The following video and photo evidence comes via You Tube and social media accounts associated with the White Helmets and the Free Syrian army. The majority of the content was uploaded by the individuals themselves. The White Helmets claim to be impartial and unbiased is also proven to be false via the following videos and photo information which directly links them to the FSA who are implicated in numerous atrocities, as is verified by the videos below.
The first video clearly shows that the White Helmets are attending a FSA meeting and are FSA affiliated. The FSA is made up of a number of groups of terrorists including Jabhat al-Nusra (al-Nusra Front -(largest group)) , Ahrar al-sham (2nd largest group also includes ISIS fighters), Jaysh al-Islam and a number of al-Sham groups, Jaish al-Fatah, Nour al-Din -al-Zinki.
The following Wikipedia list of the armed groups fighting in Syria clearly shows that the FSA is made up of al-Qaeda affiliated terrorist groups and allies.
The terrorist groups listed at the top of this post have all been intertwined and interchangeable for years while the US and EU governments have referred to them as ‘moderate’ rebels under the FSA umbrella. After the liberation of Aleppo by the Syrian army and Russian armed forces in December 2016 these groups have ‘officially’ decided to unite under one umbrella as proven by the following Reuters article released on January 28, 2017.
The following videos clearly show FSA fighters conducting torture. Note the FSA flag on the weapons clip of one of the torturers.
Graphic Warning: The victim is bound to a tire and savagely beaten and tortured by FSA fighters
In the 2nd video we see Hadi Alabdallah, the lead propaganda disseminator for the terrorist groups and the White Helmets, addressing an FSA jihadist gathering and inciting them to continue fighting. The additional videos below clearly show that he is working alongside the al-Nusra front terrorists- he congratulates them in the videos and is photographed proudly standing next to the Saudi cleric leader of al-Nusra Front in Syria Abdullah al-Muhaysinin (al-Qaeda in Syria). Keep in mind that the US State Department has openly been providing material support and weapons to these FSA groups over the past few years, as has the US allies of Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey.
The videos below are graphic and provide further examples of FSA torture and atrocities. many are conducted in the same room used for torture as the one above where the FSA weapons clip is clearly displayed.
Here’s more of the horror that the FSA conducts…….the video below shows FSA ‘rebels’ throwing Syrian policeman off of a Syrian government building. Warning: It is highly graphic.
Regarding the White Helmets ruse and their direct affiliation with the FSA terror groups, please see the following linked massive compendium of articles, photo and video evidence that directly ties them to the terrorist groups.
And if that doesn’t prove the case to you, then check out all these photos that fully expose the White Helmet terrorist scam.
Al-Nusra Front flag in the background……
Remember the Mannequin challenge? Looks like the FSA played a key role in that deception. Note FSA armband on one of the ‘actors’.
White Helmets Doctor Death…..
Before…………………………. After………………….
Twitter screen grab proves their leader follows primarily terrorist groups on Twitter including al-Muhaysini, the leader of al-Nusra Front )al-Qaeda)
And they stupidly, constantly film themselves ‘rescuing’ the same children in their fake videos.
They even use photos from other events to spread their propaganda and lies….
And photos even link Hadi, the FSA, al-Muhaysini and all the terrorists to little 7 year old Bana, the US media’s #1 darling….. exploited child hero…..She’s surrounded by terrorists…..Her own mother and father are terrorists…..
What do Harry Potter, ISIS Propaganda, and “the little Syrian refugee girl” have in Common?
Much of the propaganda network supporting the Syrian opposition is based in stylish, media-savvy London. One piece of it, as it turns out, are prominent figures associated with organizations in Israel working to destroy and discredit the global BDS movement.
Not surprisingly, some of these same well-connected figures in British media are also behind “the little Syrian refugee girl,” a phenomenon that has attracted widespread, well-organized support for the Syrian rebellion.
Blair Partnerships is a London literary agency owned by Neil Blair, who also handles Harry Potter author J.K. Rowlings. According to his Wiki, Blair was a lawyer before he joined Warner Bros. where he was Head of Business Affairs, Europe. In 2001, he became a literary agent for Christopher Little agency which in 2011 he left to become sole agent to Rowlings, taking the author and several others with him to set up his own shop.
Neil Blair also represents Bana Alabed whose Tweets have made her the public face of Sunni armed rebels in Aleppo, once the stronghold of ISIS and other Saudi and Turkish supported Jihadi-groups in northern Syria. Mr. Blair is very good at what he does. Simon & Schuster, a major NY publisher, will be releasing Bana Alabed’s ghost-written memoir later this year. http://www.thebookseller.com/news/ss-us-snap-syrian-refugee-bana-alabed-s-memoir-536586
Blair is a Zionist activist who has helped meld Rowlings into a spokesperson for the anti-BDS campaign in Britain. In 2015, Rowlings signed a letter supporting Culture for Coexistence, which boasts the slogan, “Engagement, Not Boycott.” https://cultureforcoexistence.org/
What the letter doesn’t make clear, however, is that one of the driving forces behind Culture for Coexistence is Neil Blair, JK Rowling’s literary agent.
Blair is also on the board of the UK branch of the Abraham Fund. That “coexistence” group is sponsored by Hapoalim, an Israeli bank that finances the construction of Jewish-only settlements in the occupied West Bank.
On 21 October, the UK Friends of the Abraham Fund announced as its new chairperson Alex Brummer, an editor and columnist at the rightwing British tabloid newspaper The Daily Mail, notable for its pro-Israel editorial stance and notorious for its racist and Islamophobic stereotypes.
Brummer is also a regular contributor to The Jewish Chronicle, a British newspaper with pronounced Zionist leanings.
A recent statement on the Abraham Fund’s Facebook page on what it called “ongoing tensions” claims that “Arab society in Israel must unite against the attacks and stabbings of Jews and prevent the incitement which is encouraging these acts.”
The statement makes no mention of the deadly violence perpetrated by the Israeli army and settlers against Palestinians.
Violence is clearly, according to the Abraham Fund, something perpetrated only by Palestinians.
If your still wondering who is behind the FSA and all this madness……..here’s your answer…..the Sunni Wahabi Gulf States which foment global terrorism……the ones that the US government just gave a free pass regarding the US Muslim ban…..the ones the US government considers key allies…..Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey, Egypt….just to name a few.
To keep fully updated on the White Helmets ties to terror groups, please check out the White Helmets Exposed site on Twitter.
This “best of” compilation of huge crowd videos clearly shows that the people of the breakaway regions chose their own path away from the Kiev regime that came to power in the February 2014 US and EU backed illegal coup.
Link to 2014 thread that shows the long lines during the 2014 referendum
Incredibly long lines during the 2014 referendum in Lugansk……
The following link leads to a post where I personally placed 9 videos of the 2014 referendum lines proving that voter turnout was massive. The link now shows that You Tube has removed all 9 videos from 9 separate accounts.
Newly revealed video shows the #1 al-Nusra Front terrorist in Syria Abdullah al-Muhaysini admitting the White Helmets are Mujadadeen islamic fighters.
Abdullah al-Muhaysini declares that the White Helmets (who reported on and attended the April 4th, 2017 Idlib chemical massacre) are mujahideen (Islamic jihadists).
The video directly above has now been removed from You Tube. A copy can be found at the following Live Leak link:
This second video below clearly shows al-Nusra Front leader Muhaysini addressing a meeting of ISIS fighters and encouraging them to join the al-Nusra Front terrorist group. This highlights the fact that all the groups attempting to overthrow the legitimate government in Syria are intertwined with the al-Nusra Front who are the largest terrorist group involved in the war against Syria. The fact they are the largest group fighting in Syria was highlighted on CNN by US Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard on January 25th, 2017 as show in the third video provided below. The above video of Muhaysini also stating that the White Helmets Syrian Civil Defense are Mujahideen highlights the fact that he personally acknowledges that all these groups are instruments which he utilizes and that they work together to achieve his murderous terrorism goals.
The 2nd video has now been removed by You Tube and also at my Live Leak account. This looks like a concerted effort to remove proof that al-Muhaysini directly requested ISIS fighters to join forces. I have included another You Tube exact copy version here:
In the link above, he clearly asks ISIS to join his al-Nusra Front terrorist group. Here is a also a screen cap shot from my Live Leak account where the video was also removed by a moderator. This moderator is particularly focusing on removing subject matter that exposes the terrorist ruses in Syria as is evident by the items he/she rejects when I post them to Live leak.
On November 10th, 2016 the U.S. Treasury Department finally designated al-Muhaysini as the lead terrorist in charge of al-Nusra Front (al-Qaeda) in Syria. This occurred one day after the US election. It is of serious note that the US government allowed him free reign for the entire last 5 and a half years of the Saudi and Qatari funded Syrian war.
Link to Treasury Dept. official release and statement:
WASHINGTON – The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) took action today to disrupt al-Nusrah Front’s military, recruitment, and financing operations. Specifically, OFAC designated four key al-Nusrah Front leaders – Abdallah Muhammad Bin-Sulayman al-Muhaysini, Jamal Husayn Zayniyah, Abdul Jashari, and Ashraf Ahmad Fari al-Allak – pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 13224, which targets terrorists and those providing support to terrorists or acts of terrorism. As a result of today’s action, all property and interests in property of these designated individuals subject to U.S. jurisdiction are blocked, and U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions with them.
These designations were taken in coordination with the U.S. Department of State, which today named Jabhat Fath al Sham as an alias of al-Nusrah Front – al-Qa’ida’s affiliate in Syria.
“From recruiting fighters to raising funds, these sanctioned individuals are responsible for providing key financial and logistical support to al-Nusrah Front,” said John E. Smith, Acting OFAC Director. “Treasury will continue to target al-Nusrah Front’s financial networks and choke off their access to the international financial system.”
Abdallah Muhammad Bin-Sulayman al-Muhaysini
Abdallah Muhammad Bin-Sulayman al-Muhaysini was designated for acting for or on behalf of, and providing support and services to or in support of, al-Nusrah Front.
As of late 2015, al-Muhaysini was an accepted member of al-Nusrah Front’s inner leadership circle. As of July 2015, Abdallah al-Muhaysini served as al-Nusrah Front’s religious advisor and represented al-Nusrah Front in an Idlib Province, Syria, military operations room. He has been involved in recruiting fighters to join al-Nusrah Front and helping to form a new al-Nusrah Front “state” in northern Syria. In April 2016, Muhaysini launched a campaign to recruit 3,000 child and teenage soldiers across northern Syria for al-Nusrah Front.
Al-Muhaysini has played a crucial role in providing financial aid to al-Nusrah Front. Between 2013 and 2015, al-Muhaysini raised millions of dollars to support al-Nusrah Front governance efforts in Idlib Province, Syria. As of early October 2015, al-Muhaysini had set up institutions providing financial aid to terrorist groups, including a highly successful campaign that he claimed had secured $5 million in donations to arm fighters.
New video with White Helmets attending rally with al-Nusra Front leader Abdullah al-Muhaysini in summer 2016 –
The video below features US Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard explaining that al-Nusra Front are the largest terrorist group in Syria. She does this as she cuts through the obvious and pathetic talking points of CNN propagandist stooge Jake Tapper. His talking points fail miserably in the video and below I highlight the father of Bana Albed (who Jake smugly promotes) as a terrorist.
A collage of photos links Bana family friends………….to child beheaders….and summer 2016 Boy in the Ambulance photographer.
Bana family with Erdogan in Turkey…….
Bana’s father al-Abed Ghassan with al-Nusra Front terrorists…..
Note al-Nusra Front (al-Qaeda) symbol on wall……..
7 year old Bana with al-Nusra Front propaganda disseminator Hadi Abdullah….
Hadi Abdullah with al-Nusra Front leader al-Muhaysini…….
Hadi Abdullah with al-Nusra Front/ISIS…….
The video below highlights numerous instances that Hadi Abdullah (Bana family friend and al-Muhaysini partner) is hugging, congratulating and kissing members of al-Nusra front in Syria which is under the command of Abdullah al-Muhaysini.
The video of Hadi Abdullah kissing, hugging and congratulating terrorists has also been removed from You Tube. Here’s is a Live Leak link to the video which was removed.
Amazingly, Hadi Abdullah is also featured at the “Reporters Without Borders” website as a 2016 recipient of the TV 5 Monde Press Freedom Prize. Link here:
Excerpt: The 2016 Reporters Without Borders (RSF) – TV5 Monde Press Freedom Prize will be awarded to Syrian reporter Hadi Abdullah, the Chinese news website 64Tianwang, and Chinese citizen journalists Lu Yuyu and Li Tingyu at a ceremony in Strasbourg tomorrow evening (8 November).
Hadi Abdullah is being awarded the prize in the journalist category. He is a 29-year-old freelance reporter who has braved many dangers to cover the war in Syria, entering high-risk areas where few colleagues venture in order to film and to enable civil society’s actors to speak to the outside world. He has had many brushes with death and was briefly kidnapped by the Al-Nusra Front last January. His cameraman, Khaled al-Issa, was killed in June by an explosive device left outside the home they shared, and Abdullah himself was badly injured by the blast.
The following video highlights another terrorist propaganda disseminator, Bilal Abdul-Kareem. He also interviews and reaps praise on Abdullah al-Muhaysini the lead al-Nusra front terrorist in Syria. Bilal was recently given an award by CNN and Amnesty International (as shown below)
The video above has also been removed. The same deleted video of Bilal Abdul Kareem can now be found within the following video link:
TELEVISION TROPHY – INTERNATIONAL JURY
AWARDED BY AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL
1st Prize
Arnaud COMTE and Stéphane GUILLEMOT
FRANCE 2
Mossoul : fuir à tout prix
IRAQ
2nd Prize
Clarissa WARD and Bilal Abdul KAREEM
CNN
Bilal Abdul-Kareem was also featured in the US media’s “Last Voices in Aleppo” propaganda campaign in December 2016. It’s noteworthy that the entire US media has now gone quiet about what is going on in Aleppo after the Syrian and Russian armed forces liberated the city. The US media has also stopped reporting on the White Helmets as there headquarters was found to be empty and the $100 million in funding for them obviously did not go to any part of East Aleppo. The question remains to be answered as to where the money actually went.
What the images, videos and links above show is that these individuals are all linked together. They are all part and parcel of the same propaganda ruse…….and the US media has openly worked to exploit that ruse and lie to the American people and the world as a whole. This is the greatest fraud of the 21st century.
Additional links here covering other aspects and links between these individuals:
We still need to talk about the Boy in the Ambulance to understand fully how the corrupt and complicit US and EU media exploited these children and covered up for the terrorists that have been destroying lives and infrastructure in Syria…….
Please help spread this post far and wide so people can see what is really going on with the regime change agenda that western powers are orchestrating in Syria.
Saudi Commander in Jabhat al-Nusra Gives a Speech Before Aleppo Prison Attack, Asks ISIS to join him
The video directly above has once again been made unavailable. Here is another copy cued up directly to the remarks by Abdullah al-Muhaysini asking ISIS to join his ranks.
In the two videos below James Corbett of Boilng Frogs Post provides an excellent on-point analysis of all of Barack Obama’s deceptive actions over the last 8 years. This is the true horrific legacy of global deceiver Barack Obama.
For more detailed information on Obama’s murderous foreign policy track record please subscribe to Boiling Frogs Post and Corbett Report.
Obama Quietly Signs The “Countering Disinformation And Propaganda Act” Into Law
Late on Friday, with the US population embracing the upcoming holidays and oblivious of most news emerging from the administration, Obama quietly signed into law the 2017 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) which authorizes $611 billion for the military in 2017.
In a statement, Obama said that:
Today, I have signed into law S. 2943, the “National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017.” This Act authorizes fiscal year 2017 appropriations principally for the Department of Defense and for Department of Energy national security programs, provides vital benefits for military personnel and their families, and includes authorities to facilitate ongoing operations around the globe. It continues many critical authorizations necessary to ensure that we are able to sustain our momentum in countering the threat posed by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant and to reassure our European allies, as well as many new authorizations that, among other things, provide the Departments of Defense and Energy more flexibility in countering cyber-attacks and our adversaries’ use of unmanned aerial vehicles.”
But while the passage of the NDAA – and the funding of the US military – was hardly a surprise, the biggest news is what was buried deep inside the provisions of the Defense Authortization Act.
Recall that as we reported in early June, “a bill to implement the U.S.’ very own de facto Ministry of Truth had been quietly introduced in Congress. As with any legislation attempting to dodge the public spotlight the Countering Foreign Propaganda and Disinformation Act of 2016 marks a further curtailment of press freedom and another avenue to stultify avenues of accurate information. Introduced by Congressmen Adam Kinzinger and Ted Lieu, H.R. 5181 seeks a “whole-government approach without the bureaucratic restrictions” to counter “foreign disinformation and manipulation,” which they believe threaten the world’s “security and stability.” Also called the Countering Information Warfare Act of 2016 (S. 2692), when introduced in March by Sen. Rob Portman, the legislation represents a dramatic return to Cold War-era government propaganda battles. “These countries spend vast sums of money on advanced broadcast and digital media capabilities, targeted campaigns, funding of foreign political movements, and other efforts to influence key audiences and populations,” Portman explained, adding that while the U.S. spends a relatively small amount on its Voice of America, the Kremlin provides enormous funding for its news organization, RT.
We are faced by a shocking fact these days: the profession of journalism, and I speak of mainstream media journalism, has descended into truly toxic levels of printed and broadcast disinformation. One can now virtually count on the fact that what is being said on any topic of political significance, will be a carefully scripted trotting-out of government and corporate propaganda.
That is not journalism. That is what George Orwell called ‘Newspeak’.
It is a dangerous game which these news hacks are playing. They are witnessing one event and describing it as quite another event. Let me amplify this by looking at the stories emanating out of the Middle East.
It must be obvious to most of us by now that Russia, via Putin, is being held responsible for pretty much everything which is no longer working well for Western engineered neoliberal/neocon globalism. In fact, the stream of accusations against Putin’s Russia have descended into near or actual farce, due mainly to the fact that they are not backed by any factual evidence. We are all simply supposed to ‘know’ that Mr Evil is at it again and that the West must ready itself to take action against his ‘tyrannical activities’.
Clamping down on viral fake news, Facebook partners with sites like Snopes and adds new user reporting. A new system funnels fake news reports to fact-checkers from Snopes, PolitiFact, FactCheck.org, ABC, and AP.
Facebook screen image highlights the role the social media giant plays for the Deep State
Excerpt from article above:
Once a story has been flagged as fake, the most complex element of the new strategy begins. A Facebook spokesperson walked me through how the fact-checking process will work. Facebook is working with, to start, a handful of third-party, U.S.-based fact-checking organizations: ABC News, Snopes, PolitiFact, FactCheck.org, and AP. (The sites are part of Poynter’s International Fact Checking Network and have agreed to a “fact-checkers’ code of principles.”)
Because the group of third-party fact-checkers is small at launch, and as part of its effort to focus on the highest-impact “worst of the worst,” Facebook is doing some sorting before the reported stories go to the fact-checkers. Its algorithm will look at whether a large number of people are reporting a particular article, whether or not the article is going viral, and whether the article has a high rate of shares. Facebook has also already had a system in place, for about a year, that uses signals around content (such as how people are responding to it in comments) to determine whether that content is a hoax.
The end result is tailored to the Deep States needs via the Facebook process:
And who gets to do all this ‘fact’ checking for you? The FreeThought Project has the scoop on Snopes……
Snopes, the Supposed Arbiter of ‘Fake News’ — Accused of ‘Defrauding Own Site to Pay for Prostitutes
Facebook’s choice to hire Snopes to arbitrate which news items will be allowed to stand and which should receive the Scarlet-Letter label ‘disputed’ already brought outrage — the site is notoriously left-leaning — but an exclusive report from the Daily Mail on alleged shady dealings should turn Mark Zuckerberg’s cheeks a deep shade of red.
David and Barbara Mikkelson, ex-spouses and founders of Snopes, have been hurling accusations allegations at one another in an ongoing bitter legal dispute following their divorce — and many of the claims don’t exactly give the company an air of professionalism.
Barbara, in court filings, accuses David of “raiding” Snopes’ bank account “for his personal use and attorney fees” and embezzling “$98,000 from our company over the course of four years, which were monies he expended upon himself and the prostitutes he hired …”
….Since the acrimonious divorce, David hired Elyssa Young — better known as Erin O’Bryn, a longtime escort and porn star, and now his wife — as administrative assistant at Snopes. According to the Daily Mail, Young’s escort profiles on professional sites and social media are still active, though it’s unclear whether she still works in that field.
This part interested me because this person writes so much for Snopes. Is it true? Don’t know.
Young isn’t the only eyebrow-raising Snopes employee — Kim LaCapria, the company’s lead ‘fact-checker,’ boasts openly of being a dominatrix known as “Vice Vixen,” and wrote on her personal blog she “played scrabble [sic], smoked pot, and posted to Snopes. That’s what I did on my day ‘on’ too.”
The irony of fake news being decided by Snopes is so ridiculous that even the Daily Mail UK saw fit to point it out…..
But the website’s own troubles and the intriguing choice of who carries out its ‘fact checks’ are revealed by DailyMail.com, as one of its main contributors is disclosed to be a former sex-blogger who called herself ‘Vice Vixen’.
Snopes.com will benefit from Facebook’s decision to allow users to report items in their newsfeed which they believe to be ‘fake’.
It is asking a number of organizations to arbitrate on items which are reported or which Facebook staff think may not be genuine, and decide whether they should be marked as ‘disputed’.
Picture credit of UK Mail
Husband and wife: David Mikkelson is now married to Snopes.com staff member Elyssa Young – but also engaged in a bitter legal battle with his former wife Barbara with whom he set up the site
How did this all come about? Fair.org decided to investigate the threat to powerful Washington Deep State information tools like the flagship “Washington Post” that sites that have been deemed ‘fake news’ are exposing…..
WaPo Spreading Own Falsehoods Shows Real Power of Fake News
By Adam Johnson
WaPo: Russian operation hacked a Vermont utility, showing risk to U.S. electrical grid security, officials say. Washington Post story (12/31/16) with revised headline and a never-mind editor’s note. Is this “fake news”? The putative scourge of “fake news” has been one of the most pervasive post-election media narratives. The general thrust goes like this: A torrent of fake news swept the internet, damaging Hillary Clinton and possibly leading to a Donald Trump victory.
A primary problem with this convenient-to-some narrative is that “fake news” has yet to be clearly defined by anyone. Vaguely conceptualized as misleading or outright fabricated stories, it can mean anything—as FAIR has noted previously (12/1/16)—from outlets that align with “Russian viewpoints” to foreign spam.
Additional Fair article explains how the whole ‘fake’ news meme was pushed out by dubious outfit PropOrNot in collaboration with the flag ship of the corrupt Deep State, the Washington Post….
The Washington Post (11/24/16) last week published a front-page blockbuster that quickly went viral: Russia-promoted “fake news” had infiltrated the newsfeeds of 213 million Americans during the election, muddying the waters in a disinformation scheme to benefit Donald Trump. Craig Timberg’s story was based on a “report” from an anonymous group (or simply a person, it’s unclear) calling itself PropOrNot that blacklisted over 200 websites as agents or assets of the Russian state.
The obvious implication was that an elaborate Russian psyop had fooled the public into voting for Trump based on a torrent of misleading and false information posing as news. Everyone from Bloomberg’s Sahil Kupar to CNN’s to Robert Reich to Anne Navarro to MSNBC’s Joy Ann Reid tweeted out the story in breathless tones. Center for American Progress and Clinton advocate Neera Tanden even did her best Ron Paul YouTube commenter impression, exclaiming, “Wake up people.”
But the story didn’t stand up to the most basic scrutiny. Follow-up reporting cast major doubt on the Washington Post’s core claims and underlying logic, the two primary complaints being 1) the “research group” responsible for the meat of the story, PropOrNot, is an anonymous group of partisans (if more than one person is involved) who tweet like high schoolers, and 2) the list of supposed Russian media assets, because its criteria for Russian “fake news” encompasses “useful idiots,” includes entirely well-within-the-mainstream progressive and libertarian websites such as Truth-Out, Consortium News, TruthDig and Antiwar.com (several of whom are now considering lawsuits against PropOrNot for libel).
PropOrNot says their criteria for “Russian propaganda” is “behavioral” and “motivation-agnostic,” so even those who publish views that simply coincide with the Russian government’s, regardless of intent or actual links to Russia, are per se Kremlin assets—an absurd metric that casts a net so wide as to render the concept meaningless. Glenn Greenwald and Ben Norton of The Intercept (11/26/16) called PropOrNot “amateur peddlers of primitive, shallow propagandistic clichés” who were “engaging in extremely dubious McCarthyite tactics about a wide range of critics and dissenters.” Fortune magazine’s Matthew Ingram (11/25/16) insisted the report had the “beginnings of a conspiracy theory, rather than a scientific analysis,” while AlterNet’s Max Blumenthal (11/26/16) lamented that “insiders have latched onto a McCarthyite campaign that calls for government investigations of a wide array of alternative media outlets.”
Here I provide some of the most important weekly videos related to the ongoing geopolitical insanity……here’s whats up….
The terrorist ruses in Aleppo continue to be exposed after the Syrian and Russian Armed Forces liberated the city. Note that the corrupt and complicit US media is completely ignoring Syria now and wagging the dog all about Trump instead……
Video above has been removed from You Tube, a similar video pointing out the same information can be found here:
Ah, the great unspoken. No branch of the US mainstream media wants to go there. Its two degrees of Kevin Bacon and surreal as hell. Its a multi-billionaire Geneva based Jewish Ukrainian oligarch Igor Kolomoisky who finances the volunteer far right national guard Right Sector Aidar battalions in Ukraine that are implicated in having killed over 10,000 ethnic Russian civilians over two and a half years of civilian slaughter.
Its that same oligarch being the head of the European Council of Jewish Communities and employing the coke sniffing, Ashley Madison website surfing son of the Vice President of the United States, one Hunter Biden, at an offshore Cyprus based company called Burisma Holdings while at the very same time $1.8 billion in missing IMF funds have been funneled to that same oligarchs offshore based Cyprus accounts. This information is all verifiable via reputable mainstream media outlets as shown below.
Its reads like a bad, really bad Tom Clancy novel doesn’t it? If the missing $1.8 billion has anything to do with Hunter Biden is still up in the air, but everything else is, unfortunately, verifiably accurate and comes from long term professional media outlets.
Link to large thread proving the victims of the Ukraine civil war are all ethnic Russians killed by Ukrianian fascist battalions:
Dnipro-1’s headquarters are on the ground floor of the Dnipropetrovsk administration building. Upstairs sits the regional governor, Igor Kolomoisky. The arrangement is no accident: Kolomoisky, one of Ukraine’s most controversial billionaires, funds the paramilitary, which returns the favour in these troubled times by boosting the banking and industrial tycoon’s personal security and political clout.
All the signs are of a flourishing military enterprise. Young men with Kalashnikovs and pistols and several well dressed women working on laptops fill the anteroom to Bereza’s office.
Dnipro-1 has 700 men — “officially,” Bereza says with an enigmatic smile.
“Unofficially, it’s 7,000.”
– DARK SIDE –
Questions over the far right leanings of some volunteer groups and allegations of involvement in the murder of civilians cast a long shadow. One of the most controversial is the Azov Battalion, which uses the Wolfsangel insignia — an ancient design that was resurrected in Hitler’s Germany. The Azov has been linked to Oleg Lyashko, a politician accused of neo-Nazi sympathies.
Right Sector, an ultra-nationalist party, also has its own battalion of several hundred men on the frontlines, even if the government refuses to register or pay them. Dasha Slutskovska, a 29-year-old volunteer from the battalion in Dnipropetrovsk, conceded that Right Sector has an image problem — they are relentlessly portrayed in Russia’s state-controlled media as fascists.
Naked Capitalism provides the low down on Kolomoisky’s offshore gas company Burisma Holdings which hired the US Vice Presidents son Hunter Biden……..
R. Hunter Biden Should Declare Who Really Owns His New Ukrainian Employer, Burisma Holdings
Posted on May 21, 2014 by Richard Smith
Excerpt:
Here’s last week’s big announcement, adorned by a photograph of an American with a faintly alarming rictus; oh yes, oh dear me, yes: Hunter Biden joins the team of Burisma Holdings: Burisma Holdings, Ukraine’s largest private gas producer, has expanded its Board of Directors by bringing on Mr. R Hunter Biden as a new director.
R. Hunter Biden will be in charge of the Holdings’ legal unit and will provide support for the Company among international organizations. On his new appointment, he commented: “Burisma’s track record of innovations and industry leadership in the field of natural gas means that it can be a strong driver of a strong economy in Ukraine. As a new member of the Board, I believe that my assistance in consulting the Company on matters of transparency, corporate governance and responsibility, international expansion and other priorities will contribute to the economy and benefit the people of Ukraine.”
Additional excerpt on Kolomoiskys nefarious past.
Bogolyubov and Kolomoisky fostered strong reputations as corporate raiders in the mid-2000s, becoming notorious for a series of hostile takeovers. Hostile takeovers Ukrainian style, that is, which often included the active involvement of Privat’s quasi-military teams. These schemes included, among others, a literal raid on the Kremenchuk steel plant in 2006, in which hundreds of hired rowdies armed with baseball bats, iron bars, gas and rubber bullet pistols and chainsaws forcibly took over the plant. More recently, Aerosvit Airlines, which according to the media was controlled by Mr. Kolomoisky, declared bankruptcy in 2012, stranding thousands of Ukrainians in Ukraine and abroad. The Financial Times, when reporting on Kolomoisky’s recent conflict with UK company JKX Oil & Gas, stated in no uncertain terms, that “in Ukraine they [Kolomoisky and Bogolyubov] are called ‘The Raiders’”. Privat Group has been involved in several court cases and arbitration proceedings in the US, UK, and Sweden. In 2009, a US court made clear its distrust of Privat representatives: “the Court has become increasingly skeptical of these gentleman [at Privat] and the credibility of their statements.”
Back to R. Hunter Biden:
As a new member of the Board, I believe that my assistance in consulting the Company on matters of transparency, corporate governance and responsibility, international expansion and other priorities will contribute to the economy and benefit the people of Ukraine.”
HEART OF EMPIRE — August 13, 2015, 11:32 am Undelivered Goods How $1.8 billion in aid to Ukraine was funneled to the outposts of the international finance galaxy
Kolomoisky had built his multibillion dollar financial base partly thanks to his mastery of “raiding,” the local version of mergers and acquisitions, involving methods that would make even the most hardened Wall Street financier turn pale. According to Matthew Rojansky, director of the Kennan Institute at the Woodrow Wilson Center for International Scholars, who has made a special study of the practice, “there are actual firms in Ukraine . . . registered with offices and business cards, firms [that specialize in] various dimensions of the corporate raiding process, which includes armed guys to do stuff, forging documents, bribing notaries, bribing judges.” In April 2014, as the separatists advanced, Kolomoisky mobilized his workforce into a 20,000-man private army in two battalions, Dnipro-1 and Dnipro-2, and stemmed the tide. According to Wilson Center director Rojansky, Kolomosiky is “perceived as the bulwark and the reason why the whole Novorossiya project [Putin’s plan to absorb most of eastern Ukraine] broke down at the border of the Donbass.”
As the largest bank, Kolomoisky’s PrivatBank stood to garner the largest share of the international aid. Published estimates put this share as high as 40 percent. Despite the torrent of cash, the banks’ situation did not improve; nine months into the program, the IMF announced: “As of end January 2015 . . . the banking system’s capital adequacy ratio stood at 13.8 percent, down from 15.9 percent at end-June.” Where had the money gone?
Nash Groshi (Our Money) – Investigative branch that pursued the missing IMF billions.
In this case however, thanks to investigative work by the Ukrainian anticorruption watchdog group Nashi Groshi (“Our Money”), we can actually watch the process by which the gigantic sum of $1.8 billion was smoothly maneuvered offshore, in the first instance to PrivatBank accounts in Cyprus, and thence into accounts in Belize, the British Virgin Islands, and other outposts of the international financial galaxy. The scheme, as revealed in a series of court judgments of the Economic Court of the Dnipropetrovsk region monitored and reported by Nashi Groshi, worked like this: Forty-two Ukrainian firms owned by fifty-four offshore entities registered in Caribbean, American, and Cypriot jurisdictions and linked to or affiliated with the Privat group of companies, took out loans from PrivatBank in Ukraine to the value of $1.8 billion. The firms then ordered goods from six foreign “supplier” companies, three of which were incorporated in the United Kingdom, two in the British Virgin Islands, one in the Caribbean statelet of St. Kitts & Nevis. Payment for the orders—$1.8 billion—was shortly afterwards prepaid into the vendors’ accounts, which were, coincidentally, in the Cyprus branch of PrivatBank. Once the money was sent, the Ukrainian importing companies arranged with PrivatBank Ukraine that their loans be guaranteed by the goods on order.
But the foreign suppliers invariably reported that they could not fulfill the order after all, thus breaking the contracts, but without any effort to return the money. Finally, the Ukrainian companies filed suit, always in the Dnipropetrovsk Economic Court, demanding that that foreign supplier return the prepayment and also that the guarantee to PrivatBank be cancelled. In forty-two out of forty-two such cases the court issued the identical judgment: the advance payment should be returned to the Ukrainian company, but the loan agreement should remain in force.
As a result, the loan of the Ukrainian company remained guaranteed by the undelivered goods, while the chances of returning the advance payments from foreign companies remain remote. “Basically this transaction of $1.8 bill[ion] abroad with the help of fake contracts was simply an asset siphoning [operation] and a violation of currency legislation in general,” explained Lesya Ivanovna, an investigator with Nashi Groshi in an email to me. “The whole lawsuit story was only needed to make it look like the bank itself is not involved in the scheme . . . officially it looks like PrivatBank now owns the products, though in reality [they] will never be delivered.
More on Ukraine’s oligarchs and IMF fund distribution from Naked Capitalism here:
To top it all off, Wikipedia has more on Igor Kolomoisky being the President of the United Jewish Community of Ukraine. In 2010 he was appointed as the President of the European Council of Jewish Communities.
Kolomoyski is a prominent supporter of Ukraine’s Jewish community[47] and the president of the United Jewish Community of Ukraine.[48] In 2010 he was appointed as the president of the European Council of Jewish Communities[49] after promising the outgoing president he would donate $14 million,[50] with his appointment being described as a “putsch”[48][49] and a “Soviet-style takeover”[51] by other EJCJ board members. After several ECJC board members resigned in protest, Kolomyski quit the ECJC and, together with fellow Ukrainian oligarch Vadim Rabinovich, founded the European Jewish Union.[50]
Later career
After leaving the Governor of Dnipropetrovsk Oblast post, Kolomoyskyi obtained a U.S. Visa. He moved to mainly reside in Switzerland, also spending time in the United States.[52]
So there you have it, that which the US media won’t go near with a ten foot barge pole. Now keep your hats on as this it taken to the next level with additional info on the shootdown of Malaysia Airlines flight MH-17 and the deaths of 293 innocent people.
The Russian government believes that Igor Kolomoisky is the oligarch behind the shootdown of MH-17. They have conducted a massive “White Paper” investigation on the MH-17 false flag and it all points towards a rogue Ukrainian unit in the service of Igor Kolomoisky. Robert Parry at Consortium News has pointed out this possibility for the past two and a half years.
Meanwhile, after CIA analysts had time to evaluate U.S. satellite, electronic and other intelligence data, the U.S. government went curiously silent about what it had discovered, including the possible identity of the people who were responsible. The U.S. reticence, after the initial rush to judgment blaming Russia, suggested that the more detailed findings undercut those original claims.
Graphic slide: A side-by-side comparison of the Russian presidential jetliner and the Malaysia Airlines plane.
A source who was briefed by U.S. intelligence analysts told me that the CIA’s conclusion pointed toward a rogue Ukrainian operation involving a hard-line oligarch with the possible motive of shooting down Russian President Vladimir Putin’s official plane returning from South America that day, with similar markings as MH-17. But I have been unable to determine if that assessment represented a dissident or consensus view inside the U.S. intelligence community.
What I’ve been told by one source, who has provided accurate information on similar matters in the past, is that U.S. intelligence agencies do have detailed satellite images of the likely missile battery that launched the fateful missile, but the battery appears to have been under the control of Ukrainian government troops dressed in what look like Ukrainian uniforms.
The source said CIA analysts were still not ruling out the possibility that the troops were actually eastern Ukrainian rebels in similar uniforms but the initial assessment was that the troops were Ukrainian soldiers. There also was the suggestion that the soldiers involved were undisciplined and possibly drunk, since the imagery showed what looked like beer bottles scattered around the site, the source said.
Instead of pressing for these kinds of details, the U.S. mainstream press has simply passed on the propaganda coming from the Ukrainian government and the U.S. State Department, including hyping the fact that the Buk system is “Russian-made,” a rather meaningless fact that gets endlessly repeated.
The Russian government has analyzed the released Ukrainian SBU recordings that framed the rebels for shooting down MH-17. According to the Russian government the recordings are fake and were recorded in a studio which proves the SBU had prior knowledge of the event to come and were the intentional murderers of 293 innocent civilians in order to frame Russia and draw international sympathy that would lead to the implementation of sanctions against Russia.
Link to Russian analysis recording of Ukrainian SBU fake recording:
Note: Shortly after the crash of Malaysian Flight MH17, the Ukrainian Security Service (SBU) released a video on YouTube, claiming it had intercepted calls between eastern rebels discussing how the plane was shot down. SBU said this proved that the rebels were behind the downing of the plane.However, a technical analysis by Russian sound experts of the sound in the video proves the recording is manufactured and includes drops outs, noticeable splicing (digital editing) and switching from mono to stereo. The analysis is made in Adobe Audition and shows multiple flaws such as merges, background noise coming and going, the endings of the words being cut off and many other things. A professional studio engineer can easily verify that particularly, the third conversation switches from a mono digital track to a stereo digital track in mid-conversation. That is an anomaly that would be impossible for it to have been a normal unbroken cell phone conversation. It would have had to have been either continually in mono or continually in stereo. The swicthing proves without a doubt that the recording was spliced together in a studio environment. The studio manipulation of the SBU released audio can be verified in any studio by simply extracting the original audio from the video uploaded by the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) on their YouTube channel:
Link to official original SBU released recording:
Geopolitical analyst and Finnish researcher Petri Krohn at “A Closer Look on Syria” website has extensively covered Kolomoisky, MH-17 and the British information outfit Bellingcat.
Finnish researcher Krohn revealed the leaked Russian captured Facebook screenshots of Igor Kolomoiskys assistant discussing the making of the fake SBU recordings and the shootdown of MH-17.
Below are the translations of the Facebook conversation screen shots between Kolomoiskys political protege and his assistants plus additional intercepted phone conversations. Items translated below are also verifiable from the screenshots above. They are openly discussing the faking of the studio recordings (materials) for the false flag/shootdown of MH-17.
May 1
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
01.05.2014 10:26
Svyatoslav Oliynyk Yura, come to me today
Yury Bereza
01.05.2014 10:43
Yury Bereza I can either after 8 pm tonight or tomorrow morning.
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
01.05.2014 10:50
Svyatoslav Oliynyk Well, let it be tomorrow. Call me
May 10
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
10.05.2014 10:02
Svyatoslav Oliynyk Take the so called propositions we were talking about last time, and try to be at my place tonight
Yury Bereza
10.05.2014 10:09
Yury Bereza No problem. I’ll call you in an hour!
