Valeriy Victorovich, what the person for? Or you have decided that I’ll flee and leave my family in God knows whose hands?
Valeriy Geletey
12.07.2014 23:09
Valeriy Geletey You have a short memory. Have you forgotten how you received instructions? The same person to guarantee security and confidentiality of your reports will come tomorrow.
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
12.07.2014 23:09
Svyatoslav Oliynyk Ok, waiting!
July 14
Valeriy Geletey
14.07.2014 20:43
Valeriy Geletey Remind of your boss’s promise: I haven’t received the shooting scripts! Tomorrow morning, passing the report, send me the scripts and video you made.
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
14.07.2014 20:47
Svyatoslav Oliynyk Valery Victorovich, boss gave the task to the channel director a week ago! This jerk is past lost to shame – he held back on terms! Today though they finished all. Sketched more than 10 scripts, for different versions of course of events, for the first two days. Now they are working under the next three days. I’ll send you tomorrow.
Валерий Гелетей
14.07.2014 20:48
Валерий Гелетей And don’t forget video – Petr Alexeyevich asked me of it.
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
14.07.2014 20:48
Svyatoslav Oliynyk Understood. Everything will be done. TTUL.
July 16
Valeriy Geletey
16.07.2014 08:46
Valeriy Geletey The connection later only via our channel. The person will be with you until I need this. And ask your boss why I can’t reach him as usual, and then he calls me and begins to tell everything in plain language?
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
16.07.2014 08:48
Svyatoslav Oliynyk Ok! No problem.
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
16.07.2014 08:49
Svyatoslav Oliynyk I’ll tell the boss, but his telephone has an encryptor, it can’t be monitored and decoded. He’ll call anyway!
Valeriy Geletey
16.07.2014 08:51
Valeriy Geletey Yes, but his phone has an encryptor, and mine (to which he is constantly calling) hasn’t. So remind him of my request about safe channel. At least till the end of operation.
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
16.07.2014 08:51
Svyatoslav Oliynyk Yes, certainly. I’ll tell him tonight.
Texting Oliynyk – Gritsenko materials:
October 25, 2012
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
25.10.2012 13:19
Svyatoslav Oliynyk Anatoliy Stepanovich, Happy Birthday! Wish strong health, political success and inspiration at work!
28 октября 2012 г.
Anatoliy Critsenko
28.10.2012 20:03
Anatoliy Gritsenko Thank you very much for kind words! I’m very pleased!
October 25, 2013 г.
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
25.10.2013 18:59
Svyatoslav Oliynyk Happy Birthday, Anatoliy Stepanovich! Want to wish you happiness and health! Let success always accompanies you in your business! Best regards to you!
October 26, 2013 г.
Anatoliy Gritsenko
26.10.2013 12:17
Anatoliy Gritsenko Slava, thank you for warm congrats! Health and strong nerves are on the first place, all the other we can get with our own hands, heads and labor!..
Anatoliy Gritsenko
26.10.2013 12:18
Anatoliy Gritsenko How are you? Haven’t you changed the place of residence? I thought you wanted to move with your family to the capital?
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
26.10.2013 12:47
Svyatoslav Oliynyk Anatoliy Stepanovich, I’m all right! No, I haven’t. My political career in Dnipropetrovsk is stable, and whilst Arseniy Petrovich’s proposition is interesting but now I’m not ready to leave everything for in fact making a fresh start
Anatoliy Gristenko
26.10.2013 13:08
Anatoliy Gritsenko It’s certainly up to you! It’s good that it’s all right. Tell my regards to boss.
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
26.10.2013 13:10
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
Спасибі! Неодмінно передам! Thank you! Sure I’ll tell him!
January 1
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
01.01.2014 22:29
Svyatoslav Oliynyk Ring out the old, ring in the new, Ring, happy bells, across the snow: The year is going, let him go; Ring out the false, ring in the true. Happy New Year!
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
01.01.2014 22:32
Svyatoslav Oliynyk Happy New Year, Anatoliy Stepanovich! Wish you, wish all the country, wish all us that in the new year that swine in crown were thrown off his throne by the will of all the people! Wish to obtain the new, strong and beautiful country in the new year! Happy New Year once more! Glory to Ukraine!
January 3
Anatoliy Gritsenko
03.01.2014 19:20
Anatoliy Gritsenko Happy New Year, Slava! All the best in the coming year for you too!
Anatoliy Gritsenko
03.01.2014 19:21
Anatoliy Gritsenko I join to you wishes, I wish all the country to make them come true as soon as possible! Glory to the heroes!!!
July 19
Anatoliy Gritsenko
19.07.2014 09:15
Anatoliy Gritsenko Slava! What the hell?! What have you bitches done? How could you upload that video the day before the operation???!!! Do you understand that the «Russists» have already given it for the expert review and requested Youtube for the date of its very first upload???
Anatoliy Gritsenko
19.07.2014 09:17
Anatoliy Gritsenko And those idiots who were at the desk in Kharkiv? HAVE YOUR MEMORY FAILED?! I don’t get how they are caught by our guys on the board with Crimea, while that were your people who had to detain them??? As I can see you and your boss are completely fucking brazen in your Dniprojewivsk!!! Pedro will tear you into pieces!!!! I WILL TEAR YOU BY MYSELF!!! AND TAKE THE PHONE WHEN I CALL!!!
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
19.07.2014 09:25
Svyatoslav Oliynyk Anatoliy Stepanovich, I’ll redial you now! I went out and left the phone in the cabinet, on the internet from the tablet. I’ll call you immediately, one minute.
July 23
Anatoliy Gritsenko
23.07.2014 17:38
Anatoliy Gritsenko If the boss is now around – give him the phone! I know that you are having a meeting at the moment – so just hand the phone to him! QUICKLY! I’ll call you now.
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
23.07.2014 17:40
Svyatoslav Oliynyk come on
Russia has seized all property belonging to Igor Kolomoisky in Crimea and has an in-absentia arrest warrant out for him
Above: The Right Sector that Kolomoisky funds reveals their plans for all of Europe.
Below is what the oligarchs Right Sector do to civilians…..
The Nation Magazine – U. S. Congress Has Removed a Ban on Funding Ukraine’s Neo-Nazis From Its Year End Spending BillPublished on Jan 21, 2016
A report has found that America’s $1.8 trillion dollar budget plan allows for the government to allot foreign military aid to government offshoot groups, including Neo-Nazis and fascists groups, which was blocked until summer last year. Lindsay France is joined by writer for The Nation, James Carden, who tracked the bill from Congress and how the situation evolved.
Under pressure from the Pentagon, Congress has stripped the spending bill of an amendment that prevents funds from falling into the hands of Ukrainian neo-fascist groups. In mid-December 2015, Congress passed a 2,000-plus-page omnibus spending bill for fiscal year 2016. Both parties were quick to declare victory after the passage of the $1.8 trillion package. White House spokesman Josh Earnest told reporters “we feel good about the outcome, primarily because we got a compromise budget agreement that fought off a wide variety of ideological riders.” The office of House Speaker Paul J. Ryan touted the bill’s “64 billion for overseas contingency operations” for, among other things, assisting ”European countries facing Russian aggression.”
Read more at http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=af0_1453523089#yaJAzAPMGvgBC2uL.99
The following 2015 article from RedPillTimes reveals that western diplomats may be considering fingering Kolomoisky as the official MH-17 culprit as a back up plan should the entire ruse fall apart.
Conclusion/caveat: There is still no investigation by the IMF into the stolen $1.8 billion reported in the Harpers article above after all this time. Technically, all the information above is speculative evidence as currently no mainstream media outlet nor government organization has taken it upon themselves to fully investigate all these obvious connections between Igor Kolomoisky and other nefarious individuals, quite possibly because of what that would reveal as these connections are very deep and lead to other prominent global figures, however, the information above is verifiable via numerous media outlets and the connections are plain to see. This information is all easily attainable on the internet. The questions to be asked are “why is there no IMF investigation of Kolomoisky and the IMF missing billions?” “Is Hunter Biden directly involved with Kolomoisky’s offshore accounts?” “Did a rogue unit under the command of Igor Kolomoisky shoot down Malaysian Airlines flight MH-17 as a false flag to blame Russia?” “Why is a Jewish Ukrainian oligarch financing Nazis that have killed thousands of innocent ethnic Russian Ukrainian civilians in east Ukraine?”