May 25
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
25.05.2014 19:43
Svyatoslav Oliynyk Tomorrow morning boss and I are waiting for you, are you aware?
Yury Bereza
25.05.2014 19:45
Yury Bereza Yes. I’ll be at 10
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
25.05.2014 19:45
Svyatoslav Oliynyk Ok, then by tomorrow.
June 7
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
07.06.2014 21:07
Svyatoslav Oliynyk Yura, we have arranged for today!
Yury Bereza
07.06.2014 21:10
Yury Bereza There were urgent matters…
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
07.06.2014 21:11
Svyatoslav Oliynyk So? When will you come?
Yury Bereza
07.06.2014 21:11
Yury Bereza Likely tomorrow in the afternoon. Will you be at place?
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
07.06.2014 21:12
Svyatoslav Oliynyk Yes, we will. Come.
June 16
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
16.06.2014 11:13
Svyatoslav Oliynyk You haven’t sent me materials. Forgot or what?
Yury Bereza
16.06.2014 11:19
Yury Bereza No, there’s something to add. Tonight I’ll receive some more shots, and then send the whole to you.
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
16.06.2014 11:20
Svyatoslav Oliynyk Ok, waiting.
June 28
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
28.06.2014 20:35
Svyatoslav Oliynyk Call me, I cannot reach you, you’re out of signal. Is everything arranged? By the way, what’s with the injured? Are you placed?
Yury Bereza
28.06.2014 20:39
Yury Bereza The injured are placed, everything OK. The chief doctor just needed some brainwashing) we made a little political conference, so to say, used sanctions))
Yury Bereza
28.06.2014 20:40
Yury Bereza I can’t do everything today – the guys need to be sent. Tomorrow morning, deal?
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
28.06.2014 20:40
Svyatoslav Oliynyk Yes, OK. I haven’t heard of the chief doctor yet!
Yury Bereza
28.06.2014 20:41
Yury Bereza Now it’s normal.
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
28.06.2014 20:41
Svyatoslav Oliynyk I have no doubt.
July 7
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
07.07.2014 09:56
Svyatoslav Oliynyk I need you tonight! We should present the final version of the materials. Take the expert and come after 18:00.
Yury Bereza
07.07.2014 10:07
Yury Bereza I remember! We’ll come
July 17
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
17.07.2014 21:21
Svyatoslav Oliynyk What’s with the archive? The password isn’t right. In brief – what’s there? What’s finally?
Yury Bereza
17.07.2014 21:22
Yury Bereza The password is normal! Check the layout and Caps.
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
17.07.2014 21:22
Svyatoslav Oliynyk Forget it. What’s there? And how?
Yury Bereza
17.07.2014 21:23
Yury Bereza land – direct – air
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
17.07.2014 21:24
Svyatoslav Oliynyk What the fucking air???
Yury Bereza
17.07.2014 21:26
Yury Bereza They reported that he couldn’t hold there for long, as if it was high. Made one direct. Failed. Had to make air.
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
17.07.2014 21:27
Svyatoslav Oliynyk Why have they risen Kharkiv ones first?
Yury Bereza
17.07.2014 21:30
Yury Bereza They said that the command came from Kiev firstly to the Kharkiv desk, and as it began to turn, then the others were connected.
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
17.07.2014 21:32
Svyatoslav Oliynyk clear, tell me later in detail. Are you without layover?
Юрій Береза
17.07.2014 21:34
Юрій Береза Yes, I’ll be soon at place. Just finished with journalists.
Texting Oliynyk – Geletey materials:
July 12
Valeriy Geletey
12.07.2014 23:01
Valeriy Geletey It’s my profile. Don’t ask per phone or Skype! And here – everything only in notional phrases. Got it?
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
12.07.2014 23:03
Svyatoslav Oliynyk OK. Although I don’t really share your troubles about phone. We’ve got everything arranged.
Valeriy Geletey
12.07.2014 23:06
Valeriy Geletey On traffic controllers it’s all decided with your boss. He said control is on you. I’ll send my person to you tomorrow and you’ll have to report me through him of the condition of all planned stages of preparation you are responsible for!
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
12.07.2014 23:07
Svyatoslav Oliynyk Valeriy Victorovich, what the person for? Or you have decided that I’ll flee and leave my family in God knows whose hands?
Valeriy Geletey
12.07.2014 23:09
Valeriy Geletey You have a short memory. Have you forgotten how you received instructions? The same person to guarantee security and confidentiality of your reports will come tomorrow.
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
12.07.2014 23:09
Svyatoslav Oliynyk Ok, waiting!
July 14
Valeriy Geletey
14.07.2014 20:43
Valeriy Geletey Remind of your boss’s promise: I haven’t received the shooting scripts! Tomorrow morning, passing the report, send me the scripts and video you made.
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
14.07.2014 20:47
Svyatoslav Oliynyk Valery Victorovich, boss gave the task to the channel director a week ago! This jerk is past lost to shame – he held back on terms! Today though they finished all. Sketched more than 10 scripts, for different versions of course of events, for the first two days. Now they are working under the next three days. I’ll send you tomorrow.
Валерий Гелетей
14.07.2014 20:48
Валерий Гелетей And don’t forget video – Petr Alexeyevich asked me of it.
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
14.07.2014 20:48
Svyatoslav Oliynyk Understood. Everything will be done. TTUL.
July 16
Valeriy Geletey
16.07.2014 08:46
Valeriy Geletey The connection later only via our channel. The person will be with you until I need this. And ask your boss why I can’t reach him as usual, and then he calls me and begins to tell everything in plain language?
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
16.07.2014 08:48
Svyatoslav Oliynyk Ok! No problem.
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
16.07.2014 08:49
Svyatoslav Oliynyk I’ll tell the boss, but his telephone has an encryptor, it can’t be monitored and decoded. He’ll call anyway!
Valeriy Geletey
16.07.2014 08:51
Valeriy Geletey Yes, but his phone has an encryptor, and mine (to which he is constantly calling) hasn’t. So remind him of my request about safe channel. At least till the end of operation.
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
16.07.2014 08:51
Svyatoslav Oliynyk Yes, certainly. I’ll tell him tonight.
Texting Oliynyk – Gritsenko materials:
October 25, 2012
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
25.10.2012 13:19
Svyatoslav Oliynyk Anatoliy Stepanovich, Happy Birthday! Wish strong health, political success and inspiration at work!
28 октября 2012 г.
Anatoliy Critsenko
28.10.2012 20:03
Anatoliy Gritsenko Thank you very much for kind words! I’m very pleased!
October 25, 2013 г.
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
25.10.2013 18:59
Svyatoslav Oliynyk Happy Birthday, Anatoliy Stepanovich! Want to wish you happiness and health! Let success always accompanies you in your business! Best regards to you!
October 26, 2013 г.
Anatoliy Gritsenko
26.10.2013 12:17
Anatoliy Gritsenko Slava, thank you for warm congrats! Health and strong nerves are on the first place, all the other we can get with our own hands, heads and labor!..
Anatoliy Gritsenko
26.10.2013 12:18
Anatoliy Gritsenko How are you? Haven’t you changed the place of residence? I thought you wanted to move with your family to the capital?
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
26.10.2013 12:47
Svyatoslav Oliynyk Anatoliy Stepanovich, I’m all right! No, I haven’t. My political career in Dnipropetrovsk is stable, and whilst Arseniy Petrovich’s proposition is interesting but now I’m not ready to leave everything for in fact making a fresh start
Anatoliy Gristenko
26.10.2013 13:08
Anatoliy Gritsenko It’s certainly up to you! It’s good that it’s all right. Tell my regards to boss.
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
26.10.2013 13:10
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
Спасибі! Неодмінно передам! Thank you! Sure I’ll tell him!
January 1
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
01.01.2014 22:29
Svyatoslav Oliynyk Ring out the old, ring in the new, Ring, happy bells, across the snow: The year is going, let him go; Ring out the false, ring in the true. Happy New Year!
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
01.01.2014 22:32
Svyatoslav Oliynyk Happy New Year, Anatoliy Stepanovich! Wish you, wish all the country, wish all us that in the new year that swine in crown were thrown off his throne by the will of all the people! Wish to obtain the new, strong and beautiful country in the new year! Happy New Year once more! Glory to Ukraine!
January 3
Anatoliy Gritsenko
03.01.2014 19:20
Anatoliy Gritsenko Happy New Year, Slava! All the best in the coming year for you too!
Anatoliy Gritsenko
03.01.2014 19:21
Anatoliy Gritsenko I join to you wishes, I wish all the country to make them come true as soon as possible! Glory to the heroes!!!
July 19
Anatoliy Gritsenko
19.07.2014 09:15
Anatoliy Gritsenko Slava! What the hell?! What have you bitches done? How could you upload that video the day before the operation???!!! Do you understand that the «Russists» have already given it for the expert review and requested Youtube for the date of its very first upload???
Anatoliy Gritsenko
19.07.2014 09:17
Anatoliy Gritsenko And those idiots who were at the desk in Kharkiv? HAVE YOUR MEMORY FAILED?! I don’t get how they are caught by our guys on the board with Crimea, while that were your people who had to detain them??? As I can see you and your boss are completely fucking brazen in your Dniprojewivsk!!! Pedro will tear you into pieces!!!! I WILL TEAR YOU BY MYSELF!!! AND TAKE THE PHONE WHEN I CALL!!!
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
19.07.2014 09:25
Svyatoslav Oliynyk Anatoliy Stepanovich, I’ll redial you now! I went out and left the phone in the cabinet, on the internet from the tablet. I’ll call you immediately, one minute.
July 23
Anatoliy Gritsenko
23.07.2014 17:38
Anatoliy Gritsenko If the boss is now around – give him the phone! I know that you are having a meeting at the moment – so just hand the phone to him! QUICKLY! I’ll call you now.
Svyatoslav Oliynyk
23.07.2014 17:40
Svyatoslav Oliynyk come on
Russia has seized all property belonging to Igor Kolomoisky in Crimea and has an in-absentia arrest warrant out for him
Above: The Right Sector that Kolomoisky funds reveals their plans for all of Europe.
Below is what the oligarchs Right Sector do to civilians…..
The Nation Magazine – U. S. Congress Has Removed a Ban on Funding Ukraine’s Neo-Nazis From Its Year End Spending BillPublished on Jan 21, 2016
A report has found that America’s $1.8 trillion dollar budget plan allows for the government to allot foreign military aid to government offshoot groups, including Neo-Nazis and fascists groups, which was blocked until summer last year. Lindsay France is joined by writer for The Nation, James Carden, who tracked the bill from Congress and how the situation evolved.
Under pressure from the Pentagon, Congress has stripped the spending bill of an amendment that prevents funds from falling into the hands of Ukrainian neo-fascist groups. In mid-December 2015, Congress passed a 2,000-plus-page omnibus spending bill for fiscal year 2016. Both parties were quick to declare victory after the passage of the $1.8 trillion package. White House spokesman Josh Earnest told reporters “we feel good about the outcome, primarily because we got a compromise budget agreement that fought off a wide variety of ideological riders.” The office of House Speaker Paul J. Ryan touted the bill’s “64 billion for overseas contingency operations” for, among other things, assisting ”European countries facing Russian aggression.”
Read more at http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=af0_1453523089#yaJAzAPMGvgBC2uL.99
The following 2015 article from RedPillTimes reveals that western diplomats may be considering fingering Kolomoisky as the official MH-17 culprit as a back up plan should the entire ruse fall apart.
Conclusion/caveat: There is still no investigation by the IMF into the stolen $1.8 billion reported in the Harpers article above after all this time. Technically, all the information above is speculative evidence as currently no mainstream media outlet nor government organization has taken it upon themselves to fully investigate all these obvious connections between Igor Kolomoisky and other nefarious individuals, quite possibly because of what that would reveal as these connections are very deep and lead to other prominent global figures, however, the information above is verifiable via numerous media outlets and the connections are plain to see. This information is all easily attainable on the internet. The questions to be asked are “why is there no IMF investigation of Kolomoisky and the IMF missing billions?” “Is Hunter Biden directly involved with Kolomoisky’s offshore accounts?” “Did a rogue unit under the command of Igor Kolomoisky shoot down Malaysian Airlines flight MH-17 as a false flag to blame Russia?” “Why is a Jewish Ukrainian oligarch financing Nazis that have killed thousands of innocent ethnic Russian Ukrainian civilians in east Ukraine?”
This post will examine the structure and various aspects of The Deep State, along with who controls it and how they use both real and false flag events to carry out their global domination agenda.Bill Moyer’s starts us off with a basic breakdown on The Deep State…..
There is the visible government situated around the Mall in Washington, and then there is another, more shadowy, more indefinable government that is not explained in Civics 101 or observable to tourists at the White House or the Capitol. The former is traditional Washington partisan politics: the tip of the iceberg that a public watching C-SPAN sees daily and which is theoretically controllable via elections. The subsurface part of the iceberg I shall call the Deep State, which operates according to its own compass heading regardless of who is formally in power.[1]
During the last five years, the news media have been flooded with pundits decrying the broken politics of Washington. The conventional wisdom has it that partisan gridlock and dysfunction have become the new normal. That is certainly the case, and I have been among the harshest critics of this development. But it is also imperative to acknowledge the limits of this critique as it applies to the American governmental system. On one level, the critique is self-evident: In the domain that the public can see, Congress is hopelessly deadlocked in the worst manner since the 1850s, the violently rancorous decade preceding the Civil War.
Yes, there is another government concealed behind the one that is visible at either end of Pennsylvania Avenue, a hybrid entity of public and private institutions ruling the country…
As I wrote in The Party is Over, the present objective of congressional Republicans is to render the executive branch powerless, at least until a Republican president is elected (a goal that voter suppression laws in GOP-controlled states are clearly intended to accomplish). President Obama cannot enact his domestic policies and budgets: Because of incessant GOP filibustering, not only could he not fill the large number of vacancies in the federal judiciary, he could not even get his most innocuous presidential appointees into office. Democrats controlling the Senate have responded by weakening the filibuster of nominations, but Republicans are sure to react with other parliamentary delaying tactics. This strategy amounts to congressional nullification of executive branch powers by a party that controls a majority in only one house of Congress.
Despite this apparent impotence, President Obama can liquidate American citizens without due processes, detain prisoners indefinitely without charge, conduct dragnet surveillance on the American people without judicial warrant and engage in unprecedented — at least since the McCarthy era — witch hunts against federal employees (the so-called “Insider Threat Program”). Within the United States, this power is characterized by massive displays of intimidating force by militarized federal, state and local law enforcement. Abroad, President Obama can start wars at will and engage in virtually any other activity whatsoever without so much as a by-your-leave from Congress, such as arranging the forced landing of a plane carrying a sovereign head of state over foreign territory. Despite the habitual cant of congressional Republicans about executive overreach by Obama, the would-be dictator, we have until recently heard very little from them about these actions — with the minor exception of comments from gadfly Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky. Democrats, save a few mavericks such as Ron Wyden of Oregon, are not unduly troubled, either — even to the extent of permitting seemingly perjured congressional testimony under oath by executive branch officials on the subject of illegal surveillance.
These are not isolated instances of a contradiction; they have been so pervasive that they tend to be disregarded as background noise. During the time in 2011 when political warfare over the debt ceiling was beginning to paralyze the business of governance in Washington, the United States government somehow summoned the resources to overthrow Muammar Ghaddafi’s regime in Libya, and, when the instability created by that coup spilled over into Mali, provide overt and covert assistance to French intervention there. At a time when there was heated debate about continuing meat inspections and civilian air traffic control because of the budget crisis, our government was somehow able to commit $115 million to keeping a civil war going in Syria and to pay at least £100m to the United Kingdom’s Government Communications Headquarters to buy influence over and access to that country’s intelligence. Since 2007, two bridges carrying interstate highways have collapsed due to inadequate maintenance of infrastructure, one killing 13 people. During that same period of time, the government spent $1.7 billion constructing a building in Utah that is the size of 17 football fields. This mammoth structure is intended to allow the National Security Agency to store a yottabyte of information, the largest numerical designator computer scientists have coined. A yottabyte is equal to 500 quintillion pages of text. They need that much storage to archive every single trace of your electronic life.
Yes, there is another government concealed behind the one that is visible at either end of Pennsylvania Avenue, a hybrid entity of public and private institutions ruling the country according to consistent patterns in season and out, connected to, but only intermittently controlled by, the visible state whose leaders we choose. My analysis of this phenomenon is not an exposé of a secret, conspiratorial cabal; the state within a state is hiding mostly in plain sight, and its operators mainly act in the light of day. Nor can this other government be accurately termed an “establishment.” All complex societies have an establishment, a social network committed to its own enrichment and perpetuation. In terms of its scope, financial resources and sheer global reach, the American hybrid state, the Deep State, is in a class by itself. That said, it is neither omniscient nor invincible. The institution is not so much sinister (although it has highly sinister aspects) as it is relentlessly well entrenched. Far from being invincible, its failures, such as those in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya, are routine enough that it is only the Deep State’s protectiveness towards its higher-ranking personnel that allows them to escape the consequences of their frequent ineptitude.[2]
More at link above……
The Real News Network has more on the current conflict between Trump and The Deep State….
Now we will get into why and how The Deep State carries out false flag attacks and how they keep them off-the-radar via their mainstream media cronies. The video below is a very interesting discussion on how and why false flags are conducted by The Deep State….
Israeli Lobbyist Advocates False Flag Attack To Start A War With Iran
Published on Sep 25, 2012
Last Friday, during question time at the Washington Institute for Near East policy
forum luncheon Patrick Clawson, who heads the Washington Institute’s Iran Security
Initiative, went as far as to suggest the US may be best served by carrying out a false
flag style attack so the President could take the US to war with Iran. Clawson actually went as far as to suggest that false flag operations were “the traditional way America gets to war is what would be best for US interests”. He went on to give us a concise history of past “false flag operations” – the attack on Pearl Harbor, the sinking of the Lusitania, the Gulf of Tonkin incident, and ever the blowing up of the USS Maine – as giving past Presidents the excuse needed to go to war. In the most chilling part of this speech he said, “So, if in fact the Iranians aren’t going to compromise,” the Israel lobbyist concluded with a smirk on his face, “it would be best if somebody else started the war.”
WINEP has also guested Einat Wilf who is married to Richard Gutjahr who was the first journalist that (coincidentally) filmed both the Nice and Munich terror attacks.
Here Wiki page was recently modified as proven below. She works for elite Israeli Intelligence Unit 8200
Wiki page of Einat Wilf Scrubbed: Wife of Richard Gutjahr, the man who filmed truck attack in Nice, France – and – who was on the scene of the Munich shootings- has been edited to Scrub all reference to her history working in Israeli intelligence from conspiracy
On July 14, 2016 Gutjahr said[15] he was on his holiday and happened to be present during the attack in Nice.[16] He reported on Twitter and in the ARD night magazine (Nachtmagazin) and the Bayerischer Rundfunk. He made available to the WDR German television network a video that apparently shows the beginning of the attack; he decided to explicitly object to the publication of the material on the social networks, because he wanted to leave it to the transmitters as to which images should be shown.[17][18][19][20]
On July 22, 2016 it was reported that Gutjahr, among others, was also reporting live for the ARD-Tagesschau live the shooting rampage in Olympia Shopping Mall in Munich.[15] Originally en route to the Bavarian Radio, he said he was informed by a friend about the incident and arrived one of the first reporters at the scene.[21] By some coincidence, his daughter Thamina Stoll also got footage of the shooting, and was interviewed internationally.
WINEP is a “key organization in the Israel lobby” that was founded in 1985 by leading members of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) to “provide a seemingly ‘objective’ research organization to provide consistently ‘pro-Israel’ analysis and commentary,” according to Harvard professor of International Affairs Steven M. Walt (h/t Firedoglake).
Former AIPAC staffer MJ Rosenberg was reportedly in the room when WINEP was founded and described the organization as “an AIPAC controlled think-tank that would disseminate the AIPAC line but in a way that would disguise its connections.”
It’s important to understand that Israeli agents really do control The Deep State, US government, media, thinks tanks, Wall Street, the banking sector, the MIC and Hollywood. All of these entities are controlled by people primarily in service to Israel, corrupt global elitists and US global hegemony that allows them to maintain their wealth, power and control.
And when it comes to how to carry out a false flag on behalf of The Deep State, Israel takes the cake:
The King David Hotel bombing was a terrorist attack carried out on Monday July 22, 1946 by the militant Zionist underground organization Irgun on the British administrative headquarters for Palestine…housed in the southern wing of the King David Hotel in Jerusalem. 91 people of various nationalities were killed and 46 were injured…
Disguised as Arabs, the Irgun planted a bomb in the basement of the main building of the hotel, whose southern wing housed the Mandate Secretariat and a few offices of the British military headquarters. The explosion caused the collapse of the western half of the southern wing of the hotel…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lavon_Affair
The Lavon Affair refers to a failed Israeli covert operation, code named Operation Susannah, conducted in Egypt in the Summer of 1954.[vague] As part of the false flag operation,[1] a group of Egyptian Jews were recruited by Israeli military intelligence to plant bombs inside Egyptian, American, and British-owned civilian targets, cinemas, libraries and American educational centers. The bombs were timed to detonate several hours after closing time. The attacks were to be blamed on the Muslim Brotherhood, Egyptian Communists, “unspecified malcontents” or “local nationalists” with the aim of creating a climate of sufficient violence and instability to induce the British government to retain its occupying troops in Egypt’s Suez Canal zone.[2] The operation caused no casualties among the population, but did cost the lives of four operatives: two cell members who committed suicide after being captured; and two operatives who were tried, convicted, and executed by Egypt.
More here on the recent Deep State false flags in Nice and Munich used to stir up the European Union:
Sometimes it isn’t the crime that gets you, it’s the cover-up.
One of the clumsiest cover-ups in history may take down the Israeli Mossad Department of False Flag Operations, along with its idiot operative, two-time-loser Richard Gutjahr.
Gutjahr, as I revealed last week, was pre-positioned on the scene of the recent terror attacks in Nice, France and Munich, Germany. A professional photographer, married to high-level Israeli neocon operator Einat Wilf, Gutjahr is apparently tasked with filming the beginnings of false flag terror attacks and broadcasting them to the world.
Less than one hour after I exposed Gutjahr’s presence at the scene of the Munich shopping mall attack, he removed photos of the shooting from his Twitter feed. The same photos simultaneously disappeared from a Russia Today article on the attack.
Now Gutjahr is claiming that he ACCIDENTALLY deleted those photos — which could be used as evidence against him in an “accessory to mass murder” trial.
Jewish Telegraphic Agency confirms that Richard Gutjahr’s wife served with an elite Israeli Intelligence Unit 8200.
Excerpt: The photographer in question, Richard Gutjahr, is not Israeli, but is married to an Israeli, Einat Wilf, a former Knesset member for the Labor party. Wilf served in the prestigious Israeli army’s intelligence unit 8200.
Now here’s where the coincidences get real interesting……
Richard Gutjahrs daughter Thamina Stoll was with him when he filmed the Munich shooting and it was her that gave permission across Twitter for the media to disseminate the video. Link here to her Twitter feed as the requests came in:
Caveat: I don’t agree with the end portion of this video and the gentleman’s stance on Jewish people. I believe Zionists are the at the root cause of many of these issues. There are many fine, outstanding Jewish people who are also victims of the Zionists agenda. This particular interview was the only one I could find as many others have been removed from You Tube.
Published on Jul 29, 2016
In the video above, Thamina Stoll forgets to mention an extremely unusual cohencidence. That is, that her father, Richard Gutjahr (of German ARD TV), just so happened to film the only REAL footage of the Nice Lorry Attack
Now check this pic out from six months ago, Thamina sent this Instagram photo out. Yes, that is Hillary Clinton and the intrepid reporter on the scene. The two look pretty friendly.
There is a new phrase being bandied about lately. That phrase is “Coincidence Theory”. All the above info leads me to think that there are some very interesting Deep State coincidences at play here.
I will cover the San Bernandino false flag in another post in the near future…..
In recent years it has be come quite obvious that the US government and Deep State, in collaboration with mainstream media outlets and a number of corporate/Internet entities, are now blanketing the American people with blatantly deceptive propaganda and a vastly coordinated online censorship and information control agenda. This post will delve into the methods employed from 2011 onwards and will examine various aspects of this government/elitist campaign to control the minds and perceptions of the American people, as well as citizens of other western countries.
This “Full Spectrum Dominance” propaganda/censorship front is being conducted in the following manner:
1) Manipulation of website comment sections via paid government operatives
2)Manipulation of online forums via infiltration of moderators and administrators
3)Reverse psychological projection techniques, including McCarthyism tactics and blame shifting
4)Establishment of controlled opposition groups and websites
5)Mass media coordination in collusion with an obvious government/elitists agenda
6)Use of advanced Deep State software tools to coordinate propaganda campaigns
7)Reverse psychological techniques focused on a specific government targeted adversary (in this case – Russia)
8)Monitoring of online groups that are in opposition to the government/elitists agenda
9)Labeling and discrediting of online news sites, groups and individuals that are in opposition to the government agenda, as “fake groups”
10)Manufacturing of ‘evidence’ in coordination with government selected propaganda approval outlets, thus allowing for plausible deniability (Snopes, Factcheck, Politifact, Stopfake, Syrian Observatory of Human Rights, Aleppo Media Center, Bellingcat)
11)Massive increases in funding to US government propaganda dissemination outlets (Broadcasting Board of Governors, RFE)
12)Utilization of leading social media networking sites (Facebook) to censor information, relegate certain sites to obscurity and cater to pro-government propaganda
13) Manipulation of search engine algorithms to produce results that are favorable to the governments agenda (Google, Yahoo)
14) Coordination with Internet giants to conduct operations that are favorable to the governments agenda
15) Infiltration of mass media corporations, online social media sites and Internet search engines that vastly affect public perception.
Who is the “US Information Czar” behind this “Full Spectrum Dominance” agenda?
Cass Robert Sunstein (born September 21, 1954) is an American legal scholar, particularly in the fields of constitutional law, administrative law, environmental law, and law and behavioral economics, who was the Administrator of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs in the Obama administration from 2009 to 2012. For 27 years, Sunstein taught at the University of Chicago Law School. Sunstein is the Robert Walmsley University Professor at Harvard Law School.
On January 7, 2009, the Wall Street Journal reported that Sunstein would be named to head the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA). That news generated controversy among progressive legal scholars and environmentalists. Sunstein’s confirmation was long blocked because of controversy over allegations about his political and academic views. On September 9, 2009, the Senate voted for cloture on Sunstein’s nomination as Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget.
Sunstein’s 2006 book, Infotopia: How Many Minds Produce Knowledge, explores methods for aggregating information; it contains discussions of prediction markets, open-source software, and wikis. His 2001 book, Republic.com, argued that the Internet may weaken democracy because it allows citizens to isolate themselves within groups that share their own views and experiences, and thus cut themselves off from any information that might challenge their beliefs, a phenomenon known as cyberbalkanization. He recanted many of the views expressed in the book before his confirmation as administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs in order to receive Senate confirmation.
Sunstein co-authored Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness (Yale University Press, 2008) with economist Richard Thaler of the University of Chicago. Nudge discusses how public and private organizations can help people make better choices in their daily lives. Thaler and Sunstein argue that people often make poor choices – and look back at them with bafflement! We do this because as human beings, we all are susceptible to a wide array of routine biases that can lead to an equally wide array of embarrassing blunders in education, personal finance, health care, mortgages and credit cards, happiness, and even the planet itself.
Sunstein (along with his coauthor Richard Thaler) has elaborated the theory of libertarian paternalism. In arguing for this theory, he counsels thinkers/academics/politicians to embrace the findings of behavioral economics as applied to law, maintaining freedom of choice while also steering people’s decisions in directions that will make their lives go better. With Thaler, he coined the term “choice architect.”
Conspiracy Theories” and government infiltration
Sunstein co-authored a 2008 paper with Adrian Vermeule, titled “Conspiracy Theories,” dealing with the risks and possible government responses to conspiracy theories resulting from “cascades” of faulty information within groups that may ultimately lead to violence. In this article they wrote, “The existence of both domestic and foreign conspiracy theories, we suggest, is no trivial matter, posing real risks to the government’s antiterrorism policies, whatever the latter may be.” They go on to propose that, “the best response consists in cognitive infiltration of extremist groups”,[35] where they suggest, among other tactics, “Government agents (and their allies) might enter chat rooms, online social networks, or even real-space groups and attempt to undermine percolating conspiracy theories by raising doubts about their factual premises, causal logic or implications for political action.”[35] They refer, several times, to groups that promote the view that the US Government was responsible or complicit in the September 11 attacks as “extremist groups.”
The authors declare that there are five hypothetical responses a government can take toward conspiracy theories: “We can readily imagine a series of possible responses. (1) Government might ban conspiracy theorizing. (2) Government might impose some kind of tax, financial or otherwise, on those who disseminate such theories. (3) Government might itself engage in counterspeech, marshaling arguments to discredit conspiracy theories. (4) Government might formally hire credible private parties to engage in counterspeech. (5) Government might engage in informal communication with such parties, encouraging them to help.” However, the authors advocate that each “instrument has a distinctive set of potential effects, or costs and benefits, and each will have a place under imaginable conditions. However, our main policy idea is that government should engage in cognitive infiltration of the groups that produce conspiracy theories, which involves a mix of (3), (4) and (5).”
Sunstein and Vermeule also analyze the practice of recruiting “nongovernmental officials”; they suggest that “government can supply these independent experts with information and perhaps prod them into action from behind the scenes,” further warning that “too close a connection will be self-defeating if it is exposed.“[35] Sunstein and Vermeule argue that the practice of enlisting non-government officials, “might ensure that credible independent experts offer the rebuttal, rather than government officials themselves. There is a tradeoff between credibility and control, however. The price of credibility is that government cannot be seen to control the independent experts.” This position has been criticized by some commentators[36][37] who argue that it would violate prohibitions on government propaganda aimed at domestic citizens.[38] Sunstein and Vermeule’s proposed infiltrations have also been met by sharply critical scholarly critiques.
WeAreChange confronts the “US Information Czar” in 2012…..
Published on May 1, 2012
In a rare public appearance, The Obama Administration’s Information Czar Cass Sunstein gave a lecture at the NYU Law School in NYC yesterday, prompting Luke Rudkowski of WeAreChange to attend. Watch as Luke confronts Sunstein multiple times on an academic paper he co-authored back in 2008 entitled “Conspiracy Theories” in which he called for cognitive infiltration of conspiracy groups by the government
Little known fact: Cass Sunstein is married to Samantha Powers (the US Ambassador to the United Nations) and the two of them worked on Obama’s 2008 election campaign. She was a senior advisor to Obama’s transition team along with Zbigniew Brzezinski who orchestrated the Grand Chessboard Strategy using Georgia and Ukraine against Russia.
IMI- Analysis – Understanding the Grand Chessboard – leading German Think Tank
Zbigniew Brzezinski’s book The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives is essential reading for anyone wishing to understand current and future U.S., EU and NATO policy. Brzezinski had in mind two countries or regions in particular: “Ukraine, a new and important space on the Eurasian chessboard is a geopolitical pivot because its very existence as an independent country helps to transform Russia. Brzezinski argued further that there was an imperative need to gain control of the southern Caucasus, i.e. Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia, on Russia’s southern flank.
The US military is developing software that will let it secretly manipulate social media sites by using fake online personas to influence internet conversations and spread pro-American propaganda. A Californian corporation has been awarded a contract with United States Central Command (Centcom), which oversees US armed operations in the Middle East and Central Asia, to develop what is described as an “online persona management service” that will allow one US serviceman or woman to control up to 10 separate identities based all over the world.
The project has been likened by web experts to China’s attempts to control and restrict free speech on the internet. Critics are likely to complain that it will allow the US military to create a false consensus in online conversations, crowd out unwelcome opinions and smother commentaries or reports that do not correspond with its own objectives.
The discovery that the US military is developing false online personalities – known to users of social media as “sock puppets” – could also encourage other governments, private companies and non-government organisations to do the same.
The Centcom contract stipulates that each fake online persona must have a convincing background, history and supporting details, and that up to 50 US-based controllers should be able to operate false identities from their workstations “without fear of being discovered by sophisticated adversaries”.
The video below highlights a software tool utilized by Ntrepid, the company mentioned in the Guardian article above….. (Note that all information in the software is in English and focused on propaganda to support the coup in Ukraine – also note that the Guardian article stipulates Ntrepids contract was for the near east and far east countries only. Thus, it is safe to assume that Ntrepid is receiving tax payer money to feed propaganda to the American people instead of doing what the Guardian article and original contract stipulates).
Ntrepid’s ‘Tartan” software product allows the Deep State discovery of key influential posters in online groups
Now lets take a look at how the Full Spectrum Dominance agenda is being carried out most recently across Facebook, the worlds most popular social network. The following Guardian UK article provides a basic breakdown on newly implemented government affiliated propaganda control measures:
Facebook to begin flagging fake news in response to mounting criticism
Disputed articles will be marked with the help of users and outside fact checkers amid widespread criticism that fake news influenced the US election. Facebook will begin flagging fake news stories with the help of users and outside fact checkers, the company announced on Thursday, responding to a torrent of criticism over fake news during the US election. Readers will be able to alert Facebook to possible fake news stories, which the social media behemoth will then send to outside fact-checking organizations to verify. Facebook is working with five fact-checking organizations – ABC News, AP, FactCheck.org, Politifact and Snopes – to launch the initiative. If enough of Facebook’s users report a story as fake, the social network will pass it onto these third parties to scrutinize.
If a story is deemed to fail the fact check, it will be publicly flagged as “disputed by 3rd party fact-checkers” whenever it appears on the social network. Users will be able to click on a link to understand why it’s disputed. If a Facebook user then still want to share the story, they’ll get another warning about its reliability. Disputed stories also may appear lower in the newsfeed, said Facebook.
Another change being rolled out identifies stories that are being shared more by people who have only read the headline than by people who have actually clicked on them and read the text. “We’ve found that if reading an article makes people significantly less likely to share it, that may be a sign that a story has misled people in some way,” the company said.
More at link above…..
We are also seeing Search Engine giant Google implementing restrictive Ad Sense monetization measures for You Tube sites that do not toe the official government/establishment narrative line. Example here (volume warning):
Below we see an example of Google working together with al-Jazeera (Qatar) and Hillary Clinton’s team to implement the Alphabet tool to help conduct regime change in Syria via propaganda and information dissemination. Wikileaks revealed the activity in 2015:
WikiLeaks reveals Hillary, Google, al Jazeera all conspiring against Syria.
Last week truepublica reported that four months ago, Google created a new holding company called Alphabet and that Eric Schmidt the new Executive Chairman of Alphabet, and therefore Google had decided to accept the offer of leading the Pentagon advisory board with a view to “bringing Silicon Valley innovation and best practices to the US military.” We questioned the ethics and moral judgement of both Schmidt and Google in joining forces with the biggest killing machine in modern times, certainly since the world wars.
We pointed to the meeting between Eric Schmidt and Julian Assange back in 2011, supposedly organised to discuss a book Schmidt was writing who was unexpectedly accompanied by a Jared Cohen. Cohen had moved to Google from the U.S. State Department in 2010. He had been a slick ideas guy at two U.S. administrations, known to be something of a courtier from the world of policy think tanks sympathetic to US foreign policy. He was a senior advisor for Secretaries of State Rice and Clinton.
Assange asserts that Schmidt was acting directly on behalf of Washington with a documented relationship that put him close to President Obama and Clinton and as Assange puts it: “Cohen’s directorate appeared to cross over from public relations and “corporate responsibility” work into active corporate intervention in foreign affairs at a level that is normally reserved for states. Jared Cohen could be wryly named Google’s “director of regime change.”
The following video reveals what Google advocated using the Alphabet software tool against Syria::
In the following very recent Reuters article (dated December 21, 2016) it is revealed that the US government will soon establish a “Global Engagement Center” that will track online activities of people that the government deems are “spreading false stories”.
Clinton Watts, a security consultant, former FBI agent and a fellow at the nonprofit Foreign Policy Research Institute, said the U.S. government no longer has an organization, such as the U.S. Information Agency, that provided counter-narratives during the Cold War. He said that most major Russian disinformation campaigns in the United States and Europe have started at Russian-government funded media outlets, such as RT television or Sputnik News, before being amplified on Twitter by others.
Watts said it was urgent for the U.S. government to build the capability to track what is happening online and dispute false stories. “Those two things need to be done immediately,” Watts said. “You have to have a public statement or it leads to conspiracy theories.” A defense spending pill passed this month calls for the State Department to establish a “Global Engagement Center” to take on some of that work, but similar efforts to counter less sophisticated Islamic State narratives have fallen short.
James Lewis, a cyber security expert at the Center for Strategic & International Studies who has worked for the departments of State and Commerce and the U.S. military, said Washington needed to move beyond antiquated notions of projecting influence if it hoped to catch up with Russia. “They have RT and all we know how to do is send a carrier battle group,” Lewis said. “We’re going to be stuck until we find a way deal with that.”
Watts, who said he has tracked tens of thousands of pro-Russia Twitter handles since 2014, believes many of the most effective stories stoke fear of war or other calamities or promote a narrative of corrupt Western politicians, media and other elites. Obama has asked spy agencies to deliver an analysis of Russian meddling in the election that will include discussion of propaganda operations, Office of the Director of National Intelligence General Counsel Robert Litt told Reuters.
Much more at link above…..
In the post election 2016 atmosphere, a crackdown on sites that did not follow the government line was rolled out by the US Deep State utilizing their flagship propaganda tool The Washington Post and an untraceable recently formed group calling themselves PropOrNot. The near entirety of the US and UK alternative media were placed on a PropOrNot list along wth a number of Russian news sites. Any site that exposed US corruption and/or media collusion during the election 2016 process was placed on the list. The list has now been disseminated to Facebook, Google and other Internet giants, as well as government authorized “fact checkers’ to limit the ability of these sites to influence public thought.
The US government has also been deliberating as to whether or not to enact government measures directly against sites that have been placed on the PropOrNot list, therefore stifling free speech and creating fear of reprisals for sites and individuals producing information that does not suit the governments interests. Paradoxically, all of the government techniques being employed are completely un-American. They are in complete contrast to the First Amendment………..as they abridge the freedom of speech.
Constitution of United States of America 1789
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
The following 2015 Guardian UK article highlights how service personnel of western countries are officially on Facebook and other sites influencing the governments agenda.
The British army is creating a special force of Facebook warriors, skilled in psychological operations and use of social media to engage in unconventional warfare in the information age. The 77th Brigade, to be based in Hermitage, near Newbury, in Berkshire, will be about 1,500-strong and formed of units drawn from across the army. It will formally come into being in April.
The brigade will be responsible for what is described as non-lethal warfare. Both the Israeli and US army already engage heavily in psychological operations. Against a background of 24-hour news, smartphones and social media, such as Facebook and Twitter, the force will attempt to control the narrative.
More at link….
Israel also utilizes paid government propaganda disseminators:
Israeli students to get $2,000 to spread state propaganda on Facebook
Ali Abunimah 4 January 2012
The National Union of Israeli Students (NUIS) has become a full-time partner in the Israeli government’s efforts to spread its propaganda online and on college campuses around the world.