In the two days since the Soros Open Society Foundation hack by the DCLeaks collective, several notable revelations have emerged among the data dump of over 2,500 documents exposing the internal strategy of the organization, which expose some of Soros’ tactics to influence and benefit from Europe’s refugee crisis, the opportunistic funding and influence of media organizations, providing cash for assorted “pro-democracy” groups including the infamous La Raza, Soros’ funding of various “social justice” organizations while paying to track unfavorable media coverage including that of Pamela Geller.
One particular leaked memo, profiled earlier by the Daily Caller, argues that Europe’s refugee crisis should be accepted as a “new normal,” and that the refugee crisis means “new opportunities” for Soros’ organization to influence immigration policies on a global scale. OSF program officer Anna Crowley and program specialist Katin Rosin co-authored the May 12 memo, titled “Migration Governance and Enforcement Portfolio Review.”
The nine-page review makes three key points: OSF has been successful at influencing global immigration policy; Europe’s refugee crisis presents “new opportunities” for the organization to influence global immigration policy; and the refugee crisis is the “new normal.”
As the authors write in the introduction, one of the purposes of the review “consider the effectiveness of the approaches we have used to achieve change at the international level.” A section of the review titled “Our Work” describes how America’s least transparent think tank has worked with “leaders in the field” to “shape migration policymaking and influence regional and global processes affecting the way migration is governed and enforced.”
Update: December 2018 – Above link is no longer accessible after US intelligence agencies blamed the DCLeaks on Russia. US servers are making it inaccessible.
Here is a working Wayback Machine link to the DCLeaks- Soros Foundation emails:
One of the key emails on Ukraine that shows Soros collusion with specific on board media outlets including the Guardian and the Huffington Post. These are from the official DCLeaks Soros files on Ukraine. This is just one of the 370 emails on Ukraine. Keep in mind that Soros invested over $1 billion into the country along with investment group Franklin Templeton who were invested for $8 billion also right before the coup. These blood money investments pay huge once the IMF starts to allocate funds for the targeted country and pumps 1 of every 4 dollars into Privat Bank owned by Ukrainian oligarch Igor Kolomoisky who finances and controls the Right Sector Nazis that overthrew the government. Then the peoples state assets were confiscated and sold off to pay off the IMF and the oligarchs that brought the coup in the first place. Its all a nice little blood money scam with ole Georgie Boy, Franklin Templeton, the Blackstone Group and their Geneva friends like Christine Lagarde of the IMF supplying the front while EU stooges fronting NATO like Anders Fogh Rasmussen and Carl Bildt provide the protection while robbing the tax payers of their hard earned money to fund it all and transition the money through the whole target country laundry cycle and into their own bank accounts.
Title of Portfolio: The Ukraine debate in Western Europe, $750,000
The emergence of a New Ukraine carries with it the opportunity to reinvigorate the European project and reaffirm its ideals of union, solidarity, democracy, and peace. A strong, successful Ukraine protects against a democratic backslide in the east of the continent. However, this is complicated by the reluctance of some EU actors to accept the Maidan revolution as democratic and the Ukrainian government as legitimate. These actors have their own agendas -related to geopolitical and economic considerations with Russia – and will therefore be difficult to influence.
But for other groups and individuals, on the political left and across various social movements, one can detect confusion regarding the state of affairs in Ukraine. This has been fueled by a combination of ignorance about the facts on the ground, Russian propaganda, incoherent information by the Ukrainian government, and anti-American sentiment. This second group of actors includes key opinion-makers, some traditional mainstream players (such as trade unions and some political parties), emerging groups that are re-shaping Europe’s political map (in particular in southern Europe with M5S in Italy, Podemos in Spain, Syriza in Greece), and a wide range of liberal NGOs in western Europe.