NUIS has launched a program to pay Israeli university students $2,000 to spread pro-Israel propaganda online for 5 hours per week from the “comfort of home.” The union is also partnering with Israel’s Jewish Agency to send Israeli students as missionaries to spread propaganda in other countries, for which they will also receive a stipend.
The project seeks to take advantage of the fact that “Many students in Israel master the Internet and are proficient at using the Internet and social networking and various sites and are required to write and express themselves in English.” The paid scholarship will allow them to get training and then work from home for five hours per week for a year to “refute” what it calls “misinformation” about Israel on social networking sites.
More at link……
So where is all this “Full Spectrum Dominance” which uses McCarthy tactics, red-baiting and Russia as a ruse leading to? Answer: A controlled future….one that matches the desires of the global elite and the corrupt establishment/Deep State that rules over all of us.
2nd TruthStream video explains new Facebook blocks and verifications with images.
For more information on how the US government carries out psychological information warfare, see here:
The MH-17 travesty continues. The initial story of this infringement upon reporters rights is here at the blog of the two detained journalists Michel Speakers and Stephan Beck.
On Saturday, while arriving on Schiphol, we, Michel Spekkers and Stefan Beck were held by Dutch police and interrogated. During the interrogation, not only material of the MH17 was taken from us, also our laptops, telephones, SD-cards and camera’s. We lost all material shot in Donbass, including material recorded with anonymous sources. In this article we present an overview what happened, both before and after that day.
AMSTERDAM: Dutch police have taken items from a journalist here, including possible human remains, which he found at the crash site of flight MH17 in eastern Ukraine, prosecutors said Sunday. Freelancer Michel Spekkers was met by police as he returned to Schiphol airport late Saturday after visiting the region and writing an article about his discovery at the site.
The Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777 passenger jet was shot down over eastern Ukraine on July 17, 2014 en route from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur killing all 298 on board, most of them Dutch citizens. A Dutch-led criminal investigation concluded in September that a BUK missile, transported from Russia, slammed into the plane after being fired from a field in a part of war-torn Ukraine then controlled by pro-Russian rebels. But it stopped short of saying who pulled the trigger.
Prosecutors said in a statement Sunday that Spekkers had “refused to hand over photographic and film material from the crash site” when he arrived at the airport near Amsterdam. The material including “various bags with metal parts and an object which may be human remains” would now “be examined as soon as possible.” Spekkers said in a Tweet late Saturday he had arranged to “voluntarily” hand over the items, but in the end there was “a total seizure” of his possessions including his camera, telephone and laptop.
He wrote in the daily Noordhollands Dagblat he decided to visit the crash site during a trip to Donetsk for a documentary about daily life there, after being told that debris was still strewn around the area. He described seeing things lying in the snow – including a piece of bone – saying he had videoed everything, labelled some of it and placed it into sealed ziplock bags.
Dutch freelancer journalist revealed new details of the MH17 flight crash in Ukraine and published in his blog.
MOSCOW (Sputnik) — Dutch freelancer journalist Stefan Beck wrote Tuesday in his blog that he thought Amsterdam police’s demand to hand over the material that had been collected by Beck and other journalist Michel Spekkers at the site of the MH17 flight crash in Ukraine was a suggestion, not an order. Spekkers had his luggage confiscated last Saturday upon flying back to Amsterdam after filming the MH17 crash site. He reportedly carried bags full of metal parts and an object that could have been human remains.
“Authorities therefore contacted Michel Spekkers and asked him to hand it over in either the Dutch embassy in Moscow or at Schiphol Airport. During the contact the police made clear they needed the material for investigation. More so, they claimed that the handover would be voluntarily,” Beck wrote in his Russia’s Invisible Border blog – Malaysian Transport Minister Beck stressed that the two journalists had not tried to hide the material they had brought to the Netherlands from the authorities and that they were mostly worried about the safety of the Donbas residents they had interviewed.
Dutch Journalists Ordered to Shut their Mouths on MH17 Disaster
The police of the Netherlands detained two Dutch journalists Stephen Beck and Michel Spekkers in Amsterdam, upon their return from the Donbas. The police confiscated all the materials that the journalists collected in the south-east of Ukraine.
The journalists visited the Donbass to examine the crash site of the Malaysian Airlines Boeing that crashed over the region on July 17, 2014. According to the journalists, they found fragments of the liner on the crash site, even though all the fragments of the airplane were supposed to be collected long ago. The police of the Netherlands confiscated all the fragments of the aircraft that the journalists had with them, along with all the video materials from the Donbas, including interviews with eyewitnesses of the disaster.
Stefan Beck and Michel Spekkers spent eight days in the Donbas. They came to the southeast of Ukraine to conduct a series of interviews with local residents, who showed them the place, where Flight MH17 of Malaysia Airlines crashed. The journalists were amazed to find out that many pieces of the aircraft were still on the crash site.
“There are still a lot of materials to collect there, and it is not as dangerous there as representatives of the Dutch Public Prosecutor say. Apparently, we are dealing with serious negligence,” the journalists said. Even though Beck and Spekkers had informed the Netherlands Ministry for Foreign Affairs of their visit, they were arrested at Schiphol airport upon their arrival home, one of the journalists wrote on Facebook.
More at link above….
Michael Spekkers blog is here with his side of the story:
Considering we had only a limited number of days, a visit to the place where the MH17 crashed two and a half years ago, was not on the short list of things I would do. The conversations I had with various people from the area let me decided to adjust the schedule and visit the crash site still for a day. Stefan Beck did not go with me that day. When I arrived in the area I found, to my surprise, recognisable fragments of the MH17 at various places. After a somewhat longer consideration I decided to take a selection of pieces with me. The majority of the pieces involved aluminum and plastic parts. I wanted to take these things with the purpose of research, to transfer them to the authorities and to make a strong point that there are still things to be found after 2.5 years. Among the parts I found fragments that reminded me strongly of bone remains. Earlier there where skeletal remains discovered, some were found not to be human but animal. I’m not a forensic investigator, but did not ruled out the skeletal remains could be human. I decided to take one part of the skeletal remains for further investigation in The Netherlands. The consideration for me: if it are human remains there, they do not belong there but need to get returned to The Netherlands.
Bringing stuff
The crash site of the MH17 is located about three hours to travel from Donetsk. An area with a few houses and a kind of simple first-necessities-of-life-shop. I decided to package a selection of items in separate bags. One of the bone parts I encased in a sealed tube. Later, upon returning in the hotel, all parts packed separately in ziplock bags. The part of the bone was packed during the entire trip in a locked hard packaging. I made film recordings and photos throughout the day. Of the stuff, the original spot and the things we encountered but not included. I have tried to document as much as possible all components.
The link below to Stefan Beck’s Facebook page provides updates into what is going on with the confiscated materials:
Dutch judge has decided that part of the images shot in Donbass could be used by authorities. More so, part of the material shot should be deleted.
The Judge (Rechter-Commissaris) has decide that Michel Spekkers and Stefan Beck should be present at identifying which parts should be relevant to MH17-investigations but gives no guarantees that other material will not be copied. Also, images that were shot at Amsterdam airport showing Michel Spekkers being held, and that can prove our innocence should be deleted by order of the judge. The Ordination of the judge contains a lot statements we hold untrue. For example, the judge motivates his decision, amongst others, by claiming the investigation team get the cooperation it has asked for. Claiming that the investigation is being conducted in very difficult circumstances. We would like to stress that the area where the MH17 came down is currently rather safe and that earlier statements made by the (Dutch Public Prosecuting Service) OM concerning the danger in the area are nonsense. Also the judges claims that the sources which Spekkers and Beck try to protect are ‘cab drivers and translators.’
In cooperation with our lawyer we have decided to suggest the following compromise: 1. We do not agree with deleting any images made by either of us.
2. We agree on blurring the identity of investigators of the PRIMO. (Investigation into MH17) 3. We agree on sharing the images of the MH17 on the condition that the veto on what ends up at the investigation lies with Michel Spekkers. Background: Material was previously confiscated in Amsterdam Airport by authorities. After the intervention of the Dutch Journalist Union (NVJ), the authorities were denied use over the material, until a judge (Rechter-Commissaris) would judge otherwise. With today’s Ordination material will be accessible to authorities.
So far only 1 Dutch newsoutlet contacted me for response
Complaints about not appearing in Dutch media are best addressed to dometsic media.
Beck’s Tweets regarding the matter:
Dutch police has confiscated all material shot in #Donbass by me and @spekkers. This includes faces of anonymous sources.
SCHIPHOL – At Schiphol, Dutch journalist Michel Speakers stuff handed over to the police items he had taken by his own admission from the crash site of MH17 in Ukraine.
ANP – 8-1-2017, 8:25 (Update 9-1-2017, 9:36)
On Twitter, there were reports that the National Coalition with a detective and a member of the National Forensic Investigation Team would confiscate the items, and that ‘audio interview recordings’ would be examined. Spekkers himself states in a Tweet that the material was seized, as well as cameras, phones and laptops.
Spekkers reported earlier that he found items on the MH-17 crash site, which may include human remains. He has everything in plastic bags which he took to the Netherlands. The F MH17 Family Foundation, which relatives have organized, responded that it was not very respectful.
On July 17, 2014 MH17 flight, was en route from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur, when a Buk missile shot it out of the sky over eastern Ukraine. All passengers, including 196 Dutch citizens, were killed.
[Update 11:15 pm] The prosecution has stated late in a press release that Speakers possibly used another journalist who would have tried to take material from Ukraine without handing it over to the military police at Schiphol. “The impression is created that not all the items would be given up voluntarily, particularly objects relevant to the investigation. The luggage of the two journalists was then seized and viewed locally. In addition, various bags were seized presumably which contained metal parts, as well as an object, which could possibly be a human bone”.
According to the fellow traveler of Spekkers, Stefan Beck, the police have seized all the audio and video which the two have in their possession.
2nd Dutch article from an english language source:
The Dutch police seized a number of MH17 related items, including possible human remains, from freelance reporter Michel Spekkers at Schiphol airport on Saturday night. The reporter was returning from a trip to the Ukraine, where he visited the MH17 crash site, news wire AFP reports.
In a statement on Sunday, the Public Prosecutor said that “various bags with metal parts and an object which my be human remains” will be examined as soon as possible. The Prosecutor also said that Spekkers “refused to hand over photographic and film material from the crash site”.
Spekkers responded on Twitter by saying that he arranged to voluntarily give up the items he found, but that his encounter with the police ended in a “total seizure” of his possessions.
The reporter was visiting Donetsk to make a documentary about daily life there, he wrote in Noordhollands Dagblad. He decided to visit the MH17 crash site after hearing stories about debris still strewn in the area. According to him, he found various things lying around, including a piece of bone. Seeing so much debris still at the crash site left him with “an uncomfortable feeling of helplessness”, he wrote.
Spekkers filmed everything he saw. He decided to bring back some items, hoping that they may bring :some answers to outstanding questions”.
For more info on what really happened to MH-17 – The MALAYSIAN FLIGHT MH17 CRASH ANALYSIS BY THE RUSSIAN UNION OF ENGINEERS can be found here in English:
One video from the always amazing SouthFront sums it all up quite well. This 13 minutes will bring you up to speed on the ongoing EU refugee crisis…..
Caveat: I’m a little biased here as I have been the voice of SouthFront and aided in geopolitical assistance to various videos for the SouthFront team for the past two years. Yes…. that is my voice in the video. Enjoy a little Clarity of Signal.
Germany is looking to save its decreasing population through the flood……
SECRET plans to bring up to 500,000 Syrian refugees into the European Union (EU) from Turkey are to be unveiled by Germany this week.
By TOM BATCHELOR
PUBLISHED: 07:00, Thu, Dec 3, 2015 | UPDATED: 08:09, Thu, Dec 3, 2015
According to the Hungarian prime minister, EU and Turkish leaders are set to announce a behind-the-scenes agreement to resettle hundreds of thousands of people displaced by the war in Syria.
It is not known how many of the 500,000 will arrive in Britain, but fears have been raised that a significant number could be drawn to the UK by its relatively generous welfare system.
It comes just days after the EU agreed a €3billion (£2.1bn) funding package for Turkey in return for their help in stemming the flow of migrants passing through on their way to Europe.
Hungary’s PM Viktor Orban warned of a “nasty surprise” for Europeans when the deal is announced in the coming days.
He said: “The issue [of resettlement] will be a hot potato in the coming period because even though this could be kept in a semi-secret state…someone somewhere – I think in Berlin this week – will announce that 400,000-500,000 Syrian refugees could be brought straight from Turkey to the EU. This nasty surprise still awaits Europeans.”
He added that EU nations would then be obliged to resettle them, with “intense” pressure to take in quotas of newly-arrived refugees.
Mr Orban continued: “We should not only bring these people to Europe but divide them amongst ourselves, as an obligation.”
“It will not be an easy one because obviously we cannot accept it like this.”
Hungary has firmly resisted the idea of resettlement quotas to distribute more evenly the migrants, most of whom wanted to go to Germany or Sweden.
The agreement was reportedly floated at the recent EU summit in Malta but was abandoned and not included in the multi-billion pound EU-Turkey agreements signed at the weekend in Brussels after diplomats failed to gather the necessary support for it.
UKIP defence spokesman Mike Hookem MEP told Express.co.uk the plans were “utterly unacceptable” and Europe’s citizens were “being deliberately kept in the dark”.
“Poll after poll shows that immigration is the number one concern for voters in the UK and people in other EU countries are also upset at the number of migrants being foisted on them by foreign leaders.
“We were told this week in Brussels by an EU security adviser that Daesh [ISIS] could well be planning to use the community tensions from mass resettlement to their advantage by radicalising those who find themselves in neighbourhoods where they are not welcome.”
Here’s why Merkel wants the refugees…..It serves the global elitists to keep the economy of Germany well oiled and in control of Europe……
Refugee influx helps halt decline in Germany’s population
Nation’s population is growing again although longer-term trends still point to a decline – and the need for continued high levels of immigration
Germany’s population is no longer shrinking. Four consecutive years of increasingly high net migration have outpaced the country’s birth deficit, taking the country’s population to nearly 82 million people – a level last seen in 2009.
The population growth has been particularly concentrated among those of working age. The number of people employed in Germany hit 43 million in 2015, according to data released by Destatis, the German statistics office, on Tuesday. The figure represents the highest number of people in work since German reunification. Meanwhile, the number of unemployed people has dropped below 2 million for the first time since the fall of the Berlin Wall.
Over the past 12 months the active labour force (the total number of people in employment and unemployed) has increased to 44.9 million, driven by higher labour force participation of the domestic population and the immigration of foreign workers, which has offset negative demographic effects.
Net migration has exceeded 300,000 every year since 2011, hitting 676,730 in 2014, according to data published by Germany’s federal office for migration and refugees.
Here I will be providing some of the most important weekly videos related to the ongoing geopolitical insanity…….first up..
Trumps Presser in its entirety with the call out on CNN as fake news.
Glenn Greenwald also calls out CNN on their bullshit propaganda…..
Bashar Assad, the President of Syria politely answers questions from French media who certainly can’t be trusted for representing the truth about the war. Keep in mind that the Deep States media apparatus is trying real hard right now to keep any mention of Syria off the airwaves as their ruses have been exposed after the Syrian and Russian armed forces have liberated Aleppo from the western and Gulf State backed terrorists that have destroyed Syria.
WeAreChange breaks down the BS behind the Golden Shower ruse implemented by the corrupt MSM and Deep State.
The US State Department continues to spin the lies about the non-Russian hacking of the corrupted US election. ……
Sane Progressive breaks down the MSM/corrupt two party system use of the public mistrust of Trump along with the Deep States constant gas lighting of the American people to prep them for war with Russia……
Next to al-Jazeera, Orient TV is the largest propaganda arm operating out of the Gulf States that helps foment the war against Syria.
Although obviously edited to make Orient TV look like a good natured humanitarian organization, Wikipedia will suffice for a basic run down on the Dubai based Orient News. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orient_News
Orient News TV Channel Orient News Launched February 2009 Owned by Ghassan Aboud Headquarters in Dubai
Website http://www.orient-news.net
Orient News TV, based in UAE, and broadcasts to Syria, Jordan, Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates.
Orient News TV aims to address Syrian viewers in specific and the Arab world in general, with cultural and entertainment programming as well as information and news.
Orient TV opened in Damascus in February 2009, employing 149 Syrians. However the government soon had doubts about having granted a license to Orient TV, and in July 2009 Syrian security forces raided Orient TV’s offices. As a consequence Orient TV moved to Dubai. The station began broadcasting outside of Syria with coverage of the first civil courts established in Idlib province.
Ownership
Ghassan Aboud the founder, owner of Orient Media Network
The project’s founder and owner is Syrian business man Mohammad Ghassan Aboud, born in 1967. He holds a bachelor’s degree in media from Damascus University in 1991. He left Syria for the United Arab Emirates at the beginning of the 1990s, and worked in public relations in the Abu Dhabi Engineers Association Branch, and was then Media Officer in the Emirates Equestrian Federation and Race.
Later he moved to the business world and founded the Ghassan Aboud Foundation for Vehicles, an organisation for international automotive re-export. The number of countries that deal with the institution exceeded one hundred, after which he added new groups with additional activities to become Ghassan Aboud Group.
In 2008, he established his media project where the first phase included launching satellite channel addressing the Arab families in general, and the Syrian one in espesial, taking into consideration the Arab youth generation that forms 60% of the total population. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghassan_Aboud
Muhammed Ghassan Aboud (Arabic: غسان عبود; born 1967) is a Dubai based Syrian entrepreneur, philanthropist,[1] and a founding member of the Syrian Business Council.[2] He is mainly known as the founder of Orient Media which runs the largest pro-opposition television, radio, and online media network in Syria. in June 2011, he led and organized the first major conference of Syrian intellectuals, activists, businessmen, and civil society organizers to discuss the future of Syria following the onset of the Syrian revolution in 2011. His outspoken stance against the Assad regime, opposition to ISIS, and extensive support for humanitarian aid in Syria has made him a frequent target of threats. Following his refusal to hand over a majority stake of Orient Media to Rami Makhlouf, an influential businessman and cousin to Bashar al-Assad, Ghassan’s house and personal property in Syria were all confiscated by Syrian security forces. He has since lived in exile in Dubai and Belgium.
Orient Television and Live Point Organization
In 2008 he established Orient News, a satellite channel and a TV production company LivePoint based in Dubai and Syria. His media company quickly expanded to also include bureaus in the United States, Belgium, Jordan, and Turkey. Orient News became the first full-time news channel following the 2011 Syrian revolution dedicated full-time to covering the social, political, and military dynamics of the Syrian conflict.
Orient for human relief
Ghassan Aboud established Orient for Charity and Human Relief in 2012 to provide medical, educational, and social services to the millions of Syrians that have been displaced or injured in the Syrian conflict. The organization runs eight large surgical hospitals in northern Syria in addition to field clinics that provide treatment for communicable diseases that have been spreading as a result of damages to the health infrastructure of the country due to the war. Orient Humanitarian provides free medical services to thousands of patients each month and employs around 450 medical specialists. Orient Humanitarian also runs a displaced camp in the city of Atmeh on the Turkish border which accommodates more than 5000 displaced individuals and their families, in addition to distributing more than three thousand tons of flour every month into areas badly damaged by the conflict throughout northern Syria. The organization receives doctors from international organizations such as the Syrian American Medical Society, USAID, and HAND IN HAND from the United Kingdom.
The above Wikipedia info is all part of the regime change agenda of the West used to legitimize the Syrian opposition groups that are made up of jihadists and terrorists.
Follow the link below to find out more about this terrorism support network….
This is one of the official Orient TV videos showing who they glamorize and promote in Syria. This interview is with Saudi cleric Abdullah al-Muhaysini the leader of the al-Nusra Front terrorist organization in Syria (al-Qaeda) in Syria. On November 10th, 2016 (one day after the US election) the US Treasury Department designated him as a terrorist finally.
Video directly above showing the leader of al-Nusra Front on Orient News has been removed by You Tube. I cached a copy at the following Live Leak link.
The same al-Nusra Front lead terrorist at same location with his full posse having an “allah ahkbar” snackfest. Note they held back on the “Allah Ahkbars” for the Orient TV video above.
And again declaring fatwa….
Here’s we see him with a Arab Red Crescent (Red Cross) worker holding a Red Crescent bag at the 37 second mark.
Essentially, Ghassan Aboud, the owner of Orient TV, is an oligarch similar to the lead oligarchs in Ukraine (Igor Kolomoisky, Petro Poroshenko, Viktor Pinchuk) who own the largest media outlets in the western targeted to be overthrown country and employ nefarious violent radical groups to carry out their agenda in conjunction with the US/UK governments and Deep State/global oligarchs.
The above videos clearly show who it is they are backing in Syria. Hopefully, this is a bit of an eye-opener for people as the same type of agenda was violently carried out in Ukraine where it also led to tens of thousands of deaths. The western powers are using fake propaganda arms and NGO’s along with fake humanitarian aid organizations to fool their respective citizenry and lead them to support illegal groups, violent overthrows and immoral endless warfare.
The videos below highlight the truth about the Syrian war that Orient TV and other Gulf State terrorist supporting media channels have worked so hard to cover up. This 2013 Russian Tv report with English subtitles reveals the horrific crimes of al-Nusra Front terrorists who love ran Aleppo in 2013. Highly graphic: This is how it all went down.
Asma al-Assad, the partner and wife of the Syrian president explains what is really going on.
More on the terrorist glamorized and o=portrayed as a hero by Dubai’s Orient News TV network.
WASHINGTON – The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) took action today to disrupt al-Nusrah Front’s military, recruitment, and financing operations. Specifically, OFAC designated four key al-Nusrah Front leaders – Abdallah Muhammad Bin-Sulayman al-Muhaysini, Jamal Husayn Zayniyah, Abdul Jashari, and Ashraf Ahmad Fari al-Allak – pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 13224, which targets terrorists and those providing support to terrorists or acts of terrorism. As a result of today’s action, all property and interests in property of these designated individuals subject to U.S. jurisdiction are blocked, and U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions with them.
These designations were taken in coordination with the U.S. Department of State, which today named Jabhat Fath al Sham as an alias of al-Nusrah Front – al-Qa’ida’s affiliate in Syria.
“From recruiting fighters to raising funds, these sanctioned individuals are responsible for providing key financial and logistical support to al-Nusrah Front,” said John E. Smith, Acting OFAC Director. “Treasury will continue to target al-Nusrah Front’s financial networks and choke off their access to the international financial system.”
Abdallah Muhammad Bin-Sulayman al-Muhaysini
Abdallah Muhammad Bin-Sulayman al-Muhaysini was designated for acting for or on behalf of, and providing support and services to or in support of, al-Nusrah Front.
As of late 2015, al-Muhaysini was an accepted member of al-Nusrah Front’s inner leadership circle. As of July 2015, Abdallah al-Muhaysini served as al-Nusrah Front’s religious advisor and represented al-Nusrah Front in an Idlib Province, Syria, military operations room. He has been involved in recruiting fighters to join al-Nusrah Front and helping to form a new al-Nusrah Front “state” in northern Syria. In April 2016, Muhaysini launched a campaign to recruit 3,000 child and teenage soldiers across northern Syria for al-Nusrah Front.
Al-Muhaysini has played a crucial role in providing financial aid to al-Nusrah Front. Between 2013 and 2015, al-Muhaysini raised millions of dollars to support al-Nusrah Front governance efforts in Idlib Province, Syria. As of early October 2015, al-Muhaysini had set up institutions providing financial aid to terrorist groups, including a highly successful campaign that he claimed had secured $5 million in donations to arm fighters.
Abdallah al-Muhaysini, a Pivotal Figure in the Islamist terrorist attacks on Syria
Abdallah al-Muhaysini came to Syria in 2013 to partake in the western orchestrated overthrow of Bashar al-Assad. He presents a unique case of the outsized role a single person can play in the lawless world of the so called Syrian rebellion. He has positioned himself at the center of radical jihadist politics, fund raising, and legal opinion.
Al-Muhaysini hails from the al-Qassim region in Saudi Arabia. Prior to his arrival to Syria, he completed his MA and PhD studies in Islamic Jurisprudence in the Imam Muhammad ibn Saud Islamic University in Riyadh, with a dissertation on “The Treatment of Prisoners of War in Islamic Jurisprudence.” A self-professed Salafi jihadist scholar, al-Muhaysini is often seen on the battlefields of northern Syria together with various Islamist factions, prominent among whom are Ahrar al-Sham and Jabhat al-Nusra (JN), in addition to other factions affiliated with the Jaish al-Fateh coalition. He has set up institutions that provide military and financial aid to jihadist groups, and runs a proselytization (Dawah) center (named “The Jihad’s Callers Center“) in Idlib Province.
Al-Mushaysini holds the title General Judge of Jaish al-Fateh. He is highly revered in the jihadi-Salafi landscape (notwithstanding Islamic State adherents), embracing a leading role in the warfare – most recently in the Jabha al-Nusra takeover, together with the Turkistan Islamic Party (TIP) of the Abu al-Dhuhur Air Base and in the Jaish al-Fatah battles for control over al-Fuah this month (September 2015). During clashes in the last year, he was documented delivering inflammatory speeches to the troops and bestowing religious blessing upon suicide bombers before embarking on their missions.
In the following video Saudi cleric Abdallah al-Muhaysini directly asks ISIS to join him in jihad in Syria:
The above You Tube video and Live Leak link have both now been deleted. Fortunately, there are other links of the same video. The ISIS statement can be found at this Tapestry of Terror link:
Something not very widely known in western countries, is that he is considered a hero in the Sunni Gulf States where he is regularly featured on Dubai’s Orient TV news channel and al-Jazeera.
More on the terrorists propaganda arm Orient TV in the UAE here:
Orient News TV, based in UAE, and broadcasts to Syria, Jordan, Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates.
Orient News TV aims to address Syrian viewers in specific and the Arab world in general, with cultural and entertainment programming as well as information and news. Orient TV opened in Damascus in February 2009, employing 149 Syrians. However the government soon had doubts about having granted a license to Orient TV, and in July 2009 Syrian security forces raided Orient TV’s offices. As a consequence Orient TV moved to Dubai. The station began broadcasting outside of Syria with coverage of the first civil courts established in Idlib province.
Ownership
Ghassan Aboud the founder, owner of Orient Media Network
The project’s founder and owner is Syrian business man Mohammad Ghassan Aboud, born in 1967. He holds a bachelor’s degree in media from Damascus University in 1991. He left Syria for the United Arab Emirates at the beginning of the 1990s, and worked in public relations in the Abu Dhabi Engineers Association Branch, and was then Media Officer in the Emirates Equestrian Racing Federation.
Leading Saudi cleric preaching jihad –
Leading al-Nusra Front (al-Qaeda) in Syria into battle: Note Red Crescent (Red Cross) bag at the 47 second mark.
Certain aid groups have been filmed on occasion working alongside the terrorists and proxy groups designed as NGO’s, examples here:
Proof of US and UK funded White Helmets operating alongside al-Nusra Front terrorists in Syria
The UK/US/Saudi/Soros financed White Helmets are seen in the above video operating side by side with radical Islamic jihadists in East Aleppo, Syria. UK media outlets such as the Guardian, the Independent, the BBC and ITV4 were recently pushing for these ‘White Helmet’ (read terrorists) to receive a Nobel Peace prize. This shows you how far and how low the UK media has stooped in their ‘reporting’. These media outlets and this group are exploiting children to place on their front pages to fool the public while they nefariously support terrorism.
In August 2016 CNN tried rebranding al-Nusra Front (al-Qaeda) and even gave them air time to explain their name change……..gotta love that CNN ‘reporting’!
The Daily Mail once did an expose’ on lead Saudi cleric/terrorist Abdullah al-Muhaysini, but conveniently left out the fact that he hailed from Saudi Arabia.
Al Qaeda militants in Syria parade captured regime helicopter airman on video and demand radical cleric is released
Airman was seen in video released by Al Qaeda affiliated Jabhat al-Nusra
Notorious militant Abdullah al-Muhaysini stands over him wielding a knife
Jihadi calls for the release of another Al Qaeda extremist, Mus’ab as-Suri
Airman was among at least four people captured near Idlib yesterday
To sum up, what we have here is a Saudi/US backed Islamic cleric who leads the Islamic terrorist groups in Syria against the Syrian government. He is the leader of al-Nusra Front (al-Qaeda in Syria) and other affiliated groups. Note that all the groups are intertwined and he is the main leader of all of them. This is left out of the US media narrative, and obscured by the US State Department, as is the fact that he hails from Saudi Arabia’s most prominent university and is a widely promoted cleric there.
The videos above clearly show him recruiting ISIS fighters to join his army. He is regularly featured on the UAE Dubai’s Orient TV network, and CNN recently provided his terrorist group air time to explain their name change. He uses his provided airtime in the Gulf States to solicit funds for his Islamic fatwa/jihad in Syria. Orient TV in Dubai openly facilitates this propaganda and declares him to be a freedom fighter against the infidels (namely Christians and Allawites in Syria).
There are numerous instances on camera of the Red Crescent and the White Helmets working side by side with the terrorist groups he commands. The White Helmets are a fake NGO terrorist front group posing as humanitarians and receiving extensive pro-White Helmet media coverage in the US, UK, Europe, Canada and Australia/New Zealand. They were trained by the Red Cross in 2013 as proven by the links above. What we are looking at here is one of the greatest lies ever told and its all easily provable. The western Powers That Be and the Middle Eastern Gulf States are funding and promoting the terrorists in the Middle East. The leader of which, one Abdallah al-Muhaysini is on camera in the videos above openly soliciting ISIS fighters to join him. Thats a story you will not see in any US media outlet.
Extensive Clarity of Signal links proving the White Helmets are a terrorist front group:
One more video where he names names in Saudi Arabia who are backing him and paying for the weapons.
Muhaysni named sources in Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Kuwait who financed the 100 missiles fired on civilians in W. Aleppo #Syriapic.twitter.com/He8NxklmVv
Exclusive: Buried deep inside Saturday’s New York Times was a grudging acknowledgement that the U.S.-armed “moderate” rebels in Syria are using their U.S. firepower to back an Al Qaeda offensive, reports Robert Parry.
By Robert Parry
A curious aspect of the Syrian conflict – a rebellion sponsored largely by the United States and its Gulf state allies – is the disappearance in much of the American mainstream news media of references to the prominent role played by Al Qaeda in seeking to overthrow the secular Syrian government of Bashar al-Assad.
There’s much said in the U.S. press about ISIS, the former “Al Qaeda in Iraq” which splintered off several years ago, but Al Qaeda’s central role in commanding Syria’s “moderate” rebels in Aleppo and elsewhere is the almost unspoken reality of the Syrian war. Even in the U.S. presidential debates, the arguing between Republican Donald Trump and Democrat Hillary Clinton has been almost exclusively about ISIS, not Al Qaeda.
For instance, the conflict in Aleppo between Syrian government forces and rebels operating primarily under Al Qaeda’s command is treated in the Western media as simply a case of the barbaric Assad and his evil Russian ally Vladimir Putin mercilessly bombing what is portrayed as the east Aleppo equivalent of Disney World, a place where innocent children and their families peacefully congregate until they are targeted for death by the Assad-Putin war-crime family.
The photos sent out to the world by skillful rebel propagandists are almost always of wounded children being cared for by the “White Helmet” rebel civil defense corps, which has come under growing criticism for serving as a public-relations arm of Al Qaeda and other insurgents. (There also are allegations that some of the most notable images have been staged, like a fake war scene from the 1997 dark comedy, “Wag the Dog.”)
Finally on November 10th, 2016 (The day after the US election) Muhaysini has been designated a terrorist. This BS is unforgivable as the Obama admin knew all along what this bastard was up to.
WASHINGTON – The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) took action today to disrupt al-Nusrah Front’s military, recruitment, and financing operations. Specifically, OFAC designated four key al-Nusrah Front leaders – Abdallah Muhammad Bin-Sulayman al-Muhaysini, Jamal Husayn Zayniyah, Abdul Jashari, and Ashraf Ahmad Fari al-Allak – pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 13224, which targets terrorists and those providing support to terrorists or acts of terrorism. As a result of today’s action, all property and interests in property of these designated individuals subject to U.S. jurisdiction are blocked, and U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions with them.
These designations were taken in coordination with the U.S. Department of State, which today named Jabhat Fath al Sham as an alias of al-Nusrah Front – al-Qa’ida’s affiliate in Syria.
“From recruiting fighters to raising funds, these sanctioned individuals are responsible for providing key financial and logistical support to al-Nusrah Front,” said John E. Smith, Acting OFAC Director. “Treasury will continue to target al-Nusrah Front’s financial networks and choke off their access to the international financial system.”
Abdallah Muhammad Bin-Sulayman al-Muhaysini
Abdallah Muhammad Bin-Sulayman al-Muhaysini was designated for acting for or on behalf of, and providing support and services to or in support of, al-Nusrah Front.
As of late 2015, al-Muhaysini was an accepted member of al-Nusrah Front’s inner leadership circle. As of July 2015, Abdallah al-Muhaysini served as al-Nusrah Front’s religious advisor and represented al-Nusrah Front in an Idlib Province, Syria, military operations room. He has been involved in recruiting fighters to join al-Nusrah Front and helping to form a new al-Nusrah Front “state” in northern Syria. In April 2016, Muhaysini launched a campaign to recruit 3,000 child and teenage soldiers across northern Syria for al-Nusrah Front.
Al-Muhaysini has played a crucial role in providing financial aid to al-Nusrah Front. Between 2013 and 2015, al-Muhaysini raised millions of dollars to support al-Nusrah Front governance efforts in Idlib Province, Syria. As of early October 2015, al-Muhaysini had set up institutions providing financial aid to terrorist groups, including a highly successful campaign that he claimed had secured $5 million in donations to arm fighters.
Note the July 26, 2014 date on the RT video below which clearly shows the horrific and clearly inhumane massive Israeli bombing of apartment blocks in Gaza. This was a major warcrime on the most massive scale when it took place and Israel has never owned up and accepted responsibility for this inhumane mass slaughter. Over 2,000 innocent people died during the July 2014 bombing of Gaza, yet the event received very little attention at the time due to the corrupt mainstream media establishment focusing the publics attention nearly entirely on the shootdown of MH-17 and the demonization of the Russian President Vladimir Putin at that time.
CNN eventually started covering the massive bombings only toward the very end of the month of July, but painted the Israel air force as conducting polite “knocks on the roof”…even after they bombed the U.N. children schools. They even go so far as to refer to the entire period prior to these ‘roof knocks’ as a time of a humanitarian truce, even though the RT video above clearly shows there was nothing humanitarian about anything Israel was doing to Gaza. Even if some militants from Gaza had fired rockets into the confiscated territory of Israel there is no way that these counter strikes were proportional in response to shoulder fired rockets. Israel was literally exterminating whole city blocks of people. The estimate minimum death toll was 2,000 civilians. The majority of the MSM was notably absent at this time. A current 2017 You Tube search shows very little MSM participation in reporting about what happened in Gaza in July 2014. Strangely enough, due to the fact they are often reporting fake news themselves, it was only CNN that provided video reports on the massive bombings of Gaza by the Israeli air force.
The Israeli Ambassador slammed CNN on air for reporting that Israel even went so far as to bomb the United Nations children schools in Gaza.
The following video covers the MH-17 psychological groundwork and compares it to what really took place on July 17, 2014.
Of course the real reason for the massive bombing of Gaza is hidden and revolves around Israeli Zionists true plans…..
The Zionists have made know, since that late 1800s, of their intent to drive out (ethnically cleanse) all the Palestinians.
Despite the steady arrival in Palestine of Jewish colonists after 1882, it is important to realize that not until the few weeks immediately preceding the establishment of Israel in the spring of 1948 was there ever anything other than a huge Arab majority. For example, the Jewish population in 1931 was 174,606 against a total of 1,033,314.” Edward Said, “The Question of Palestine.”
“The aim of the Fund was ‘to redeem the land of Palestine as the inalienable possession of the Jewish people.’…As early as 1891, Zionist leader Ahad Ha’am wrote that the Arabs “understood very well what we were doing and what we were aiming at’… ‘We shall try to spirit the penniless population across the border by procuring employment for it in transit countries, while denying it employment in our own country… Both the process of expropriation and the removal of the poor must be carried out discreetly and circumspectly’…At various locations in northern Palestine Arab farmers refused to move from land the Fund purchased from absentee owners, and the Turkish authorities, at the Fund’s request, evicted them…
“Before the 20th century, most Jews in Palestine belonged to old Yishuv, or community, that had settled more for religious than for political reasons. There was little if any conflict between them and the Arab population. Tensions began after the first Zionist settlers arrived in the 1880’s…when purchased land from absentee Arab owners, leading to dispossession of the peasants who had cultivated it.” Don Peretz, “The Arab-Israeli Dispute.”
“Serfs they (the Jews) were in the lands of the Diaspora, and suddenly they find themselves in freedom ; and this change has awakened in them an inclination to despotism. They treat the Arabs with hostility and cruelty, deprive them of their rights, offend them without cause, and even boast of these deeds; and nobody among us opposes this despicable and dangerous inclination.” Zionist writer Ahad Ha’am, quoted in Sami Hadawi, “Bitter Harvest.”
Here’s more by the Independent UK on the massive damage done to Gaza……
The latest conflict has left more than 2,200 people dead, mostly civilians
As discussions for a long-term truce between Israel and Hamas continue in Cairo, Gaza is picking up the pieces of a 50-day war that left more than 2,200 people dead.
People are beginning to leave refugee camps and UN shelters amid hopes that a ceasefire declared yesterday will hold but many have no home to return to.
More than 20,000 homes are estimated to have been rendered uninhabitable by shelling and air strikes that the Israel Defence Forces (IDF) claimed targeted only “terrorist” sites used by Hamas for military purposes.
Just a day before the peace deal was struck, bombing toppled one of Gaza’s tallest buildings, the 15-storey Basha Tower full of apartments and offices, after days of strikes against shopping complexes and high rises.
The UN estimates that more than 20,000 homes have been reduced to rubble or rendered uninhabitable and workers are racing to avert humanitarian crisis by fixing damaged water mains and power lines.
50 Days of Death & Destruction: Israel’s “Operation Protective Edge”
PALESTINIANS KILLED & INJURED
According to the United Nations, between July 7 and August 26, at least 2131 Palestinians were killed in Gaza as a result of Israel’s “Operation Protective Edge.” According to Al Mezan Center for Human Rights, a total of 2168 Palestinians were killed, while the Palestinian Center for Human Rights (PCHR) put the total number of Palestinian fatalities at 2191. (NOTE: Updated February 2015 to reflect revised PCHR figures)
According to the UN, at least 1473 of the dead were civilians, including 501 children and 257 women, with another 379 individuals yet to be identified. According to PCHR, 1660 Palestinian civilians were killed, including 527 children and 299 women, while Al Mezan reported that 1666 of the dead were civilians, including 521 children and 297 women. For further reference, see “Notable Incidents of Civilian Casualties” section in fact sheet here. (NOTE: Updated February 2015 to reflect revised PCHR figures)
According to the UN, at least 142 Palestinian families lost three or more members killed in a single Israeli attack, for a total of 739 fatalities (see here for more), and up to 1500 children were orphaned.