Objectives:
· To stimulate debate and doubt in those democratic left movements, parties and audiences of Western Europe where a negative perception of the transformation of Ukraine is hegemonic, or very preponderant.
· To discredit the idea that the independence and integrity of Ukraine is an ideological cause of the Right.
· To influence the way information about Ukraine is heard and perceived in Southern Europe, especially among the group of doubters (see above). Specifically, we would like to facilitate the exchange of information with a skeptical or cautious European audience to show the degree of debate within Ukraine about its current reforms and that there are different visions for the future of Ukraine.
Expected impacts: (expected impacts in the field of the 2015 activities)
1. Media impact: Greater presence of voices from Ukraine’s civil society in left leaning and alternative press. More direct reporting by Ukrainian journalists on the ground facilitated by translating articles and also from OSF journalist-fellows inside Ukraine.
2. Left-wing “pro-Maidan” opinion formers’ voices amplified in the debate on Ukraine, e.g. organize a conference on the New Ukraine in partnership with the political science/international affairs department in the leading universities in each of Germany, France, Spain, Italy and Greece. These conferences to include a variety of voices from the new Ukraine.
3. Stronger grassroots-to-grassroots and CSO-to-CSO networks fostered between European and Ukraine civil society through activist exchange workshops; greater understanding of the complexities of Ukraine’s current political transition by EU actors and more nuanced appreciation of European perspectives by their counterparts in Ukraine.
4. Russia’s line on Ukraine will be subjected to a greater degree of scrutiny and skepticism by the left-wing actors involved in this project, relating to the European anti-fascist movement will be a key entry point in this debate.
Underwrite 2 conferences.
Tentative budget: $150K
Media: Build on existing relationships, for example with the Guardian to increase coverage of voices from the New Ukraine – e.g. Maidan: One year on. Work with the alternative press (e.g. Eurozine, Huffington Post, Street Press, Internazionale) as key influencers for the audience we are targeting, for example by funding translations of articles by Ukrainian journalists.
Fund individual and organizational grants for investigative reporting with long-stay grants in Ukraine, as well as journalist exchanges, to allow for deeper reporting of stories and for journalists to build their own contacts (instead of relying on Moscow-based reports).
Targeted round of newsroom briefings by authoritative experts on Ukraine.
Outputs: up to 10 grants for journalists.
Tentative budget: $100K
Set up a CSO coalition Friends of Maidan who will engage in informal and regular advocacy about the situation in Ukraine in their respective countries and expose potential allies to diverse views on Ukraine.
Output: Coalitions in the five target research countries and one EU level aimed at GUE/NGL groups.
Tentative Budget: $175k
Soros finances humanitarian organizations while at the same he finances propaganda campaigns that promote and lead to coups and war. The manipulation of a simple photo by the Soros funded Human Rights Watch highlights the point. The original picture was taken on the day of the Odessa Massacre in May 2014, a horrific event where 45 ethnic Russian protesters were burned to death by the Right Sector who arrived by buses and trains from Kiev. Yet, the Soros funded HRW used the very same pic in an anti-Russian campaign and even Tweeted it on their Twitter feed.
Finnish researcher Petri Krohn archived the shots at his “Closer Look on Syria” website.
Unknown hackers hacked into the database of the Soros Foundation and posted more than 2500 files of the organization on the Internet. The documents published on the website DCLeaks.com cover the period from 2008 to 2016 and related to different aspects of the activity of the billionaires organisation.
Ukraine is also mention in the papers of the organisation, and quite frequently – 370 times. Among the files there are documents concerning the organisation of Euromaidan, a shorthand report of activist meetings with the representatives of the “Resurrection” Fund and US ambassador Geoffrey Pyatt, as well as materials about a planned George Soros meeting with the leader of “Svoboda” Oleg Tyahnybok and others. It “unexpectedly” turns out that the insinuation of “Kremlin Propaganda”, that Euromaidan was not a spontaneous release of the people to the streets in a uniform rush, but was directed by western organizations, is at least partly confirmed.
Many documents concern the delivery of grants to the Ukrainian mass media, organizations, and certain journalists. For example, in one document it is proposed to allocate $500,000 a year for “technical assistance” to such media as the TV channel Hromadske and websites such as “Crimea, Realities and Ostrov”.
Much more at link above….
A Ukrainian hacker group claim to have emails that implicate billionaire George Soros in attempting to get involved in the conflict between Ukraine and Russia over the past year. Soros allegedly says that America should provide military hardware to Ukraine and try to adjust the perception of financial stability in the region. Alexey Yaroshevsky has more from New York City. https://www.rt.com/usa/355919-soros-hacked-files-released/
More than 2,500 files from the raft of organizations run by billionaire George Soros have been leaked by hackers.
Saturday’s leak, published by DC leaks, includes hundreds of internal documents from multiple departments of Soros’ groups, predominantly the Open Society Foundations.
The files are grouped into sections such as geographical region, the World Bank and the President’s Office, and cover the period from 2008 up until 2016, according to The Daily Caller. They reveal work plans, strategies, priorities and other activities by Soros, and include reports on European elections, migration and asylum in Europe.
DC Leaks claims to be the work of American activists who want to present the truth about the “US decision-making process as well as about the key elements of American political life.” US security experts however are blaming the leak on Russian hackers, according to Bloomberg, in a similar reaction seen in the wake of the DNC leaks.
George Soros is a Hungarian-American business magnate, investor, philanthropist, political activist and author who is of Hungarian-Jewish ancestry and holds dual citizenship. He drives more than 50 global and regional programs and foundations. Soros is named an architect and a sponsor of almost every revolution and coup around the world for the last 25 years. The USA is thought to be a vampire due to him and his puppets, not a lighthouse of freedom and democracy. His minions spill blood of millions and millions of people just to make him even more rich. Soros is an oligarch sponsoring the Democratic party, Hillary Clinton, hundreds of politicians all over the world. This website is designed to let everyone inside George Soros’ Open Society Foundation and related organisations. We present you the workplans, strategies, priorities and other activities of Soros. These documents shed light on one of the most influential network operating worldwide.
Soros gave Clinton step-by-step instructions on how to tackle Albania unrest – WikiLeaks email
An email leaked by WikiLeaks reveals that when Hillary Clinton was US secretary of state in 2011, billionaire George Soros instructed her on how to handle unrest in Albania, stressing it “needs urgent attention at senior levels of the US government.” “Dear Hillary,” begins the email dated January 24, 2011 from the founder of Open Society Foundations, Soros. “A serious situation has arisen in Albania which needs urgent attention at senior levels of the US government. You may know that an opposition demonstration in Tirana on Friday resulted in the deaths of three people and the destruction of property,” Soros says, according to the leaked email.
Three men were shot dead as anti-government demonstrators clashed with police in the Albanian capital in late January of 2011. Supporters of the opposition Socialist Party refused to accept the results of a 2009 election, citing corruption and fraud, when then-Prime Minister Sali Berisha’s Democratic Party won by a thin margin. Berisha accused the opposition of attempting to provoke a Tunisia-style uprising, saying “the bastard children of Albania’s own Ben Alis conceived Tunisian scenarios.”
“There are serious concerns about further unrest connected to a counter-demonstration to be organized by the governing party… and a follow-up event by the opposition two days later to memorialize the victims,” Soros says. “The prospect of tens of thousands of people entering the streets in an already inflamed political environment bodes ill for the return of public order and the country’s fragile democratic process,” he adds. “I believe two things need to be done urgently,” he adds. “1. Bring the full weight of the international community to bear on Prime Minister Berisha and opposition leader Edi Rama to forestall further public demonstrations and to tone down public pronouncements. 2. Appoint a senior European official as a mediator.”