According to the Palestinian Ministry of Health, 11,100 Palestinians were wounded, including 3374 children, 2088 women, and 410 elderly people. The UN estimates that 1000 of the injured children will suffer a lifelong disability.
The UN estimates that at least 373,000 children require direct and specialized psychosocial support (PSS), while every child in Gaza has been affected by the crisis and will need some level of psychosocial support. (For more on the toll inflicted on Gaza’s children, see our recently released fact sheet, The Children of Gaza: A Generation Scarred & Under Siege.)
During the same period, 71 Israelis were killed by Palestinians, including 66 soldiers and four civilians, as well as one foreign worker from Thailand.
HOMES DESTROYED & PALESTINIANS DISPLACED
According to the UN, 18,000 housing units were totally destroyed or severely damaged by Israeli attacks, leaving approximately 108,000 of Gaza’s 1.8 million Palestinians homeless. Prior to this latest assault, there were 12,000 Palestinians still displaced from Israel’s 2008-09 attack, “Operation Cast Lead,” and a shortage of 71,000 housing units, according to the UN. (See here for UN Gaza Crisis Atlas, showing satellite images and geographic distribution of attacks.)
According to the UN, at the peak of Israel’s assault, an estimated 485,000 people (approximately 28% of Gaza’s population) were displaced.
DESTRUCTION OF CIVILIAN INFRASTRUCTURE
Israeli attacks caused widespread damage to Gaza’s already frail and dilapidated electrical grid, run down and in disrepair after seven years of siege and blockade. Most notably, on July 29 Israel bombed Gaza’s only power plant, knocking it out of commission indefinitely, prompting Amnesty International to condemn the attack as an act of “collective punishment” against the entire population. (Israel previously bombed the plant during assaults in 2006 and 2008-09.) According to the UN, even following repairs to what remains of the electrical grid, most areas of Gaza continue to endure up to 18 hours of electrical outages a day.
Israel’s destruction of Gaza’s power plant caused the shutdown of water treatment plants, while Israeli tank fire put Gaza’s largest sewage treatment plant out of commission. Other Israeli attacks did extensive damage to Gaza’s water and sewage systems, also already in critical condition due to the siege and previous Israeli assaults, leading to the release of raw sewage into open pools, farmland, and the Mediterranean Sea, causing health concerns and affecting fishermen. On August 5, Oxfam warned that Israeli attacks damaging wells, pipelines, and reservoirs had caused the contamination of fresh water supplies, already heavily contaminated before the assault, and that 15,000 tons of solid waste had leaked into the streets of Gaza.
According to the September 4 UN Gaza crisis report:
450,000 people were unable to access municipal water systems due to infrastructure damage and/or low water pressure.
On average, 20% to 30% of Gaza’s water and wastewater systems remain significantly damaged.
According to the UN, 22 schools were destroyed and 118 damaged, and at least six teachers killed. As a result of the ongoing violence, schools being damaged and destroyed, and displaced people taking refuge in schools, nearly half a million children had the start of their school year delayed, from August 24 to September 14. As the UN noted in its September 4 Gaza crisis report.
Libya, like Yemen and Ukraine, has almost become the “forgotten war’ as corrupted western media outlets keep it off the radar and out of the public eye. Its all part of the order from chaos agenda. They’ll let you know what they want you to know and nothing more…….thus, I thought it was well beyond time to give folks a proper primer on what the U.S. and European powers have been supporting in Libya as that unfortunate country continues to spiral into conflict and chaos.
During 2016, Southfront Geopolitical Analysis has performed an excellent service by putting together some primer videos on western support for terrorists and a basic assessment of the Libyan war.
Geopolitical researcher and former US congressman (Head of Intelligence Committee) Peter Hoekstra has also compiled a lot of important info related to terrorists in Libya…..his “Investigative Project on Terrorism” site is a good resource for those looking to learn more about the connections between global terrorists and global and Deep State powers. It is very telling that the Obama administration spokeman Josh Earnest tried to denounce Hoekstra’s 2015 book.
The barbaric and elusive Chechen commander who recruited British executioner “Jihadi John” has moved to Sirte, Libya to assume control of ISIS operations in the terrorist organization’s metastasizing Mediterranean caliphate. The Investigative Project on Terrorism first learned about the movement of Abu Omar al-Shishani – among the world’s most-wanted terrorists – through its exclusive Middle East sources. Other news organizations later confirmed the account.
Al-Shishani is a former American-trained officer in the Georgian special forces. He developed a reputation for his ferocity and effectiveness while fighting against the Russians during the 2008 invasion of Georgia and later for ISIS against dictator Bashar al-Assad in Syria. He established his presence not long after arriving in former dictator Muammar Gaddafi’s hometown Sirte by ordering one execution and chopping the limbs off another individual.
Western intelligence officials believe that up to 6,500 ISIS fighters – twice the number previously thought – have relocated to Libya as a result of coalition airstrikes on ISIS in the Middle East and new difficulties entering Syria.
Libya’s emergence as an ideal location in which to foster its new caliphate arose after NATO assisted radical jihadists in killing Gaddafi in 2011 and abruptly abandoned the country. Left in its wake were two rival governments competing for power, which created space for Islamists to turn Libya into a cesspool of extremism.
ISIS’s new caliphate along the Mediterranean coastline reaches as close as 200 miles from the vulnerable southern border of Europe. It exploits Libya as a base to export weapons, jihadists and ideology to Europe, Africa and the Middle East. Benghazi and Derna have long been nests of radicalism. They provided more fighters per capita to Afghanistan and Iraq than nearly any other geographic area in the world. The difference between then and now is that Gaddafi kept the lid on the garbage can.
With al-Shishani hanging his hat in Sirte, Libya has become a safe haven for one of the most murderous leaders in the world today. The situation demonstrates the total failure of a Western foreign policy that “leads from behind.”
Pete Hoekstra is the Shillman Senior Fellow at the Investigative Project on Terrorism and the former Chairman of the U.S. House Intelligence Committee. He is the author of “Architects of Disaster: The Destruction of Libya.”
SouthFront covers more about ISIS being used as a ruse to carry out the global domination agenda of the western powers……
A large part of the Grand Chessboard is, of course, about control of the resources…….
Now Libya is destabilized, the excuse of pursuing terrorists allows western powers to expand influence down into sub-Saharan Africa as a ploy to ‘go after’ the terrorists they are in actuality aligned with…..
More here from Brandon Turbeville at Activist Post:
Hillary Clinton And The Funding Of Al-Qaeda Terrorists In Libya And Syria
Picking up where the Benghazi scandal left off, it cannot be stated often enough that Hillary Clinton, in her tenure as Secretary of State, was instrumental in helping to fund, organize, train, and direct al-Qaeda terrorist forces in Libya and Syria.
In regards to Libya, it was well known and even criticized by Libyan officials that Clinton’s State Department was actively funneling weaponry to “rebels” with “ties to al-Qaeda.” Of course, the “rebels” actually were al-Qaeda as the Libyan “rebellion” itself was nothing more than the use of proxy forces by the United States and NATO whose ranks were made up of terrorists, jihadists, and mercenaries. As the Washington Times reported in February, 2015
The Libyan free Press site has more on what the NATO backed terrorists have done to people of darker skin color since the western destabilization and overthrow of Muamar Gaddafi:
Libyan Rebels Listed by US State Department as Terrorists – NATO leaders are guilty under US code of providing material support to terrorists.
by Tony Cartalucci
“Whoever knowingly provides material support or resources to a foreign terrorist organization, or attempts or conspires to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 15 years, or both, and, if the death of any person results, shall be imprisoned for any term of years or for life. To violate this paragraph, a person must have knowledge that the organization is a designated terrorist organization (as defined in subsection (g)(6)), that the organization has engaged or engages in terrorist activity (as defined in section 212(a)(3)(B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act), or that the organization has engaged or engages in terrorism (as defined in section 140(d)(2) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1988 and 1989).”-USC § 2339B. Providing material support or resources to designated foreign terrorist organizations
In March 2011, the London Telegraph reported that Libya’s rebels had direct ties to Al Qaeda and that both leaders and fighters had spent time in both Iraq and Afghanistan combating US troops. The article titled, “Libyan rebel commander admits his fighters have al-Qaeda links” featured Abdel-Hakim al-Hasidi, who had been captured by the US after fighting Americans in Afghanistan, returned to Libya, and released under a bargain for Hasidi and his Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) militants to abandon extremism and become productive members of society. Quite obviously, and with the US, UK, and NATO’s help, Hasidi and his men went back on this bargain and are now sowing murder and mayhem across Libya.
This post looks into the media’s support for the terrorists in east Aleppo during the Syrian/Russian liberation of the city in December 2016. Numerous western media outlets ran with a campaign to convince their respective audiences that the poor terrorists were innocent civilians being killed by murderous Syrian and Russian troops. Nothing could be further from the truth……as highlighted below.
People extensively cited by the Western media last week as saying their last goodbyes from eastern Aleppo appear to be well and still reporting. Among the latest videos, one of the ‘departed’ is showing off a rebel fighter wearing a suicide vest.
Last week (December 2016), as the fighting became intensive for the remaining pockets of insurgent-held areas of eastern Aleppo in Syria, numerous reports in the mainstream media cited activists on the ground. Their message was more or less the same: we are about to die under bombs, so we are saying our last goodbyes.
The 10 days of rebel evacuation from eastern Aleppo is wrapping up, and the journalists and activists appear to have survived quite well the ‘Russian bunker busters’ and other threats they reported.
Fighters haven't been allowed 2 leave. They all have explosive belts & say they won't be arrested if regime breaks deal pic.twitter.com/QROBWUGprv
TELEVISION TROPHY – INTERNATIONAL JURY
AWARDED BY AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL
1st Prize
Arnaud COMTE and Stéphane GUILLEMOT
FRANCE 2
Mossoul : fuir à tout prix
IRAQ
2nd Prize
Clarissa WARD and Bilal Abdul KAREEM
CNN
Here he is praising the lead al-Nusra Front terrorist in Syria – as designated by the US Treasury Department in the article below.
WASHINGTON – The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) took action today to disrupt al-Nusrah Front’s military, recruitment, and financing operations. Specifically, OFAC designated four key al-Nusrah Front leaders – Abdallah Muhammad Bin-Sulayman al-Muhaysini, Jamal Husayn Zayniyah, Abdul Jashari, and Ashraf Ahmad Fari al-Allak – pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 13224, which targets terrorists and those providing support to terrorists or acts of terrorism. As a result of today’s action, all property and interests in property of these designated individuals subject to U.S. jurisdiction are blocked, and U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions with them.
These designations were taken in coordination with the U.S. Department of State, which today named Jabhat Fath al Sham as an alias of al-Nusrah Front – al-Qa’ida’s affiliate in Syria.
“From recruiting fighters to raising funds, these sanctioned individuals are responsible for providing key financial and logistical support to al-Nusrah Front,” said John E. Smith, Acting OFAC Director. “Treasury will continue to target al-Nusrah Front’s financial networks and choke off their access to the international financial system.”
Abdallah Muhammad Bin-Sulayman al-Muhaysini
Abdallah Muhammad Bin-Sulayman al-Muhaysini was designated for acting for or on behalf of, and providing support and services to or in support of, al-Nusrah Front.
As of late 2015, al-Muhaysini was an accepted member of al-Nusrah Front’s inner leadership circle. As of July 2015, Abdallah al-Muhaysini served as al-Nusrah Front’s religious advisor and represented al-Nusrah Front in an Idlib Province, Syria, military operations room. He has been involved in recruiting fighters to join al-Nusrah Front and helping to form a new al-Nusrah Front “state” in northern Syria. In April 2016, Muhaysini launched a campaign to recruit 3,000 child and teenage soldiers across northern Syria for al-Nusrah Front.
Al-Muhaysini has played a crucial role in providing financial aid to al-Nusrah Front. Between 2013 and 2015, al-Muhaysini raised millions of dollars to support al-Nusrah Front governance efforts in Idlib Province, Syria. As of early October 2015, al-Muhaysini had set up institutions providing financial aid to terrorist groups, including a highly successful campaign that he claimed had secured $5 million in donations to arm fighters.
Link here to recent posts on terrorist al-Muhaysini:
No Credibility in Barrage of “Final Message” Social Media Posts From East Aleppo
DECEMBER 15, 2016
21st Century Wire
A flood of “final message” tweets and social media posts, allegedly out of Aleppo, are not from mere civilians, but are coming from activists and film makers with spots on prime time TV. The narrative of the Syrian Army and Russian forces killing civilians being pushed by these social media blasts do not match what our reporters are seeing on the ground in Aleppo where liberated civilians are rejoicing in the streets. Is it a coincidence that the social media accounts appear to be coordinating on the spreading of Western propaganda or is it an all out PR campaign?
Social media coming out of Aleppo has gone into overdrive. Well-articulated video pleas alleging near-death snake their way into the mainstream. There’s just one issue: these aren’t just any civilians, but activists and filmmakers – with spots on primetime TV. The narrative is the same each time: that an all-out genocide is taking place; that the Assad forces are going from city to city killing their own people and taking no prisoners; and that Aleppo’s rebels valiantly look death in the face as they endure alleged Russian bombardment.
‘In the Now’ found there’s little to indicate that the people appearing in the mobile videos were actual civilians experiencing the hyped ‘Russian and Syrian shelling.
More at link above…..
Here’s how they do it….
A former editor and correspondent of the The New York Times, Michael Cieply describes how the newspaper works:
Quote: It was a shock on arriving at the New York Times in 2004, as the paper’s movie editor, to realize that its editorial dynamic was essentially the reverse. By and large, talented reporters scrambled to match stories with what internally was often called “the narrative.” We were occasionally asked to map a narrative for our various beats a year in advance, square the plan with editors, then generate stories that fit the pre-designated line.
Reality usually had a way of intervening. But I knew one senior reporter who would play solitaire on his computer in the mornings, waiting for his editors to come through with marching orders. Once, in the Los Angeles bureau, I listened to a visiting National staff reporter tell a contact, more or less: “My editor needs someone to say such-and-such, could you say that?”
The bigger shock came on being told, at least twice, by Times editors who were describing the paper’s daily Page One meeting: “We set the agenda for the country in that room.”
Note that the bomb is placed in position, then detonated on camera, followed by crisis actors running onto the scene and laying down/feigning injury, soon after an ambulance immediately arrives on the scene and other crisis actors start carrying those faking injury to the vehicle. This story appeared on the AP and across affiliated news organizations on October 31st, 2016. The 2nd video below explains the western media’s application of the staged false flag bombing.
Caveat: My use of the video’s does not necessarily mean that I agree with all of the statements of the narrators thereof. What matters in this context is the visual content of the videos provided.
2nd video highlights the Associated Press use and application of the false flag.
MRT has now removed the article that is highlighted in the 2nd video…..
Excerpt: Excerpt from Daily Mail Uk article titled “Iraqi special forces poised on eastern edge of Mosul”. Material was also used by the Associated Press. Photos included at the online article prove it was the same attack. Excerpt from article: BAZWAYA, Iraq (AP) — Iraqi special forces stood poised to enter Mosul in an offensive to drive out Islamic State militants after sweeping into the last village on the city’s eastern edge Monday while fending off suicide car bombs without losing a soldier.Armored vehicles, including Abrams tanks, drew fire from mortars and small arms as they moved on the village of Bazwaya in an assault that began at dawn, while artillery and airstrikes hit IS positions.
Read more at http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=286_1478179244#4tMdyZmxiLkUyKsk.99
Iraqis made fake video for car suicide bombing ( stage ) CCTV camera debunked what Shiite militias said that there was a suicide attack in Residential area ( Baghdad ). Posted time 30 October 2016.
Caveat: I don’t necessarily agree with all of the views of the narrator, however, the video above does clearly show the crisis actors running into the scene and acting injured post explosion.
Now here’s the link to the Daily Mail UK article that features the story of the ‘bombing’ and photos from the scene:
Iraqi special forces poised on eastern edge of Mosul
BAZWAYA, Iraq (AP) — Iraqi special forces stood poised to enter Mosul in an offensive to drive out Islamic State militants after sweeping into the last village on the city’s eastern edge Monday while fending off suicide car bombs without losing a soldier. Armored vehicles, including Abrams tanks, drew fire from mortars and small arms as they moved on the village of Bazwaya in an assault that began at dawn, while artillery and airstrikes hit IS positions. By evening, the fighting had stopped and units took up positions less than a mile from Mosul’s eastern border and about 5 miles (8 kilometers) from the center, two weeks into the offensive to retake Iraq’s second-largest city.
Daily Mail description: People inspect the aftermath of a deadly car bomb explosion that hit a popular fruit and vegetable market in a commercial street in Baghdad’s northwestern neighborhood of Hurriyah, Iraq, Monday, Oct. 31, 2016. Iraqi police say a parked car bomb exploded in Baghdad’s northwestern neighborhood of Hurriyah on Sunday, killed at least 10 and wounding many. (AP Photo/ Karim Kadim)
Daily Mail description:
Children pick through debris at the site of a deadly car bomb explosion that hit a popular fruit and vegetable market on Sunday, in a commercial street in Baghdad, Iraq, Monday, Oct. 31, 2016. Iraqi police say a parked car bomb exploded in Baghdad’s northwestern neighborhood of Hurriyah on Sunday, killed at least 10 and wounding many. (AP Photo/ Karim Kadim)
Daily Mail description:
People inspect the aftermath of a deadly car bomb explosion that hit a popular fruit and vegetable market in a commercial street in Baghdad’s northwestern neighborhood of Hurriyah, Iraq, Monday, Oct. 31, 2016. Iraqi police say a parked car bomb exploded in Baghdad’s northwestern neighborhood of Hurriyah on Sunday, killed at least 10 and wounding many. (AP Photo/ Karim Kadim)
My two cents……
for folks who wondered if some of these global events are being staged, now you have verifiable proof. These people planted a bomb, blew up a car, brought in fake crisis actors and then had the Iraq authorities channel that story to the Associated Press and Daily Mail UK who published it with photos as a real news event. They are caught dead to rights this time.
Now ask yourself “Why would they want to fake this event in the outskirts of Mosul, Iraq right now?”
Answer: Because they are not really fighting ISIS. The whole Mosul charade is to make it seem like they are fighting ISIS when in actuality they are preparing a front to take over the border areas of Syria so they can still continue their Syrian war using proxy jihadist groups. Note how the Daily Mail article states that “Iraqi special forces stood poised to enter Mosul in an offensive to drive out Islamic State militants after sweeping into the last village on the city’s eastern edge Monday while fending off suicide car bombs without losing a soldier.”
Note that the US could have destroyed these jihadists in the open as they fled Mosul and Raqqa on their way to Palmyra, Syria where they recently took over that previously liberated (by Russian/Syrian forces) small archaeological site and city. Yet the US did not bomb them and instead they let them take control of Palmyra. The Russian government pointed out that the US was doing this at the time, however, once again the corrupt US media played their effective role of covering it all up for the masses.
According to the Russian military, the terrorists have received considerable reinforcement, including heavy military hardware from the regions of Raqqa and Deir ez-Zor.
“IS has dispatched a considerable force to Palmyra from the area of Raqqa, where militants, backed by the US and the international coalition ceased combat action against the terrorists this week,” the statement by the Russian military says.
The Reconciliation Center notes that the Syrian Army is engaged in fighting the jihadists.
“Despite heavy losses in manpower and [military] hardware, the terrorists seek to come as close as possible and gain a foothold in the city, as the Russian Air Force is not conducting airstrikes against residential areas in the city of Palmyra,” the statement reads.
Thus, it’s a lot of bullshit folks. Their whole war on ISIS is for keeping the public ignorant of what is really going on. They are simply conducting regime change and using ISIS as a ruse to fool the public into supporting their wars and self enrichment/control agenda.
The following 6 videos lay it all out pretty well……..
These are the reporters that the corrupt and complicit US media relies on for what is going on in Syria. This is who they defend and give awards to. Up is down and down is up. Gotta love that Plausible Deniability the US State Department is providing itself as it outright supports terrorists while flat out lying that it does no such thing……
May 3, 2017 update – All of the videos providing evidence for this post have been removed from You Tube. Fortunately, all of the videos have been cached into one large video that is available at the following link. This link covers it all pretty well and also has some other amazing videos within it.
Examining the media’s child exploitation when it comes to 7 year old Bana…..below we see her with the same al-Nusra Front ‘reporter’ Hadi Abdallah who is shown in the videos above kissing al Nusra Front (al-Qaeda) terrorists and posing side by side with the leader of al- Nusra Front terrorist group Abdullah al-Muhaysini
The Corbett Report sums it all up regarding US media complicity and lies of omission, including using terrorists for their ‘news’ reporting……
Above photo Hadi Abdullah poses with Abdullah al-Muhaysini leader of al-Nusra Front
Hadi Abdallah with 7 year old Bana…….
Hadi Abdallah with terrorist group again…..
Bana and family clean up well for a December photo shoot with Turkish President Receyp Erdogan
Bana’s father Al-Abed Ghassan shown in numerous photos below with terrorists…..note ISIS logo on wall in first photograph…..
Family friends are linked to terrorists that beheaded 12 year old boy in July 2016…….
Video of Fatemah coaching Bana through the interviews….
Bana has no thoughts or opinions of her own&had nothing to do w/the tweets. Watch Fatemah give her all the answers.Child manipulation #Syriapic.twitter.com/l2TbNUCTnG
Excerpt: The 2016 Reporters Without Borders (RSF) – TV5 Monde Press Freedom Prize will be awarded to Syrian reporter Hadi Abdullah, the Chinese news website 64Tianwang, and Chinese citizen journalists Lu Yuyu and Li Tingyu at a ceremony in Strasbourg tomorrow evening (8 November).
Hadi Abdullah is being awarded the prize in the journalist category. He is a 29-year-old freelance reporter who has braved many dangers to cover the war in Syria, entering high-risk areas where few colleagues venture in order to film and to enable civil society’s actors to speak to the outside world. He has had many brushes with death and was briefly kidnapped by the Al-Nusra Front last January. His cameraman, Khaled al-Issa, was killed in June by an explosive device left outside the home they shared, and Abdullah himself was badly injured by the blast.
Note that the French Press Freedom award paragraphs above state Hadi Abdallah was briefly kidnapped by the al-Nusra Front. It is obvious from the videos and photos above that he was never kidnapped and was instead embedded and working alongside al-Nusra Front terrorist group. This type of subversion and media manipulation has become common place when reporting on the Syrian war. The hypocrisy shown by the French broadcaster Channel 5 is astounding considering that over the past year hundreds of French citizens have lost their lives in terror attacks caused by jihadists affiliated with the same groups that Hadi Abdullah is working in conjunction with.
“Her messages are sophisticated for a 7-year-old, for example, particularly for one whose native language is not English,” The New York Times admitted on Dec. 7. Reporters Rick Gladstone, Megan Specia, and Sydney Ember further noted the skepticism of some humanitarian aid workers: “International aid advocates have expressed mixed feelings about Bana’s fame — satisfaction that she has increased global sympathy for child victims in Syria, but concern that her story, as presented on Twitter, may not be entirely accurate.”
Barbara McKenzie of 21st Century Wire has highlighted numerous other inconsistencies in the so-called “Bana Project” in a report for 21st Century Wire on Nov. 29. McKenzie’s analysis suggests that many of Bana’s initial Twitter followers were fake, and her apparently immediate mastery of the nuances of Twitter, such as the use of hashtags, reveals that social media experts have likely advised her on how to best reach Western audiences.
TELEVISION TROPHY – INTERNATIONAL JURY
AWARDED BY AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL
1st Prize
Arnaud COMTE and Stéphane GUILLEMOT
FRANCE 2
Mossoul : fuir à tout prix
IRAQ
2nd Prize
Clarissa WARD and Bilal Abdul KAREEM
CNN
More on the lead terrorist, who was finally deemed such on November 10, 2016, here:
WASHINGTON – The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) took action today to disrupt al-Nusrah Front’s military, recruitment, and financing operations. Specifically, OFAC designated four key al-Nusrah Front leaders – Abdallah Muhammad Bin-Sulayman al-Muhaysini, Jamal Husayn Zayniyah, Abdul Jashari, and Ashraf Ahmad Fari al-Allak – pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 13224, which targets terrorists and those providing support to terrorists or acts of terrorism. As a result of today’s action, all property and interests in property of these designated individuals subject to U.S. jurisdiction are blocked, and U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions with them.
These designations were taken in coordination with the U.S. Department of State, which today named Jabhat Fath al Sham as an alias of al-Nusrah Front – al-Qa’ida’s affiliate in Syria.
“From recruiting fighters to raising funds, these sanctioned individuals are responsible for providing key financial and logistical support to al-Nusrah Front,” said John E. Smith, Acting OFAC Director. “Treasury will continue to target al-Nusrah Front’s financial networks and choke off their access to the international financial system.”
Abdallah Muhammad Bin-Sulayman al-Muhaysini
Abdallah Muhammad Bin-Sulayman al-Muhaysini was designated for acting for or on behalf of, and providing support and services to or in support of, al-Nusrah Front.
As of late 2015, al-Muhaysini was an accepted member of al-Nusrah Front’s inner leadership circle. As of July 2015, Abdallah al-Muhaysini served as al-Nusrah Front’s religious advisor and represented al-Nusrah Front in an Idlib Province, Syria, military operations room. He has been involved in recruiting fighters to join al-Nusrah Front and helping to form a new al-Nusrah Front “state” in northern Syria. In April 2016, Muhaysini launched a campaign to recruit 3,000 child and teenage soldiers across northern Syria for al-Nusrah Front.
Al-Muhaysini has played a crucial role in providing financial aid to al-Nusrah Front. Between 2013 and 2015, al-Muhaysini raised millions of dollars to support al-Nusrah Front governance efforts in Idlib Province, Syria. As of early October 2015, al-Muhaysini had set up institutions providing financial aid to terrorist groups, including a highly successful campaign that he claimed had secured $5 million in donations to arm fighters.
Link here to recent posts on terrorist al-Muhaysini:
What does all the above video and photo evidence point to? Apparently the US government, media and a number of western entities love them some terrorists when it suits their agenda………
IMI-Analyse 2009/013, in: IMI/DFG-VK: Kein Frieden mit der NATO
Imperial Geopolitics: Ukraine, Georgia and the New Cold War between NATO and Russia
von: Martin Hantke | Veröffentlicht am: 1. Januar 2009
Drucken
Hier finden sich ähnliche Artikel
Zbigniew Brzezinski’s book The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives is essential reading for anyone wishing to understand current and future U.S., EU and NATO policy. Over ten years ago the former National Security Advisor gave a graphic description of the imperatives of imperial geopolitics. He argued that the U.S.A.’s position of supremacy should be preserved under all circumstances. To this end NATO, acting as a “bridgehead” of the U.S.A., should expand into Eurasia and take control of geostrategically important regions so as to prevent Russia’s resurgence as a powerful political force.
Brzezinski had in mind two countries or regions in particular: “Ukraine, a new and important space on the Eurasian chessboard is a geopolitical pivot because its very existence as an independent country helps to transform Russia. Without Ukraine, Russia ceases to be a Eurasian empire. Russia without Ukraine can still strive for imperial status, but it would then become a predominantly Asian imperial state, more likely to be drawn into debilitating conflicts with aroused Central Asians, who would then be supported by their fellow Islamic states to the south.” “However, if Moscow regains control over Ukraine, with its 52 million people and major resources as well as access to the Black Sea, Russia automatically again regains the wherewithal to become a powerful imperial state, spanning Europe and Asia.”1 Brzezinski argued further that there was an imperative need to gain control of the southern Caucasus, i.e. Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia, on Russia’s southern flank. The past master of U.S. geopolitics set out the aim and purpose of NATO policy with impressive clarity: “The United States and the NATO countries – while sparing Russia’s self-esteem to the extent possible, but nevertheless firmly and consistently – are destroying the geopolitical foundations which could, at least in theory, allow Russia to hope to acquire the status as the number two power in world politics that belonged to the Soviet Union.
In the years that followed, these words were systematically put into political practice with NATO taking its eastward expansion right up to Moscow’s borders. Furthermore, active Western support for the “colourful revolutions” in Georgia (2003) and Ukraine (2004) led to the sitting pro-Russian or neutral governments and presidents being ousted by pro-Western candidates.3 Russia regarded NATO’s policy as crossing the “red line”. As the war between Russia and Georgia in the summer of 2008 showed, Russia is no longer prepared to stand idly by in the face of further attempts at expansion. Nevertheless, the Western military alliance is doggedly pursuing its escalation policy, in which Ukraine and Georgia are now being offered NATO membership as a means of safeguarding the “successes” that have been scored. U.S. President Barack Obama is also in favour of these two countries joining NATO.4 The announcement that Michael McFaul, a hardliner on policy towards Moscow, is to be appointed senior director for Russian affairs at the National Security Council gives little cause for hope that Washington under its new president will abandon its aggressive, anti-Russian policy. This amounts to tacit acceptance that the New Cold War between NATO and Russia, invoked so frequently of late, will become a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Ukraine: “On someone else’s arse”
Even now, the approach to Ukraine is evidently still determined by Brzezinski’s recipes from the devil’s workshop of geopolitics. NATO accession and Europe’s energy supply are issues that are closely intertwined. Writing in Handelsblatt, Peter Zeihan from Strategic Forecast, the think-tank often referred to as the “shadow CIA”, described the complex geopolitical situation as follows: “On the one hand, the ‘orange’ revolution of 2004 led to the installation of a Ukrainian government hostile to Russia’s objectives. President Viktor Yushchenko would like to integrate his country into the European Union and NATO. For Russia that would be the kiss of death. Most of the infrastructure linking Russia with Europe – from pipelines to railway lines and high-voltage cables – is located in Ukraine. Industry and agriculture in both countries are closely interlinked. There are more Russians living in eastern Ukraine than anywhere else in the world outside Russia. The Russian Black Sea fleet is stationed in the Ukrainian port of Sevastopol because there are no reasonable alternatives. Ukraine stretches so far into southern Russia that a hostile power in the country could pose a threat to Moscow. Moreover, the country stretches so far eastwards that an antagonistic government there could even threaten Russia’s connections with the Caucasus. In a nutshell, if Ukraine slips out of Russia’s sphere of influence Russia will be forced completely onto the defensive in strategic terms. Vice versa, if Russia regains control in Kiev, the country could set itself up as a regional – and perhaps even a global – power.”5 It was to obviate such a scenario that Washington engaged in a further round of frenzied activity shortly before the end of U.S. President George W. Bush’s period in office. This activity was aimed at advancing Ukraine’s future membership of NATO. Martin Luther’s words to the effect that “Riding through a fire is easy on someone else’s arse” might perhaps have flashed through the mind of the then U.S. Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice, as she walked up with Ukrainian Foreign Minister, Volodymyr Ohryzko, to sign the United States-Ukraine Charta on Strategic Partnership on 19 December 2008. Rice said: “The United States supports Ukraine’s integration into the Euro-Atlantic structures. And in that regard, I want to assure you that the declaration at Bucharest which foresees that Ukraine will be a member of NATO when it can meet those standards is very much at the center of our policy.” The Ukrainian Foreign Minister set great store by a strengthening of the presence of the United States in Ukraine, in particular through a diplomatic mission on the Crimean peninsula in the Black Sea.6
In addition to a programme of enhanced security cooperation intended to strengthen Ukraine’s candidacy for NATO membership, agreement was reached on close collaboration on energy issues. It was resolved inter alia that “In recognition of the importance of a well functioning energy sector, the parties intend to work closely together on rehabilitating and modernizing the capacity of Ukraine’s gas transit infrastructure.”7 This Charter on Strategic Partnership was signed against the backdrop of the gas dispute between Ukraine and Russia. Given Ukraine’s failure to pay its debts and the lack of any new agreement on deliveries of gas to Ukraine, supplies of Russian gas to Ukraine were stopped as of 1 January 2009. Within a few days the dispute began to have an effect on energy supplies throughout Europe. On 6 January 2009, Turkey, Bulgaria, Greece and Macedonia reported that deliveries through the Ukrainian transit pipelines had come to a halt. Supplies to Austria fell by 90%. There are a number of indications that Ukraine’s actions can only be explained by reference to the support it received from the U.S.A. That was the Russian view too: “The Russian gas company Gazprom has pinned responsibility for the gas dispute with Ukraine on the U.S.A. Gazprom declared on Tuesday that Ukraine’s actions are being directed by the U.S. government. Despite the deployment of EU observers the Ukraine is again removing gas from the transit pipelines. Russia is therefore unable to deliver supplies to the EU countries. Alexander Medvedev, Deputy Chairman of the Board of Executive Directors of the Russian energy giant, has accused the U.S.A. of fuelling the conflict.”8
In the case of both Georgia and Ukraine there is a close link between the gas dispute and support for their admission to NATO. In April 2008 the Bertelsmann Foundation concluded that Ukraine and Georgia were already closely integrated into “NATO’s working processes”. “Ever since it was founded in 1994, both countries have been part of the Partnership for Peace programme of the North Atlantic Alliance which is intended to promote individual cooperation between NATO and non-NATO countries. Cooperation has subsequently been extended. […] In their bilateral cooperation agreements with NATO both countries see far-reaching domestic reforms as a means of moving closer to the defence alliance. Such reforms principally concern the consolidation of internal democratic structures, but priority is also given to the fight against global terrorism and support for the operations and missions of the North Atlantic Alliance. The latter was one reason why U.S. President George W. Bush emphasized his efforts to have Ukraine and Georgia included in the Membership Action Plan. The progress made in integration into NATO’s defence structures puts into perspective the question that arose at the Bucharest summit about the steps Ukraine and Georgia will take after the provisional ‘no’ to their admission to the Membership Action Plan. Their path will inevitably take them into NATO.“9
Germany is playing a double role here. On the one hand it has joined France in rejecting an accelerated accession procedure for Ukraine, which the U.S.A. favoured; on the other hand it is playing a risky game by not placing any obstacles in the path of fundamental approval of Ukraine’s accession to NATO. The German Foreign Office has itself provided an apt description of this double role: “At the NATO summit in Bucharest in April 2008 Ukraine was in principle given the prospect of membership (‘We agreed today that these countries (i.e. Ukraine and Georgia) will become members of NATO’). Ukraine was not granted a Membership Action Plan (MAP); instead, a comprehensive review process was initiated.”10 This granting of prospective membership to Ukraine for the first time, combined with Georgia’s aggression shortly afterwards against Abkhazia and South Ossetia, proved the last straw for Moscow.
Georgia: a geopolitical prize
A look at the map quickly makes it clear why the Southern Caucasus is so important. Georgia provides the only opportunity of supplying Europe with gas and oil from the resource-rich countries of Central Asia and of transporting goods and products to Europe by land from China and Kazakhstan. The Nabucco pipeline project is intended to help reduce Europe’s “dependence” on Russian gas imports, which currently account for 40% of its supplies and are expected to climb to even higher levels. According to the European press service EurActiv, “The US has long been pushing for the construction of oil and natural gas pipelines from the Caspian basin that would bypass Russia, especially via Georgia.”11 The project is a top priority for the European Union, too. During his period as representative of the EU Council President in 2006 the Austrian Minister of Economics Martin Bartenstein said: “[The] Nabucco pipeline is Europe’s most important energy project.”12
For both the EU Member States and the NATO countries Georgia provides the geographical terrain that is essential to cutting Russia off from the purchasers of its energy exports. Russia’s countermeasures include three pipeline projects – Nord Stream (Baltic Sea pipeline), South Stream (Russian-Italian gas pipeline through the Black Sea via Varna in Bulgaria) and Blue Stream (from Russia through the Black Sea into Turkey) – as well as the building of direct energy lines to western and southern Europe to ensure the unobstructed export of energy free from any checks or controls by former Eastern Bloc states very favourably disposed to the U.S.A. This was why the U.S.A., in particular, played the Georgian card in the hope of containing Russia’s political influence in Europe and preventing its rise to the status of an industrial power.
Western support for the war
Germany continues to play a significant part in the arming of Georgia. The Federal Armed Forces (Bundeswehr) mostly train Georgian officers as part of the general staff training course which includes participants from other countries. Over the past few years the Bundeswehr has been host to a steady stream of high-ranking military delegations from Georgia. In addition, G 36 rifles manufactured by Heckler & Koch have been delivered to Georgia. The bulk of the training has been carried out by the U.S.A., however. The U.S. Army has trained Georgian soldiers “to bring the armed forces of Georgia, a loyal ally of Washington, up to NATO standards as an outpost in the Caucasus.”13 In 2006 alone, says the German news magazine Der Spiegel, the U.S.A. supported Georgia to the tune of 80 million U.S. dollars, 13 million of which went on the payment of “military supplies and services” as well as the training of soldiers. In addition the U.S.A. has helped Georgia by regularly modernising its fleet and delivering helicopters free of charge.14 The considerable extent of U.S. military assistance, which has “enabled the Pentagon to overhaul Georgia’s forces from bottom to top”, is described by the New York Times as follows: “At senior levels, the United States helped rewrite Georgian military doctrine and train its commanders and staff officers. At the squad level, American marines and soldiers trained Georgian soldiers in the fundamentals of battle.”15
All told, therefore, the Georgian armed forces have over five infantry brigades each numbering 2,000 men. In addition there are the reservist units whose level of training is far inferior. The Georgian government talks officially of 37,000 soldiers and 100,000 reservists. Since Mikhail Saakashvili took office, Georgia’s military spending has increased significantly: “In 2003 it amounted to 52 million lari (24 million U.S. dollars), whereas in 2006 that figure had tripled to 139 million lari (78 million U.S. dollars). Real expenditure is much higher, however. Anyone liable to be called up for military service, for example, can buy themselves out of the army – four-fifths of the money goes straight to the ministry.”16
There is also brisk cooperation between Georgia and NATO. In July 2008, a joint manoeuvre was held as part of the Partnership for Peace Programme in which a total of 1,630 military personnel, including 1,000 Americans and 600 Georgians, took part.17 In addition, the Georgian army has been – and still is – prominently involved in the war in Iraq, which is in contravention of international law, as well as in Afghanistan and Kosovo. In 2008, Georgia had 2,000 solders in Iraq, the third-largest contingent of the “Coalition of the Willing”. However, after the Georgian army had been repulsed in South Ossetia in August 2008, the U.S. Air Force flew the Georgian units stationed in Iraq back to the home front to provide help while the fighting was still in progress. Given the massive campaign undertaken by the U.S.A. and its allies to build up the country’s military, it is barely credible that, while the U.S.A. might not actually have given the green light, it was not fully informed of the pending attack and subsequently kept silent about it.