Soros suggested three candidates: Carl Bildt, Martti Ahtisaari, and Miroslav Lajcak, saying all “have strong connections to the Balkans.” “The US and the EU must work in complete harmony over this, but given Albania’s European aspirations the EU must take the lead,” he stressed, adding that his foundation in Tirana was “monitoring the situation closely and can provide independent analysis of the crisis.” Several days after the email was sent to Clinton, the EU did send one of Soros’ suggested nominees, Miroslav Lajcak, to meet Albanian leaders in Tirana to try to mediate an end to the unrest, Reuters reported.
Good video that lays it all out quite well regarding Clinton, Soros, Libya, Ukraine, Syria, Albania.
Caveat: Can’t say I agree with all the views of this poster, but in this video he does lay out quite well the email connections between Soros and Clinton and to their wars/overthrows. I believe that if we want to reveal the crimes and lies of the Deep State that we have to come together and put our political subservience to the wayside.
GEORGE SOROS’S FALSE FLAG FACTORIES- Article by Wayne Madsen
Global hedge fund tycoon and political provocateur George Soros is leading a war of symbols, namely flags and banners either resurrected or conjured up by his myriad non-profit groups, to stir religious, racial, and ethnic tensions the world over. From the Serbian OTPOR! movement and its clenched-fist symbol adopted by protests groups around the world to the menacing black and white flag of the Islamic State, which first appeared during the Soros-backed “Arab Spring” rebellions, Soros’s “false flag” factories have been running at break-neck production speeds.
Soros and his acolytes saw the importance of symbology in the writings of Gene Sharp of the Albert Einstein Institution in Boston, Massachusetts. Although Sharp’s catechism of how to conduct non-violent resistance and revolution has been likened by some political scientists to Mohandas Gandhi and Dr. Martin Luther King, his concepts on upsetting the political status quo appear to be borrowed more from the likes of Mao Zedong, Karl Marx, and Adolf Hitler.
Among Sharp’s necessary tools to conduct political action are “flags and symbolic colors,” “slogans, caricatures, and symbols,” and “banners, posters, and displayed communications.” The “symbolic colors” have been used by Soros- and Central Intelligence Agency-sponsored “color revolutions” in Ukraine (Orange) and Kyrgyzstan (Pink) and attempted color revolutions in Iran (Green), Kuwait (Blue), and Burma (Saffron).
Using the Sharp template and financing from Soros and the CIA-linked National Endowment for Democracy (NED), Symbols were used in the themed Arab Spring revolutions in Tunisia (Jasmine) and Egypt (Lotus) and attempted revolutions in Georgia (Rose), Lebanon (Cedar), Uzbekistan (Cotton), and Moldova (Grape)…
More at link….
Keep clearly in mind that when Soros says ‘Open” he means open to pillage and rob from. The ruse works in that he pays off the politicians and media outlets that kindle the fire. While this is taking place he’s making ‘investments’. Then when it all goes down he can quickly recoup on the initial investment and control the key players within the target country in order to asset strip the country of the peoples hard earned valuable infrastructure through cronies. The IMF works in a very similar manner. Franklin Templeton group also seems to have worked in conjunction with Soros when it came to the initial investment before the Ukraine coup. John Helmer covered much of the IMF aspect with Naked Capitalism back in March 2015 when the loans for Ukraine were coming due and being exposed more fully.
Ukraine’s debt haircut showdown looms
Foreign bondholders wait to see what Russia decides to do
Excerpt:
Ukraine‘s hope of reaching a compromise with its international creditors hangs in the balance as the two sides prepare for complex negotiations to begin this month. While Kiev has been open about its plan to impose a haircut on billions of dollars of public debt, investors are expected to resist losses. A committee of foreign bondholders who account for more than half of the country’s external debt, including Franklin Templeton, has already been set up and is being led by Blackstone’s advisory arm.
This group could block proposals relating to bonds they hold, as could Russia which holds one bond in full. However, academics say Ukraine is not necessarily out of options if this occurs. Governments in the past have found that looking within the machinery of their bonds can sometimes strengthen their hand.
The question then is whether this risks the country’s deal with the IMF, which has a rule about not lending to countries that miss payments to other governments. Fund officials suggest the IMF might tweak its own rules to get around the situation but academics say another option might be for Ukraine to make Russia’s debt unenforceable in English courts, arguing that Russia’s annexation of Crimea should be set off against the debt.