At any rate, the Russians are certain that the attack took place with support from Washington. The Russian ambassador to NATO, Dimitri Rogozin, made a statement to the effect that Saakashvili agreed the attack with his “backers”. It is clear to whom he was referring.18 Vladimir Vasilyev, Chairman of the Duma Security Committee, summed up the Russian point of view as follows: “The longer the matter goes on, the better the world will come to understand that Georgia would never have been capable of it [the attack on South Ossetia] without the United States”.19 In an interview for the German TV station ARD the Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin made his views of the U.S.A.’s behaviour perfectly clear: “One cannot help thinking that the American leadership knew of the planned action and, indeed, participated in it […] in order to organise a small-scale but successful war. And, if things went wrong, to force Russia into the role of the enemy.”20
Russia’s counter-attack
It is, indeed, hard to believe that the Georgian attack took place without any prior consultation with the U.S.A. Yet it must have been clear to the U.S. government that the Georgian army would be crushed in battle, which was precisely what happened. The question arises, therefore, as to Washington’s motives. Did it simply miscalculate in assuming that Russia would quietly accept the Georgian advance? It is hard to imagine but conceivable nonetheless. The other explanation is that the primary objective was to stir up a conflict with Russia so as to make the European Union toe an even more anti-Russian line and that Saakashvili came in handy here in the role of useful idiot, albeit at the expense of the people in the region. The matter cannot be clarified with any degree of certainty, although the latter explanation would appear more plausible.
At all events, the calculation backfired, because Russia seized the opportunity provided by the Georgian attack to improve its own position in the Caucasus. It is also very hard to imagine that Moscow was not informed of Georgia’s invasion plans. It was evidently well prepared for such an eventuality. In July, 8,000 Russian soldiers carried out an exercise simulating the repulsion of a Georgian attack. That might also explain why the Georgian troops were halted within 24 hours and the Russian troops gained the upper hand relatively quickly. Hence to describe Georgia’s war of aggression as the result of President Saakashvili stumbling into a Russian trap is not very convincing. Whether the Russians were well prepared or not, the fact of the matter is that Georgia engaged in a war of aggression.
In the course of the conflict Russia succeeded in shattering confidence in Georgia’s reliability as a transit country for future Caspian energy supplies. Georgia’s President Mikhail Saakashvili himself said that “one of the main reasons for the Russian attack was that Georgia already has the Baku-Tblissi-Ceyhan pipeline (BTC), which has been laid one metre underground from end to end. This is intended to circumvent Russia.”21 That suspicion is not as mistaken as it might seem. After all, the opening of the BTC pipeline in May 2006, over which Washington and Moscow had wrangled bitterly for almost a decade, was one of the biggest geopolitical successes in the U.S.A.’s plans to roll back Russian influence in the region. “The Georgian security adviser, Alexander Lomaia, says that the Russians dropped six bombs but failed to hit the pipeline. If that is true, it would indicate that Russia’s military action was conducted in pursuit of other, more far-reaching strategic goals than merely preventing a humanitarian crisis in South Ossetia.”22
The Nabucco project was also dealt a heavy blow. According to Ed Chow from the Center for Strategic and International Studies, “Russia has raised serious doubts in the minds of Western lenders and investors […] as to whether a pipeline through Georgia is safe from attacks or beyond the control of the Kremlin.”23 Nevertheless, EU Energy Commissioner Andris Piebalgs attempted to give an assurance that the EU was sticking to its plan to build the Nabucco pipeline through Georgia despite the Caucasus conflict: “This infrastructure is needed”, Piebalgs said.24
For the first time since the end of the (old) Cold War Russia has thus ended a Western attempt at expansion by military means. That alone is sufficient to underline the dimensions of the Russian-Georgian war. At the same time the invasion of Georgia is a clear signal to the West that in future Russia will once again have to be taken into account in international power politics. A Strategic Forecast analysis says: “Russia has demonstrated three things with its operation in South Ossetia. Firstly, its army can carry out successful operations, which foreign observers have doubted. Secondly, the Russians can defeat forces trained by U.S. military instructors. Thirdly, Russia has shown that the U.S.A. and NATO are not in a position that would enable them to intervene militarily in this conflict.”25
Astonishing one-sidedness
It is hardly surprising that the Russian response to the Georgian invasion was fiercely criticised by the U.S., which almost unreservedly took Georgia’s side. Zbigniew Brzezinski was vociferous in his response, comparing Putin’s actions with those of Hitler. He went on to say that Moscow’s behaviour “can lead to exclusion and economic and financial sanctions. If Russia continues down this road it must ultimately be isolated within the community of states.”26
The European Union adopted an equally one-sided stance: “The European Council is gravely concerned by the open conflict which has broken out in Georgia, by the resulting violence and by the disproportionate reaction of Russia.”27 These were the words used by the European heads of state and government on 1 September in commenting on the events in the Caucasus. They failed to mention, let alone criticise, the fact that Georgia’s aggression was clearly what had unleashed the war. The statement continues by severely criticising Russia alone. Thus the heads of state and government “strongly condemn Russia’s unilateral decision to recognise the independence of Abkhazia and South Ossetia.” In stark contrast to the policy of recognizing Kosovo that was pursued by the vast majority of EU Member States, the European Council “recalls that a peaceful and lasting solution to the conflict in Georgia must be based on full respect for the principles of independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity recognised by international law, the Final Act of the Helsinki Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe and United Nations Security Council resolutions.”27
There were occasional vehement demands for even more drastic action against Russia. The Chairman of the European Parliament’s Foreign Affairs Committee, Jacek Saryusz-Wolski (EPP), advocated an EU position that is “tougher than that of NATO.”28 The fact that the hardliners were not able to have their way entirely has to do with the specific constellation of interests that have made this appear inopportune, particularly from a German perspective. On the one hand there is a desire to show Moscow who is in charge in Europe but, on the other, there is a wish not to spoil things completely with Russia, because business there is simply too profitable.29 Nevertheless, Germany is in almost full accord with NATO’s escalation policy.
(Energy) NATO is put into position
In November 2006 U.S. Senator Richard Lugar, a leading NATO strategist, literally went on the offensive. On the fringes of the NATO summit in Riga he criticised Moscow for its attempts to use oil as a “weapon” against the West and proposed the setting up of an “Energy NATO”. The underlying idea is that in future NATO should treat any interruption of oil and gas supplies as it would a military attack (see article by Tobias Pflüger).
In January 2008, five high-ranking NATO generals published a position paper that was specifically introduced into the debate in the form of a catalogue of requirements for the forthcoming updating of NATO’s strategic concept, the idea being that it could serve as a blueprint for the NATO summit on 3/4 April 2009: “ There will be an increase in global competition for scarce resources, and this will certainly be the case for fossil fuel, which will swell the possibility of suppliers abusing their position and their leverage.. […]Dependency on oil and gas is a vulnerability that some governments will seek to exploit – the Gazprom crisis demonstrated how easily demand can be manipulated. The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) is – and is likely to remain – a mechanism for keeping the price of oil artificially high, and recently Russia and the United Arab Emirates have been exploring the idea of setting up a ‘Gas OPEC’. […] For this reason, it might well be worth considering using NATO as an instrument of energy security.“30
Shortly afterwards, in June 2008, Richard Lugar, who for a time was under discussion as Barack Obama’s Secretary of State for Defense, repeated his threats against Russia at a hearing of the Senate and vigorously advocated the building of the Nabucco pipeline.31 At the same hearing the new U.S. Vice-President Joseph Biden expressly praised Lugar’s work on energy policy and emphasised the importance of the conflicts in the Caspian region: “The stakes involve hundreds of billions of dollars in oil and infrastructure, the resurgence of Russia, and the energy security of Europe.. […] Russians love chess. Our strategic response on the chess board of Central Asia must be to establish a presence on parts of the board they do not yet control. That means laying down new pipelines that add alternatives […] to the monopoly Russia has enjoyed.”32
Biden is therefore likely to have welcomed one of the last major security policy initiatives launched by the Bush administration which aimed at drawing Georgia further into the Western orbit by means of a joint declaration on partnership: “The United States and Georgia officially became “strategic partners” under a charter signed by the two governments on January 9 [2009]. […] Few details have been publicized about the charter, which was signed four months after Georgia’s disastrous war with Russia. It has been widely reported, however, that the Georgian pact resembles a strategic partnership charter signed by the United States and Ukraine in December.”33 Like the United States-Ukraine Charter on Strategic Partnership the agreement with Georgia is likely to comprise intensified military cooperation and measures to expedite Ukraine’s membership of NATO. On 15 September 2008 NATO resolved to set up a commission to deepen relations with Georgia. This is intended “to coordinate Alliance efforts to assist Georgia in recovering from the recent conflict”.34
Cold War as a self-fulfilling prophecy
The aim of the policy pursued by the U.S.A. in Ukraine and Georgia is to wage a new Cold War against Russia. Russia is to be challenged by a policy of pinpricks involving “colourful revolutions”, energy blockades, NATO expansion and the stationing of missiles in Poland and the Czech Republic. By disrupting economic relations with Western Europe Washington aims to contain Russia’s global political influence and thwart its advance as a new industrial power. Should this scenario turn out to be a success, it would simultaneously ensure that the NATO allies in Western Europe are tied into a joint strategy of escalation and have to become even more heavily involved in projects designed to secure energy supplies.
Since this strategy has thus far proved successful and it cannot, unfortunately, be assumed that there will be a move away from a policy of U.S. confrontation under President Obama, there is a renewed threat of bloc confrontation. At the height of the Georgian war Russian President Dmitri Medvedev sent out a clear message to the West: “We are not afraid of anything, not even the prospect of a Cold War.”35 The anti-war movement will have to adjust to the realities of the New Cold War. The strategy of imperialism pursued by NATO and the EU must be opposed here and now in a calm and collected fashion.
2nd article explains the Obama/Brzezinski connection:
http://rense.com/general81/abig.htm
Confirmed – Obama Is
Zbigniew Brzezinski Puppet
Commentary
By Webster Tarpley
3-21-8
Any lingering doubts about Obama’s status as an abject puppet of Zbigniew Brzezinski and the Rockefeller Trilateral Commission ended this morning when the withered mummy of imperialism himself appeared on MSNBC’s Morning Joe* to campaign for Obama, urged on by his own moronic daughter, Mika Brzezinski, an Obama groupie and sycophant.
Zbigniew, a low-level Polish aristocrat whose life has been devoted to hatred for Russia, lauded Obama for his 2002 speech opposing the Iraq war, saying that he himself was the source of Obama’s arguments back then – thus confirming Obama’s long-term status as his puppet, which probably began in 1981-1983, when Obama was a student at Columbia University, and Zbig was directing the anti-Russian institute.
The aging revanchist showed all the misogynism of his szachta origins with a scurrilous attack on Sen. Clinton as a mere housewife, a Mamie Eisenhower running against charismatic a JFK played by Zbig’s own Manchurian candidate, and as a woman whose foreign policy experience was worth as much as that of Zbig’s own travel agent.
Zbig, who was kept in the closet for many months during the Carter administration because of his hideous Dr. Strangelove persona, portrayed Obama as a peace candidate who wanted to end the Iraq war and usher in peace in the Middle East. Zbig is an infamous Cold War hawk who has managed to re-invent himself in the eyes of some dupes by opposing the Iraq adventure, mainly because it is bad for imperialism.
Zbig did not mention that the reason he wants to downplay certain aspects of US aggression in the Middle East is to free up resources for use in the much bigger and more dangerous adventures which the Trilateral Commission is now directing.
Zbig is the mastermind of the Kosovo secession under KLA terrorist auspices, a gambit against Serbia and Russia to prepare a coming Operation Barbarossa II against Moscow. With the help of his son Mark Brzezinski, another top foreign policy controller of Obama, Zbig is also behind the new Euromissiles crisis involving US ABM installations in Poland. Zbig is the enforcer for the new CIA policy of killing Pakistanis (as “terrorists”) without consulting the government of that country, a nuclear power twice as big as Iran.
Most dangerous of all, Zbig is the obvious mastermind of the massive destabilization of China now ongoing, starting with the CIA/MI-6 Tibet insurrection, which has placed the US on a collision course with China, a superpower with 1.4 billion people and thermonuclear weapons which can strike US cities, a far cry from the helpless and defenseless targets preferred by the neocons. It is an open secret that Zbig intends to attempt a color revolution or CIA people power coup in China under the cover of the Beijing Olympics later this year. He may also make the Taiwan crisis explode. The dangers of these lunatic policies are infinitely worse than anything that could ever come out of the Middle East.
Senator Jay Rockefeller and Trilateral/BIlderberger boss Joseph Nye are also actively campaigning for Obama. Nye is the theoretician of “soft power,” a new form of imperialist aggression based on economic warfare, subversion, deception, and people power coups. They want Obama to mobilize soft power to give a face lift to US imnperialism.
Brzezinski’s goal is confrontation with the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, the main world center for resistance to US-UK global domination.
Anti-war activists are still fixated on Iran, but not Brzezinski is not – his target is China, TWENTY times bigger than Iran, with ICBMs ready to launch, followed by Russia, the world’s biggest nuclear power. Such confused activists need to focus on stopping the next war – the final global showdown with Pakistan, China, and Russia. That means rejecting Brzezinski’s puppet candidate Obama.
Inquiry Points Toward a Pentagon Plot to Subvert Obama’s Syria Policy
Airstrikes by the United States and its allies against two Syrian army positions Sept. 17 killed at least 62 Syrian troops and wounded dozens more. The attack was quickly treated as a non-story by the U.S. news media; U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) claimed the strikes were carried out in the mistaken belief that Islamic State forces were being targeted, and the story disappeared.
The circumstances surrounding the attack, however, suggested it may have been deliberate, its purpose being to sabotage President Obama’s policy of coordinating with Russia against Islamic State and Nusra Front forces in Syria as part of a U.S.-Russian cease-fire agreement.
Normally the U.S. military can cover up illegal operations and mistakes with a pro forma military investigation that publicly clears those responsible. But the air attack on Syrian troops also involved three foreign allies in the anti-Islamic State campaign named Operation Inherent Resolve: the United Kingdom, Denmark and Australia. So, the Pentagon had to agree to bring a general from one of those allies into the investigation as a co-author of the report. Consequently, the summary of the investigation released by CENTCOM on Nov. 29 reveals far more than the Pentagon and CENTCOM brass would have desired.
Thanks to that heavily redacted report, we now have detailed evidence that the commander of CENTCOM’s Air Force component attacked the Syrian army
Reality Check: Proof That Those “Moderate Rebels” in Syria are Really Jihadists. “These are not “freedom fighters” they are not looking to make Syria free, they are looking to enslave it.” Part 1
This video was made private after Ben Swanns\’s channel was taken off the air in February 2017 therefore I searched online for another copy which is below.
Published on Dec 28, 2016
Reality Check: Proof That Those “Moderate Rebels” in Syria are Really Jihadists. “These are not “freedom fighters” they are not looking to make Syria free, they are looking to enslave it.” Part 1
Van Genderen said that it is unlikely that there was planned maintenance occurring simultaneously on the three ‘primary’ radar systems. One explanation could be that there was a lack of spare parts to keep them running. Netherlands has received information from Ukraine and Russia. Both countries have made video recordings available of the radar screens. However, the raw data of the primary radar data was not made available. Russia has stated that it was not transferred because it was not saved, however, the three Ukrainian systems in the area stood out. According to Van Genderen, with closer examination of the raw data from the primary radar the chances would be greater of determining where the missile came from.
Survivors have therefore written a letter to Russian President Vladimir Putin. They ask him, including whether he is willing to do everything to recover radar and satellite images. The families of deceased passengers also previously wrote letters to Prime Minister Mark Rutte, the US Secretary of State John Kerry and President of Ukraine Petro Poroshenko. Expert of the Dutch Aerospace Centre, Michel Peters, claiming Friday that the damage to the plane can simply be caused by a BUK missile. ” It is particularly important in the light of the warhead. ”
The Lower House is conducting talks all day with experts about MH17. These include the decision on the air routes above conflict, as well as radar and satellite data in the MH17 case and the future prosecution and trial of the perpetrators. According to experts, airlines and services should be required to share information about the safety of flights. Bart de Vries, head of Flight Operations for KLM, announced that the airline needs good information on the safety of air routes. Each society would, he should have a system to receive this information and to respond to them. Intelligence agencies now share information with airlines, but are not obliged to. KLM had in his own words had no information about the danger over eastern Ukraine, where flight MH17 ended by a rocket attack.
We had in the first 48 hours can do things differently, but I would surround myself so again with the same group of people
Dick Schoof, National Coordinator for Counterterrorism and Security
Prohibit
The role of the Dutch government is discussed. To set aviation lawyer Arthur Flieger that the Netherlands may simply prohibit airlines to fly over dangerous areas. Then there is clarity for everyone, and does not need any airline itself weigh the risks. Réne Torenvlied, professor of public management at the University of Twente, says that the initial response to the disaster was difficult. Survivors also were dissatisfied with the actions of the government. The government wants above all to learn from the mistakes. Until today there is aftercare. National Coordinator for Counterterrorism and Security, Dick Schoof: ,, We were in the first 48 hours can do things differently, but I would so again surround with the same group of people. ”
Additional new MH-17 news: From Google translate. A minimum of four radar systems should have images of MH17 disaster
By Michael van der Galien January 22, 2016
Professor and radar expert Piet van Genderen, TU Delft, says that at least four radars should have picked up the images of flight MH17 being downed.
That is a remarkable statement because it proves the government has no radar images and also has not been able to get their hands on them. During a hearing in the House, Van Genderen said the following:
“The primary radar images of these four facilities are the most important because the chances are that they picked up the image of the BUK missile and it should be seen. Also, the disintegration of the aircraft is on these images, it should almost certainly be noticeable.”
This involves three radar stations in Ukraine and one in Russia. All four facilities would see what brought down the plane. These countries, however, deny they have these images.
Van Genderen trust it for a penny:
“That these facilities were all out of operation or undergoing maintenance as Ukraine and Russia claim is not credible.”
Satellite Expert Marco Langbroek adds that he finds it strange that the government is doing nothing to retrieve the satellite imagery.
“Three of these satellites covered Ukraine at the time of the crash. It seems to me that to see justice served there is every interest to have this information. Indeed, the evidence can thus be substantiated. ”
And now it comes: Minister Ard van der Steur still maintains that he does not need more images of the flight. He states this while every expert says that these images are a) in existence and b) will prove conclusively who shot the aircraft down.
New MH-17 news: From Google translate: Four radars were active for MH17 ‘
by Paul Eldering and Jolanda van der Graaf
THE HAGUE –
The shootdown of down MH17 was imaged by at least four radars in the vicinity said Professor and radar expert Piet van Genderen at TU Delft during a hearing in the Parliament. “The primary radar images of these four facilities are the most important because the chances are that the they picked up a BUK missile and it should be seen. Also, the disintegration of the aircraft is on these images, it should be almost certainly noticeable. ”
It involves three Ukrainian systems – one in the Lugansk airport and two long-range radar in the vicinity – and a fourth Russian radar at Rostov.
“That all these facilities were all not in operation or under maintenance as Ukraine and Russia claim is not credible,” said the professor.
Like Van Genderen, satellite expert Marco Langbroek believes that the images are crucial to the criminal investigation as to who the perpetrators are. According to Langbroek there must exist a large number of satellite images of the disaster. This includes the so-called Space Based Infrared Systems, the top-secret radar systems of the Americans. “Three of these satellites covered Ukraine at the time of the crash,” said Langbroek. “It seems to me that justice has every interest to have this information. Indeed, the evidence can thus be substantiated.”
According to Minister Van der Steur of Security and Justice, the Public Prosecutor’s has no need for additional radar and satellite images. However, he said that if later it is different, “the government will do its utmost to make available relevant information to the Public Prosecution for the criminal investigation.” Despite the letter of Van der Steur, survivors, experts and also have MPs, still have serious doubts about the events surrounding the radar and satellite imagery.
Note that in late 2015, the entire Dutch press was lit up with these stories about Ukraine not supplying the MH17 radar data and claiming all facilities were undergoing maintenance at the time. It should also be considered as to why the entire US, UK, Canadian and Australian media chose to completely ignore this important new revelation which didn’t even feature in Google search results.
All information compiled below was ascertained by Finnish geopolitical researcher Petri Krohn who administrates the “A Closer Look on Syria” website and George Eliason at Washingtonblog……Here’s what Krohn and Eliason’s deep web research has led to so far regarding the “Grizzly Steppe” hacker who US authorities cited as hacking into the Vermont power grid.
1) U.S. Department of Homeland Security claims that the DNC was hacked by Russian intelligence services using a Russian malware tool they have named Grizzly Steppe or “PAS tool PHP web kit”. They have published a YARA signature file that allows anyone to identify it.
On October 7, 2016, the Department Of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) issued a joint statement on election security compromises. DHS has released a Joint Analysis Report (JAR) attributing those compromises to Russian malicious cyber activity, designated as GRIZZLY STEPPE.
The JAR package offers technical details regarding the tools and infrastructure used by Russian civilian and military intelligence services (RIS). Accompanying CSV and STIX format files of the indicators are available here:
GRIZZLY STEPPE Indicators (CSV)
GRIZZLY STEPPE Indicators (STIX xml)
DHS recommends that network administrators review JAR-16-20296.pdf below for more information and implement the recommendations provided.
Revisions
December 29, 2016: Initial release
2) Security company Wordefence says Grizzly Steppe is actually P.A.S. web shell, a common malware tool on WordPress sites. They have identified its origin to an Ukrainian download site Profexer.name
US Govt Data Shows Russia Used Outdated Ukrainian PHP Malware
Update at 1am Pacific Time, Monday morning Jan 2nd: Please note that we have published a FAQ that accompanies this report. It contains a summary of our findings and answers several other questions our readers have had. It also provides some background on our methodology. You can read it either before or after reading this report. The original report follows:
The United States government earlier this year officially accused Russia of interfering with the US elections. Earlier this year on October 7th, the Department of Homeland Security and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence released a joint statement that began:
“The U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations. The recent disclosures of alleged hacked e-mails on sites like DCLeaks.com and WikiLeaks and by the Guccifer 2.0 online persona are consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts.”
Yesterday the Obama administration announced that they would expel 35 Russian diplomats and close two Russian facilities in the United States, among other measures, as punishment for interfering with the US 2016 election.
In addition, yesterday the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) released a Joint Analysis Report, or JAR, compiled by the DHS and FBI, which they say attributes the election security compromises to Russian intelligence operatives that they have codenamed ‘GRIZZLY STEPPE‘.
The report that DHS and DNI released includes in its first paragraph: “This document provides technical details regarding the tools and infrastructure used by the Russian civilian and military intelligence Services (RIS) to compromise and exploit networks and endpoints associated with the U.S. election, as well as a range of U.S. Government, political, and private sector entities. The report contains specific indicators of compromise, including IP addresses and a PHP malware sample.”
3) The profexer site presents a SSL certificate that identifies it as pro-os.ru and gives an email address aazzz@ro.ru.
WinRAR 5.21 + x64 + Repack / Русская версия скачать → Программы
WinRAR, скачать, программы
Постер к новости
Очень удобный, очень быстрый архиватор для Windows. Наверное каждый третий пользователь знаеть что такое WinRAR и как им пользоватся. Предлагаю вам скачать самую последнею версию программы.
5) The contacts given on the pro-os.ru site link to the VK account of Roman Alexeev and the email address roman@pro-os.ru. The VK account has been suspended because of “suspicious activity”. (You need to be logged in to VK to see the “Author” of the application.) https://vk.com/app4714348
6) One of the sites where “Roman Alexeev” links to his VK account is Freelancehunt.com. His profile contains a photograph and the nick aazzz. He claims he is from Zaporizhia and 25 years old. https://freelancehunt.com/freelancer/aazzz.html (archive)
7) The profile photo on Freelancehunt actually belongs to Jaroslav Volodimirovich Panchenko (ПАНЧЕНКО Ярослав Володимирович), an information technology student and member of the student self-government structure of the Poltava National Technical University. http://pntu.edu.ua/ru/diyalnist/studentske-zhittya.html
Pic above of Jaroslav Volodimirovich Panchenko as he apears on the official site of ПолтНТУ.
All information in the above post credited to Finnish geopolitical researcher Petri Krohn whose more detailed blog on this information can be found at the following link:
Aspects of this ‘hacking’ story have now been amended by the Deep States flagship propaganda dissemination tool, the Washington Post……..the corrections are here:
Russian operation hacked a Vermont utility, showing risk to U.S. electrical grid security, officials say
Editor’s Note: An earlier version of this story incorrectly said that Russian hackers had penetrated the U.S. electric grid. Authorities say there is no indication of that so far. The computer at Burlington Electric that was hacked was not attached to the grid.
More here at Washington blog on how the CrowdStrike story fell apart regarding this false flag hack:
Why Crowdstrike’s Russian Hacking Story Fell Apart- Say Hello to Fancy Bear
Posted on January 3, 2017 by George Eliason
[Preface by Washington’s Blog: As patriotic Americans, we are most concerned about what’s best for the U.S. If it’s Ukrainians – more than Russians – who are interfering with our country, we have a right to know. We are for uncovering the truth, wherever that may lead. As such, we bring you alternative voices and on-the-ground reporting. Then we let you decide what you believe.]
In the wake of the JAR-16-20296 dated December 29, 2016 about hacking and influencing the 2016 election, the need for real evidence is clear. The joint report adds nothing substantial to the October 7th report. It relies on proofs provided by the cyber security firm Crowdstrike that is clearly not on par with intelligence findings or evidence. At the top of the report is an “as is” statement showing this. The difference between Dmitri Alperovitch’s claims which are reflected in JAR-1620296 and this article is that enough evidence is provided to warrant an investigation of specific parties for the DNC hacks. The real story involves specific anti-American actors that need to be investigated for real crimes.
For instance, the malware used was an out-dated version just waiting to be found. The one other interesting point is that the Russian malware called Grizzly Steppe is from Ukraine. How did Crowdstrike miss this when it is their business to know? Later in this article you’ll meet and know a little more about the real “Fancy Bear and Cozy Bear.” The bar for identification set by Crowdstrike has never been able to get beyond words like probably, maybe, could be, or should be, in their attribution.
The article is lengthy because the facts need to be in one place. The bar Dimitri Alperovitch set for identifying the hackers involved is that low. Other than asking America to trust them, how many solid facts has Alperovitch provided to back his claim of Russian involvement? The December 29th JAR adds a flowchart that shows how a basic phishing hack is performed. It doesn’t add anything significant beyond that. Noticeably, they use both their designation APT 28 and APT 29 as well as the Crowdstrike labels of Fancy Bear and Cozy Bear separately. This is important because information from outside intelligence agencies has the value of rumor or unsubstantiated information at best according to policy. Usable intelligence needs to be free from partisan politics and verifiable. Intel agencies noted back in the early 90’s that every private actor in the information game was radically political.
Newly released Russian MoD video shows that the White Helmet HQ in Aleppo is abandoned and strewn with al-Nusra Front items. Hence providing further proof that the White Helmets are aligned with terror groups. The big question now is “where did the $100 million in US and UK funding disappear to?” The video below provides conclusive evidence that the White Helmets are no longer in Aleppo and have abandoned the small outpost that they were using there. It also shows that the ‘hospitals’ that the White Helmets claimed were destroyed are actually still intact, thus proving that they were feeding the US and western media false stories from the ‘Aleppo Media Center’ they had created with US and UK seed money.
Below is another newly revealed video showing White Helmets caught interacting with murderous terrorists once again.
New video: White Helmets caught interacting with murderous terrorists again.
Vanessa Beely at 21st Centruy Wire has more on the Real Syrian Civil Defense
The REAL Syria Civil Defence
.
Let us now focus upon the very real heroes inside Syria, the real Syria Civil Defence that have been usurped by the NATO mountebank White Helmets who also call themselves the “Syria Civil Defence” – a mere simulacra of the REAL Syria Civil Defence who have been saving lives in Syria, and further afield for decades.
The REAL Syria Civil Defence was established as an organisation, in 1953, some 63 years before the White Helmets were a glimmer in the eyes of CIA and MI6 operatives.
The REAL Syria Civil Defence is a founding member of the ICDO (International Civil Defence Organisation). Other ICDO partners include the UN Department of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), Secretarian of the International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UNISDR), International Search and Rescue Advisory Group (INSARAG), World Health Organisation (WHO), United Nations of Geneva (UNOG), Red Cross and the Red Crescent.
To our knowledge and according to the Head Quarters of the REAL Syria Civil Defence in Damascus, the White Helmets are NOT a member of the ICDO. The REAL Syria Civil Defence have received awards for their participation in the training of other member states in USAR (Urban Search and Rescue) and for their contributions to the Civil Defence community, prior to the NATO dirty war on Syria that began in earnest, in 2011.
More from Vanessa at link above…..
The main battlefront of the Syrian war now moves on to Idlib where Syrian and Russian forces can more easily contain and wipe out the terrorist threat.
Saudi Arabia’s dream of becoming the dominant Arab and Muslim power in the world has gone down in flames. Saudi Arabia’s military pressure on Assad served only to make him seek more help from Russia, precipitating intervention which the US was not prepared to oppose
Patrick Cockburn 6 January 2017
As recently as two years ago, Saudi Arabia’s half century-long effort to establish itself as the main power among Arab and Islamic states looked as if it was succeeding. A US State Department paper sent by former Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, in 2014 and published by Wikileaks spoke of the Saudis and Qataris as rivals competing “to dominate the Sunni world”.
A year later in December 2015, the German foreign intelligence service BND was so worried about the growing influence of Saudi Arabia that it took the extraordinary step of producing a memo, saying that “the previous cautious diplomatic stance of older leading members of the royal family is being replaced by an impulsive policy of intervention”.
An embarrassed German government forced the BND to recant, but over the last year its fears about the destabilising impact of more aggressive Saudi policies were more than fulfilled. What it did not foresee was the speed with which Saudi Arabia would see its high ambitions defeated or frustrated on almost every front. But in the last year Saudi Arabia has seen its allies in Syrian civil war lose their last big urban centre in east Aleppo. Here, at least, Saudi intervention was indirect but in Yemen direct engagement of the vastly expensive Saudi military machine has failed to produce a victory. Instead of Iranian influence being curtailed by a more energetic Saudi policy, the exact opposite has happened. In the last OPEC meeting, the Saudis agreed to cut crude production while Iran raised output, something Riyadh had said it would always reject.
In the US, the final guarantor of the continued rule of the House of Saud, President Obama allowed himself to be quoted as complaining about the convention in Washington of treating Saudi Arabia as a friend and ally. At a popular level, there is growing hostility to Saudi Arabia reflected in the near unanimous vote in Congress to allow families of 9/11 victims to sue the Saudi government as bearing responsibility for the attack. Under the mercurial guidance of Deputy Crown Prince and Defence Minister Prince Mohammed bin Salman, the most powerful figure in Saudi decision making, Saudi foreign policy became more militaristic and nationalistic after his 80 year old father Salman became king on 23 January 2015. Saudi military intervention in Yemen followed, as did increased Saudi assistance to a rebel alliance in Syria in which the most powerful fighting force was Jabhat al-Nusra, formerly the Syrian affiliate of al-Qaeda.
Nothing has gone well for the Saudis in Yemen and Syria.
In the two days since the Soros Open Society Foundation hack by the DCLeaks collective, several notable revelations have emerged among the data dump of over 2,500 documents exposing the internal strategy of the organization, which expose some of Soros’ tactics to influence and benefit from Europe’s refugee crisis, the opportunistic funding and influence of media organizations, providing cash for assorted “pro-democracy” groups including the infamous La Raza, Soros’ funding of various “social justice” organizations while paying to track unfavorable media coverage including that of Pamela Geller.
One particular leaked memo, profiled earlier by the Daily Caller, argues that Europe’s refugee crisis should be accepted as a “new normal,” and that the refugee crisis means “new opportunities” for Soros’ organization to influence immigration policies on a global scale. OSF program officer Anna Crowley and program specialist Katin Rosin co-authored the May 12 memo, titled “Migration Governance and Enforcement Portfolio Review.”
The nine-page review makes three key points: OSF has been successful at influencing global immigration policy; Europe’s refugee crisis presents “new opportunities” for the organization to influence global immigration policy; and the refugee crisis is the “new normal.”
As the authors write in the introduction, one of the purposes of the review “consider the effectiveness of the approaches we have used to achieve change at the international level.” A section of the review titled “Our Work” describes how America’s least transparent think tank has worked with “leaders in the field” to “shape migration policymaking and influence regional and global processes affecting the way migration is governed and enforced.”
Update: December 2018 – Above link is no longer accessible after US intelligence agencies blamed the DCLeaks on Russia. US servers are making it inaccessible.
Here is a working Wayback Machine link to the DCLeaks- Soros Foundation emails:
One of the key emails on Ukraine that shows Soros collusion with specific on board media outlets including the Guardian and the Huffington Post. These are from the official DCLeaks Soros files on Ukraine. This is just one of the 370 emails on Ukraine. Keep in mind that Soros invested over $1 billion into the country along with investment group Franklin Templeton who were invested for $8 billion also right before the coup. These blood money investments pay huge once the IMF starts to allocate funds for the targeted country and pumps 1 of every 4 dollars into Privat Bank owned by Ukrainian oligarch Igor Kolomoisky who finances and controls the Right Sector Nazis that overthrew the government. Then the peoples state assets were confiscated and sold off to pay off the IMF and the oligarchs that brought the coup in the first place. Its all a nice little blood money scam with ole Georgie Boy, Franklin Templeton, the Blackstone Group and their Geneva friends like Christine Lagarde of the IMF supplying the front while EU stooges fronting NATO like Anders Fogh Rasmussen and Carl Bildt provide the protection while robbing the tax payers of their hard earned money to fund it all and transition the money through the whole target country laundry cycle and into their own bank accounts.
Title of Portfolio: The Ukraine debate in Western Europe, $750,000
The emergence of a New Ukraine carries with it the opportunity to reinvigorate the European project and reaffirm its ideals of union, solidarity, democracy, and peace. A strong, successful Ukraine protects against a democratic backslide in the east of the continent. However, this is complicated by the reluctance of some EU actors to accept the Maidan revolution as democratic and the Ukrainian government as legitimate. These actors have their own agendas -related to geopolitical and economic considerations with Russia – and will therefore be difficult to influence.
But for other groups and individuals, on the political left and across various social movements, one can detect confusion regarding the state of affairs in Ukraine. This has been fueled by a combination of ignorance about the facts on the ground, Russian propaganda, incoherent information by the Ukrainian government, and anti-American sentiment. This second group of actors includes key opinion-makers, some traditional mainstream players (such as trade unions and some political parties), emerging groups that are re-shaping Europe’s political map (in particular in southern Europe with M5S in Italy, Podemos in Spain, Syriza in Greece), and a wide range of liberal NGOs in western Europe.
Objectives:
· To stimulate debate and doubt in those democratic left movements, parties and audiences of Western Europe where a negative perception of the transformation of Ukraine is hegemonic, or very preponderant.
· To discredit the idea that the independence and integrity of Ukraine is an ideological cause of the Right.
· To influence the way information about Ukraine is heard and perceived in Southern Europe, especially among the group of doubters (see above). Specifically, we would like to facilitate the exchange of information with a skeptical or cautious European audience to show the degree of debate within Ukraine about its current reforms and that there are different visions for the future of Ukraine.
Expected impacts: (expected impacts in the field of the 2015 activities)
1. Media impact: Greater presence of voices from Ukraine’s civil society in left leaning and alternative press. More direct reporting by Ukrainian journalists on the ground facilitated by translating articles and also from OSF journalist-fellows inside Ukraine.
2. Left-wing “pro-Maidan” opinion formers’ voices amplified in the debate on Ukraine, e.g. organize a conference on the New Ukraine in partnership with the political science/international affairs department in the leading universities in each of Germany, France, Spain, Italy and Greece. These conferences to include a variety of voices from the new Ukraine.
3. Stronger grassroots-to-grassroots and CSO-to-CSO networks fostered between European and Ukraine civil society through activist exchange workshops; greater understanding of the complexities of Ukraine’s current political transition by EU actors and more nuanced appreciation of European perspectives by their counterparts in Ukraine.
4. Russia’s line on Ukraine will be subjected to a greater degree of scrutiny and skepticism by the left-wing actors involved in this project, relating to the European anti-fascist movement will be a key entry point in this debate.
Underwrite 2 conferences.
Tentative budget: $150K
Media: Build on existing relationships, for example with the Guardian to increase coverage of voices from the New Ukraine – e.g. Maidan: One year on. Work with the alternative press (e.g. Eurozine, Huffington Post, Street Press, Internazionale) as key influencers for the audience we are targeting, for example by funding translations of articles by Ukrainian journalists.
Fund individual and organizational grants for investigative reporting with long-stay grants in Ukraine, as well as journalist exchanges, to allow for deeper reporting of stories and for journalists to build their own contacts (instead of relying on Moscow-based reports).
Targeted round of newsroom briefings by authoritative experts on Ukraine.
Outputs: up to 10 grants for journalists.
Tentative budget: $100K
Set up a CSO coalition Friends of Maidan who will engage in informal and regular advocacy about the situation in Ukraine in their respective countries and expose potential allies to diverse views on Ukraine.
Output: Coalitions in the five target research countries and one EU level aimed at GUE/NGL groups.
Tentative Budget: $175k
Soros finances humanitarian organizations while at the same he finances propaganda campaigns that promote and lead to coups and war. The manipulation of a simple photo by the Soros funded Human Rights Watch highlights the point. The original picture was taken on the day of the Odessa Massacre in May 2014, a horrific event where 45 ethnic Russian protesters were burned to death by the Right Sector who arrived by buses and trains from Kiev. Yet, the Soros funded HRW used the very same pic in an anti-Russian campaign and even Tweeted it on their Twitter feed.
Finnish researcher Petri Krohn archived the shots at his “Closer Look on Syria” website.
Unknown hackers hacked into the database of the Soros Foundation and posted more than 2500 files of the organization on the Internet. The documents published on the website DCLeaks.com cover the period from 2008 to 2016 and related to different aspects of the activity of the billionaires organisation.
Ukraine is also mention in the papers of the organisation, and quite frequently – 370 times. Among the files there are documents concerning the organisation of Euromaidan, a shorthand report of activist meetings with the representatives of the “Resurrection” Fund and US ambassador Geoffrey Pyatt, as well as materials about a planned George Soros meeting with the leader of “Svoboda” Oleg Tyahnybok and others. It “unexpectedly” turns out that the insinuation of “Kremlin Propaganda”, that Euromaidan was not a spontaneous release of the people to the streets in a uniform rush, but was directed by western organizations, is at least partly confirmed.
Many documents concern the delivery of grants to the Ukrainian mass media, organizations, and certain journalists. For example, in one document it is proposed to allocate $500,000 a year for “technical assistance” to such media as the TV channel Hromadske and websites such as “Crimea, Realities and Ostrov”.
Much more at link above….
A Ukrainian hacker group claim to have emails that implicate billionaire George Soros in attempting to get involved in the conflict between Ukraine and Russia over the past year. Soros allegedly says that America should provide military hardware to Ukraine and try to adjust the perception of financial stability in the region. Alexey Yaroshevsky has more from New York City. https://www.rt.com/usa/355919-soros-hacked-files-released/
More than 2,500 files from the raft of organizations run by billionaire George Soros have been leaked by hackers.
Saturday’s leak, published by DC leaks, includes hundreds of internal documents from multiple departments of Soros’ groups, predominantly the Open Society Foundations.
The files are grouped into sections such as geographical region, the World Bank and the President’s Office, and cover the period from 2008 up until 2016, according to The Daily Caller. They reveal work plans, strategies, priorities and other activities by Soros, and include reports on European elections, migration and asylum in Europe.
DC Leaks claims to be the work of American activists who want to present the truth about the “US decision-making process as well as about the key elements of American political life.” US security experts however are blaming the leak on Russian hackers, according to Bloomberg, in a similar reaction seen in the wake of the DNC leaks.
George Soros is a Hungarian-American business magnate, investor, philanthropist, political activist and author who is of Hungarian-Jewish ancestry and holds dual citizenship. He drives more than 50 global and regional programs and foundations. Soros is named an architect and a sponsor of almost every revolution and coup around the world for the last 25 years. The USA is thought to be a vampire due to him and his puppets, not a lighthouse of freedom and democracy. His minions spill blood of millions and millions of people just to make him even more rich. Soros is an oligarch sponsoring the Democratic party, Hillary Clinton, hundreds of politicians all over the world. This website is designed to let everyone inside George Soros’ Open Society Foundation and related organisations. We present you the workplans, strategies, priorities and other activities of Soros. These documents shed light on one of the most influential network operating worldwide.
Soros gave Clinton step-by-step instructions on how to tackle Albania unrest – WikiLeaks email
An email leaked by WikiLeaks reveals that when Hillary Clinton was US secretary of state in 2011, billionaire George Soros instructed her on how to handle unrest in Albania, stressing it “needs urgent attention at senior levels of the US government.” “Dear Hillary,” begins the email dated January 24, 2011 from the founder of Open Society Foundations, Soros. “A serious situation has arisen in Albania which needs urgent attention at senior levels of the US government. You may know that an opposition demonstration in Tirana on Friday resulted in the deaths of three people and the destruction of property,” Soros says, according to the leaked email.
Three men were shot dead as anti-government demonstrators clashed with police in the Albanian capital in late January of 2011. Supporters of the opposition Socialist Party refused to accept the results of a 2009 election, citing corruption and fraud, when then-Prime Minister Sali Berisha’s Democratic Party won by a thin margin. Berisha accused the opposition of attempting to provoke a Tunisia-style uprising, saying “the bastard children of Albania’s own Ben Alis conceived Tunisian scenarios.”
“There are serious concerns about further unrest connected to a counter-demonstration to be organized by the governing party… and a follow-up event by the opposition two days later to memorialize the victims,” Soros says. “The prospect of tens of thousands of people entering the streets in an already inflamed political environment bodes ill for the return of public order and the country’s fragile democratic process,” he adds. “I believe two things need to be done urgently,” he adds. “1. Bring the full weight of the international community to bear on Prime Minister Berisha and opposition leader Edi Rama to forestall further public demonstrations and to tone down public pronouncements. 2. Appoint a senior European official as a mediator.”
Soros suggested three candidates: Carl Bildt, Martti Ahtisaari, and Miroslav Lajcak, saying all “have strong connections to the Balkans.” “The US and the EU must work in complete harmony over this, but given Albania’s European aspirations the EU must take the lead,” he stressed, adding that his foundation in Tirana was “monitoring the situation closely and can provide independent analysis of the crisis.” Several days after the email was sent to Clinton, the EU did send one of Soros’ suggested nominees, Miroslav Lajcak, to meet Albanian leaders in Tirana to try to mediate an end to the unrest, Reuters reported.
Good video that lays it all out quite well regarding Clinton, Soros, Libya, Ukraine, Syria, Albania.
Caveat: Can’t say I agree with all the views of this poster, but in this video he does lay out quite well the email connections between Soros and Clinton and to their wars/overthrows. I believe that if we want to reveal the crimes and lies of the Deep State that we have to come together and put our political subservience to the wayside.
GEORGE SOROS’S FALSE FLAG FACTORIES- Article by Wayne Madsen
Global hedge fund tycoon and political provocateur George Soros is leading a war of symbols, namely flags and banners either resurrected or conjured up by his myriad non-profit groups, to stir religious, racial, and ethnic tensions the world over. From the Serbian OTPOR! movement and its clenched-fist symbol adopted by protests groups around the world to the menacing black and white flag of the Islamic State, which first appeared during the Soros-backed “Arab Spring” rebellions, Soros’s “false flag” factories have been running at break-neck production speeds.
Soros and his acolytes saw the importance of symbology in the writings of Gene Sharp of the Albert Einstein Institution in Boston, Massachusetts. Although Sharp’s catechism of how to conduct non-violent resistance and revolution has been likened by some political scientists to Mohandas Gandhi and Dr. Martin Luther King, his concepts on upsetting the political status quo appear to be borrowed more from the likes of Mao Zedong, Karl Marx, and Adolf Hitler.
Among Sharp’s necessary tools to conduct political action are “flags and symbolic colors,” “slogans, caricatures, and symbols,” and “banners, posters, and displayed communications.” The “symbolic colors” have been used by Soros- and Central Intelligence Agency-sponsored “color revolutions” in Ukraine (Orange) and Kyrgyzstan (Pink) and attempted color revolutions in Iran (Green), Kuwait (Blue), and Burma (Saffron).
Using the Sharp template and financing from Soros and the CIA-linked National Endowment for Democracy (NED), Symbols were used in the themed Arab Spring revolutions in Tunisia (Jasmine) and Egypt (Lotus) and attempted revolutions in Georgia (Rose), Lebanon (Cedar), Uzbekistan (Cotton), and Moldova (Grape)…
More at link….
Keep clearly in mind that when Soros says ‘Open” he means open to pillage and rob from. The ruse works in that he pays off the politicians and media outlets that kindle the fire. While this is taking place he’s making ‘investments’. Then when it all goes down he can quickly recoup on the initial investment and control the key players within the target country in order to asset strip the country of the peoples hard earned valuable infrastructure through cronies. The IMF works in a very similar manner. Franklin Templeton group also seems to have worked in conjunction with Soros when it came to the initial investment before the Ukraine coup. John Helmer covered much of the IMF aspect with Naked Capitalism back in March 2015 when the loans for Ukraine were coming due and being exposed more fully.
Ukraine’s debt haircut showdown looms
Foreign bondholders wait to see what Russia decides to do
Excerpt:
Ukraine‘s hope of reaching a compromise with its international creditors hangs in the balance as the two sides prepare for complex negotiations to begin this month. While Kiev has been open about its plan to impose a haircut on billions of dollars of public debt, investors are expected to resist losses. A committee of foreign bondholders who account for more than half of the country’s external debt, including Franklin Templeton, has already been set up and is being led by Blackstone’s advisory arm.
This group could block proposals relating to bonds they hold, as could Russia which holds one bond in full. However, academics say Ukraine is not necessarily out of options if this occurs. Governments in the past have found that looking within the machinery of their bonds can sometimes strengthen their hand.
The question then is whether this risks the country’s deal with the IMF, which has a rule about not lending to countries that miss payments to other governments. Fund officials suggest the IMF might tweak its own rules to get around the situation but academics say another option might be for Ukraine to make Russia’s debt unenforceable in English courts, arguing that Russia’s annexation of Crimea should be set off against the debt.
George Soros, chairman of Soros Fund Management, argued this week that Europe was so preoccupied by Greece it is had ignored Ukraine’s economic plight. “ . . . Europe has been drip-feeding Ukraine, just as it has Greece,” he wrote in an opinion column this week. “As a result, Ukraine barely survives, while Putin has the first-mover advantage.”
My theory is that those cronies are primarily Switzerland and London based such as Ukrainian oligarch Igor Kolomoisky who controls Ukraine’s Privat Bank, the Right Sector battalions, employs Joe Bidens son and is the head of the European Jewish Congress. Hence the reason no government is going after Kolomoisky for his theft of $1.8 billion in IMF funds as reported by Andrew Cockburn in Harpers in summer 2015.
HEART OF EMPIRE — August 13, 2015, 11:32 am
Undelivered Goods
How $1.8 billion in aid to Ukraine was funneled to the outposts of the international finance galaxy
By Andrew Cockburn
Excerpt:
Kolomoisky had built his multibillion dollar financial base partly thanks to his mastery of “raiding,” the local version of mergers and acquisitions, involving methods that would make even the most hardened Wall Street financier turn pale. According to Matthew Rojansky, director of the Kennan Institute at the Woodrow Wilson Center for International Scholars, who has made a special study of the practice, “there are actual firms in Ukraine . . . registered with offices and business cards, firms [that specialize in] various dimensions of the corporate raiding process, which includes armed guys to do stuff, forging documents, bribing notaries, bribing judges.”
See ….when your one of the global elite, you get a free pass.
I do think they are trying to divide and conquer the American people and by inflaming internal conflict in the US the global elite who run the US Deep State are attempting to avoid responsibility for their large scale crimes. The purple color theme was quite obvious after the election but now they have seemed to quiet it down somewhat as many people were calling it out, myself included.
In the following posts are numerous examples of Soros’ hand operating behind the scenes regarding recent events in the US and Syria.
In addition, a number of Avaaz founders and board members have close connections to Soros’ Open Society Foundations such as Eli Pariser (both a Board Member of OSF and a member of the Open Society US programs as well as Moveon.org) and Pedro Abramovay (the Regional Director For Latin America and the Caribbean at OSF, the Director of Latin America Programs at OSF and a campaign director of Avaaz).
Discover the Networks, published a summary of the connections between some of the founders of Avaaz. The website writes, Ricken Patel: A Canadian, Patel is both the executive director of Res Publica and president/executive director of Avaaz Eli Pariser: The executive director of MoveOn, Pariser is Avaaz’s board chairman and also serves on the advisory board of Res Publica. Tom Perriello: This former U.S. congressman from Virginia co-founded Res Publica and has been a longtime advocacy partner with Ricken Patel. Ben Brandzel: Formerly an advocacy director for MoveOn, Brandzel also served as director of new-media campaigns and fundraising for Barack Obama’s Organizing for America. In addition, he worked for the presidential campaigns of Howard Dean and John Edwards.
As one might suspect, despite its constant rhetoric regarding “human rights,” “freedom,” and “democracy,” Avaaz has openly supported violence, war, and imperialism. In 2011, Avaaz raised its voice as loudly as it could with demands that the EU, NATO, UN, and all other parties “stop the violent crackdown” on civilians in Libya. Translated: Avaaz called on the EU, NATO, UN, and all other parties to come to the rescue of jihadists that had been unleashed against the government and the people of Libya in order to overthrow Ghaddafi for the benefit of the NATO powers. Avaaz soon after turned its sights on Syria, the next country in line to suffer under NATO’s attempt to destroy an uncooperative national government. As a sampling of the drivel Avaaz regularly released regarding Syria, Avaaz posted on its website the following transparent propaganda in an attempt to drum up support for a No Fly Zone in Syria.
Links to the emails showing foreknowledge and discussion of the subject…
The first two emails below reveal that the Podesta/Clinton team fully understood that Qatar and Saudi Arabia finance ISIS and international terrorism. These email exchanges in this post took place immediately after the Wall Street Journal/Grimaldi article titled
“Foreign Government Gifts to Clinton Foundation on the Rise”
This entire effort should be done with a low profile, avoiding the massive traditional military operations that are at best temporary solutions. While this military/para-military operation is moving forward, we need to use our diplomatic and more traditional intelligence assets to bring pressure on the governments of Qatar and Saudi Arabia, which are providing clandestine financial and logistic support to ISIL and other radical Sunni groups in the region.
One area in which these countries should take more action is cracking down on private financing that flows from some Gulf countries to terrorist groups such as ISIS—and the United States should increase its Treasury and Justice Department efforts to cut the financial links between the Gulf and extremist groups such as ISIS.
3rd email: Bill Clinton $1 million birthday donation from Qatar….
Last Thursday, April 12, I met individually with the Ambassadors from Qatar, Brazil, Peru, Malawi, and Rwanda, in Washington, DC. Below is a summary of key points from each meeting, and we are following-up on each point. I’d welcome your feedback. Sincerely, Ami QATAR – Would like to see WJC “for five minutes” in NYC, to present $1 million check that Qatar promised for WJC’s birthday in 2011. – Qatar would welcome our suggestions for investments in Haiti – particularly on education and health. They have allocated most of their $20 million but are happy to consider projects we suggest. I’m collecting input from CF Haiti team.
Subject: RE: WSJ | Foreign Government Donations I will leave all the defensive things to those who have and know the data for pushback. But there is a much larger strategic question that we need to resolve and stop this from spreading beyond today and probably tomorrow. And that is how quickly foundation stops. Even if we don’t announce it immediately, we may want to stop immediately. Obviously, doing this in the context of an overall strategy we can stick with is better than dealing with brush fires.
Qatar was for CGI
The only governments that donated to the endowment were: Saudi Arabia, Oman, and UAE
On Feb 18, 2015, at 8:56 AM, Margolis, Jim < Jim.Margolis@gmmb.com<mailto:Jim.Margolis@gmmb.com wrote: Nick, So virtually all of these donations were to the endowment and were not for specific projects, correct?
It would be nice to paint a picture of how this money is being put to work — even anecdotally.
More on their discussions and awareness of problematic Clinton Foundation donations from states that support terrorism or have a dubious record regarding support for terrorist related activities:
Excerpt: “This is why Morocco would be such a problem–more of this the first week she’s out selling her story.”
The Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates and Oman donations went to the endowment drive.
*Write to *James V. Grimaldi at James.Grimaldi@wsj.com On Feb 17, 2015, at 8:39 PM, Nick Merrill <nmerrill@hrcoffice.com> wrote:
James Grimaldi, the same investigative reporter writing this larger piece about Foundation/State Department overlap with corporate money (which is still TBD in terms of when/whether it will run) is writing a piece for tomorrow about the Foundation’s acceptance of foreign money. The increase shows up on last year’s disclosure for a number of reasons, some of it related to ongoing programs, some because there was an uptick in foreign money after she left State and the MOU no longer applied. Craig and his team have been working with them all day to separate fact from fiction where they can, and have given them a strong statement about donors’ contributions to the Foundation being a result of the good work it does, but wanted everyone to have a heads up. Nick
5th email related to WSJ/ James Grimaldi article on Clinton Foundation foreign donations from Qatar and Saudi Arabia. Discussion on receiving the funds shows awareness of states sponsoring terrorism, yet Clinton Foundation still took the money:
Subject: Re: WSJ | Foreign Government Donations To answer earlier questions on this chain — we looked into foreign govt donations to former presidential libraries and foundations a while back. See memo attached. Will update to include Bush 43. Bush 41 received funds from Qatar, Kuwait, Japan, Oman, UAE for his library, including while his son was in office.
Additional email- Discussion of stopping taking the money:
On Feb 18, 2015, at 12:50 PM, John Podesta <john.podesta@gmail.com> wrote: > > Practical to reimpose State Department rules? Buy us anything? Mostly > those are Q’s for Cheryl and Denis. > On Feb 18, 2015 12:21 PM, “Joel Benenson” <jbenenson@bsgco.com> wrote:
Sorry to be clear – foundation stops — means stop taking foreign gov’t money. Is that possible? If not we’re going to be very vulnerable on that throughout and I think our opponents and some on our side will say at is unseemly for a potential U.S. President taking money from foreign governments for her private foundation.
What the above emails show is full awareness (via their own email statements) that Qatar and Saudi Arabia are supporters and financier of ISIS, yet the Clinton team still took the money Qatar and Saudi Arabia offered, including a $1 million check from Qatar on Bill Clintons birthday (as stated in the above email).
The Podesta team then went on to discuss the impropriety of taking money from Qatar and Saudi Arabia, as well as other Sunni Gulf states, and Morocco. To reconcile this impropriety they used examples of other administrations doing the same previously. This shows complete awareness of their ongoing actions, however, they still chose to accept the money regardless of how it may have looked and knowing full well that the states the money came from were ISIS/terroism backers.
Thus, at a minimum, the Wikileaks released Podesta emails prove that they were fully aware of their actions and that the countries they took the money from were ISIS-Islamic radical terrorism support states. This makes them complicit in supporting murder, international terrorism and terrorist related activities.
Link to original WSJ article that led to their discussions on impropriety:
Foreign Government Gifts to Clinton Foundation on the Rise
By James V. Grimaldi and Rebecca Ballhaus
Recent post reveals that lead Saudi cleric terrorist commander in Aleppo, Syria receives extensive air time on Dubai Gulf State financed TV Channel “Orient TV” and is hailed in the Gulf States as a ‘revolutionary’ hero. There is no way realistically possible that the US surveillance apparatus and the Clinton team is not aware of this fact. If they are unaware of it then they are completely negligent in their duties and responsibilities to the American people they were appointed to represent.
Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton’s Clinton Foundation and the Islamic State group (ISIS) both receive funding from the same sources in the Middle East, namely the government of Saudi Arabia and Qatar, Julian Assange claimed in a recent interview.
In an interview that will be broadcast by Russia Today (RT) on Saturday, the founder of the controversial nonprofit information dissemination organization WikiLeaks accused the former secretary of state of underplaying the support that the country’s allies in the Middle East provide to the extremist group behind numerous deaths across the world.
Assange, who has been seeking refuge in the Ecuadorian embassy in London since 2012, and his organization released over 30,000 emails from Clinton’s private server, along with about 20,000 emails from the Democratic National Committee and over 50,000 emails from her campaign manager John Podesta.
One of these email exchanges between Clinton and Podesta, then an advisor to President Barack Obama, had details of Clinton telling Podesta to “bring pressure” on the Middle Eastern powers “which are providing clandestine financial and logistic support to ISIL [Islamic State, IS, ISIS] and other radical Sunni groups,” RT reported.
In a 2014 email made public by Assange’s WikiLeaks last month, Hillary Clinton, who had served as secretary of state until the year before, urges John Podesta, then an advisor to Barack Obama, to “bring pressure” on Qatar and Saudi Arabia, “which are providing clandestine financial and logistic support to ISIL [Islamic State, IS, ISIS] and other radical Sunni groups.”
I think this is the most significant email in the whole collection,” Assange, whose whistleblowing site released three tranches of Clinton-related emails over the past year, told Pilger in an exclusive interview, courtesy of Dartmouth Films.
“All serious analysts know, and even the US government has agreed, that some Saudi figures have been supporting ISIS and funding ISIS, but the dodge has always been that it is some “rogue” princes using their oil money to do whatever they like, but actually the government disapproves. But that email says that it is the government of Saudi Arabia, and the government of Qatar that have been funding ISIS.”
Wikileaks- Podesta email release highlights Clinton team discussing lobbying via foreign agents and decision making regarding accepting of various foreign donations. Note that Podesta was on point soliciting money from Gulf states.
Take fair warning: Between November 2016 and January 2017 the groups above were all active in fomenting civil unrest and demonstrations in the US by using social media and core liberal issues in the post election atmosphere to motivate people to rise up and incite change in the election result.
What isn’t being reported is that they are directly involved with promoting the fake Syrian White helmets who are terrorists disguised as humanitarian aid workers in Syria and have been filmed on numerous occasions operating alongside al-Nusra Front terrorists in the Syrian conflict. Avaaz was also instrumental in gathering signatures for a No-Fly Zone over Libya which led to the deaths of tens of thousands of people after the country was destabilized. Simply put, these groups foment violent revolution under the guise of social activism. Proof here:
Syria has certainly been risky. The group was quicker on the draw in responding to the first signs of the protest movement than most aid organisations, even than most media outlets that pride themselves in getting speedily to difficult places.
To begin with, Avaaz sent a team of staff organisers to Lebanon after spotting the first signs of a nascent protest movement in Syria. Contact was then made with Syrian activists inside the country, and go-betweens recruited, notably Wissam Tarif, a highly respected Syrian pro-democracy leader who is widely consulted by journalists and senior western diplomats.
From there its involvement in the Syrian Arab spring drew it steadily further and further into the conflict. First off Avaaz sent in hundreds of thousands of dollars’ worth of communications equipment – satellite phones and internet connections known as BGANs –that gave the protesters a link to the outside world.
As with earlier Arab spring engagements in Tunisia and Libya, they realised that equipment alone was not enough: the protesters needed to know how to use it if they were to be effective. So Avaaz sent in trainers who could give grounding in how to use the satphones as well as basic training in citizen journalism.
More links here to my recent posts on the “Purpose” group that is directly affiliated with Avaaz and Moveon.org and now pushing anti-Trump protests in the US.
A quick look at the Wikipedia page for social activism group Avaaz shows that they are founded by MoveOn Executive Director Eli Pariser, Australian progressive entrepreneur David Madden and Jeremy Heimans (co-founders of Purpose.com).
Excerpt: Jeremy Joshua Heimans is co-founder and CEO of Purpose. He is an Australian-born political activist and a co-founder of GetUp! and global online political community Avaaz.org.
“SumOfUs” online activism group also linked to Avaaz and Purpose.
CEO- Taren Stinebrickner-Kauffman (born 14 November 1981) is the founder and executive director of SumOfUs. She is an Australian-American activist and the daughter of DePauw University professors, former Georgetown basketball standout Bruce Stinebrickner and author Kelsey Kauffman. She was raised in Greencastle, Indiana.
Taren Stinebrickner-Kauffman graduated summa cum laude and Phi Beta Kappa with a degree in mathematics from Duke University in 2004.
Before founding SumOfUs, Taren Stinebrickner-Kauffman worked at a number of other progressive groups including Avaaz.org, GetUp.org.au, and the AFL-CIO.
Posts related to the Syrian White Helmet terrorists that Avaaz and Purpose have been promoting who are masquerading as humanitarian aid workers in Syria.
Extensive links proving the White Helmets are a terrorist front group:
To sum up I will borrow a paragraph from JP Radical Arendt’s post earlier that I will provide a link to below. Here’s what we are really dealing with:
We are aware of weaponized NGOs, such as the National Endowment for Democracy, Freedom House, and Soros’s Open Society Foundations. These NGOs basically carry out, in plain sight, the CIA’s program of subversion. This is merely another layer on top of the CIA’s “mighty Wurlitzer” of “journalists” who write what the CIA wants written – and have done so for 50+ years. We are aware that these NGOs are behind the Color Revolution scam, which is nothing more than hybrid warfare – deliberately escalating legitimate political grievances into violent confrontations. We have witnessed these NGOs in action in Venezuela, in Egypt, in the Ukraine. When these facts are pointed out, the response is to demonize those who report these facts as “agents of Putin”.
I hope Arendt doesn’t mind that I used that paragraph. It describes it all perfectly and reminds us that we must be extra vigilant right now. I believe that faux liberals who did very little real activism previously are being played in these anti-Trump protests. Real progressive anti-war liberals like myself and others had been right working as solid activists all along to get the truth out about US war crimes and corruption. We did not sit idly by while Hillary Clinton and her criminal gang were conducting war crimes, false flags and taking millions of dollars in bribes in the Middle East. We have been accused time and time again of being Putin trolls or Trump apologists during the last few years even though we may have just helped prevent full scale WW3 breaking out.
Its time to be seriously concerned that the groups above are intentionally fomenting unrest in the United States. We need to wake the American people up to what these groups are really all about. They are promoting terrorists in Syria and lying to their respective memberships while using core liberal and progressive issues to carry out their nefarious agenda. The American people don’t deserve to be used so that the US goes to war against itself. That serves none of our better interests. It once again serves the interest of the global elite and the corrupt establishment. Violent revolution seems to be what the establishment wants. Consider all the info above and be very cautious going forward.
And, once again, where does the start-up seed money for these groups come from?
MoveOn.org is primarily funded by small-dollar contributions from its millions of members. Major contributors to MoveOn.org during the 2004 election cycle included financier George Soros who gave US$1.46 million to MoveOn.org Voter Fund;
All evidence on the actions of these global elitists will be supplied by ‘reputable’ mainstream sources in this thread. I will focus on the Rothschild’s, Igor Kolomoisky who financed the Ukrainian Right Sector Nazi battalions, various Ukrainian oligarchs as well as Color ‘Revolution’ financier George Soros.
It’s an easy start as we see that the DC Leaks have revealed that George Soros was the main player behind the Ukrainian coup and the “new media/social media” rollout on Ukraine. He monitored groups in Ukraine using social media spyware, set up meetings, paid huge sums to MSM outlets to influence them, constantly was in contact and influencing US government and European government officials, pulled strings at the IMF and had direct contact, as well as provided support, with all the major players that led the coup. It is now also very well known that the 2014 Ukrainian coup was led by groups of fascist pro Nazi battalions.
Having established that Soros is a global elitists who controls world changing events, lets move along to Ukrainian oligarch Igor Kolomoisky. This is the evidence that he financed the Ukrainian Nazi battalions, hired Joe Biden’s son Hunter for an offshore holding company called Burisma Holdings based in Cyprus and also stole $1.8 billion in IMF funds that were misdirected into Cyprus based offshore accounts.
Agence Presse France introduces us to Kolomoisky…..
Dnipro-1’s headquarters are on the ground floor of the Dnipropetrovsk administration building. Upstairs sits the regional governor, Igor Kolomoisky. The arrangement is no accident: Kolomoisky, one of Ukraine’s most controversial billionaires, funds the paramilitary, which returns the favour in these troubled times by boosting the banking and industrial tycoon’s personal security and political clout.
All the signs are of a flourishing military enterprise. Young men with Kalashnikovs and pistols and several well dressed women working on laptops fill the anteroom to Bereza’s office.
Dnipro-1 has 700 men — “officially,” Bereza says with an enigmatic smile.
“Unofficially, it’s 7,000.”
– DARK SIDE –
Questions over the far right leanings of some volunteer groups and allegations of involvement in the murder of civilians cast a long shadow. One of the most controversial is the Azov Battalion, which uses the Wolfsangel insignia — an ancient design that was resurrected in Hitler’s Germany. The Azov has been linked to Oleg Lyashko, a politician accused of neo-Nazi sympathies.
Right Sector, an ultra-nationalist party, also has its own battalion of several hundred men on the frontlines, even if the government refuses to register or pay them. Dasha Slutskovska, a 29-year-old volunteer from the battalion in Dnipropetrovsk, conceded that Right Sector has an image problem — they are relentlessly portrayed in Russia’s state-controlled media as fascists.
R. Hunter Biden Should Declare Who Really Owns His New Ukrainian Employer, Burisma Holdings
Posted on May 21, 2014 by Richard Smith
Here’s last week’s big announcement, adorned by a photograph of an American with a faintly alarming rictus; oh yes, oh dear me, yes: Hunter Biden joins the team of Burisma Holdings: Burisma Holdings, Ukraine’s largest private gas producer, has expanded its Board of Directors by bringing on Mr. R Hunter Biden as a new director.
R. Hunter Biden will be in charge of the Holdings’ legal unit and will provide support for the Company among international organizations. On his new appointment, he commented: “Burisma’s track record of innovations and industry leadership in the field of natural gas means that it can be a strong driver of a strong economy in Ukraine. As a new member of the Board, I believe that my assistance in consulting the Company on matters of transparency, corporate governance and responsibility, international expansion and other priorities will contribute to the economy and benefit the people of Ukraine.”
HEART OF EMPIRE — August 13, 2015, 11:32 am
Undelivered Goods
How $1.8 billion in aid to Ukraine was funneled to the outposts of the international finance galaxy
Kolomoisky had built his multibillion dollar financial base partly thanks to his mastery of “raiding,” the local version of mergers and acquisitions, involving methods that would make even the most hardened Wall Street financier turn pale. According to Matthew Rojansky, director of the Kennan Institute at the Woodrow Wilson Center for International Scholars, who has made a special study of the practice, “there are actual firms in Ukraine . . . registered with offices and business cards, firms [that specialize in] various dimensions of the corporate raiding process, which includes armed guys to do stuff, forging documents, bribing notaries, bribing judges.” In April 2014, as the separatists advanced, Kolomoisky mobilized his workforce into a 20,000-man private army in two battalions, Dnipro-1 and Dnipro-2, and stemmed the tide. According to Wilson Center director Rojansky, Kolomosiky is “perceived as the bulwark and the reason why the whole Novorossiya project [Putin’s plan to absorb most of eastern Ukraine] broke down at the border of the Donbass.”
As the largest bank, Kolomoisky’s PrivatBank stood to garner the largest share of the international aid. Published estimates put this share as high as 40 percent. Despite the torrent of cash, the banks’ situation did not improve; nine months into the program, the IMF announced: “As of end January 2015 . . . the banking system’s capital adequacy ratio stood at 13.8 percent, down from 15.9 percent at end-June.” Where had the money gone?
In this case however, thanks to investigative work by the Ukrainian anticorruption watchdog group Nashi Groshi (“Our Money”), we can actually watch the process by which the gigantic sum of $1.8 billion was smoothly maneuvered offshore, in the first instance to PrivatBank accounts in Cyprus, and thence into accounts in Belize, the British Virgin Islands, and other outposts of the international financial galaxy. The scheme, as revealed in a series of court judgments of the Economic Court of the Dnipropetrovsk region monitored and reported by Nashi Groshi, worked like this: Forty-two Ukrainian firms owned by fifty-four offshore entities registered in Caribbean, American, and Cypriot jurisdictions and linked to or affiliated with the Privat group of companies, took out loans from PrivatBank in Ukraine to the value of $1.8 billion. The firms then ordered goods from six foreign “supplier” companies, three of which were incorporated in the United Kingdom, two in the British Virgin Islands, one in the Caribbean statelet of St. Kitts & Nevis. Payment for the orders—$1.8 billion—was shortly afterwards prepaid into the vendors’ accounts, which were, coincidentally, in the Cyprus branch of PrivatBank. Once the money was sent, the Ukrainian importing companies arranged with PrivatBank Ukraine that their loans be guaranteed by the goods on order.
But the foreign suppliers invariably reported that they could not fulfill the order after all, thus breaking the contracts, but without any effort to return the money. Finally, the Ukrainian companies filed suit, always in the Dnipropetrovsk Economic Court, demanding that that foreign supplier return the prepayment and also that the guarantee to PrivatBank be cancelled. In forty-two out of forty-two such cases the court issued the identical judgment: the advance payment should be returned to the Ukrainian company, but the loan agreement should remain in force.
As a result, the loan of the Ukrainian company remained guaranteed by the undelivered goods, while the chances of returning the advance payments from foreign companies remain remote. “Basically this transaction of $1.8 bill[ion] abroad with the help of fake contracts was simply an asset siphoning [operation] and a violation of currency legislation in general,” explained Lesya Ivanovna, an investigator with Nashi Groshi in an email to me. “The whole lawsuit story was only needed to make it look like the bank itself is not involved in the scheme . . . officially it looks like PrivatBank now owns the products, though in reality [they] will never be delivered.
The thread above also provides various evidence that the Russian government believes Igor Kolomoisky was the lead orchestrator behind the false flag shootdown of Malaysian Airlines flight MH17.
Viktor Pinchuk was also a Ukrainian oligarch that played a key role in the Ukrainian crisis and paid the Clinton Foundation $8.6 million for what appears to be political favors regarding Ukraine.
Onward and upwards we go to other big daddies……the Rothschild’s, specifically for now, Jacob Rothschild.
Its already well known that they are behind the worlds banking system so lets not go into that and instead focus on some curious current events where Jacob Rothschild plays a major role.
First lets start with the fact that Lord Rothschild started a company with Dick Cheney and Rupert Murdoch that will illegally extract natural gas from the Syrian Golan Heights. A project worth a potential $40 billion.
Then lets move along to the fact that when Vladamir Putin shut down and imprisoned Russian oil tycoon Mikhail Khodorkovsky who was stealing billions of dollars worth of Russia’s natural resource dollars that could have gone to lifting the Russian people out of poverty, that very same Khodorkovsky transferred $8 billion to one Jacob Rothschild whose offices are directly located behind Whitehall in London.
Russian tycoon ‘names successor’
Yukos headquarters
Yukos is braced for more raids
Russian oil tycoon Mikhail Khodorkovsky has named Jacob Rothschild as a possible successor to take over his Yukos oil company if he goes to prison on fraud charges, according to reports. The Rothschilds have financed oil exploration in Russia since the Tsarist period, while Lord Rothschild has close connections with Yukos. Police raided Yukos offices in Moscow on Friday, spending nearly 17 hours searching through computer archives, the Russian financial daily Kommersant quoted a top Yukos official as saying. Mr Khodorkovsky, who has been in the United States at a conference attended by Microsoft founder Bill Gates, and is reported to be preparing for the worst ahead.
The authorities are investigating tax evasion at Yukos and rival firm Sibneft, which are due to merge to create the world’s fourth-ranked producer. Mr Khodorkovsky, who has a personal fortune estimated at $8bn has been targeted by prosecutors in what is seen as a politically-driven campaign by Kremlin figures. The tycoon has been financing opposition parties ahead of December parliamentary elections, in a move analysts say breaks a 2000 agreement between President Vladimir Putin and the nation’s billionaire magnates for them to keep out of politics.
And here we come to something much more recent regarding the money of the Russian people and another thief who was ripping them off.
About €300 million ($336 million) was found in Swiss bank accounts of the father of Russia’s anti-corruption agency head, media reports. The news comes days after police arrested Dmitry Zakharchenko and found over $122 million in cash at his Moscow home.
Law enforcement agencies found documents about the accounts of offshore firms registered in the name of Zakharchenko’s father Viktor, according to a source speaking to Rosbalt news agency.
“Six bank accounts like this were found mostly at Rothschild Bank and the Dresdner Bank, with each having between €45 million and €47 million. This is more than €300 million,” the source added.
The source described the amounts on the Swiss accounts as being “colossal,” while the authorities are trying to find out where the money came from. “It’s clear that we are not only talking about money from Nota-Bank, as it was previously perceived,” the source mentioned.
NOTA-Bank had its license revoked by the Russian Central Bank in November. Zakharchenko’s lawyer Yury Novikov said that his client did not know anything about the Swiss bank accounts.
Ah, lucky Lord Rothschild strike again! Nothing to see here though.
Now lets move back in time to the older Rothschild’s and the Balfour Agreement letter in 1917. You already know the story that it was Rothschild who initially called for the creation of Israel.
Excerpt: The Balfour Declaration was a letter dated 2 November 1917 from the United Kingdom’s Foreign Secretary Arthur James Balfour to Walter Rothschild, 2nd Baron Rothschild
And you know that Israel was set up by the British House of Lords in 1947, of which, of course, the older Lord Rothschild had profound influence over the issue being behind the Bank of England. The Palestinians were tossed under the bus by the Brits at that time and the Rothschild’s were able to procure land in Palestine even before the 1940’s war. Then in 1947 Israel was established. The Rothschild family then went on to play the leading role by funding the new Israel’s governmental infrastructure. James A. de Rothschild financed the Knesset building as a gift to the State of Israel and the Supreme Court of Israel building was donated to Israel by Dorothy de Rothschild. Outside the President’s Chamber is displayed a letter Mrs. Rothschild wrote to the then current Prime Minister Shimon Peres expressing her intention to donate a new building for the Supreme Court.
The Knesset compound sits on a hilltop in western Jerusalem in a district known as Sheikh Badr before the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, now Givat Ram. The main building was financed by James de Rothschild as a gift to the State of Israel in his will and was completed in 1966.
Considering the influence the older Lord Rothschild and his family had over the decision conducted by the British to establish Israel in the Balfour letter, one should wonder why in 1947, the same British government that set up the state of Israel and supplied the land rights to the Rothschild’s would also repatriate 7,100 Ukrainian Waffen SS who killed over 100,000 poles and Jews at Volhynia and Eastern Galicia
Ukrainian SS ‘Galicia’ Division allowed to settle in Britain
August 2005
Recent releases at The National Archives
Home office papers reveal how 7,100 Ukrainian men from the 14th Waffen SS ‘Galicia’ Division were allowed to settle in Britain in order to protect them from persecution in Stalinist controlled Ukraine. The documents follow the case of the Ukrainian soldiers, from their capture in Italy by British forces to Britain’s reaction to an Italian treaty with the Soviet Union to repatriate the men. Catalogue reference: HO 213/1851, Ukrainian prisoners of war in Italy: possible transportation to UK for ‘screening’.
I would simply ask the question, what was going on here? Why did the UK repatriate an entire regiment of Ukrainian Waffen SS who shot naked Jewish women and children in the back of the head while they fell into pits that were then set on fire with some victims still alive? Who, specifically, made the decision to repatriate them?
Video link to massacres of Poles in Volhynia and Eastern Galicia 1943-1944:
Regarding the UK’s actions towards Israel and the Rothschild’s, it should also be considered why the UK and US supplied tetraethyll lead for fuel to IG Farben who were the largest company in Germany and were fueling Adolph Hitler’s war machine. Link to thread on the subject including video evidence by Dr. Anthony Sutton of the Hoover Institute proving such:
Now I don’t know where all this leads or what these global elitists are up to but it seems to me that things being reported in the media are not necessarily the truth and the history of the past that we are taught is rife with inaccuracies and omissions. I always preface my posts that are conspiracy theories with a message that “this is a conspiracy theory of mine”, however, this time around I will not do so as the information above is all sourced from well established mainstream media outlets, the historical records of the UK, Wikipedia, well established professional writers and my previous sourced posts. I hope people ask more questions about what is really going on with the global elite behind these life and death situations.
Taking this further:
Post WWII its worth starting with Bretton Woods then establishment of the UN the next year
Bretton Woods led to the IMF and World Bank tools of the global elite used for asset stripping and debt slavery while the UN served as new way to control the NWO. All these institutional tools of the global elite were established around the same time right at the end of the 2nd World War, a war that I believe the global elite played a major role in causing. I believe that the wars serve as a means to implement these massive tools that the elite put in place to maintain control and we may see similar tools implemented due to the current wars. The global elite never back down, they just keep steamrolling for control.
The IMF was established by a number of influential European banking families and is 51% controlled by the US Federal Monetary Reserve but it is also believed by many people that that institution is also under the control of the worlds richest banking family, the Rothschild’s as well as other major bankers/players, same as the IMF. These connections are difficult to prove without documentation but not difficult to speculate upon considering the Rothschild’s history of controlling the worlds money and the famous story of the Creature of Jekyll Island in 1913 where Rothschild representatives played the most important roles.
Paul Warburg
was probably the most important person at the meeting because of his knowledge of banking as it was practiced in Europe. He was a partner in Kuhn, Loeb & Company and was a representative of the Rothschild banking dynasty in England and France where he maintained a very close working relationships throughout his entire career with his brother, Max Warburg, who was the head of the Warburg banking consortium in Germany and the Netherlands. He was also one of the wealthiest men in the world at the time.
He also founded and became the first director of the Council on Foreign Relations at its founding in 1921. The CFR being another tool of the global elite used to oversee US foreign policy.
Wikipedia currently suffices fine for the low down on Warburg.
Death[edit]
Warburg died at his home in New York City on January 24, 1932, and was buried in Sleepy Hollow Cemetery in Sleepy Hollow, New York. At the time of his death he was chairman of the Manhattan Company and a director of the Bank of Manhattan Trust Company, Farmers Loan and Trust Company of New York, First National Bank of Boston, Baltimore & Ohio Railroad, Union Pacific Railroad, Los Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad, Western Union Telegraph Company, American I.G. Chemical Company, Agfa Ansco Corporation, and Warburg & Company of Amsterdam.
Yes, you guessed it. Its the very same I.G. as in I.G. Farben that fueled Hitler’s war machine.
Excerpt:
American IG owes its genesis to a German business conglomerate, namely, Interessens-Gemeinschaft Farbenindustrie AG, or IG Farben for short. The business, along with the industrial empire that “IG” controlled and commanded, has been described as “a state within a state.”