George Soros, chairman of Soros Fund Management, argued this week that Europe was so preoccupied by Greece it is had ignored Ukraine’s economic plight. “ . . . Europe has been drip-feeding Ukraine, just as it has Greece,” he wrote in an opinion column this week. “As a result, Ukraine barely survives, while Putin has the first-mover advantage.”
My theory is that those cronies are primarily Switzerland and London based such as Ukrainian oligarch Igor Kolomoisky who controls Ukraine’s Privat Bank, the Right Sector battalions, employs Joe Bidens son and is the head of the European Jewish Congress. Hence the reason no government is going after Kolomoisky for his theft of $1.8 billion in IMF funds as reported by Andrew Cockburn in Harpers in summer 2015.
HEART OF EMPIRE — August 13, 2015, 11:32 am
Undelivered Goods
How $1.8 billion in aid to Ukraine was funneled to the outposts of the international finance galaxy
By Andrew Cockburn
Excerpt:
Kolomoisky had built his multibillion dollar financial base partly thanks to his mastery of “raiding,” the local version of mergers and acquisitions, involving methods that would make even the most hardened Wall Street financier turn pale. According to Matthew Rojansky, director of the Kennan Institute at the Woodrow Wilson Center for International Scholars, who has made a special study of the practice, “there are actual firms in Ukraine . . . registered with offices and business cards, firms [that specialize in] various dimensions of the corporate raiding process, which includes armed guys to do stuff, forging documents, bribing notaries, bribing judges.”
See ….when your one of the global elite, you get a free pass.
I do think they are trying to divide and conquer the American people and by inflaming internal conflict in the US the global elite who run the US Deep State are attempting to avoid responsibility for their large scale crimes. The purple color theme was quite obvious after the election but now they have seemed to quiet it down somewhat as many people were calling it out, myself included.
In the following posts are numerous examples of Soros’ hand operating behind the scenes regarding recent events in the US and Syria.
In addition, a number of Avaaz founders and board members have close connections to Soros’ Open Society Foundations such as Eli Pariser (both a Board Member of OSF and a member of the Open Society US programs as well as Moveon.org) and Pedro Abramovay (the Regional Director For Latin America and the Caribbean at OSF, the Director of Latin America Programs at OSF and a campaign director of Avaaz).
Discover the Networks, published a summary of the connections between some of the founders of Avaaz. The website writes, Ricken Patel: A Canadian, Patel is both the executive director of Res Publica and president/executive director of Avaaz Eli Pariser: The executive director of MoveOn, Pariser is Avaaz’s board chairman and also serves on the advisory board of Res Publica. Tom Perriello: This former U.S. congressman from Virginia co-founded Res Publica and has been a longtime advocacy partner with Ricken Patel. Ben Brandzel: Formerly an advocacy director for MoveOn, Brandzel also served as director of new-media campaigns and fundraising for Barack Obama’s Organizing for America. In addition, he worked for the presidential campaigns of Howard Dean and John Edwards.
As one might suspect, despite its constant rhetoric regarding “human rights,” “freedom,” and “democracy,” Avaaz has openly supported violence, war, and imperialism. In 2011, Avaaz raised its voice as loudly as it could with demands that the EU, NATO, UN, and all other parties “stop the violent crackdown” on civilians in Libya. Translated: Avaaz called on the EU, NATO, UN, and all other parties to come to the rescue of jihadists that had been unleashed against the government and the people of Libya in order to overthrow Ghaddafi for the benefit of the NATO powers. Avaaz soon after turned its sights on Syria, the next country in line to suffer under NATO’s attempt to destroy an uncooperative national government. As a sampling of the drivel Avaaz regularly released regarding Syria, Avaaz posted on its website the following transparent propaganda in an attempt to drum up support for a No Fly Zone in Syria.