The Farben cartel was created in 1925, when Hermann Schmitz, the master organizer, with Wall Street financial assistance, created the giant chemical corporation, combining six already giant German chemical companies — Badische Anilin- und Sodafabrik Ludwigshafen (BASF), Bayer, Agfa, Hoechst, Weiler-ter-Meer, and Griesheim-Elektron. These six companies were merged into Interessen-Gemeinschaft Farbenindustrie AG or, IG Farben, for short.
In year 1928, the American holdings of IG Farben, namely, the American branches of Bayer Company, General Aniline Works, Agfa Ansco, and Winthrop Chemical Company, were organized into a Swiss holding company, which was named Internationale Gesellschaft für Chemische Unternehmungen AG or IG Chemie, in short. The controlling interest of this entity rested with IG Farben in Germany. In the following year, 1929, just a decade before the outbreak of the Second World War, these American firms merged to become American IG Chemical Corporation, or American IG, later renamed General Aniline & Film.
On the eve of World War II, IG Farben, the German chemical conglomerate, was the largest manufacturing enterprise in the world and exercised extraordinary economic and political clout in Nazi Germany. In 1936, it was the principal source for Zyklon B, the poison used in German concentration camps. From 1942-1945, the company used slave labor from Nazi concentration camps. After 1945, three members of the board of governors of American IG were tried and convicted as German war criminals. In 1952, IG Farben was split into BASF, Bayer, and Hoechst again.
So there you have it. This man led the creation of the US Federal Reserve and the Council on Foreign Relations and also was the chairman and director of American I.G., the US branch of I.G. Farben that supplied the gas for gas chambers and fueled the German war machine in WW2. It seems clear from this action that it wasn’t simply just Hitler who was exterminating prisoners. Others also had a hand in the matter, including a number of directors at large companies based in the US, Germany and Switzerland.
Quite a wicked web was woven by Paul Warburg it seems. His name seems quite fitting. Metaphorically, he seems to have been quite the Judas.
A lot of the information I supply on the subject came from the following sources. It grows quite complex, so I will provide mainly links as it is difficult to provide a 100% certifiable direct connection for the Jekyll Island meeting. First, this book explains that the Warburg’s aspired to be agents of the Rothschild’s and how Max Warburg served his apprenticeship for the Rothschild’s banks in Paris and London two decades prior to WW1. In the 1890’s the Warburg’s started the first Hamburg loan issuing house for the Rothschild’s international government loans.
What John Moody did not know, or did not tell his readers, was that the most powerful men in the United States were themselves answerable to another power, a foreign power, and a power which had been steadfastly seeking to extend its control over the young republic of the United States since its very inception. This power was the financial power of England, centered in the London Branch of the House of Rothschild. The fact was that in 1910, the United States was for all practical purposes being ruled from England, and so it is today.
The ten largest bank holding companies in the United States are firmly in the hands of certain banking houses, all of which have branches in London. They are J.P. Morgan Company, Brown Brothers Harriman, Warburg, Kuhn Loeb and J. Henry Schroder. All of them maintain close relationships with the House of Rothschild, principally through the Rothschild control of international money markets through its manipulation of the price of gold. Each day, the world price of gold is set in the London office of N.M. Rothschild and Company.
Although these firms are ostensibly American firms, which merely maintain branches in London, the fact is that these banking houses actually take their direction from London. Their history is a fascinating one, and unknown to the American public, originating as it did in the international traffic in gold, slaves, diamonds, and other contraband. There are no moral considerations in any business decision made by these firms. They are interested solely in money and power.
Dr. Anthony Sutton of the Hoover Institute also explains how Wall Street firms transferred the money to Lenin and the Bolsheviks to finance the revolution. These banks were run by the global elite mentioned in the links above.
A classic interview by Professor Antony Sutton, who taught economics at California State University, and was a research fellow at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution. In this talk, Prof. Sutton goes into his impeccable research on how a close-knit group of Western financiers and industrialists (centered around Morgan and Rockefeller in the US, and around Milner and the City financiers, in the UK) created and sustained their three supposed enemies right from the very beginning: Soviet Russia, Nazi Germany, and FDR’s Fabian socialism.
When looking into the Warburg family its also important to note their connections to the World Zionist Organization.
Otto Warburg (20 July 1859 – 10 January 1938), was a German botanist. He was also a notable industrial agriculture expert, as well as an active member of the Zionist Organization (ZO). From 1911–21, he served as the president of the ZO, which among other things, sought ‘for the Jewish people a publicly and legally assured home in Palestine.”[1]
In 1911 Warburg was elected president of the World Zionist Congress in Palestine, and he remained in the office until 1920. After 1920, the Congress moved to England. But Warburg stayed in Palestine and became founding director of the Agricultural Experimental Station in Tel Aviv. It later became the ‘Institute of Agriculture and Natural History’.
If one naturally connects the dots one can see how the Warburg’s played a key role in setting up the Federal Reserve and other US and international organizations by themselves and proxies while the Rothschild’s and Warburg’s worked together to purchase land in Palestine and set up the state of Israel. The Rothschild’s dominated British banking and parliament at this time, and are reputed to still do so today from offices directly behind Whitehall. At that time both families were purchasing massive amounts of land in Palestine over the twenty year period between WW1 and WW2. After WW2, the Rothschild’s payed for the primary government buildings within the newly formed state. All of this was conducted mainly out of London through backroom meetings and the World Zionist Congress. In 1911 Warburg was elected president of the World Zionist Congress in Palestine, and he remained in the office until 1920. After 1920, the Congress moved to England. Then later back to Basel, Switzerland.
Incidentally, Senator Nelson Aldrich was also a servant of Rothschild’s at the Jekyll Club Hotel meeting.
Here’s also an interesting article where the NY Times covers up for the whole cabal and their actions during WW1 and WW2, and attempts to paint a picture of them being victims.
Sometimes, the bankers financed both sides. The Rothschilds’ agents, the Warburg banking house, were financing the Kaiser. Paul Warburg, a naturalized citizen from Germany who had been decorated by the Kaiser in 1912, was vice chairman of the Federal Reserve Board. He had also handled large sums furnished by Germany for Lenin and Trotsky while his brother Max (who was Kaiser Wilhelm’s personal banker) was the leader of the German espionage system! It was this brother, Max, who authorized Lenin’s train to pass through the lines and execute the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia. Jacob Schiff, like the Warburgs, also had two brothers in Germany during the war, Philip and Ludwig, who also were active as bankers to the German Government.
The Rothschilds meanwhile bought the German news agency, Wolff, to further control the flow of information to the German people and what the rest of the world would hear from inside Germany. One of the leading executives of Wolff was none other than Max Warburg! The Rothschilds would later buy an interest in the Havas news agency in France and Reuters in London. The tentacles of the banking families reached deep into the power elites: Dr. von Bethmann Hollweg, was the son of Moritz Bethmann from the Frankfurt banking family of Frankfurt, a cousin of the Rothschilds.
Kuhn, Loeb & Co. represented the Rothschild interests in the US, and along with the Harrimans, the Goulds and the Rockefellers, became the dominant powers in the railroad and America financial world while they war-mongered to fatten themselves even more. The first available appointment on the Supreme Court of the United States which Woodrow Wilson filled was given to Kuhn-Loeb lawyer Louis Brandeis who had been selected by Jacob Schiff to carry on war agitation. Through marriage, the Kuhn Loeb Company managed to twine itself throughout the U.S. Food Administration, the British Secret Service and the Wilson White House. And on and on and on it went, like a ball of twine, tangling and tying the bankers, their progeny and their friends together for war and profits.
Now to really have your mind blown…….this relates to 3 World Wars.
Caveat: I have a Jesus versus Judas theory that implies that the Zionist Jews threw the good Jews under the bus during WW2 in order to set up the state of Israel. My link above of Max Warburg and I.G. Farben delves into this subject matter. Even though I’m agnostic, I respect all religious practices and see beauty in them, as well as a search for understanding. I love good people of the Jewish faith and think that Zionists will use anybody for their own nefarious purposes. I will leave viewers who try to paint me as anti-semitic with the now famous Norman Finklelstein video that negates that tired ruse…
The lie……..at the 2:38 mark the reporter states “And Wolf one of the reasons why the people there (at the refugee camps) are so afraid that a massacre could take place if Gaddafi forces do prevail is that they’re even shooting at humanitarian aid ships”
Note that earlier in the video all the refugees are black sub-saharan Africans.
It is now very well known that black africans who primarily came from sub-saharan poor countries to work in Libya due to the readily available oil work and irrigation jobs have now been hunted and slaughtered by US and NATO backed radical jihadist groups that were used to overthrow the country. The majority of Libyan refugee drowning deaths in the Mediterranean are black sub-saharan refugees attempting to flee the slaughter in NATO destabilized Libya. Being black in Libya right now is a death sentence due to the racist hateful views of the US backed radicals who saw the black workers as a threat to their own jobs when Gaddafi was in power. Once Gaddafi was removed it became hunting season on black refugees.
14 October 2013
RACISM AND REVOLUTION: THE PLIGHT OF BLACK AFRICANS IN LIBYA
by Shaimaa Abul Hajj
Last Thursday as many as 350 migrants, mainly from sub-Saharan Africa, died as they tried to reach Italy by boat. But as the world continues to reel from the shock of the Lampedusa tragedy, the spotlight is turning towards Libya, the point of the boat’s departure. More than 30,000 migrants and refugees have arrived in Italy by sea this year alone, according to the United Nations – mainly from Libya.
What are they running from?
In their home countries, which are mainly Eritrea, Somalia and increasingly, Syria, the answer is conflict, repression and persecution. But Libya has also long been a base for guest workers from all over Africa who were attracted by its booming oil economy to find decent work. For years they were welcomed by Muammar Gaddafi, but now, many of those same migrants are scrambling to flee Libya’s instability and deadly discrimination.
Divisions
As the second anniversary of the death of Gaddafi approaches, peace still eludes Libya.
Equal Times met with some of the black African migrants trying to survive in Libya.
A group of Sudanese immigrants close to the eastern border with Egypt told us that following the 2011 February revolution, armed Libyans went from door-to-door looking for ‘Africans’. “We were chased everywhere we went,” said J.Kawasili who originally comes from Somalia. “They said we supported Gaddafi and killed rebels and assaulted women.”
Kawasili says that he and the other migrants were forced to leave town and that while trying to escape, a 15-year-old Sudanese girl was raped by the rebels. He also says their identity documents were destroyed by the militia. The exact number of sub-Saharan African refugees, asylum seekers and economic migrants in Libya is unknown. However, some reports puts that figure at around 18,000.
Libya is the main point of departure for African migrants trying to cross the Mediterranean Sea in order to reach Italy and other parts of southern Europe. But the Italian government, working with the European border agency Frontex, has been criticised for using harsh methods to try and stop the flow of migrants rather than trying to give the help that refugees are entitled to under international law. Methods include intercepting the small, fishing boats which carry them, while at sea, thus forcing them back to North Africa.
Related articles showing the high number of sub-saharan Libyan refugee deaths due to drownings in the Med after fleeing Libyan instability, violence and chaos due to NATO led war:
So to quickly put things into perspective, Muammar Gadaffi was supplying over 20,000 sub-saharan Africans with jobs and livelihood for a better life and once NATO overthrew the government by supporting radical jihadist groups those very same sub-saharan Africans were hunted and killed and made refugees, a large amount of which died by drowning on a perilous journey towards Europe by crossing the daunting Mediterranean Sea. In the above video from 2011, CNN states that those poor people (who have now most likely lost their lives) are in danger from being killed by Gaddafi, the man that provided them jobs and security. The outright lying by the CNN reporter is plain to see and now, 5 years later, the world knows what really happened in Libya. The US, UK, and French governments with the aid of their propaganda channels such as CNN and the BBC turned Libya into a hell on Earth, especially for black sub-saharan Africans.
Now let take a look at what Hillary Clinton knew about the summary executions of black skinned people in Libya…..
On New Year’s Eve, the State Department released 3,000 new Hillary Clinton emails from her tenure as secretary of state. While much of the corporate media dove into investigating pointless gossip, Brad Hoff at the Levant Report decided to look for more clues into understanding the epic failure that was the 2011 war on Libya by the US and NATO.
What Hoff discovered in the emails was Secretary Clinton being briefed by a trusted advisor, Sidney Blumenthal, on a events in Libya where Clinton’s public statements appear to contradict her private understanding. The issues range from the early presence of special forces and al Qaida-linked militants on the ground to the material motivations of France (gold, oil). And, of course, more evidence that Clinton knew the claims about Qaddafi issuing Viagra to troops for rapes were bogus. But, perhaps, the most troubling revelation is that Secretary Clinton was being explicitly told that the Libyan rebel forces were conducting racially charged massacres of black Africans under the rationale of labeling them “foreign mercenaries.”
In an email on March 27, 2011 [PDF], Blumenthal informs Secretary Clinton that a Libyan rebel commander told him that “his troops continue to summarily execute all foreign mercenaries captured in the fighting.” Summarily execute is a nice way of saying they are straight up killing anyone they see, who they think could be a “foreign mercenary.” So, you ask, how are the rebels determining who are (and are not) foreign mercenaries based merely on sight? The answer is based on the color of their skin. But the killings were not just cases of mistaken identity, they were part of a racial grudge connected to perceived favoritism by the Gaddafi government.
As the BBC reported in 2011, the war for the rebels extended to black Libyan civilians and sub-Saharan contract workers. The town of Tawergha, whose residents were descendants of black slaves, was “cleansed” by the rebels. The 30,000 people who lived in Tawergha were forced to flee, many unable to outrun the rebels and subjected to beatings, rape, and those summary executions Blumenthal mentioned. A 2011 report from Human Rights Watch accuses rebels of terrorizing the people of Tawergha. After setting their homes on fire, the rebels captured the black Libyans and subjected them to “torture and severe beatings, sometimes leading to death.”
More at link above……
Another UK story related to the plight of black Africans in Libya:
A video that reportedly showing black Africans being forced to eat the former Libyan flag inside a cage by Libyan rebels has surfaced on the Internet.
In the following CNN video the reporter does recognize that a young dark skinned African man is being kidnapped, however, he leaves out the fact that the young man will most likely be killed by the US backed terrorists that took over the country.
It was Hillary Clinton who led the charge for the war in Libya and today she relies on the vote of African Americans in order to get into the US presidential office. I hope all people of all race and colors will recognize that the plight of black people did not matter one iota to Mrs, Hillary Clinton when it came to the war in Libya and its horrific blood soaked after shocks. Regarding Gaddafi who protected and helped black people, she simply laughed and stated “We came, we saw, he died”. Those are the words of a real sociopath, possibly a psychopath, whose direct actions led to the deaths of tens of thousands of innocent people. People who deserved better than to die in such a manner.
In 2011, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton led the charge by the Obama Administration to begin a military campaign in Libya. US and NATO forces helped Libyan rebels overthrow the government led by Muammar Gaddafi. The justification was to prevent a massacre that was supposedly imminent in Benghazi, Libya.
Clinton maneuvered behind the scenes to keep the NATO coalition together, as well as promote regime change as the ultimate goal. After the war, she claimed that “we set into motion a policy that was on the right side of history, on the right side of our values, on the right side of our strategic interests in the region.”
Gaddafi, who fled after the fall of his government, was eventually found, then tortured and killed by the rebels — something Clinton apparently found amusing when, in an interview with CBS News, she paraphrased Julius Caesar in regards to Gaddafi, chuckling “We came, we saw, he died.” Once again, Hillary Clinton had backed the violent overthrow of a government in the Middle East, and, once again, the results would ultimately be a nightmare for both the region and the US.
More at Shadowproof link above….
Watching the above videos should give anyone who supported Hillary Clinton serious pause for thought. Her claiming to care about the plight of dark skinned people is all a ploy. The videos and information above clearly show that her actions regarding the overthrow of the government of once stable Libya led to the deaths of tens of thousands of innocent and helpless dark skinned people.
When we say that the U.S. media are not “state-run”, we are using a narrow definition of the word “state”, a definition that excludes everything but the government. If we use the broader definition for “state” — the ruling Establishment — then U.S. media are indeed state-controlled. All of the senior media people are members of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the main governing body of the Establishment.
In addition:
* Most Establishment sources take their cues from the NYT and WP (Washington Post), and are reluctant to take an independent position.
* Most of the media are owned by six corporate conglomerates
* These corporations are in business to make money, not to tell the truth. There is no profit to be made by going against the tide, going against public opinion, or going against the government and losing “access” to “leaks”.
* The media are also influenced by the CIA — see Project Mockingbird
Recent media mergers in the United States
Over time the amount of media merging has increased and the number of media outlets have increased. That translates to fewer companies owning more media outlets, increasing the concentration of ownership.[1] In 1983, 90% of US media was controlled by fifty companies; today, 90% is controlled by just six companies.
Top six:
Company . Revenues (2015)
Comcast ……… $74.51B
Walt Disney ….. $52.46B
20th Cent Fox … $28.98B
Time Warner ….. $28.11B
CBS …………. $13.88B
Viacom ………. $13.27B
Media outlets (partial list):
* Comcast ……… NBCUniversal, NBC and Telemundo, Universal Pictures, Focus Features, DreamWorks Animation, 26 TV stations in the U.S., USA Network, Bravo, CNBC, The Weather Channel, MSNBC, Syfy, NBCSN, Golf Channel, Esquire Network, E!, Cloo, Chiller, Universal HD and the Comcast SportsNet regional system. Comcast also owns the Philadelphia Flyers through a separate subsidiary.
* Walt Disney ….. ABC Television Network, ESPN, the Disney Channel, A&E and Lifetime, approximately 30 radio stations, music, video game, and book publishing companies, production companies Touchstone, Marvel Entertainment, Lucasfilm, Walt Disney Pictures, Pixar Animation Studios, mobile app developer Disney Mobile, Disney Consumer Products and Interactive Media, and theme parks in several countries. Also has a longstanding partnership with Hearst Corporation, which owns additional TV stations, newspapers, magazines, and stakes in several Disney television ventures.
* 20th Cent Fox … Fox Broadcasting Company; Fox News Channel, Fox Business Network, Fox Sports 1, Fox Sports 2, National Geographic, Nat Geo Wild, FX, FXX, FX Movie Channel, and the regional Fox Sports Networks ; film production companies 20th Century Fox, Fox Searchlight Pictures and Blue Sky Studios.
* Time Warner ….. CNN, the CW (a joint venture with CBS), HBO, Cinemax, Cartoon Network/Adult Swim, HLN, NBA TV, TBS, TNT, truTV, Turner Classic Movies, Warner Bros. Pictures, Castle Rock, DC Comics, Warner Bros. Interactive Entertainment, and New Line Cinema.
* CBS …………. CBS Television Network and the CW (a joint venture with Time Warner), CBS Sports Network, Showtime, Pop; 30 television stations; CBS Radio, Inc., which has 130 stations; CBS Television Studios; book publisher Simon & Schuster.
* Viacom ………. MTV, Nickelodeon/Nick at Nite, VH1, BET, Comedy Central, Paramount Pictures, and Paramount Home Entertainment.
Although Viacom and CBS Corporation have been separate companies since 2006, they are both partially owned subsidiaries of the private National Amusements company, headed by Sumner Redstone. As such, Paramount Home Entertainment handles DVD/Blu-ray distribution for most of the CBS Corporation library.
The former News Corporation was split into two separate companies on June 28, 2013, with publishing assets and Australian media assets going to New News Corp, and broadcasting and media assets going to 21st Century Fox. Both companies remain under the control of Rupert Murdoch
— “Media cross-ownership in the United States”, wqikipedia, 22 Oct 2016
Media convergence becomes more interesting when vertical integration with content providers occurs. Current examples include content providers acquiring content creators such as Comcast (The US cable giant) acquiring NBC-Universal or here in Canada with either BCE acquiring CTV/TSN, and a host of print and radio properties, or Shaw’s acquisition of Global. The concern with increased ownership from a vertical integration perspective is that ultimately competition will suffer resulting in higher prices for media audiences. Bell’s recent push to add more to its content stream with the acquisition of Astral Media was rejected by the CRTC given it would “threaten the availability of diverse programming for Canadians and endanger the ability of distribution undertakings to deliver programming at affordable rates and on reasonable terms on multiple platforms”. Subsequently, as these media giants grow there are concerns that they will frame the context of events based on their own perspective which typically is motivated by profit, moral or geographical biases. And given that the vast majority of these transnational media conglomerates are US based, it tends to be an American perspective reinforced abroad. According to Sasa Vucinic’s speech as part of the TED Talks forum in 2005, he’s quoted as saying that“(as much as) 83 percent of the population of this planet lives in societies without independent press. … 83 percent of the population on the whole planet does not really know what is going on in their countries.” Additionally, Alisa Miller (2008) in a speech also from a TED forum noted that “79 percent of total news coverage in the US in February 2007 was entirely US focused”. There were significant global media stories emerging at the time, but ultimately according to Miller “covering ‘Britney’ is cheaper”, and I might add, more engaging from a ratings perspective. Given the strength of US media it’s no surprise that the global landscape is dominated from a US lens.
Article from 2014- Media and Entertainment Mega Mergers Increase 50%
The big companies keep getting bigger, with the number of mergers and acquisitions between major players increasing substantially during the past year, according to a report by PwC. This year has already seen a number of splashy pacts between Time Warner Cable and Comcast and AT&T and DirecTV, to say nothing of deals that weren’t, such as 21st Century Fox’s failed bid for Time Warner.
Overall, the number of corporate hookups was relatively even with the year-ago quarter, with 218 announced deals compared to 210 in 2013. The bulk of the activity was in the so-called “megadeal” space, which ranks mergers and acquisitions of more than $1 billion in value. Those increased by 50% year over year, from six to nine, and include the $2 billion sale of the Los Angeles Clippers and the Level 3’s $5.7 billion deal TW Telecom, in addition to AT&T’s $48 billion purchase of DirecTV and Comcast’s $46 billion pitch for Time Warner Cable.
And who owns all this media? This next article will blow your mind. If your open-minded enough to be able to accept it.
Caveat 1: I dig good Jews and dislike Zionist Jews who use other people for their own nefarious purposes. I have my Jesus versus Judas theories that some of you may have read here before. My theory goes that bad Zionist Jews threw good helpless Jews under the bus during World War II and financed I.G. Farben the most powerful company in Germany and the world at that time. I believe this was done in order to establish the State of Israel and that the Rothschild’s and their associates carried out these actions. Link to my JPR posts backing up this theory:
Caveat: I disagree with the Coveners League stance in the link above on black versus white issues. I believe all human beings are equal and consider myself an open minded progressive person, however, I find the information they have compiled in their research to be largely accurate with some minor inaccuracies. To me, these divisive global media issues are not black versus white or Jews versus Christian or Russian versus Western powers. They are humanity versus a global criminal cabal that seeks to control all of humanity for their own nefarious purposes. (Seems like the Orwellian plot of Star Wars, I know. 🙂 I believe all types of people on all political, racial and social divides must wake up to this fact so that we can come together as a well informed public to make the world a better, freer place where war is a thing of the past and our lives are drastically improved by redistributing wealth fairly across the global spectrum while divisive issues are no longer promoted and are instead pushed to the back burner while important uniting issues are promoted. Exposing and side lining our corrupt media to the realms of obscurity is the first and currently most important key to solving these profound global issues across the board.
More here on Jewish control over the global media:
This is why we have to go around them and relegate them to obscurity and build our own news information outlets. It is already happening and that is why the elite are now so over-reactionary. In a paradoxical sense, they have us in our own ‘West World” where the robots are waking up. I think shows like West World are created to confuse the issue and somewhat condition us to willful acceptance. The same applies to House of Cards which I believe is also a show that promotes social conditioning. Many movies this past summer of 2016 also were forms of this conditioning. Examples being: Suicide Squad, American Ultra, The Purge-Election Year, Captain America Civil War. I saw some of this predictive programming and subliminal conditioning in the 2016 Super Bowl when I noticed the big X (for Malcolm) that Beyonces dance troupe performed I said to my wife that the elite are going to inflame America and divide us like never before. That is exactly what happened over the course of 2016. They have promoted all the chaos and divisiveness. They need us fighting each other so we don’t go after them. Their most important tool is their ability to control our minds. The West World example is well worth checking into. I found one line from the shows first episode particularly obvious…….when the lead character Delores points to the moving cattle in the distance she says “see that one leading at the front….that’s the juice” (a not so subtle allusion to the Jews). Ah…the Hollywood and global elite love to rub it in our faces. 🙂
For folks that might be interested in predictive programming and how the elite bury coding in movies, I recommend the following introduction.
During the early days of the Ukraine coup and subsequent war I was posting up a large amount of information at Democratic Underground and Daily Kos using the forums as an outlet to get info into the US public consciousness. Unfortunately, I was harassed by a large number of Russiaphobic people for doing so, and within a short time my posts were censored and I was banned from both sites. Thus, I moved on to post info at Fire Dog Lake where I was welcomed by the crew there and even featured on the front page on many occasions. FireDogLake eventually closed up shop, was sold and changed their name to Shadowproof. Once again they proved their coolness by transferring all the material I had compiled into a new Shadowproof archive. They rock. Here’s all those important posts.
Once again…..a great big thanks to the awesome crew at Shadowproof. They truly went out of their way to preserve the posts of their former content providers and I really appreciate that. 🙂
Massive bunker buster bomb with radioactive particle spread to camera. It is theorized by analysts that this is a small nuclear bunker buster, also known as an Deep Earth-Penetrating Weapon (EPW) the initial blast is the first stage blasting the surface layer and second blast (a few second later is the main charge detonating deep under the ground. Online paid trolls have been constantly stating that this was a ammo facility that was hit. They provide no evidence of such and and also fail to explain the radioactive particle dispersion in front of the camera lenses of multiple cameras
APRIL 7, 2016 10:00PM EDT
Yemen: US Bombs Used in Deadliest Market Strike
Coalition Allies Should Stop Selling Weapons to Saudi Arabia
(Sanaa) – Saudi Arabia-led coalition airstrikes using United States-supplied bombs killed at least 97 civilians, including 25 children, in northwestern Yemen on March 15, 2016, Human Rights Watch said today. The two strikes, on a crowded market in the village of Mastaba that may have also killed about 10 Houthi fighters, caused indiscriminate or foreseeably disproportionate loss of civilian life, in violation of the laws of war. Such unlawful attacks when carried out deliberately or recklessly are war crimes.
Human Rights Watch conducted on-site investigations on March 28, and found remnants at the market of a GBU-31 satellite-guided bomb, which consists of a US-supplied MK-84 2,000-pound bomb mated with a JDAM satellite guidance kit, also US-supplied. A team of journalists from ITV, a British news channel, visited the site on March 26, and found remnants of an MK-84 bomb paired with a Paveway laser guidance kit. Human Rights Watch reviewed the journalists’ photographs and footage of these fragments.
“One of the deadliest strikes against civilians in Yemen’s year-long war involved US-supplied weapons, illustrating tragically why countries should stop selling arms to Saudi Arabia,” said Priyanka Motaparthy, emergencies researcher at Human Rights Watch. “The US and other coalition allies should send a clear message to Saudi Arabia that they want no part in unlawful killings of civilians.”
New Report of U.S.-Made Cluster Bomb Use by Saudis in Yemen
Human Rights Watch released a report Sunday providing new indications that Saudi Arabia has fired American-made cluster munitions, banned by international treaty, in civilian areas of Yemen, and said their use may also violate United States law.
The report included photographs from Yemen purporting to show unexploded but potentially lethal remnants of American cluster weapons, suggesting that they had failed legally required reliability standards.
Published on May 25, 2015
Note radioactive dispersion of particles to camera from mini-nuke
Life is not good for human beings in Yemen. Saudi Arabia is killing civilians and bombing family gatherings and hospitals with US supplied bombs and military hardware
Saudi Arabia has engaged in war crimes, and the United States is aiding and abetting them by providing the Saudis with military assistance. In September 2015, Saudi aircraft killed 135 wedding celebrants in Yemen. The airstrikes have killed 2,800 civilians, including 500 children. Human Rights Watch charges that these bombings “have indiscriminately killed and injured civilians.”
This conflict is part of a regional power struggle between Iran and Saudi Arabia. The Saudis are bombing Yemen in order to defeat the Houthi rebels, who have been resisting government repression for a long time. Iran has been accused of supporting the Houthis, although Iran denies this. Yemen is strategically located on a narrow waterway that links the Gulf of Aden with the Red Sea. Much of the world’s oil passes through this waterway.
A United Nations panel of experts concluded in October 2015 that the Saudi-led coalition had committed “grave violations” of civilians’ human rights. They include indiscriminate attacks; targeting markets, a camp for displaced Yemenis, and humanitarian aid warehouses; and intentionally preventing the delivery of humanitarian assistance. The panel was also concerned that the coalition considered civilian neighborhoods, including Marra and Sadah, as legitimate strike zones. The International Committee of the Red Cross documented 100 attacks on hospitals.
Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions prohibits the targeting of civilians. It provides that parties to a conflict “shall at all times distinguish between the civilian population and combatants and between civilian objects and military objectives and accordingly shall direct their operations only against military objectives.”
Saudi Arabia is also engaging in serious individual human rights violations.
In January 2016, the Saudi government executed 47 people, including a prominent pacifist Shia cleric, who had been a leader of the 2011 Arab Spring in Saudi Arabia. Most were beheaded. This horrifies us when ISIS does it. Yet State Department spokesman John Kirby protested weakly, “We believe that diplomatic engagement and direct conversations remain essential in working through differences.”
The Saudi Arabia lobby in the United States is a collection of lawyers, public relation firms and professional lobbyists paid directly by the government of Saudi Arabia to lobby the public and government of the United States on behalf of the interests of the government of Saudi Arabia.
An article by journalist John R. MacArthur in Harper’s Magazine details “The Vast Power of the Saudi Lobby”. According to MacArthur,
The long and corrupt history of American-Saudi relations centers around the kingdom’s vast reserves of easily extractable oil, of course. Ever since President Franklin D. Roosevelt met aboard ship in 1945 with King Ibn Saud, the special relationship with the desert kingdom has only grown stronger. The House of Saud is usually happy to sell us oil at a consistent and reasonable price and then increase production if unseemly market forces drive the world price of a barrel too high for U.S. consumers. In exchange we arm the Saudis to the teeth and turn a blind eye to their medieval approach to crime and punishment.
According to Seymour Hersh the power of Prince Bandar and the Saudi lobby was so great that Bandar effectively joined the Bush administration as a virtual member of the cabinet.
George Washington University Professor Hossein Askari blames the “power of the Saudi lobby in Washington” for the failure of the American government to defend the democracy protesters in Bahrain in 2011. According to Askari, “our marriage to the Al-Sauds threatens our (American) national security.”
Role of Bandar bin Sultan
In the assessment of The Economist, “No Arab ambassador—perhaps no ambassador—has come close to matching Prince Bandar’s influence in the American capital. At the height of his powers he was indispensable to both sides: in Mr Ottaway’s words, “at once the king’s exclusive messenger and the White House’s errand boy”. The Prince’s “feats” of lobbying legerdemain included securing the purchase of AWACS surveillance aircraft in the teeth of fierce Israeli and congressional opposition, and augmenting his influence with the Reagan administration by quietly supplying $32m to the Contras in Nicaragua and $10m to anti-communist politicians in Italy.
Following the money
In the first decade of the 21st century the Saudis paid approximately $100 million to American firms to lobby the American government.
Major lobbying firms that work as lobbyists in the pay of the Saudi government include Hill & Knowlton, which has been employed to lobby for Saudi Arabia since 1982. Qorvis Communications has worked for Saudi Arabia since the 9/11 attacks, receiving over $60.3 million over the course of a decade.Hogan Lovells U.S., L.L.P., formerly Hogan & Harston, worked for Saudi Arabia in 2009. The Loeffler Group, LLP, headed by former Congressman Tom Loeffler of Texas, was paid $10.5 million by the Saudi government during the first decade of the century, and gave Sandler Innocenzi, Inc. $8.9 million. Patton Boggs, LLP, earned over $3 million from Saudi Arabia for lobbying in the first decade of the century.
The Middle East Policy Council has received large payments from Saudi Arabia to lobby for the Kingdom, including $1 million in 2007.
A partial list of firms that have been paid by Saudi Arabia to lobby the American government includes:
In September alone, foreign lobbying disclosure documents show the Saudi government signing deals with PR powerhouse Edelman and lobbying leviathan the Podesta Group, according to recent disclosures.
Edelman, the largest privately owned public relations agency in the world, is known for helping clients win favorable media coverage on mainstream outlets. The Podesta Group is a lobbying firm founded by Tony Podesta, a major fundraiser for the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign.
The new signings are the latest in a year-long hiring spree by the Persian Gulf state as it further builds up its already formidable political arsenal inside the Beltway. The Saudi Arabian Royal Embassy did not respond to a request for comment.
In March, the Saudi Royal Embassy retained two influential lobbying firms, DLA Piper and Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman. DLA Piper, for instance, employs a small army of former government officials, including retired U.S. Sens. Saxby Chambliss and George Mitchell. Also in March, the embassy retained two firms that specialize in analyzing big data for political clients, Targeted Victory and Zignal Labs.
Saudi Arabia’s political operation already includes former Sen. Norm Coleman, R-Minn., who chairs one of the largest Republican Super PACs in the country, as well as the public relations firm MSLGROUP/Qorvis, and Saudi Aramco, the state-owned oil company that funds several influential American political groups, including the American Petroleum Institute. Aramco’s U.S. subsidiary, Saudi Refining, is a registered agent of the Saudi government. The government also finances a number of think tanks and universities, and has made contributions to prominent American nonprofits, including the Clinton Foundation.
The Podesta Group contract is with the Center for Studies and Media Affairs at the Saudi Royal Court. The contract, filed in the Justice Department’s foreign lobbying database, says that the firm will provide “public relations” work for the center.
Mini-nuke/possible MOAB with radioactive elements
Link to website that examines the probability that US supplied mini-nukes were used in Yemen in 2015.
Excerpt: On paper, the Clinton Foundation looks unimpeachable: a charitable organization dedicated to improving millions of lives through education and health.
However, it remains mired in suspicions about conflicts of interest involving the Democratic candidate for the White House.
Three months before the US presidential election, Hillary Clinton’s opponents accuse her almost daily of having used her influence as secretary of state in 2009-2013 for the benefit of the foundation her husband and former president, Bill, founded in 2001.
Unsurprisingly, accusations against the Clinton Foundation have focused on the financing of an organization whose resources have soared by almost 475 percent in a decade to exceed $337 million, according to its internal audits.
Its generous donor contributions — $217 million in 2014 — have prompted controversy, especially those from foreign governments: Saudi Arabia ($10 to $25 million), Kuwait (up to $10 million), Qatar and the United Arab Emirates (up to $5 million), according to the foundation’s figures.
Clinton Foundation Defends Acceptance of Foreign Donations
Charity has received funds from governments of U.A.E., Saudi Arabia, Oman and Canada, among others
The foundation had agreed to stop raising money from foreign governments in 2009, after Mrs. Clinton became secretary of state. That step was in deference to Obama administration concerns about the propriety of taking money from other nations while Mrs. Clinton served as America’s top diplomat.
Mrs. Clinton left the State Department in early 2013, and the foundation later dropped the ban.
The United Arab Emirates, a first-time donor, gave between $1 million and $5 million, 2014 according to disclosures on an online Clinton Foundation database. Saudi Arabia, a previous donor, has given between $10 million and $25 million since the foundation’s creation. An unspecified portion of the money came in 2014.
Qatar’s government committee preparing for the 2022 soccer World Cup gave between $250,000 and $500,000 in 2014. Qatar’s government had previously donated between $1 million and $5 million.
Oman, which had made a donation previously, gave an undisclosed amount in 2014. Over time, Oman has given the foundation between $1 million and $5 million. Prior to last year, its donations fell in the same range.
Prince Turki al-Faisal, a former ambassador to the U.S. and member of the Saudi royal family who has attended annual meetings of the Clinton Global Initiative, made donations in 2013 and 2014, though exact dates aren’t available. Prince Turki met Bill Clinton decades ago when both were students at Georgetown University’s foreign-service school. Prince Turki’s chief of staff didn’t respond to emails seeking comment.
Another donor, Sheikh Mohammed H. Al Amoudi, an Ethiopian immigrant to Saudi Arabia, has donated between $5 million and $10 million, including while Mrs. Clinton served in the State Department. Mr. Al Amoudi has built an empire of construction, agricultural and energy companies across Saudi Arabia and Ethiopia.
Also giving money was Victor Dahdaleh, a London businessman whose foundation contributed between $1 million and $5 million, has ties to Bahrain’s state-owned aluminum company. He was the intermediary between the state-owned Aluminum Bahrain B.S.C. and Alcoa World Alumina, which is majority owned by Alcoa Inc. Last year, he was acquitted in London on charges of bribing Bahraini officials to secure contracts for the Alcoa firm. In the U.S., the Alcoa affiliate pleaded guilty last year to corruption charges, and the Justice Department said an investigation into the matter remains open.
The website of Friends of Saudi Arabia, a group listed as a million-dollar donor to the Clinton Foundation, is also down. But according to the U.S.-Saudi Arabia Information Service:
Friends of Saudi Arabia is an apolitical, secular, educational, non-profit organization that serves to build bridges of goodwill and understanding between Saudi Arabia and the international community.
Events hosted by Friends of Saudi Arabia serve as a tool for nurturing dialogue, debate, alliance building and networking opportunities between people of diverse backgrounds with hopes to dispel misconceptions, establish friendships, and inspire global understanding and exchange. Friends of Saudi Arabia aims to promote better “people to people” understanding as well as bridging social and cultural gaps.
Saudi Arabia Has Funded 20% Of Hillary’s Presidential Campaign, Saudi Crown Prince Claims
In what may be the pinnacle of hypocrisy, moments ago Hillary Clinton, while speaking live on national security and addressing the Orlando shooting took some time from her constant bashing of the Second Amendment and calling for a ban on assault rifles, to say some less than kind words about Saudi Arabia whom it accused of supporting radical organizations. This is what she said:
The third area that demands attention is preventing radicalization and countering efforts by ISIS and other international terrorist networks to recruit in the United States and Europe. For starters, it is long past time for the Saudis, the Qataris and the Kuwaitis and others to stop their citizens from funding extremist organizations. And they should stop supporting radical schools and mosques around the world that have set too many young people on a path towards extremism. We also have to use all our capabilities to counter jihadist propaganda online. This is something that I spend a lot of time on at the State Department.
There is nothing wrong with that statement, as it is the whole truth – Saudi Arabia’s involvement in supporting terrorism stretches from Sept 11 all the way through to ISIS – however, where there is a big, and potentially law-breaking, problem is what Jordan’s official news agency, Petra News Agency, reported on Sunday citing the Saudi crown price, namely that Saudi Arabia is a major funder of Hillary Clinton’s campaign to become the next president of the United States.
As MEE notes, the Petra News Agency published on Sunday what it described as exclusive comments from Saudi Deputy Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman which included a claim that Riyadh has provided 20 percent of the total funding to the prospective Democratic candidate’s campaign.
The report was later deleted and the news agency has not responded to requests for comment from Middle East Eye. However, the deletion took place too late, as the Washington-based Institute for Gulf Affairs managed to capture the report and has re-published the original Arabic Petra report, which quoted Prince Mohammed as having said Saudi Arabia had provided with “full enthusiasm” an undisclosed amount of money to Clinton.
The US State Department has approved the sale of $1.29 billion (Ј848.6m) worth of bombs to Saudi Arabia, as its military carries out air strikes in neighbouring Yemen.
President Obama pledged to bolster military support for Saudi Arabia after tensions were strained following a US-brokered nuclear deal with Iran.
The sale, if it is not blocked by the US congress, “will replenish the Royal Saudi Air Force’s (RSAF) current inventory, augmenting Saudi Arabia’s capability,” a State Department spokesman said.
Despite Atrocities, U.S. Approves $1.29 Billion Arms Sale to Saudi Arabia
Posted on Nov 17, 2015
The Pentagon announced on Monday that the U.S. has approved a $1.29 billion arms sale to Saudi Arabia, despite widespread mounting evidence of the country’s mass atrocities and possible war crimes in neighboring Yemen.
The U.S. State Department on Friday approved the sale of over 10,000 bombs, munitions, and weapons parts produced by Boeing and Raytheon. This includes 5,200 Paveway II “laser guided” and 12,000 “general purpose” bombs. “Bunker Busters,” also included in the deal, are designed to destroy concrete structures.
“The proposed sale augments Saudi Arabia’s capability to meet current and future threats from potential adversaries during combat operations,” the Defense Security Cooperation Agency, which is part of the U.S. Department of Defense, said in an announcement of the deal released Monday.
But Raed Jarrar, government relations manager for the American Friends Service Committee (AFSC), told Common Dreams: “Sending additional weapons to the Middle East will not stabilize the region or put an end to violence and extremism. Supporting proxy wars, interventions, and military occupations will only add fuel to the fire.”
“It’s also illegal under U.S. and international law to transfer weapons to human rights abusers, or to forces that will likely use it to commit gross violations of human rights,” Jarrar continued. “There is documented evidence that such abuses have been committed by almost all of U.S. allies in the region.”
The U.S. statement indicates that the deal will, in part, be used to replenish arms for Saudi Arabia’s seven-month-long military assault on Yemen, which has killed at least 2,355 civilians and wounded 4,862, according to United Nations statistics.
Why Does Saudi Arabia Need $90 Billion in Weapons?
The Obama administration is seeking a go-ahead from Congress to sell up to $60 billion worth of sophisticated warplanes to Saudi Arabia and could add another $30 billion worth of naval arms in a deal designed to counter the rise of Iran as a regional power.
The deal would apparently represent the largest single U.S. arms sale ever approved. It would allow Saudi Arabia, the most militarily advanced of the Arab Gulf states and one of the richest countries in the world, to buy top-line U.S.-made helicopters and fighter jets with ranges that would span the Middle East and beyond.
Unlike some previous sales to Saudi Arabia, this one is not expected to be derailed by opposition in Congress or from U.S. backers of Israel, who have worried in the past about blunting Israel’s military edge over its Arab neighbors.
That’s more than half of the regular DoD procurement budget in 2010 and a number equal to the entire defense budget of the UK for this year (adjusted roughly to USD).
ISIS and al Qaeda fights alongside Saudi Arabia in Yemen-
A coalition of Arab states led by Saudi Arabia is fighting alongside al-Qaeda militants against Houthi rebels in Yemen, according to a report. A BBC documentary crew has filmed jihadists and pro-government militiamen fighting rebels near the southern city of Taiz, supported by UAE soldiers.
It is unclear if the two groups are working together to coordinate their assault on the city, which lies 160 miles (260km) south of the capital Sana’a. Saudi Arabia has been leading a coalition of nine Arab states in a bombing campaign against Shia-dominated Houthi forces loyal to former Yemeni president Ali Abdullah Saleh since March 2015.
In late-2015, documentary maker Safa AlAhmad filmed members of Ansar al-Sharia, an affiliate of al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), attacking Houthi fighters on a key hilltop near Taiz, with pro-government troops nearby. She was reportedly told by the militants to stop filming them and that they were angered by the presence of a woman.
According to a report from the Yemeni media network “Al-Jabhah News”, the Islamic State of Iraq and Al-Sham (ISIS) has been fighting alongside the Saudi-led Coalition and their mercenaries against the Houthi forces and Yemeni Army in the provincial capital of the Ta’iz Governorate.
ISIS and Al-Qaeda reportedly have a small presence inside the provincial capital; however, they can only be seen fighting against the Yemeni Army’s Republican Guard and their popular committees (including the Houthis).
The bodies of dead Houthi and Yemeni Army soldiers have been videotaped by the terrorist group being dragged in the streets of Ta’iz; this has been the extent of their propaganda in the provincial capital.
A Yemeni news agency “Al-Jabhah News” reported that in Yemen’s Taiz Governorate ISIS terrorists are fighting alongside the Saudi-led Coalition against the Yemeni Army and Houthi forces.
The news agency also reported that there are a small presence of ISIS and Al-Qaeda inside Taiz Governorate where those terrorists groups have been only fighting against the Yemeni army and Houthis popular committees.
According to a photo published by the news agency, two dead bodies of Houthis and Yemeni army soldiers were dragged on the street of Ta’iz by a Toyota van that belongs to ISIS terrorists. It is also reported that terrorist groups videotaped the gruesome act and distributed in social media to create terror propaganda against the Yemeni defending forces.
Hospitals bombed by Saudi Arabia
MSF’s medical activities in Yemen have been bombed four times in less than three months, with two hospitals, a clinic and an ambulance coming under fire. The organization is seeking guarantees from the warring parties that medical activities will be protected according to international humanitarian law.
“The way war is being waged in Yemen shows that the warring parties do not recognize or respect the protected status of hospitals and medical facilities,” said Raquel Ayora, MSF director of operations. “It is causing enormous suffering for people trapped in conflict zones. Public places are being bombed and shelled on a massive scale. Not even hospitals are being spared, even though medical facilities are explicitly protected by international humanitarian law.”http://
SANA’A, YEMEN, JANUARY 10, 2016—A hospital in northern Yemen supported by the international medical humanitarian organization Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) was hit by a projectile this morning, killing four people, wounding 10 and causing the collapse of several buildings of the medical facility.
Three of the injured are MSF staff members, two of whom are in critical condition.
According to MSF staff members on the ground, at 9:20 a.m. one projectile struck the Shiara Hospital in Razeh district, where MSF has been working since November 2015. MSF cannot confirm the origin of the attack, but planes were seen flying over the facility at the time. At least one more projectile fell near the hospital.
The number of casualties could rise as there could still be people trapped in the rubble. All staff and patients have evacuated and patients are being transferred to Al Goumoury hospital in Saada, also supported by MSF.
“All warring parties, including the Saudi-led coalition, are regularly informed of the GPS coordinates of the medical sites where MSF works, and we are in constant dialogue with them to ensure that they understand the severity of the humanitarian consequences of the conflict and the need to respect the provision of medical services,” said Raquel Ayora, MSF director of operations.
“There is no way that anyone with the capacity to carry out an airstrike or launch a rocket would not have known that the Shiara Hospital was a functioning health facility providing critical services and supported by MSF. We reiterate to all parties to the conflict that patients and medical facilities must be respected and that bombing hospitals is a violation of international humanitarian law.”
Extensive links to my important Jackpine Radicals posts exposing the White Helmet terrorists throughout 2016.….
Please bookmark and save this large amount of info related to the US/UK backed White Helmets as it is extensive proof that the officials of the aforementioned countries (and others) are supporting a fake group that is directly linked to terrorism. The White Helmets killed the real Syrian Civil Defense in east Aleppo, Syria in 2013. The videos and research throughout these posts, which is primarily conducted by UK investigative reporting outfit 21st Century Wire and Venessa Beeley, exposes one of the greatest war lies over told, a massive propaganda effort meant to deceive and coerce the populations of western countries into believing that al-Qaeda linked terrorists are civil humanitarians that save little children.
The 2016 1st Annual Western Backed Terrorist Awards – All Categories Compendium
Complete list of the 2016 awards for western backed war crimes and support for terrorists, terrorist acts and terrorist support states. Allah Akbar to all these award winners!
Additional links to White Helmet videos showing them interacting with terrorist groups such as al-Nusra Front and Ahrar al-Sham, as well as filming themselves in often ridiculous situations that were obviously staged or overacted.
Overacting White Helmets Shoulder-To-Shoulder With Terrorists in Hama-
At the 13:28 mark in the above video we see the White Helmet member that drove the vehicle in which the two Syrian captive soldiers who were tortured and executed were held.
https://www.ukcolumn.org covers all western propaganda efforts related to Syria and the ongoing US financed wars.
The leaders of the White Helmets just gave a speech at Georgetown University
in Washington, D.C. The following link explains that Prof. Marwa Daoudy of Georgetown University’s School of Foreign Service orchestrated the film screening for them.
Who are Avaaz the promoters of the White Helmets> See below.
Proof the fake establishment played the left for the last decade……
Its all becoming quite obvious. As in boxing, Obama and the corrupt establishment produced a fake left, and just like in boxing. they followed up Bush with a one two punch. We have been played as the following article lays out how organizations that people identify as ‘progressive’ actually advocate for, and pump out blatant propaganda for regime change in Syria. The two party system and all their establishment tools have simply been playing good cop, bad cop all along with the same agenda at play.
Avaaz: The Online Pro-War Propagandist And Color Revolution NGO
It’s considered one of the globe’s largest NGOs, yet the odds are most Americans have never heard of it. Avaaz, (whose name means “voice” in many languages), is a massive “online activist organization” that claims to promote freedom and democracy all across the world in a variety of different means and for a variety of different causes. According to its own website, since its creation in 2007, Avaaz’s mission is to “organize citizens of all nations to close the gap between the world we have and the world most people everywhere want.” Avaaz is, indeed, part of the color revolution apparatus, having apparently received funds from George Soros’ Open Society Foundation to start up in 2007. Avaaz was founded by Res Publica and Moveon.org, both Soros-funded organizations that attempt to co-opt the American left into supporting ideas and campaigns closely associated with the communitarian foundation oligarchs.
The Avaaz Players
In addition, a number of Avaaz founders and board members have close connections to Soros’ Open Society Foundations such as Eli Pariser (both a Board Member of OSF and a member of the Open Society US programs as well as Moveon.org) and Pedro Abramovay (the Regional Director For Latin America and the Caribbean at OSF, the Director of Latin America Programs at OSF and a campaign director of Avaaz).
Discover the Networks, published a summary of the connections between some of the founders of Avaaz. The website writes, Ricken Patel: A Canadian, Patel is both the executive director of Res Publica and president/executive director of Avaaz Eli Pariser: The executive director of MoveOn, Pariser is Avaaz’s board chairman and also serves on the advisory board of Res Publica. Tom Perriello: This former U.S. congressman from Virginia co-founded Res Publica and has been a longtime advocacy partner with Ricken Patel. Ben Brandzel: Formerly an advocacy director for MoveOn, Brandzel also served as director of new-media campaigns and fundraising for Barack Obama’s Organizing for America. In addition, he worked for the presidential campaigns of Howard Dean and John Edwards.
As one might suspect, despite its constant rhetoric regarding “human rights,” “freedom,” and “democracy,” Avaaz has openly supported violence, war, and imperialism. In 2011, Avaaz raised its voice as loudly as it could with demands that the EU, NATO, UN, and all other parties “stop the violent crackdown” on civilians in Libya. Translated: Avaaz called on the EU, NATO, UN, and all other parties to come to the rescue of jihadists that had been unleashed against the government and the people of Libya in order to overthrow Ghaddafi for the benefit of the NATO powers. Avaaz soon after turned its sights on Syria, the next country in line to suffer under NATO’s attempt to destroy an uncooperative national government. As a sampling of the drivel Avaaz regularly released regarding Syria, Avaaz posted on its website the following transparent propaganda in an attempt to drum up support for a No Fly Zone in Syria:
More at link on the blatant pro-regime change propaganda campaign.
More on how Axaaz plays a key role gathering support from an unsuspecting public through on-line petitions for a no-fly zone here:
Paul Warburgwas probably the most important person at the 1913 Federal Reserve establishment meeting on Jekyll Island because of his knowledge of banking as it was practiced in Europe. He was a partner in Kuhn, Loeb & Company and was a representative of the Rothschild banking dynasty in England and France where he maintained a very close working relationships throughout his entire career with his brother, Max Warburg, who was the head of the Warburg banking consortium in Germany and the Netherlands. He was also one of the wealthiest men in the world at the time.
He also called for and attended the founding of the Council on Foreign Relations in 1921. The CFR being another tool of the global elite used to oversee US foreign policy.
Wikipedia currently suffices fine for the low down on Warburg.
Death[edit]
Warburg died at his home in New York City on January 24, 1932, and was buried in Sleepy Hollow Cemetery in Sleepy Hollow, New York. At the time of his death he waschairman of the Manhattan Company and a director of the Bank of Manhattan Trust Company, Farmers Loan and Trust Company of New York, First National Bank of Boston, Baltimore & Ohio Railroad, Union Pacific Railroad, Los Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad, Western Union Telegraph Company, American I.G. Chemical Company, Agfa Ansco Corporation, and Warburg & Company of Amsterdam.
Yes, you guessed it. Its the very same I.G., as in I.G. Farben, that fueled Hitler’s war machine.
Excerpt:
American IG owes its genesis to a German business conglomerate, namely, Interessens-Gemeinschaft Farbenindustrie AG, or IG Farben for short. The business, along with the industrial empire that “IG” controlled and commanded, has been described as “a state within a state.”
The Farben cartel was created in 1925, when Hermann Schmitz, the master organizer, with Wall Street financial assistance, created the giant chemical corporation, combining six already giant German chemical companies — Badische Anilin- und Sodafabrik Ludwigshafen (BASF), Bayer, Agfa, Hoechst, Weiler-ter-Meer, and Griesheim-Elektron. These six companies were merged into Interessen-Gemeinschaft Farbenindustrie AG or, IG Farben, for short.
In year 1928, the American holdings of IG Farben, namely, the American branches of Bayer Company, General Aniline Works, Agfa Ansco, and Winthrop Chemical Company, were organized into a Swiss holding company, which was named Internationale Gesellschaft für Chemische Unternehmungen AG or IG Chemie, in short. The controlling interest of this entity rested with IG Farben in Germany. In the following year, 1929, just a decade before the outbreak of the Second World War, these American firms merged to become American IG Chemical Corporation, or American IG, later renamed General Aniline & Film.
On the eve of World War II, IG Farben, the German chemical conglomerate, was the largest manufacturing enterprise in the world and exercised extraordinary economic and political clout in Nazi Germany. In 1936, it was the principal source for Zyklon B, the poison used in German concentration camps. From 1942-1945, the company used slave labor from Nazi concentration camps. After 1945, three members of the board of governors of American IG were tried and convicted as German war criminals. In 1952, IG Farben was split into BASF, Bayer, and Hoechst again.
So there you have it. This man led the creation of the US Federal Reserve and the Council on Foreign Relations and also was the chairman and director of American I.G., the US branch of I.G. Farben, the same I.G. Farben that supplied the gas for gas chambers and fueled the German war machine in WW2. It seems clear from this action that it wasn’t simply just Hitler who was exterminating prisoners in concentration camps. Others seem to have also had a hand in the matter, including a number of directors at large companies based in the US, Germany and Switzerland.
Quite a wicked web was woven by Paul Warburg it seems. His name seems quite fitting. Paradoxically and metaphorically speaking, he seems to have been quite the Judas.
Understanding how the CFR was established. Wikipedia will suffice for a basic understanding of its early history:
As a result of discussions at the Paris Peace Conference, a small group of British and American diplomats and scholars met on May 30, 1919 at the Hotel Majestic in Paris and decided to create an Anglo-American organization called “The Institute of International Affairs”, which would have offices in London and New York.[2]:12[3]:5 Due to the isolationist views prevalent in American society at the time, the scholars had difficulty gaining traction with their plan, and turned their focus instead to a set of discreet meetings that had been taking place since June 1918 in New York City, under the name Council on Foreign Relations. The meetings were headed by the corporate lawyer Elihu Root, who had served as Secretary of State under President Theodore Roosevelt, and attended by 108 “high-ranking officers of banking, manufacturing, trading and finance companies, together with many lawyers.” The members were proponents of Wilson’s internationalism, but were particularly concerned about “the effect that the war and the treaty of peace might have on postwar business.”
[3]:6–7 The scholars from the inquiry saw an opportunity here to create an organization that brought diplomats, high-level government officials and academics together with lawyers, bankers, and industrialists to engineer government policy. On July 29, 1921 they filed a certification of incorporation, officially forming the Council on Foreign Relations.[3]:8–9 In 1922 Edwin F. Gay, former dean of the Harvard Business School and director of the Shipping Board during the war, spearheaded the Council’s efforts to begin publication of a magazine that would be the “authoritative” source on foreign policy. He gathered $125,000 from the wealthy members on the council, and via sending letters soliciting funds to “the thousand richest Americans”. Using these funds, the first issue of Foreign Affairs was published in September 1922, and within a few years had a gained a reputation as the “most authoritative American review dealing with international relations”.[2]:17–18
In the late 1930s, the Ford Foundation and Rockefeller Foundation began contributing large amounts of money to the Council.[4] In 1938 they created various Committees on Foreign Relations, which later became governed by the American Committees on Foreign Relations in Washington, D.C., throughout the country, funded by a grant from the Carnegie Corporation. Influential men were to be chosen in a number of cities, and would then be brought together for discussions in their own communities as well as participating in an annual conference in New York. These local committees served to influence local leaders and shape public opinion to build support for the Council’s policies, while also acting as “useful listening posts” through which the Council and U.S. government could “sense the mood of the country”.[2]:30–31
Beginning in 1939 and lasting for five years, the Council achieved much greater prominence within the government and the State Department, when it established the strictly confidential War and Peace Studies, funded entirely by the Rockefeller Foundation.[3]:23 The secrecy surrounding this group was such, that the Council members who were not involved in its deliberations were completely unaware of the study group’s existence.[3]:26 It was divided into four functional topic groups: economic and financial, security and armaments, territorial, and political. The security and armaments group was headed by Allen Welsh Dulles who later became a pivotal figure in the CIA’s predecessor, the Office of Strategic Services. The CFR ultimately produced 682 memoranda for the State Department, marked classified and circulated among the appropriate government departments.[3]:23–26
A fine bunch these gentlemen are. A substantial amount of currently available information points to Allen Dulles as being the man who was really behind the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.
More here on the global elite that financed Hitler, Hess and their war machine:
The Best Enemies Money Can Buy – Dr. Antony Sutton
A classic interview by Professor Antony Sutton, who taught economics at California State University, and was a research fellow at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution.
In this talk, Prof. Sutton goes into his impeccable research on how a close-knit group of Western financiers and industrialists (centered around Morgan and Rockefeller in the US, and around Milner and the City financiers, in the UK) created and sustained their three supposed enemies right from the very beginning: Soviet Russia, Nazi Germany, and FDR’s Fabian socialism.
While Cecil Rhodes and the Oppenheimers went to South Africa, the Kuhn Loebs were off to re-colonize America. Rudyard Kipling was sent to India. The Schiffs and Warburgs manhandled Russia. The Rothschilds, Lazards and Israel Moses Seifs pushed into the Middle East. In Princeton, New Jersey the Round Table founded the Institute for Advanced Study (IAS) as partner to its All Souls College at Oxford. IAS was funded by the Rockefeller’s General Education Board. IAS members Robert Oppenheimer, Neils Bohr and Albert Einstein created the atomic bomb. [3]
In 1919 Rothschild’s Business Roundtable spawned the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA) in London. The RIIA soon sponsored sister organizations around the globe, including the US Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the Asian Institute of Pacific Relations, the Canadian Institute of International Affairs, the Brussels-based Institute des Relations Internationales, the Danish Foreign Policy Society, the Indian Council of World Affairs and the Australian Institute of International Affairs. Other affiliates popped up in France, Turkey, Italy, Yugoslavia and Greece. [4]
Business Roundtables around the World. The American Roundtable issues seem to be outlined here which look as double speak :
Here’s more also on how the Warburg’s were behind the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia and enthusiastically greeted the overthrow and murder of the royal family of Russia.
This aim of international finance, whether centered in Germany, England or the USA, to open up Russia to capitalist exploitation by supporting the Bolsheviks, was widely commented on at the time by a diversity of well-informed sources, including Allied intelligence agencies, and of particular interest by two very different individuals, Henry Wickham Steed, editor of The London Times, and Samuel Gompers, head of the American Federation of Labor.
On May 1, 1922 The New York Times reported that Gompers, reacting to negotiations at the international economic conference at Genoa, declared that a group of “predatory international financiers” were working for the recognition of the Bolshevik regime for the opening up of resources for exploitation. Despite the rhetoric by New York and London bankers during the war that a Russian revolution would serve the Allied cause, Gompers opined that this was an “Anglo-American-German banking group,” and that they were “international bankers” who did not adhere to any national allegiance. He also noted that prominent Americans who had a history of anti-labor attitudes were advocating recognition of the Bolshevik regime.
The Council on Foreign Relations Report
The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) had been established in 1921 by President Wilson’s chief adviser Edward Mandel House out of a previous think tank called The Inquiry, formed in 1917–1918 to advise President Wilson on the Paris Peace Conference of 1919. It was this conference about which Steed had detailed his observations when he stated that there were financial interests trying to secure the recognition of the Bolsheviks.[25]
The concluding report dismissed “hysterical” fears that the revolution would spill outside Russia’s borders into central Europe or, worse, that the heady new revolutionaries would ally with nationalistic Muslims in the Middle East to evict European imperialism. The Bolsheviks were on their way to “sanity and sound business practices,” the Council study group concluded, but the welcome to foreign concessionaires would likely be short-lived. Thus, the Council experts recommended in March 1923 that American businessmen get into Russia while Lenin’s invitation held good, make money on their investments, and then get out as quickly as possible.
Round Table Groups, Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg Group, Chatham House [Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA)], Pilgrims Society, Club of the Isles, Club of Rome, Tavistock Institute.
In February 2014 a coup was carried out in Kiev, Ukraine utilizing violent Right Sector Neo-Nazis to overthrow the legitimate elected government of the country in order to bring it into the western sphere of influence and pull it into conflict and out of Russia’s orbit. These Neo-Nazis groups were financed by Ukrainian oligarchs and directly supported by the United States government. The entire US media establishment went along with the false narrative on Ukraine by portraying these violent groups as legitimate peaceful protesters who were seeking freedom from repression, however, nothing could be further from the truth that the media intentionally concealed from the public.
As reported by the UN, since February 2014, over 10,000 innocent people (the number is likely much higher) have been killed in the Ukrainian Civil War, the near entirety of the victims are ethnic Russian civilian men, women and children who have been bombed in their own homes by the Kiev regime forces supported by the United States and western powers. That illegal bombing continues to this very day and OSCE ‘observers’ intentionally obfuscate their reports to obscure that the Kiev forces who drove 400 miles east and are conducting this indiscriminate shelling of the civilian population.
The Russian ‘invasion’ that the US media and western representatives incessantly ‘reported’ about for two years never materialized. They simply manufactured the narrative. If Russia did want East Ukraine the war for the eastern portion would have been long since over 2 years ago. The real invading army that is killing and terrorizing civilians is the one that came eastward from Kiev. The people of Donbass simply held two referendums to claim their own ethnic Russian state after the US backed coup. This fact has also been intentionally covered up by the entire US establishment media. After those referendums, the US State Department went on record as saying that the Kiev forces have the right to attack east Ukraine in order to maintain sovereignty.
The US media has also intentionally never sent any reporters into the conflict zone to accurately report the fate of the 4 million ethnic Russian civilians living in Donbass. If they were to do so they would see that the actual Donbass rebels are primarily (85%) made up of local inhabitants. The remainder of the forces are international volunteers. The US media has also neglected to report on the 2 million ethnic Russian civilians refugees who fled TO RUSSIA. The fact that refugees sought safety with Russia is a definitive indicator of the fact that the Kiev regime forces were killing ethnic Russian families.
The near entirety of the video evidence coming out of the war zone proves the aforementioned account to be true beyond any doubt regardless of any corrupt establishment media spin. I have personally compiled over 500 hours of video evidence related to the Ukrainian Conflict that highlight the misrepresentations by western media of the truth about the war. Using social media, first person videos and eyewitness accounts while working in collaboration with video compilers all over the world, I believe I have compiled the largest cache of videos related to the Ukrainian Civil War and I present my entire work below, as well as that of some of my fellow truth seekers in other countries.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024944357 Look at all those terrorists!!!!!! Evidence of the 1st Donbass referendum in May 2014. This is an important link as it shows clearly that You Tube has now removed all 9 videos of the referendum from 9 separate accounts. Those videos showed tens of thousands of people voting to separate from the new coup imposed Kiev fascist regime.
The above media material proves beyond all reasonable doubt that the US government, media and western powers are intentionally lying about what has really happened in Ukraine over the past two and a half years. The fact that the US media continue to obfuscate and lie about these world changing events during the US election cycle also highlights that they have no respect for the American people and are continuing to deceive them on a massive scale. The American people and the world as a whole deserves better than this from our government and media representatives. For all these lies, all these crimes and all these deaths, people should be in jail, not continuing this horrific madness while continuing to foment more war and more false narratives.
Its amazing and surreal to watch how things are playing out now in US politics in relation to all this insanity. Where it will all lead is anyones guess at this point. I knew when Ukraine was happening that it would be a good opportunity to highlight the US Deep States nefarious geopolitical actions on a grand scale due to the amount of video coming out of the the country and the ability to now fully use social media. I remember when Iraq was happening and there wasn’t anything like that video or social media wise, therefore many of us fighting to get the truth out had to rely on only a few sources for info. Back then it was a Republican administration fomenting the war but it caught me off guard when so many so called ‘liberal’dems were active in covering up the warcrimes of the Ukrainian Nazis and attempting to frame Russia for the coup and subsequent war that the US instigated. Thus, I now refer to them as faux liberals as real liberals would be anti-war first and foremost.
For what they have given Obama a free pass for they should be truly ashamed.
Saudi Arabia is in the market for a better reputation in Washington, D.C.
In September alone, foreign lobbying disclosure documents show the Saudi government signing deals with PR powerhouse Edelman and lobbying leviathan the Podesta Group, according to recent disclosures. Edelman, the largest privately owned public relations agency in the world, is known for helping clients win favorable media coverage on mainstream outlets. The Podesta Group is a lobbying firm founded by Tony Podesta, a major fundraiser for the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign.
The new signings are the latest in a year-long hiring spree by the Persian Gulf state as it further builds up its already formidable political arsenal inside the Beltway. The Saudi Arabian Royal Embassy did not respond to a request for comment. In March, the Saudi Royal Embassy retained two influential lobbying firms, DLA Piper and Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman. DLA Piper, for instance, employs a small army of former government officials, including retired U.S. Sens. Saxby Chambliss and George Mitchell. Also in March, the embassy retained two firms that specialize in analyzing big data for political clients, Targeted Victory and Zignal Labs.
Saudi Arabia’s political operation already includes former Sen. Norm Coleman, R-Minn., who chairs one of the largest Republican Super PACs in the country, as well as the public relations firm MSLGROUP/Qorvis, and Saudi Aramco, the state-owned oil company that funds several influential American political groups, including the American Petroleum Institute. Aramco’s U.S. subsidiary, Saudi Refining, is a registered agent of the Saudi government. The government also finances a number of think tanks and universities, and has made contributions to prominent American nonprofits, including the Clinton Foundation.
The Podesta Group contract is with the Center for Studies and Media Affairs at the Saudi Royal Court. The contract, filed in the Justice Department’s foreign lobbying database, says that the firm will provide “public relations” work for the center.
Recently released FARA documents from the United States Justice Department indicate that the world’s largest Public Relations agency, Edelman – as well as lobbying behemoth The Podesta Group – have been hired by Saudi Arabian interests to further their American interests in media and government.
Richard Edelman’s PR Firm, Edelman PR, has long had close relations with the Saudi Kingdom, including ongoing representation of the Embassy to enhance, “the Kingdom’s interests among key groups within the world body and to U.N. observers.”
The Podesta Group – owned by Tony Podesta, whose brother John Podesta is Chairman of the 2016 Hillary Clinton presidential campaign – was hired for a $200,000 public relations engagement with the Center for Studies and Media Affairs at the Saudi Royal Court.
The Podesta Group specializes in global advocacy and strategic communications. Offering their top-level bipartisan support to organizations, governments, and individuals, earning them a title bestowed by Bloomberg Businessweek as the “Beltway Blackbelt.” They bring decades worth of experience calling on 535 members globally to give clients an e-ticket ride of focused boutique and data-driven results.
In Saudi Arabia, we have over 20 legal staff operating from offices in Riyadh, Jeddah and Al Khobar and provide the full range of legal services under the trading name DLA Piper Saudi Arabia. DLA Piper Saudi Arabia is the trading name of the association between Dr Eyad Reda and DLA Piper Middle East LLP, a part of DLA Piper, operating through various separate and distinct legal entities. — SG
Saudi Arabia is spending millions of dollars on American Public Relations firms to spin. And their spin doctors are working overtime after the execution of Shiite leader Sheik Nimr Baqr al-Nimr, followed by the severance of ties with Iran.
The Saudis spend millions for years on public relations – it has been reported they spent over $100 million from 2000 to 2010 on American propaganda.
Today, DC PR Agency Qorvis Communications who works as a PR agency for Saudi Arabia since shortly after 9/11 (which spent millions after 15 of the 19 bombers were found to have been Saudis) billed $7 Million Dollars to the Kingdom during the most recent billing period. They have arranged meetings for Saudi leaders — including Salman bin Abdulaziz Al-Saud, who was appointed to the Saudi throne in January – with American government
Qorvis Communications, operating as a PR agency for Saudi Arabia since shortly after 9/11, continues their efforts to show only the best, so much so they recently doubled their usual invoice for the most current billing period ($7 million) from the previous one. Qorvis has been very busy, putting U.S. government leaders and officials in touch with members of the Saudi royal family, including Salman bin Abdulaziz Al-Saud, who was appointed to the Saudi throne in January. And their efforts have been bipartisan.
As The Intercept notes, a number of people have been hired by the Saudi government with positions of influence into the U.S. government including:
The brother of Hilary Clinton’s campaign manager hired at the Saudi Embassy. Ignacio Sanchez, a top fundraiser for Jeb Bush. The leader of the largest super PAC (Republican) in the country. A law firm deeply tied to the Obama administration.
They’ve lobbied various think tank members and officials at companies like Lockheed Martin, General Electric and many other prominent and influential American business people.
In addition to Qorvis, Saudi Arabia works with a lobbyist from the law firm Hogan Lovells (H.P. Goldfield) and vice chairman of Albright Stonebridge Group. But it doesn’t end there. They also employ other PR and lobbying firms, including Edelman, DLA Piper, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, and the Podesta Group. Also, firms such as Tuluna USA, American Directions Group, and Zignal Labs have been employed to do surveys on public opinion of Saudi Arabia in the U.S. and to analyze the information from a big data perspective.
The world’s largest PR firm, Edelman PR is tasked with the assignment of promoting, “the Kingdom’s interests among key groups within the world body and to U.N. observers.” Others in the PR business who work for the Saudis include Hill & Knowlton (since 1982), and other “active foreign principals for Saudi Arabia” on the FARA website include DLA Piper, Targeted Victory, Pillsbury Winthrop, Hogan Lovells, and the Podesta Group.
According to a federal lobbying filing Edelman Worldwide is working on a variety of assignments for the Saudis from December 19, 2012 through the end of 2013 – with tasks including development and production of brochures, book development/giveaways, video production, and more. And just 2 weeks ago, the International Public Relations Association (IPRA) hosted “The 4th Public Relations Forum” in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Qorvis/MSL Targets Digital Push for Saudi Arabia
By Kevin McCauley
Qorvis/MSLGroup has farmed out a chuck of digital work for Saudi Arabia to Targeted Victory, the Republican consulting firm in Alexandria, Va.
Qorvis/MSL, which has been Saudi Arabia’s “go-to” PR shop since the days following the 9/11 terror attacks, will pay Targeted Victory a $40K monthly fee for online content/management and social media activities. Michael Beach, one-time national victory director for the Republican National Committee, and Zac Moffatt, digital director for the Romney for President Campaign, co-founded Targeted Victory.
Qorvis/MSL also has lined up Zignal Laboratories, Big Data/analytics shop, for a $15K monthly contract to gauge Saudi Arabia’s digital effort. Josh Ginsburg, who was political director for former California Governor Arnold Schwarznegger and field director for Romney’s presidential run, helms Zignal Labs.
Hogan Lovells operates in Saudi Arabia through an association with The Law Office of Montaser Al-Mohammed (AYALA) and has seconded several lawyers to AYALA’s offices in Riyadh and Jeddah.
Hogan Lovells LLP, another U.S. firm hired by the Saudis, is registered to work for the Royal Embassy of Saudi Arabia through 2016, disclosures show. Robert Kyle, a lobbyist from the firm, has bundled $50,850 for Clinton’s campaign.
Excerpt: About Juda Engelmayer Juda Engelmayer oversees the Corporate Communications/Public Affairs/Crisis Communications groups for 5WPR, 1 of the 25 largest PR agencies in the U.S. He directs a team whose efforts are put to task for business, political, advocacy, and policy relates issues, as well as for individuals in national and international arenas. At 5WPR, he publicly campaigns for clients, directing promotion and positioning, and handles issues of public discourse on corporate, financial, personal and philanthropy related matters.
Bahrain in the last 12 months has hired at least ten public relations companies since last year. Yes, you read it right – ten – including Qorvis, the Washington company hired by Saudi Arabia to salvage that kingdom’s reputation abroad after the 9/11 terrorist attack. The regime of Bahrain, which tortures its own citizens, has an awful human rights record and doesn’t recognize the existence of Israel, also hired Joe Trippi, former campaign manager for Howard Dean’s 2004 presidential bid, and Sanitas International, whose partner Christopher Harvin is a former Bush White House aide.
Several organizations connected to the kingdom play an active role in policy debates. Khalid Alnaji, a registered agent of the Saudi government and president of the US subsidiary of the Saudi Arabian national oil company ARAMCO, sits on the board of the American Petroleum Institute, the powerful lobby group that funds several conservative nonprofits and sponsors election-season television advertisements. On September 17, the former Ambassador Robert Ford, a senior fellow at the Middle East Institute, testified before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on the need to arm Syrian rebel groups.
Throughout the years, Saudi Arabia has retained numerous law and lobbying firms to influence American public opinion and policy.
The contract to work with Coleman was registered in July through Hogan Lovells, a law firm where Coleman has worked since 2011, after being defeated in his re-election campaign in 2008.
In addition to Hogan Lovells, the Saudi government counts several other firms, including Squire Patton Boggs and Qorvis-MSLGROUP, as part of its lobbying operation.
Other interesting links related to the Saudi PR issue:
The American people have to turn the establishment media off.
That is the only real answer. They have to turn to new alternatives for information. No one is going to be held to account for 9/11 and support for terrorists in Syria and elsewhere at this point…….ever, unfortunately, not under the current system. The establishment media are part and parcel of the Deep State. Six corporations control the US media and collude with the Deep State on the intentional deception. They have no desire to expose their own crimes or those of US corporations and the government. Its bad for business and their personal agenda and interests. Right now their agenda is boiling us like frogs when it comes to Russia. If the American people continue to want to be fed propaganda and be lied to then they will continue to being manipulated, robbed and led to war on behalf of terror states like Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the global elite. Simple as that. The real question is how are the American people going to continue to approach this problem?
We really need a nationwide boycott of the MSM as well as the breakup of those 6 media corps with all new regulations that follow the Fairness Doctrine. We need a new focus on responsible reporting. Consortium News is an excellent news outlet that should be encouraged as an example of how to report fairly, accurately and properly if we are going to break through the sellout media that is in bed with corrupt entities.
Wikileaks- Podesta email release highlights Clinton team discussing lobbying via foreign agents and decision making regarding accepting of various foreign donations. Note that Podesta was on point soliciting money from Gulf states.
Welcome to my window into the current geopolitical madness as it plays out around the globe. I was highly active getting info out about the wars in Iraq, Libya, Syria and Ukraine and just trying to do my duty as a good citizen to expose the warcrimes and theft of our taxpayer money by the global elite and their corrupt vassals in the worlds governments and media. I believe I may have been one of the first people to fully realize and combine the use of the tools of first-person video, social media and internet discussion groups to thoroughly highlight warcrimes and nefarious government doings in this new age of Internet technology. This in turn has led to me being constantly trolled, alerted upon, censored and banned at a number of popular discussion forums including Democratic Underground, Raw Story, Daily Kos, Discussionist, The Guardian UK and most recently Jackpine Radicals. Thus, with the latest JPR banning in December 2016, I felt it was time to change my approach somewhat and have now established this official “Clarity of Signal” website that can be used as a resource for pulling up my previous compiled research on the Grand Chessboard/Great Game for control of the world. It is full of my best posts with loads of links, videos and photo evidence, and it also acts as a hub for people who want to conduct their own research and easily access some of the best links and video sites for geopolitical discussion on the web. I hope interested and concerned citizens embrace these tools at our disposal and help get the message out so that we can fully expose the crimes of the global elite and help bring an end to these horrific wars that they use for control, theft and profit. Just so folks know, my goal is to help stop war and spread some human knowledge and kindness. That’s it. 🙂 I have no political affiliation and am not into red team vs blue team bullshit. That time is over. Now is the time for all sides to come together and stand against being divided and conquered by the elitists that rule over us. Going after the global elite, their corrupt establishment media and the Deep State is the key to a better and brighter future for all of us. I hope others see that and understand that sometimes I use links and information from websites and global states that they may disagree with. I do this in order to highlight the bigger picture. I call doing such freedom of speech and keeping an open mind. All subjects are open for discussion and on the table with me. Hence my name for the site…… Clarity of Signals “Sphere of Insanity”……and yes, I am a conspiracy theorist/analyst. Technically, everything you read here and on the web could be a conspiracy……after all, we do live in an age of fake news. 🙂 The real question to be asking is “what is the real fake news?” I hope this site provides you with some insight into the fact that the mainstream news media colludes with the government and often puts out false stories (fake news) to mislead the public about nefarious government doings.
Oh…and by the way, please enjoy some of my original music why you are here too. Its up in the top right hand corner of the site for you to listen to. I’m a creator. I like to create music and produce good vibes. I hope you dig it. I write songs about surreal and philosophical subjects and I play all the instruments myself these days, except the drums which I program. The lyrics I compose represent my philosophic view of the world and the global awakening that is now taking place. If you want to help support my endeavors exposing the wars and crimes of the global elite, then simply purchase some of my original music at CD Baby:
I’m also on Spotify if you prefer to stream the music and simply listen without paying anything. Screenshot of my Spotify page.
….and by the way, that beautiful dalmatian is my old partner in crime Texas Elvis who used to cuddle up to me when I wrote my songs. Tex has now gone on to the Rainbow Bridge…… I like to think that he is always by my side while I do this crazy shit. 🙂 Peace to you and your family. Let’s change this world for the better together and help get the truth out to wake up the masses.
Above: Shed where part of the MH17 material was discovered.
Hadi Abdallah with 7 year old Bana…….
Clarity of Signal 