In February 2014 a coup was carried out in Kiev, Ukraine utilizing violent Right Sector Neo-Nazis to overthrow the legitimate elected government of the country in order to bring it into the western sphere of influence and pull it into conflict and out of Russia’s orbit. These Neo-Nazis groups were financed by Ukrainian oligarchs and directly supported by the United States government. The entire US media establishment went along with the false narrative on Ukraine by portraying these violent groups as legitimate peaceful protesters who were seeking freedom from repression, however, nothing could be further from the truth that the media intentionally concealed from the public.
As reported by the UN, since February 2014, over 10,000 innocent people (the number is likely much higher) have been killed in the Ukrainian Civil War, the near entirety of the victims are ethnic Russian civilian men, women and children who have been bombed in their own homes by the Kiev regime forces supported by the United States and western powers. That illegal bombing continues to this very day and OSCE ‘observers’ intentionally obfuscate their reports to obscure that the Kiev forces who drove 400 miles east and are conducting this indiscriminate shelling of the civilian population.
The Russian ‘invasion’ that the US media and western representatives incessantly ‘reported’ about for two years never materialized. They simply manufactured the narrative. If Russia did want East Ukraine the war for the eastern portion would have been long since over 2 years ago. The real invading army that is killing and terrorizing civilians is the one that came eastward from Kiev. The people of Donbass simply held two referendums to claim their own ethnic Russian state after the US backed coup. This fact has also been intentionally covered up by the entire US establishment media. After those referendums, the US State Department went on record as saying that the Kiev forces have the right to attack east Ukraine in order to maintain sovereignty.
The US media has also intentionally never sent any reporters into the conflict zone to accurately report the fate of the 4 million ethnic Russian civilians living in Donbass. If they were to do so they would see that the actual Donbass rebels are primarily (85%) made up of local inhabitants. The remainder of the forces are international volunteers. The US media has also neglected to report on the 2 million ethnic Russian civilians refugees who fled TO RUSSIA. The fact that refugees sought safety with Russia is a definitive indicator of the fact that the Kiev regime forces were killing ethnic Russian families.
The near entirety of the video evidence coming out of the war zone proves the aforementioned account to be true beyond any doubt regardless of any corrupt establishment media spin. I have personally compiled over 500 hours of video evidence related to the Ukrainian Conflict that highlight the misrepresentations by western media of the truth about the war. Using social media, first person videos and eyewitness accounts while working in collaboration with video compilers all over the world, I believe I have compiled the largest cache of videos related to the Ukrainian Civil War and I present my entire work below, as well as that of some of my fellow truth seekers in other countries.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024944357 Look at all those terrorists!!!!!! Evidence of the 1st Donbass referendum in May 2014. This is an important link as it shows clearly that You Tube has now removed all 9 videos of the referendum from 9 separate accounts. Those videos showed tens of thousands of people voting to separate from the new coup imposed Kiev fascist regime.
The above media material proves beyond all reasonable doubt that the US government, media and western powers are intentionally lying about what has really happened in Ukraine over the past two and a half years. The fact that the US media continue to obfuscate and lie about these world changing events during the US election cycle also highlights that they have no respect for the American people and are continuing to deceive them on a massive scale. The American people and the world as a whole deserves better than this from our government and media representatives. For all these lies, all these crimes and all these deaths, people should be in jail, not continuing this horrific madness while continuing to foment more war and more false narratives.
Its amazing and surreal to watch how things are playing out now in US politics in relation to all this insanity. Where it will all lead is anyones guess at this point. I knew when Ukraine was happening that it would be a good opportunity to highlight the US Deep States nefarious geopolitical actions on a grand scale due to the amount of video coming out of the the country and the ability to now fully use social media. I remember when Iraq was happening and there wasn’t anything like that video or social media wise, therefore many of us fighting to get the truth out had to rely on only a few sources for info. Back then it was a Republican administration fomenting the war but it caught me off guard when so many so called ‘liberal’dems were active in covering up the warcrimes of the Ukrainian Nazis and attempting to frame Russia for the coup and subsequent war that the US instigated. Thus, I now refer to them as faux liberals as real liberals would be anti-war first and foremost.
For what they have given Obama a free pass for they should be truly ashamed.
Clarity of Signal 
